Skill audit report
Rigor Paper Context helper for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use only when the README and repository files leave a narrow reproduction-critical gap and the task is to resolve a specific paper detail such as dataset split, preprocessing, evaluation protocol, checkpoint mapping, or runtime assumption from primary paper sources while recording conflicts. Do not use for general paper summary, repo scanning, environment setup, command execution, title-only paper lookup, or replacing README guidance by default.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
INFO62
484 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
WARN57
484 stars, 16 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
2d since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
PASS90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add lllllllama/RigorPilot-Skills --skill paper-context-resolver
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
INFO62
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/lllllllama/RigorPilot-Skills/tree/main/skills/paper-context-resolver
Review status
PASS88
AI review data available
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install path
92
npx skills add lllllllama/RigorPilot-Skills --skill paper-context-resolver
Repository
88
https://github.com/lllllllama/RigorPilot-Skills/tree/main/skills/paper-context-resolver
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
2d since push
AI review
88
Approved with no listed issues
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Warnings
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K Stars · Audit report
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
61K Stars · Audit report
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38K Stars · Audit report
Usable description available
Dependency risk
90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
62
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Stars/forks activity
57
484 stars, 16 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
68
484 GitHub stars