event-study-cars
>-
Profil de l’actif
Recherche et travail de connaissance
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scénario
Agents de recherche
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Adéquation Agent
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Compatible avec Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI ou des Agents personnalisés.
Installer
Prêt
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Maintenance
À jour
Mis à jour aujourd’hui
Risque
Revue nécessaire
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Qualité GitHub
47
64/100 Qualité · 65/100 Confiance
Tags de couverture
Notes de revue
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
Carte d’adoption Agent
Confiance, audit et préparation à l’installation en un coup d’œil
Ces scores combinent les métadonnées publiques du dépôt, les signaux de revue OpenAgentSkill, la fraîcheur de maintenance et la préparation à l’installation. Ils servent à présélectionner et ne remplacent pas la revue humaine.
Qualité
PrometteurUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Confiance
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Revue nécessaireRevue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5
Revue humaine avant installation
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
47 stars GitHub
Activité du dépôt
47 stars et 0 forks
Maintenance
Mis à jour aujourd’hui
Licence
MIT
Installer
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Sécurité d’installation
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Résultats Agent
Pas encore de données de résultats Agent
Documentation
Thin public metadata
Résumé des risques
Revoir avant production
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
Préparation à l’installation
Chemin d’installation disponible
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- La licence est déclarée
- Pas encore de preuve de résultat Agent-Proven
Métadonnées lisibles par Agent
Données de décision lisibles par machine pour ce skill.
Utilisez ce bloc ou le JSON intégré pour décider si un Agent doit installer ce skill, choisir une alternative ou demander d’abord une revue humaine.
Tâches adaptées
- Workflows finance et quant
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Retrieve market data
Agents adaptés
Décision d’installation
- Commande
- npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
- Politique
- Revoir
- Revue humaine
- Oui
Confiance et risque
- Confiance
- 57/100
- Audit
- 75/100
- Niveau de risque
- Revue nécessaire
Boucle de résultat
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- ID d’événement
- resolve
- Résultats
- 5
Commande d’installation
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-carsNe pas utiliser quand
- Équipes qui nécessitent un SLA soutenu par le fournisseur
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- Indices de permissions à haut risque : exécution shell ou de commande
Sécurité Agent v2
47/100 · Éviter l’installation automatique
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Élevé
Exécution shell ou de commande
Les métadonnées de la skill font référence à des workflows de terminal, CLI, shell, sous-processus ou exécution de commande.
Moyen
Accès réseau
La skill récupère probablement des pages distantes, API, dépôts ou services externes.
Moyen
Accès au système de fichiers
La skill peut lire ou écrire des fichiers de projet, documents, artefacts générés ou l’état local de l’espace de travail.
- Indices de permissions à haut risque : exécution shell ou de commande
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Cibles d’installation
Installer ce skill dans votre workflow Agent
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install kennethkhoocy-event-study-carsPlan de résolution Agent
Laissez un Agent vérifier la pertinence avant l’installation.
L’API Resolve renvoie la skill sélectionnée, des alternatives, la politique de sécurité, les notes d’audit, la cible d’installation et un prompt prêt à l’emploi.
Ouvrir JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Texte Resolve
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
L’Agent doit vérifier
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copier le prompt
Task: Use event-study-cars in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
Install command: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Relais Agent
Donnez à l’Agent le chemin d’installation, pas un autre annuaire.
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
Format texte LLM
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install?format=text
Trouver des alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=event-study-cars&limit=3
Prompt Agent
Use event-study-cars for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install, then install with: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-carsMétadonnées Registry
Profil lisible par Agent pour la sélection automatique de skills.
L’API Registry fournit les signaux de décision, confiance, audit, cas d’usage et installation sans analyser l’interface.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars
Texte LLM
/api/registry/manifest/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?format=text
Alias d’installation
/api/registry/install/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars
Recommander
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Adéquation Agent
Finance et quant
Tags de cas d’usage
Plateformes
Claude Code
Rapport d’audit
Revue nécessaire · 75/100
Revue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Panneau de décision Agent
Fallback candidate for Finance and quant
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rôle dans la pile
Candidate de secours
Pertinence principale
Finance et quant
Libellé de confiance
Prototyper d’abord
Chemin d’installation
Commande prête
À utiliser lorsque
- Workflows finance et quant
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Preuves
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- profil qualité 64/100
- 4 événements OpenAgentSkill
revoir d’abord
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
Chemin d’implémentation
- 1Installez-le dans un Agent en sandbox et exécutez une tâche de Finance et quant de bout en bout.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Profil de confiance
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Adoption GitHub
Vérifier47 stars GitHub
Activité stars/forks
Vérifier47 stars et 0 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Maintenance récente
ValidéMis à jour aujourd’hui
Clarté de licence
ValidéMIT
Signaux positifs
- Revue IA approuvée
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- Dépôt maintenu récemment
- La commande d’installation ne présente aucun motif de haut risque évident
- La boucle de résultats est prête mais nécessite la première exécution réelle de l’Agent
Réviser avant installation
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- README/SKILL.md completeness: Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
- Pas encore de rapports de résultats Agent réels
- Une revue humaine est requise avant une installation sans surveillance
Action recommandée
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Profil qualité
Prometteur candidat pour les workflows Agent
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Adéquation au workflow
Utilisez cette skill dans ces scénarios
Analyze markets
Finance and quant
I need my agent to analyze markets, financial data, filings, portfolios, and quant strategies.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Adéquation au workflow
Ajouter à un workflow complet
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Liste d’alternatives
Comparer avant installation
Similar skills that may fit this task.
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
MoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
Cua
Open-source infrastructure for Computer-Use Agents. Sandboxes, SDKs, and benchmarks to train and evaluate AI agents that can control full desktops (macOS, Linux, Windows).
Vue d’ensemble
--- name: event-study-cars description: >- Complete methodology for computing publication-quality cumulative abnormal returns with proper event-study test statistics, matching the robustness of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 for Stata. Covers dateline construction, event-date mapping, estimation and event windows, thin-trading adjustment, OLS with Theil prediction error correction, abnormal return computation, CAR/CAAR/AAR accumulation, boundary contamination guards, and common tests such as Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen, generalized sign, Wilcoxon, and GRANK-T. Use when the user mentions abnormal returns, event windows, market-model regressions, CARs, CAAR, AAR, eventstudy2, thin trading, trade-to-trade returns, or event-study test statistics. ---
# Event Study: Cumulative Abnormal Returns (CARs)
A complete methodology reference for computing publication-quality CARs with robust test statistics, matching the rigor of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 (v3.2b) for Stata. This skill is **generic** — applicable to any market, asset class, or event type.
## Use the shipped engine first (do not rewrite it)
`scripts/eventstudy.py` is a complete, runnable Python replication of eventstudy2, validated against the Stata package to floating-point precision (AR ~1e-8, CAR ~6e-8, CAAR and the implemented test statistics ~1e-7) on a generic CRSP sample across all four models (FM, COMEAN, MA, RAW). It is generic — all column names, the model, windows, thin-trading, and log handling are CLI flags. When a user wants CARs computed, **run this engine**; do not author a new pipeline.
```bash python scripts/eventstudy.py --selftest # synthetic self-check, no inputs python scripts/eventstudy.py \ --returns returns.csv --market market.csv --events events.csv \ --id-col permno --ret-col ret --event-date-col event_date --mkt-col vwretd \ --model FM --car-windows "-1,1;-5,5;-10,10" \ --eswlb -250 --eswub -30 --evwlb -10 --evwub 10 --out-dir out/ ```
Inputs are CSV/Parquet: returns (`id, date, ret`), market/factors (`date, mkt[, factors]`), events (`id, event_date`). Outputs: `ar_panel.csv`, `car_panel.csv`, `test_statistics.csv`. Requires numpy/pandas/scipy. Run `--help` for all flags (`--factor-cols smb,hml`, `--model MA`, `--no-thin-trading`, ...). The sections below document the methodology the engine implements; read them to audit, extend, or port it.
## Methodology Overview: The 8-Step Pipeline
### Step 1: Build Trading Calendar (Dateline)
Construct a master list of valid trading dates from the security returns file.
1. Collect all unique dates on which at least one security has a non-missing return (or, if using a factor model, dates where market/factor returns exist). 2. Count the number of securities with valid returns on each date. 3. Optionally drop weekends (`delweekend`). 4. Apply `dateline_threshold`: drop dates where the count of return observations falls below `threshold × mean(daily_count)`. A threshold of 0.2 works well for international samples with heterogeneous holidays. 5. The resulting date vector is the **dateline** — all downstream windows are defined in dateline time (relative trading days), not calendar time.
### Step 2: Map Event Dates to Nearest Valid Trading Day
For each event: 1. Find the nearest dateline date **on or after** the event date. 2. If the shift exceeds `max_shift` calendar days (default: 3), **exclude** the event entirely — do not silently map it to a distant trading day. 3. Events with missing dates, or dates outside the dateline range, are also excluded and logged with the reason.
### Step 3: Construct Estimation and Event Windows
For each firm-event pair, define windows in **relative trading time** (offsets from the event day on the dateline):
- **Estimation window**: `[esw_lb, esw_ub]` — default `[-250, -30]`. - **Event window**: `[evw_lb, evw_ub]` — determined by the widest CAR window requested. - Enforce a **gap** between the estimation and event windows to prevent event contamination of the benchmark model.
**Exclusion checks** (per firm-event): - Insufficient estimation-window observations (fewer than `min_esw_obs`, default 120). - Insufficient event-window observations. - **IPO/delisting guard**: if the stock's first observed return date falls after `evw_lb` or last observed return date falls before `evw_ub`, exclude the firm-event. These are survivorship-biased observations.
### Step 4: Apply Thin-Trading Adjustment
For markets with non-trivially thin trading (most markets outside US mega-caps), apply the Maynes-Rumsey (1993) trade-to-trade transformation **by default**.
> Read `references/thin_trading.md` for the complete transformation, including > the `cum_periods` construction, the regression specification with `nocons`, > and the boundary contamination guard.
**Summary**: Non-trading days accumulate into the next trading day's return. All variables (returns, factors, intercept) are divided by `sqrt(cum_periods)`. OLS is run with `nocons` because the intercept regressor `1/sqrt(d)` replaces the standard constant. This is a GLS correction for the heteroscedasticity introduced by multi-period returns.
### Step 5: Run OLS and Compute STDF
For each firm-event pair, estimate the benchmark model over the estimation window and compute the **standard deviation of forecast** (STDF) for every observation (estimation + event window).
> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for model specifications (RAW, > COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR).
**STDF** (Theil 1971 prediction error correction):
For each observation t, the forecast standard deviation is:
STDF_it = sigma_hat_i * sqrt(1 + x'_t (X'X)^{-1} x_t)
where `x_t` is the regressor vector at time t, `X` is the estimation-window design matrix, and `sigma_hat_i = sqrt(SSR / (T_i - 2 - df))` is the OLS residual standard deviation. `df` is the number of additional factors beyond the market (0 for market model, 2 for FF3, etc.).
The STDF accounts for both the inherent noise in returns (sigma) and the estimation uncertainty in the model coefficients (which grows when event-window factor values are far from estimation-window means).
**Python**: after `numpy.linalg.lstsq`, compute the hat matrix `H = X @ inv(X'X) @ X'` and `h_t = x'_t @ inv(X'X) @ x_t` for each event-window observation. Then `STDF_t = sigma_hat * sqrt(1 + h_t)`.
### Step 6: Compute Abnormal Returns
AR_it = R_it - predicted_it
where `predicted_it` comes from the estimated benchmark model applied to event-window factor values.
**Critical rule**: do NOT zero-fill missing event-window returns. A missing return means the stock did not trade — setting it to zero biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. Leave it as NaN and let the accumulation step handle the count of valid ARs.
### Step 7: Accumulate CARs
For each requested CAR window `[lb, ub]` and each firm-event:
CAR_i = sum of AR_it for t in [lb, ub] where AR_it is not NaN
**Boundary contamination guard** (from eventstudy2): - If the **first** day of the CAR window has `cum_periods > 1`, the return on that day spans back before the window start. Set CAR = NaN. - If the **last** day of the CAR window has a missing AR, the firm-event lacks coverage at the window boundary. Set CAR = NaN. - For AAR (day-by-day) output: any day with `cum_periods > 1` has its AR set to NaN (the multi-period return cannot be attributed to a single day).
Track `n_valid_ar` per CAR: the count of non-NaN ARs in the window. A valid CAR should have `n_valid_ar == window_length`. CARs with fewer valid days should be flagged or excluded depending on the analysis.
### Step 8: Compute Test Statistics
Compute at minimum: **Patell (1976)**, **BMP (Boehmer et al. 1991)**, **Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP**, and the **generalized sign test (Cowan 1992)**. For maximum rigor, compute all 13 tests.
> Read `references/test_statistics.md` for exact formulas, null hypotheses, > distributions, and Python implementation notes for all 13 tests.
> Read `references/kolari_pynnonen.md` for the cross-correlation adjustment > procedure (ADJ factor) and the GRANK-T test.
Test statistics are reported at two levels: - **AAR level**: one test statistic per event day (tests whether the average AR across firms is significantly different from zero on that day). - **CAAR level**: one test statistic per CAR window (tests whether the cumulative average AR is significantly different from zero over the window).
---
## Model Selection
> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for full mathematical specifications.
| Model | When to Use | |-------|-------------| | **RAW** | Baseline/diagnostic only. No benchmark subtracted. | | **COMEAN** | Simplest parametric benchmark (constant mean return). | | **MA** (market-adjusted) | When factor data is unavailable. Subtracts market return directly. | | **FM** (factor model) | Standard choice for short-window event studies. Market model (1 factor) or FF3/FF5/Carhart (multi-factor). | | **BHAR** | Long-horizon event studies (months/years). Requires skewness-adjusted bootstrap (Lyon et al. 1999). |
Default: **FM with market model** (1 factor) for short-window studies.
---
## Critical Rules
1. **NEVER** replace missing event-window returns with zero. This biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. The only exception is BHAR models, which assume continuous holding.
2. **NEVER** compute CARs when the stock's first/last trading date falls inside the event window (IPO/delisting bias).
3. **NEVER** sum CARs when a boundary day has `cum_periods > 1` — the return spans outside the intended window.
4. **NEVER** run OLS with a standard constant when using the trade-to-trade transformation. Use `nocons` with `1/sqrt(cum_periods)` as the intercept regressor.
5. **NEVER** report CARs without at least one parametric and one non-parametric test statistic.
6. **NEVER** mix log and simple returns between the LHS and RHS of the market model. If stock returns are in logs, factor returns must also be in logs (or convert both via `ln(1+R)` before estimation). Jensen's inequality creates bias otherwise.
---
## Output Contract
A valid CAR output dataset must contain:
**Identifiers** (column names vary by project): - `firm_id`, `event_id`, `event_date`
**Estimation diagnostics** (per firm-event, per model): - `alpha`, `beta` (per factor), `nobs`, `r2`, `sigma_hat`
**Per CAR window per model**: - `car_value` — NaN if invalid - `n_valid_ar` — count of non-NaN ARs in the window
**Exclusion reason** (per firm-event): - `insufficient_est_obs`, `insufficient_evt_obs`, `ipo_in_window`, `delisting_in_window`, `event_off_dateline`, `boundary_contamination`
**Test statistics** (separate output): - AAR-level and CAAR-level tests, each with test statistic value and p-value - Minimum: Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP, generalized sign test
---
## Sensible Defaults
These can be overridden by the user:
| Parameter | Default | Notes | |-----------|---------|-------| | Estimation window | `[-250, -30]` | ~1 year of trading days | | Min estimation obs | 120 | Conservative; eventstudy2 defaults to 30 | | Event window | Widest CAR window | Determined by user's CAR windows | | Max event-date shift | 3 calendar days | Beyond this, exclude the event | | Dateline threshold | 0.0 | Include all trading days (set ~0.2 for international samples) | | Thin-trading adjustment | ON | Disable only for extremely liquid markets | | Log returns | Convert via `ln(1+R)` | Unless input is already in logs | | Min event-window obs | 1 | Per eventstudy2 default | | Kolari-Pynnonen ADJ | Computed | Skip only if N > 500 firms (O(N^2) cost) |
---
## Reference Files
Read these for detailed formulas and implementation guidance:
| File | Contents | When to Read | |------|----------|--------------| | `references/estimation_models.md` | RAW, COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR model specs | When choosing or implementing a benchmark mo
Détails techniques
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Licence
- MIT
- Dernière mise à jour
- 24 août 2026
- Publié
- 24 août 2026
Instantané de décision
Candidate de secours
recent repository activity
Audit
Revue d’installation
Revue d’installation et d’adoption
- Sécurité
- 76/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Installer
- 92/100
Preuves validées par Agent
Preuves validées par Agent
Rapports après resolve, revue, installation et une exécution limitée.
- Taux de réussite
- —
- Échec récent
- —
- Résultats
- 0
- Qualité de sortie
- —
- Échecs
- 0
- Non pertinent
- 0
- Installations
- 0
- Bloqué par le risque
- 0
- Configuration requise
- 0
- Production
- 0
Aucune donnée de résultat Agent pour l’instant. La première exécution peut signaler succès, besoin de configuration, blocage de risque, échec ou non-pertinence via /api/agent/outcome.
Installer
Ajouter au workflow Agent
Gratuit et open source. Examinez le rapport avant l’installation dans des Agents de production.
Boucle de croissance
Kit de partage
Brouillon guidé par scénario pour event-study-cars, prêt pour une publication manuelle sur X.
A practical pick for a repeatable workflow: event-study-cars: >- 47 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x
Réponse facultative avec commande d’installation
Listing + install path for event-study-cars: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x Install: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Source de la fiche
Indexé par Registry
Cette fiche a été indexée à partir de sources publiques et n’est pas marquée officielle tant qu’une revendication de mainteneur n’est pas approuvée.
- Créateur
- kennethkhoocy
- Indexé par
- Index communautaire OpenAgentSkill
L’attribution renvoie au dépôt public ou au profil du créateur. Les créateurs peuvent revendiquer la fiche pour mettre à jour les signaux de propriété.
Revendiquer ce skillRevendication du propriétaire
Revendiquer cette fiche de skill
Cette fiche Indexé par Registry est attribuée à kennethkhoocy, mais n’est pas encore marquée officielle. Revendiquez-la pour ajouter un signal de propriétaire vérifié et rendre les futures mises à jour de lancement, d’installation et d’audit plus fiables.
Kit de backlinks créateur
Ajoutez les badges de preuve à votre README
Affichez la fiche canonique, les signaux actuels de confiance et d’audit, ainsi que de vraies preuves Agent-Proven là où les développeurs évaluent le dépôt.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)Auteur
kennethkhoocy
@kennethkhoocy
Tags
Adéquation plateforme
Signaux de santé
- Stars GitHub
- 47
- Score de qualité
- 35/100
- Dernier push GitHub
- 24 août 2026
- Indications de framework
- Inconnu
- Vues OpenAgentSkill
- 4
- Copies d’installation
- 0
- Clics sortants
- 0
Signal de communauté
Indiquez si ce skill semble utile à votre workflow Agent. Les retours agrégés améliorent le classement au fil du temps.
Confiance et sécurité
Do not auto-install
- Adoption GitHub47 stars GitHubVérifier
- Activité stars/forks47 stars et 0 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuellesVérifier
- Maintenance récenteMis à jour aujourd’huiValidé
- Clarté de licenceMITValidé
- Complétude README/SKILL.mdLes métadonnées publiques nécessitent davantage de contexte README/SKILL.mdVérifier
- Risque dépendances/runtimeSurface d’exécution de commandesInfo
Skills associés
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
37.0K StarsMoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
88.5K StarsCua
Open-source infrastructure for Computer-Use Agents. Sandboxes, SDKs, and benchmarks to train and evaluate AI agents that can control full desktops (macOS, Linux, Windows).
21.4K Stars