lt2md

Prüfen · 60
Im Registry indexiert

Convert born-digital, scanned, or mixed PDFs into auditable Markdown while preserving reading order, equations, source-page anchors, and information-bearing images as adjacent non-original text descriptions. Use this skill whenever a user asks to transcribe, OCR, understand, or c

Verified installs0
Stars33
Version1.0.0
Qualität62/100 · Vielversprechend
Vertrauen60/100 · Nur Sandbox
Audit74/100 · Prüfung nötig

Asset-Profil

Recherche und Wissensarbeit

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Bereich ansehen

Szenario

Document processing

I need my agent to read PDFs, extract tables, and turn documents into structured data.

Agent-Fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.

Installieren

Bereit

npx skills add libnyx/LT2MD --skill lt2md

Wartung

Aktuell

Heute gepusht

Risiko

Prüfung nötig

Permission surface may require sandboxing

GitHub-Qualität

33

62/100 Qualität · 68/100 Vertrauen

Abdeckungs-Tags

RechercheDocument processingSicherheitagent-skill

Review-Notizen

Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md references external files (references/*.md, scripts/*.py) that are not fully included in the excerpt, but they are part of the repository and the skill is self-contained within the repo.

Agent-Adoptionskarte

Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick

Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.

Qualität

Vielversprechend
62

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Vertrauen

Nur Sandbox
60

Nützlicher Kandidat mit fehlenden oder gemischten Vertrauenssignalen. Bis der Ergebniszyklus die Passung belegt, in einem isolierten Arbeitsbereich verwenden.

Audit

Prüfung nötig
74

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation

Nur in einer Sandbox ausführen und nahe Alternativen vergleichen, bevor sie produktiv eingesetzt wird.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

33 GitHub-Stars

Repository-Aktivität

33 Stars und 1 Forks

Wartung

Heute gepusht

Lizenz

AGPL-3.0

Installieren

npx skills add libnyx/LT2MD --skill lt2md

Installationssicherheit

Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad

Berechtigungsfläche

secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

Agent-Ergebnisse

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten

Dokumentation

Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext

Risikoübersicht

Vor Produktion prüfen

  • The SKILL.md references external files (references/*.md, scripts/*.py) that are not fully included in the excerpt, but they are part of the repository and the skill is self-contained within the repo.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

Installationsbereitschaft

Installationspfad verfügbar

  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Lizenz ist angegeben
  • Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege

Agent-lesbare Metadaten

Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.

Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.

JSON öffnen

Geeignete Aufgaben

  • Document processing-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Read uploaded files

Geeignete Agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Installationsentscheidung

Befehl
npx skills add libnyx/LT2MD --skill lt2md
Richtlinie
Blockieren
Menschliche Prüfung
Ja

Vertrauen und Risiko

Vertrauen
60/100
Audit
74/100
Risikoebene
Prüfung nötig

Ergebnis-Loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event-ID
resolve
Ergebnisse
5

Installationsbefehl

npx skills add libnyx/LT2MD --skill lt2md

Nicht verwenden, wenn

  • Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md references external files (references/*.md, scripts/*.py) that are not fully included in the excerpt, but they are part of the repository and the skill is self-contained within the repo.
  • Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access

Agent-Sicherheit v2

30/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden

Blocked for auto-installBlockieren

This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.

Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.

Per API auflösen

Hoch

Shell- oder Befehlsausführung

Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.

Mittel

Netzwerkzugriff

Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.

Mittel

Dateisystemzugriff

Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.

Hoch

Secrets or environment access

Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.

  • Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Installationsziele

Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install libnyx-lt2md

Agent-Auflösungsplan

Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.

Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.

Textplan öffnen

Agent sollte prüfen

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Prompt kopieren

Task: Use lt2md in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20lt2md%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/libnyx-lt2md/install
Install command: npx skills add libnyx/LT2MD --skill lt2md
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent-Übergabe

Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

Installations-API öffnen

Agent-Prompt

Use lt2md for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/libnyx-lt2md/install, then install with: npx skills add libnyx/LT2MD --skill lt2md

Registry-Metadaten

Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.

Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.

Manifest öffnen

Agent-Fit

61/100

Document processing

Plattformen

Claude Code

Audit-Bericht

Prüfung nötig · 74/100

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

Audit-Bericht ansehenEval-Bericht ansehen

Agent-Entscheidungspanel

Fallback candidate for Document processing

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

61
Bereitschaft
Prototyp
Phase

Rolle im Stack

Fallback-Kandidat

Primäre Eignung

Document processing

Vertrauenslabel

Zuerst prototypisieren

Installationspfad

Befehl bereit

Verwenden wenn

  • Document processing-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidenz

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • Qualitätsprofil 62/100
  • 1 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen

zuerst prüfen

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md references external files (references/*.md, scripts/*.py) that are not fully included in the excerpt, but they are part of the repository and the skill is self-contained within the repo.

Implementierungspfad

  1. 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Document processing-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Vertrauensprofil

Nur Sandbox

Nützlicher Kandidat mit fehlenden oder gemischten Vertrauenssignalen. Bis der Ergebniszyklus die Passung belegt, in einem isolierten Arbeitsbereich verwenden.

60
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub-Akzeptanz

Prüfen

33 GitHub-Stars

Star-/Fork-Aktivität

Prüfen

33 Stars und 1 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar

Aktuelle Wartung

Bestanden

Heute gepusht

Lizenzklarheit

Bestanden

AGPL-3.0

Positive Signale

  • KI-Prüfung genehmigt
  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
  • Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
  • Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf

Vor Installation prüfen

  • The SKILL.md references external files (references/*.md, scripts/*.py) that are not fully included in the excerpt, but they are part of the repository and the skill is self-contained within the repo.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
  • GitHub adoption: 33 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 33 stars, 1 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
  • Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
  • Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich

Empfohlene Aktion

Nur in einer Sandbox ausführen und nahe Alternativen vergleichen, bevor sie produktiv eingesetzt wird.

Qualitätsprofil

Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

62
GitHub-Stars
33
Aktualität
Heute
Installationsbereit
Ja
Lizenz
AGPL-3.0
Vor Installation prüfen: Low GitHub adoption signal · The SKILL.md references external files (references/*.md, scripts/*.py) that are not fully included in the excerpt, but they are part of the repository and the skill is self-contained within the repo.

Workflow-Eignung

Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen

Workflow-Eignung

Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen

Alternativen-Shortlist

Vor Installation vergleichen

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Alle vergleichen

Übersicht

--- name: lt2md description: Convert born-digital, scanned, or mixed PDFs into auditable Markdown while preserving reading order, equations, source-page anchors, and information-bearing images as adjacent non-original text descriptions. Use this skill whenever a user asks to transcribe, OCR, understand, or convert a PDF into Markdown, especially for scanned PDFs, image-heavy pages, formulas, multi-column layouts, page or section ranges, or token-efficient reuse. LT2MD (Long Transcribe to Markdown) is a workflow contract, not a replacement for a PDF parser or OCR/VLM backend. ---

# LT2MD — Long Transcribe to Markdown

LT2MD turns observable PDF content into Markdown that an agent or a person can audit later. It is designed for born-digital, scanned, and mixed PDFs. The goal is not merely to obtain text: preserve reading order, formulas, figure meaning, scope boundaries, and a path back to the source page.

The PDF remains the only authority for content. OCR, extracted text, model guesses, and formatting preferences are candidates or transformations, never evidence that can overrule the rendered page.

## Read before doing the task

1. Read [workflow.md](references/workflow.md) for roles, batches, two-pass visual reading, and write permissions. 2. Before rendering or reusing pages, read [page-cache.md](references/page-cache.md) and initialize/recover a local job with `scripts/manage_job.py`. 3. Before creating or changing a candidate Markdown file, read [markdown-contract.md](references/markdown-contract.md); for long documents also read [job-state.md](references/job-state.md) and [checkpoint-review.md](references/checkpoint-review.md). 4. Before a format review, read [format-review.md](references/format-review.md) and treat [示范文档.md](references/示范文档.md) as a read-only format fixture. 5. Use `scripts/validate_markdown.py`, `scripts/audit_markdown.py`, and `scripts/manage_job.py verify` as separate final gates. Do not place OCR, model calls, or PDF interpretation inside the static tools.

## Non-negotiable principles

- **Separate evidence, semantic target, and allowed transformation.** Evidence is the rendered page, PDF page number, readable text layer, and Markdown markers. The semantic target is the author's text, mathematics, figure relationships, and reading order. Allowed transformations include merging print line breaks, removing page furniture, and applying the Markdown contract. - **Lock the scope before writing.** If no range is specified, process the whole PDF. If a range is specified, do not silently expand it. A range that ends mid-page includes only the requested semantic blocks. - **Reuse page evidence by byte identity.** Render through the content-addressed job cache. The same PDF bytes and render configuration must reuse verified page PNGs across chapters, restarts and renamed files; only missing or corrupt pages may be rerendered. - **Use the rendered page as the tie-breaker.** Text extraction and OCR are useful candidates. They do not settle reading order, formulas, captions, diagrams, or ambiguous glyphs without visual confirmation. - **Describe every information-bearing figure.** Keep the original caption when readable, then place an adjacent description explicitly marked as a LT2MD/transcriber supplement and not original text. Include objects, labels, directions, arrows, sequence, spatial relationships, subfigures, and relationships directly expressed by the figure without inventing outside conclusions. - **Keep provenance local.** Put one block-level `SOURCE` HTML comment on its own line before every complete paragraph, display equation, figure block, table or example block. Do not insert an anchor inside a word, sentence, inline formula, display-math block, table row, caption or image description. A cross-page block uses one physical-page range before the merged block. - **Keep content and format review separate.** Content corrections require evidence from the source PDF. A format reviewer may only report or apply style-only changes against the immutable fixture. Only the coordinator writes the final Markdown. - **Mark uncertainty instead of guessing.** When a glyph, page boundary, or reading order cannot be uniquely resolved, give the best source-grounded transcription and add a `转录注` with the exact page and ambiguity. Never silently normalize an uncertain value into a familiar one.

## Operating procedure

1. **Preflight.** Initialize or recover a job. Record the PDF SHA-256, physical page count, requested range, book-page mapping if readable, text-layer availability, render configuration, columns, formula/figure density, output path and task-requirement hash. Render the original pages before trusting OCR. If printed page numbers become visibly clear only after initialization and have a verified linear relation, record it before the first inventory with `manage_job.py set-book-page-offset <job> --offset <N>`; otherwise retain `unmapped` rather than guessing. Once recorded, that mapping is source evidence: the batch scaffold's `source_print_pages` and every `SOURCE` `BOOK_PAGE` must follow it, and manager review/checkpoint/finalization rejects contradictions. 2. **Batch.** Process continuous page ranges adaptively: 1–2 dense/low-quality pages, 2–4 ordinary pages, and at most 6 clear single-column pages. If the user did not choose groups, run `manage_job.py batch-plan <job> --json` after initialization, then visually lower any recommendation that contains formulas, tables, multi-column order, dense figures, poor legibility, or a cross-page semantic block. The raster-only plan is a conservative starting point, not visual proof. Prefer complete paragraphs, sections, or examples as cut points; keep a sentence crossing a page boundary with one transcriber. 3. **Inventory and transcribe.** Before trusting any existing Markdown candidate, visually inventory each source page's headings, prose, displayed equations, figures/captions, tables, footnotes, examples/exercises and cross-page continuations. For the current 1–6-page batch, create that source-only record first with `manage_job.py source-inventory-template`, fill only source objects and evidence, then freeze it with `manage_job.py seal-source-inventory`. Only after that seal may the transcriber use `manage_job.py batch-template --author-id <transcriber>` to create a fresh, non-overwriting batch-scoped candidate. This order is a hard gate: candidate block IDs, review decisions and candidate text must not be retrofitted into the source inventory. Never copy an unreviewed full-document V1 draft into the batch candidate and mistake a whole-document audit failure for a batch transcription attempt. Separate body text, equations, figures, captions, examples, headers, footers, and scan noise. Preserve literal Markdown backslashes while writing formulas: an escape-interpreting string layer must not turn a formula command into TAB, FF, or another C0 control byte. Merge only print line breaks and cross-page continuation; do not insert a page boundary inside a word, sentence, or LaTeX expression. An existing Markdown draft is an untrusted candidate, not evidence: visually re-check every retained block. If an inventory item has no source-grounded candidate block, leave the batch blocked; do not omit it merely because the candidate lacks an anchor. If a block is left unchanged, preserve page-specific review evidence; if the page cannot be read, stop there rather than calling the unchanged draft complete. 4. **Coordinate.** Merge candidate blocks in source-page order, attach page anchors, preserve equation tags and figure/example structure, and keep the locked range visible. 5. **Second visual read.** After the candidate passes its static contract and before generating a review template, record a handoff of its exact bytes with `manage_job.py reviewer-handoff`. The manager, not reviewer-supplied JSON, owns the reviewer actor ID, local security-principal record, candidate digest, and sealed-inventory binding. The default policy is an auditable process handoff: it does not prove subjective independence merely because labels differ. An optional `init --review-identity-policy os-security-principal-v1` also requires the reviewer process to use a different local OS security principal from the candidate and source-inventory authoring processes; it still cannot prove distinct people or model contexts. The handoff reviewer re-reads the rendered source and completes mappings against the already sealed source-only inventory. The reviewer may add candidate mappings, dispositions and risk closures, but may not rewrite sealed source facts. The coordinator changes content only after confirming the source. An omitted footnote, caption, heading, or cross-page continuation remains blocking even when static Markdown checks pass. 6. **Risk-driven third read.** Run the audit and re-check only real differences, low-resolution areas, dense formulas, multi-panel figures, cross-page joins, scope boundaries and risk hits. Use only the cached target/adjacent pages and targeted crops. 7. **Checkpoint and recover context.** Freeze every complete 1–6 page batch with a source-bound `checkpoint-review` JSON manifest through `manage_job.py checkpoint` before starting later pages. Use `manage_job.py review-template` only after the sealed-inventory-backed candidate passes the static contract **and** its exact-byte reviewer handoff is recorded; it produces a blocked identity/hash scaffold and does not replace source review. The manager rejects a missing handoff, a stale candidate digest, a forged reviewer label/principal, an indented-code pseudo-anchor, a review block spanning multiple SOURCE blocks, or a structural modification hidden by whitespace normalization. A failed static check, audit, source-inventory mapping, or independent review is a stop condition: repair the same batch or leave it explicitly incomplete; never treat a failure report as permission to continue. If a source object visibly continues to the next physical page before any independent review, do not accept the short batch or anchor a fragment. Use `manage_job.py extend-unclosed-source-inventory` only to preserve its sealed source facts and exact unclosed candidate while expanding the same-start range to at most six pages; then re-inventory every page, create a fresh candidate, and complete the normal independent review. This extension is blocked evidence, never acceptance, and cannot change a checkpointed range. When a reviewer supplies source-grounded omissions, misreads, ordering defects, or wrong-page anchors, return only that batch and the exact evidence to the transcriber, then obtain a new independent reread—never relabel the old review as accepted. If that review proves the **source-only inventory facts themselves** are incomplete or wrong, do not mutate the old seal: use `manage_job.py source-inventory-revision-template` with that independent blocked review, reread and seal the new source-only inventory, then create a fresh replacement candidate for the same range. The manager freezes a SHA-named copy of the blocked candidate and review; the new candidate receipt must bind the new active seal, and verification checks both the forward and backward revision chain. It rejects self-review, stale candidate replay, altered lineage, and unchanged source facts; a blocked review can never become acceptance. For jobs created before frozen-candidate evidence existed, use the strict `manage_job.py backfill-revision-evidence <job> --pages <range>` migration only when the preserved bytes, hashes, receipt, old seal and blocked review agree exactly. Every 16 accepted physical pages or 4 accepted batches, whichever comes first, actually reread task brief, render manifest, progress, frozen evidence and risk queue, then record the receipt with `manage_job.py reread`. This longer cadence supplements, rather than replaces, the per-batch evidence checkpoint; a cache-only or partial job must n

Technische Details

Version
1.0.0
Lizenz
AGPL-3.0
Letzte Aktualisierung
23. Aug. 2026
Veröffentlicht
23. Aug. 2026

Entscheidungsübersicht

Fallback-Kandidat

61
Bereit
Prototyp
Phase

recent repository activity

Audit

Installationsprüfung

Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung

74
Prüfung nötig
Sicherheit
72/100
Wartung
100/100
Installieren
92/100
Vollständiges Audit öffnenEval-Bericht ansehen

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.

0
Belegt
Needs first agent runAuto-Installation: zuerst prüfenLetzter: Unbekannt
Erfolgsrate
Letzter Fehler
Ergebnisse
0
Ausgabequalität
Fehlgeschlagen
0
Nicht relevant
0
Installationen
0
Durch Risiko blockiert
0
Einrichtung erforderlich
0
Produktion
0

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.

Installieren

Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen

Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.

Wachstums-Loop

Share-Kit

X

Szenariobasierter Entwurf für lt2md, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.

Kuratorenhinweis
A practical pick for design or creative work:

lt2md: Convert born-digital, scanned, or mixed PDFs into auditable Markdown while preserving reading order, equations, source-page...

33 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/libnyx-lt2md?ref=x
X-Entwurf öffnen
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for lt2md:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/libnyx-lt2md?ref=x

Install: npx skills add libnyx/LT2MD --skill lt2md
Antwortentwurf öffnen

Quelle des Eintrags

Registry-indexiert

Beanspruchbar

Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.

Ersteller
libnyx
Indexiert von
OpenAgentSkill Community-Index

Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.

Diesen Skill beanspruchen

Eigentümeranspruch

Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen

Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird libnyx zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.

Creator-Backlink-Kit

Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen

Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/libnyx-lt2md?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/libnyx-lt2md)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/libnyx-lt2md?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/libnyx-lt2md)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/libnyx-lt2md?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/libnyx-lt2md/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/libnyx-lt2md?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/libnyx-lt2md)

Autor

L

libnyx

@libnyx

Plattform-Fit

Gesundheitssignale

GitHub-Stars
33
Qualitätswert
34/100
Letzter GitHub-Push
23. Aug. 2026
Framework-Hinweise
Unbekannt
OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
1
Installationskopien
0
Externe Klicks
0

Community-Signal

Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.

Vertrauen & Sicherheit

Nur Sandbox

60
  • GitHub-Akzeptanz33 GitHub-StarsPrüfen
  • Star-/Fork-Aktivität33 Stars und 1 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarPrüfen
  • Aktuelle WartungHeute gepushtBestanden
  • LizenzklarheitAGPL-3.0Bestanden
  • README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
  • Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikocredential or environment access, database surfaceInfo