marketing-strategy Audit report.

Warnings

• Permission surface may require sandboxing
• Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
• The 'Authoritative Foundations' section cites Product-Led Marketing, Schwartz Awareness Levels, and Pulizzi Content Tilt, but all three are described with the same generic marketing-strategy sentence rather than actual framework-specific guidance.
• references/framework-notes.md also only lists framework names and does not explain how to apply them.
• templates/output-template.md does not provide a true copy-paste deliverable structure; its 'Core output' section simply repeats the SKILL.md output description.
• scripts/check-output.py expects sections like '## Framework Basis', '## Recommendation', '## Implementation Steps', and '## Metrics', but the provided output template uses different headings ('## Summary', '## Core output', '## Frameworks Applied', etc.), so the validator would fail on a deliverable produced from the template.
• Low GitHub adoption signal
• Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
• Quality score needs review
• Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
• GitHub adoption: 49 GitHub stars
• Stars/forks activity: 49 stars, 14 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Method

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.