event-study-cars
>-
공급 자산 프로필
리서치 및 지식 작업
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
시나리오
리서치 Agent
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent 적합도
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI 또는 맞춤형 Agent에 적합합니다.
설치
준비됨
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
유지보수
최신
오늘 푸시됨
위험
검토 필요
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
GitHub 품질
47
64/100 품질 · 65/100 신뢰
커버리지 태그
검토 메모
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
Agent 채택 스코어카드
신뢰, 감사, 설치 준비 상태를 한눈에 확인하세요
이 점수는 공개 저장소 메타데이터, OpenAgentSkill 검토 신호, 유지보수 최신성, 설치 준비 상태를 결합합니다. 후보 선정 신호일 뿐, 사람의 검토를 대체하지 않습니다.
품질
유망유용한 후보이지만 채택 전에 대안과 비교하세요.
신뢰
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
감사
검토 필요설치 준비 상태, 보안 메타데이터, 유지보수 및 채택 위험에 대한 기계 판독형 검토입니다.
OpenAgentSkill 신뢰 점수 v5
설치 전 사람 검토
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
스타
GitHub 스타 47
저장소 활동
스타 47, 포크 0
유지보수
오늘 푸시됨
라이선스
MIT
설치
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
설치 안전성
표준 패키지 또는 런타임 설치 경로
권한 범위
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent 결과
아직 Agent 결과 데이터가 없습니다
문서
Thin public metadata
위험 요약
프로덕션 전 검토
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
설치 준비 상태
설치 경로 사용 가능
- 설치 경로를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 저장소 근거를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 라이선스가 명시되었습니다
- 아직 Agent 검증 결과 근거가 없습니다
Agent 읽기용 메타데이터
이 스킬의 기계 판독형 의사결정 데이터.
이 블록 또는 포함된 JSON을 사용해 Agent가 이 스킬을 설치할지, 대안을 고를지, 먼저 사람의 검토를 요청할지 판단할 수 있습니다.
적합한 작업
- 금융 및 퀀트 워크플로
- Claude Code 팀
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Retrieve market data
적합한 Agent
설치 결정
- 명령어
- npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
- 정책
- 검토
- 사람 검토
- 예
신뢰와 위험
- 신뢰
- 57/100
- 감사
- 75/100
- 위험 수준
- 검토 필요
결과 루프
- 엔드포인트
- /api/agent/outcome
- 이벤트 ID
- resolve
- 결과
- 5
설치 명령어
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars사용하지 말아야 할 경우
- 벤더 지원 SLA가 필요한 팀
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- 고위험 권한 힌트: Shell 또는 명령 실행
Agent 안전 v2
47/100 · 자동 설치 피하기
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
높음
Shell 또는 명령 실행
Skill 메타데이터가 터미널, CLI, Shell, 하위 프로세스 또는 명령 실행 워크플로를 참조합니다.
중간
네트워크 접근
Skill은 원격 페이지, API, 저장소 또는 외부 서비스에 접근할 수 있습니다.
중간
파일 시스템 접근
Skill은 프로젝트 파일, 문서, 생성 산출물 또는 로컬 작업 공간 상태를 읽거나 쓸 수 있습니다.
- 고위험 권한 힌트: Shell 또는 명령 실행
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
설치 대상
Agent 워크플로에 이 스킬 설치
공개 설치 엔드포인트에서 명령어, 안전 체크리스트, 대상 프롬프트와 정규 링크를 가져옵니다.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install kennethkhoocy-event-study-carsAgent 해결 계획
설치 전에 Agent가 적합성을 검증하게 하세요.
Resolve API는 최우선 스킬, 대안, 안전 정책, 감사 메모, 설치 대상 및 Agent가 페이지를 스크래핑하지 않고 사용할 수 있는 프롬프트를 반환합니다.
JSON 열기
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve 텍스트
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
설치 핸드오프
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
Agent가 확인할 항목
- Resolve API에서 작업 적합도와 대안을 확인합니다.
- 감사 점수, 신뢰 점수 및 안전 정책 경고를 확인합니다.
- Codex, Claude Code, Cursor 또는 CLI의 설치 대상 호환성을 확인합니다.
프롬프트 복사
Task: Use event-study-cars in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
Install command: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent 핸드오프
또 다른 디렉터리 페이지 대신 설치 경로를 Agent에게 제공합니다.
공개 설치 엔드포인트에서 명령어, 안전 체크리스트, 대상 프롬프트와 정규 링크를 가져옵니다.
설치 핸드오프
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
LLM 텍스트 형식
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install?format=text
대안 찾기
/api/skills/search?q=event-study-cars&limit=3
Agent 프롬프트
Use event-study-cars for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install, then install with: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-carsRegistry 메타데이터
자동 스킬 선택을 위한 Agent 읽기용 프로필.
Registry API를 통해 동일한 결정, 신뢰, 감사, 사용 사례, 설치 신호를 제공하므로 Agent가 UI를 스크래핑하지 않고도 순위를 매길 수 있습니다.
Agent 결정 패널
Fallback candidate for Finance and quant
먼저 이 스킬로 프로토타입을 만들고 대체 후보를 준비하세요.
스택 내 역할
대체 후보
주요 적합도
금융 및 퀀트
신뢰 라벨
먼저 프로토타입
설치 경로
명령어 준비됨
사용 시점
- 금융 및 퀀트 워크플로
- Claude Code 팀
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
근거
- 최근 저장소 활동
- 설치 명령 또는 GitHub 저장소를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 품질 프로필 64/100
- OpenAgentSkill 상호작용 3건
먼저 검토
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
구현 경로
- 1샌드박스 Agent에 설치하고 금융 및 퀀트 작업을 처음부터 끝까지 한 번 실행하세요.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
신뢰 프로필
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub 채택도
확인GitHub 스타 47
스타/포크 활동
확인스타 47, 포크 0; 현재 메타데이터에서 이슈 활동을 확인할 수 없습니다
최근 유지보수
통과오늘 푸시됨
라이선스 명확성
통과MIT
긍정 신호
- AI 검토 승인됨
- 설치 경로를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 저장소 근거를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 최근 유지보수된 저장소
- 설치 명령에서 뚜렷한 고위험 패턴이 발견되지 않았습니다
- 결과 루프는 준비되었지만 첫 실제 Agent 실행이 필요합니다
설치 전 검토
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- README/SKILL.md completeness: Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
- 아직 실제 Agent 결과 보고서가 없습니다
- 무인 설치 전에 사람 검토가 필요합니다
권장 작업
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
품질 프로필
유망 Agent 워크플로용 후보
유용한 후보이지만 채택 전에 대안과 비교하세요.
워크플로 적합도
이 스킬을 사용할 시나리오
Analyze markets
Finance and quant
I need my agent to analyze markets, financial data, filings, portfolios, and quant strategies.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
워크플로 적합도
완전한 워크플로에 추가
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
대안 후보
설치 전 비교
이 작업에 적합할 수 있는 유사 스킬입니다.
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
MoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
Cua
Open-source infrastructure for Computer-Use Agents. Sandboxes, SDKs, and benchmarks to train and evaluate AI agents that can control full desktops (macOS, Linux, Windows).
개요
--- name: event-study-cars description: >- Complete methodology for computing publication-quality cumulative abnormal returns with proper event-study test statistics, matching the robustness of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 for Stata. Covers dateline construction, event-date mapping, estimation and event windows, thin-trading adjustment, OLS with Theil prediction error correction, abnormal return computation, CAR/CAAR/AAR accumulation, boundary contamination guards, and common tests such as Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen, generalized sign, Wilcoxon, and GRANK-T. Use when the user mentions abnormal returns, event windows, market-model regressions, CARs, CAAR, AAR, eventstudy2, thin trading, trade-to-trade returns, or event-study test statistics. ---
# Event Study: Cumulative Abnormal Returns (CARs)
A complete methodology reference for computing publication-quality CARs with robust test statistics, matching the rigor of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 (v3.2b) for Stata. This skill is **generic** — applicable to any market, asset class, or event type.
## Use the shipped engine first (do not rewrite it)
`scripts/eventstudy.py` is a complete, runnable Python replication of eventstudy2, validated against the Stata package to floating-point precision (AR ~1e-8, CAR ~6e-8, CAAR and the implemented test statistics ~1e-7) on a generic CRSP sample across all four models (FM, COMEAN, MA, RAW). It is generic — all column names, the model, windows, thin-trading, and log handling are CLI flags. When a user wants CARs computed, **run this engine**; do not author a new pipeline.
```bash python scripts/eventstudy.py --selftest # synthetic self-check, no inputs python scripts/eventstudy.py \ --returns returns.csv --market market.csv --events events.csv \ --id-col permno --ret-col ret --event-date-col event_date --mkt-col vwretd \ --model FM --car-windows "-1,1;-5,5;-10,10" \ --eswlb -250 --eswub -30 --evwlb -10 --evwub 10 --out-dir out/ ```
Inputs are CSV/Parquet: returns (`id, date, ret`), market/factors (`date, mkt[, factors]`), events (`id, event_date`). Outputs: `ar_panel.csv`, `car_panel.csv`, `test_statistics.csv`. Requires numpy/pandas/scipy. Run `--help` for all flags (`--factor-cols smb,hml`, `--model MA`, `--no-thin-trading`, ...). The sections below document the methodology the engine implements; read them to audit, extend, or port it.
## Methodology Overview: The 8-Step Pipeline
### Step 1: Build Trading Calendar (Dateline)
Construct a master list of valid trading dates from the security returns file.
1. Collect all unique dates on which at least one security has a non-missing return (or, if using a factor model, dates where market/factor returns exist). 2. Count the number of securities with valid returns on each date. 3. Optionally drop weekends (`delweekend`). 4. Apply `dateline_threshold`: drop dates where the count of return observations falls below `threshold × mean(daily_count)`. A threshold of 0.2 works well for international samples with heterogeneous holidays. 5. The resulting date vector is the **dateline** — all downstream windows are defined in dateline time (relative trading days), not calendar time.
### Step 2: Map Event Dates to Nearest Valid Trading Day
For each event: 1. Find the nearest dateline date **on or after** the event date. 2. If the shift exceeds `max_shift` calendar days (default: 3), **exclude** the event entirely — do not silently map it to a distant trading day. 3. Events with missing dates, or dates outside the dateline range, are also excluded and logged with the reason.
### Step 3: Construct Estimation and Event Windows
For each firm-event pair, define windows in **relative trading time** (offsets from the event day on the dateline):
- **Estimation window**: `[esw_lb, esw_ub]` — default `[-250, -30]`. - **Event window**: `[evw_lb, evw_ub]` — determined by the widest CAR window requested. - Enforce a **gap** between the estimation and event windows to prevent event contamination of the benchmark model.
**Exclusion checks** (per firm-event): - Insufficient estimation-window observations (fewer than `min_esw_obs`, default 120). - Insufficient event-window observations. - **IPO/delisting guard**: if the stock's first observed return date falls after `evw_lb` or last observed return date falls before `evw_ub`, exclude the firm-event. These are survivorship-biased observations.
### Step 4: Apply Thin-Trading Adjustment
For markets with non-trivially thin trading (most markets outside US mega-caps), apply the Maynes-Rumsey (1993) trade-to-trade transformation **by default**.
> Read `references/thin_trading.md` for the complete transformation, including > the `cum_periods` construction, the regression specification with `nocons`, > and the boundary contamination guard.
**Summary**: Non-trading days accumulate into the next trading day's return. All variables (returns, factors, intercept) are divided by `sqrt(cum_periods)`. OLS is run with `nocons` because the intercept regressor `1/sqrt(d)` replaces the standard constant. This is a GLS correction for the heteroscedasticity introduced by multi-period returns.
### Step 5: Run OLS and Compute STDF
For each firm-event pair, estimate the benchmark model over the estimation window and compute the **standard deviation of forecast** (STDF) for every observation (estimation + event window).
> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for model specifications (RAW, > COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR).
**STDF** (Theil 1971 prediction error correction):
For each observation t, the forecast standard deviation is:
STDF_it = sigma_hat_i * sqrt(1 + x'_t (X'X)^{-1} x_t)
where `x_t` is the regressor vector at time t, `X` is the estimation-window design matrix, and `sigma_hat_i = sqrt(SSR / (T_i - 2 - df))` is the OLS residual standard deviation. `df` is the number of additional factors beyond the market (0 for market model, 2 for FF3, etc.).
The STDF accounts for both the inherent noise in returns (sigma) and the estimation uncertainty in the model coefficients (which grows when event-window factor values are far from estimation-window means).
**Python**: after `numpy.linalg.lstsq`, compute the hat matrix `H = X @ inv(X'X) @ X'` and `h_t = x'_t @ inv(X'X) @ x_t` for each event-window observation. Then `STDF_t = sigma_hat * sqrt(1 + h_t)`.
### Step 6: Compute Abnormal Returns
AR_it = R_it - predicted_it
where `predicted_it` comes from the estimated benchmark model applied to event-window factor values.
**Critical rule**: do NOT zero-fill missing event-window returns. A missing return means the stock did not trade — setting it to zero biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. Leave it as NaN and let the accumulation step handle the count of valid ARs.
### Step 7: Accumulate CARs
For each requested CAR window `[lb, ub]` and each firm-event:
CAR_i = sum of AR_it for t in [lb, ub] where AR_it is not NaN
**Boundary contamination guard** (from eventstudy2): - If the **first** day of the CAR window has `cum_periods > 1`, the return on that day spans back before the window start. Set CAR = NaN. - If the **last** day of the CAR window has a missing AR, the firm-event lacks coverage at the window boundary. Set CAR = NaN. - For AAR (day-by-day) output: any day with `cum_periods > 1` has its AR set to NaN (the multi-period return cannot be attributed to a single day).
Track `n_valid_ar` per CAR: the count of non-NaN ARs in the window. A valid CAR should have `n_valid_ar == window_length`. CARs with fewer valid days should be flagged or excluded depending on the analysis.
### Step 8: Compute Test Statistics
Compute at minimum: **Patell (1976)**, **BMP (Boehmer et al. 1991)**, **Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP**, and the **generalized sign test (Cowan 1992)**. For maximum rigor, compute all 13 tests.
> Read `references/test_statistics.md` for exact formulas, null hypotheses, > distributions, and Python implementation notes for all 13 tests.
> Read `references/kolari_pynnonen.md` for the cross-correlation adjustment > procedure (ADJ factor) and the GRANK-T test.
Test statistics are reported at two levels: - **AAR level**: one test statistic per event day (tests whether the average AR across firms is significantly different from zero on that day). - **CAAR level**: one test statistic per CAR window (tests whether the cumulative average AR is significantly different from zero over the window).
---
## Model Selection
> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for full mathematical specifications.
| Model | When to Use | |-------|-------------| | **RAW** | Baseline/diagnostic only. No benchmark subtracted. | | **COMEAN** | Simplest parametric benchmark (constant mean return). | | **MA** (market-adjusted) | When factor data is unavailable. Subtracts market return directly. | | **FM** (factor model) | Standard choice for short-window event studies. Market model (1 factor) or FF3/FF5/Carhart (multi-factor). | | **BHAR** | Long-horizon event studies (months/years). Requires skewness-adjusted bootstrap (Lyon et al. 1999). |
Default: **FM with market model** (1 factor) for short-window studies.
---
## Critical Rules
1. **NEVER** replace missing event-window returns with zero. This biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. The only exception is BHAR models, which assume continuous holding.
2. **NEVER** compute CARs when the stock's first/last trading date falls inside the event window (IPO/delisting bias).
3. **NEVER** sum CARs when a boundary day has `cum_periods > 1` — the return spans outside the intended window.
4. **NEVER** run OLS with a standard constant when using the trade-to-trade transformation. Use `nocons` with `1/sqrt(cum_periods)` as the intercept regressor.
5. **NEVER** report CARs without at least one parametric and one non-parametric test statistic.
6. **NEVER** mix log and simple returns between the LHS and RHS of the market model. If stock returns are in logs, factor returns must also be in logs (or convert both via `ln(1+R)` before estimation). Jensen's inequality creates bias otherwise.
---
## Output Contract
A valid CAR output dataset must contain:
**Identifiers** (column names vary by project): - `firm_id`, `event_id`, `event_date`
**Estimation diagnostics** (per firm-event, per model): - `alpha`, `beta` (per factor), `nobs`, `r2`, `sigma_hat`
**Per CAR window per model**: - `car_value` — NaN if invalid - `n_valid_ar` — count of non-NaN ARs in the window
**Exclusion reason** (per firm-event): - `insufficient_est_obs`, `insufficient_evt_obs`, `ipo_in_window`, `delisting_in_window`, `event_off_dateline`, `boundary_contamination`
**Test statistics** (separate output): - AAR-level and CAAR-level tests, each with test statistic value and p-value - Minimum: Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP, generalized sign test
---
## Sensible Defaults
These can be overridden by the user:
| Parameter | Default | Notes | |-----------|---------|-------| | Estimation window | `[-250, -30]` | ~1 year of trading days | | Min estimation obs | 120 | Conservative; eventstudy2 defaults to 30 | | Event window | Widest CAR window | Determined by user's CAR windows | | Max event-date shift | 3 calendar days | Beyond this, exclude the event | | Dateline threshold | 0.0 | Include all trading days (set ~0.2 for international samples) | | Thin-trading adjustment | ON | Disable only for extremely liquid markets | | Log returns | Convert via `ln(1+R)` | Unless input is already in logs | | Min event-window obs | 1 | Per eventstudy2 default | | Kolari-Pynnonen ADJ | Computed | Skip only if N > 500 firms (O(N^2) cost) |
---
## Reference Files
Read these for detailed formulas and implementation guidance:
| File | Contents | When to Read | |------|----------|--------------| | `references/estimation_models.md` | RAW, COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR model specs | When choosing or implementing a benchmark mo
기술 세부 사항
- 버전
- 1.0.0
- 라이선스
- MIT
- 최근 업데이트
- 2026년 8월 24일
- 게시일
- 2026년 8월 24일
결정 스냅샷
대체 후보
최근 저장소 활동
Agent 검증 증거
Agent 검증 증거
Resolve, 검토, 설치 및 한 번의 제한된 실행 후 결과 보고서입니다.
- 성공률
- —
- 최근 실패
- —
- 결과
- 0
- 출력 품질
- —
- 실패
- 0
- 관련 없음
- 0
- 설치
- 0
- 위험 차단
- 0
- 설정 필요
- 0
- 프로덕션
- 0
아직 Agent 결과 데이터가 없습니다. 첫 실행은 /api/agent/outcome을 통해 성공, 설정 필요, 위험 차단, 실패 또는 비관련 결과를 보고할 수 있습니다.
성장 루프
공유 키트
event-study-cars용 시나리오 기반 초안입니다. X에 수동으로 게시할 수 있습니다.
A practical pick for a repeatable workflow: event-study-cars: >- 47 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x
선택 사항: 설치 명령이 포함된 답글
Listing + install path for event-study-cars: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x Install: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
등록 출처
Registry 색인
이 등록은 공개 소스에서 색인되었으며 유지보수자 소유권 주장이 승인될 때까지 공식으로 표시되지 않습니다.
- 색인 주체
- OpenAgentSkill 커뮤니티 인덱스
귀속은 공개 저장소 또는 제작자 프로필에 연결됩니다. 제작자는 등록을 주장하여 소유권 신호를 업데이트할 수 있습니다.
이 스킬 소유권 주장소유자 소유권 주장
이 스킬 등록 소유권 주장
이 Registry 색인 등록은 kennethkhoocy에게 귀속되어 있지만 아직 공식으로 표시되지 않았습니다. 소유권을 주장하면 확인된 소유자 신호가 추가되어 이후 출시, 설치 및 감사 업데이트를 더 신뢰할 수 있습니다.
크리에이터 백링크 키트
README에 증거 배지 추가
개발자가 저장소를 평가하는 위치에 정규 등록, 현재 신뢰 및 감사 신호, 실제 Agent-Proven 증거를 표시합니다.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)작성자
kennethkhoocy
@kennethkhoocy
플랫폼 적합도
상태 신호
- GitHub 스타
- 47
- 품질 점수
- 35/100
- 최근 GitHub 푸시
- 2026년 8월 24일
- 프레임워크 힌트
- 알 수 없음
- OpenAgentSkill 조회수
- 3
- 설치 명령 복사
- 0
- 외부 클릭
- 0
커뮤니티 신호
이 스킬이 Agent 워크플로에 유용한지 알려 주세요. 집계된 피드백은 시간이 지날수록 순위를 개선합니다.
신뢰와 안전
Do not auto-install
- GitHub 채택도GitHub 스타 47확인
- 스타/포크 활동스타 47, 포크 0; 현재 메타데이터에서 이슈 활동을 확인할 수 없습니다확인
- 최근 유지보수오늘 푸시됨통과
- 라이선스 명확성MIT통과
- README/SKILL.md 완성도공개 메타데이터에 더 충실한 README/SKILL.md 맥락이 필요합니다확인
- 의존성/런타임 위험명령 실행 범위정보
관련 스킬
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
37.0K 스타MoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
88.5K 스타Cua
Open-source infrastructure for Computer-Use Agents. Sandboxes, SDKs, and benchmarks to train and evaluate AI agents that can control full desktops (macOS, Linux, Windows).
21.4K 스타