chem-sorption-gcmc Rapport d’audit.

Avertissements

• Dependency or permission surface needs review
• Permission surface may require sandboxing
• The SKILL.md does not explain the output file formats (e.g., gcmc_results.json, multi_gcmc.json) or how to interpret the results (e.g., uptake units, selectivity).
• The example uses only 100 Monte Carlo steps, which is far below the recommended minimum of 50,000 for real simulations; this could mislead users into thinking such short runs are sufficient.
• The term 'BVT' is used without explanation; users unfamiliar with the ensemble may be confused.
• Quality score needs review
• Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
• Stars/forks activity: 161 stars, 24 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
• Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
• Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

Méthode

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.