Pre-install eval
privacy-eu Eval report.
A machine-readable install decision for agents: task fit, Trust Score, Audit Score, install safety, permission surface, and a concrete validation plan before this skill touches a workspace.
do not auto install
Audit score: Risky
Required gates
Checks an agent must pass before install
Task fit
84
Task wording matches this skill metadata.
- Evaluate privacy-eu before installing it in an agent workflow
- automation
- Legal and compliance workflows; Claude Code teams; teams that value GitHub adoption signals
Install path
92
Install handoff is available.
- npx skills add kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms --skill privacy-eu
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
- npx skills add kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms --skill privacy-eu
Trust score
73
Good trust signals with a few areas worth checking before rollout.
- Strong shortlist
- 578 GitHub stars
- Apache-2.0
Audit score
79
Risky
- Potential broker, wallet, exchange, or real-money execution surface; sandbox and explicit approval are required
Agent safety gate
63
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
- Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
- Audit risk exceeds the requested agent policy
License clarity
86
Apache-2.0
- Apache-2.0
Permission surface
100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
- Browser automation: medium
- Network access: medium
Validation plan
What the agent should do next
- 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
- 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
- 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
- 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
- 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.
Do not use when
Conditions that require another skill
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- User-provided interview answers are inserted into MDX templates; without escaping or validation, there is a potential template/content injection risk that could break generated pages or alter legal text.
- Audit risk risky exceeds max_risk=medium
- Potential broker, wallet, exchange, or real-money execution surface; sandbox and explicit approval are required
- The SKILL.md excerpt references many external files (checklists, scripts, templates) that are not shown in the excerpt; reviewers cannot fully verify they exist and are complete in the repository.
Supporting checks
Trust signals behind the decision
README/SKILL.md completeness
warn76
Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
Recent maintenance
pass88
2mo since push
Alternatives available
pass82
Alternative skills are available for comparison.