event-study-cars
>-
Asset-Profil
Recherche und Wissensarbeit
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Szenario
Recherche-Agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent-Fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.
Installieren
Bereit
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Wartung
Aktuell
Heute gepusht
Risiko
Prüfung nötig
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
GitHub-Qualität
47
64/100 Qualität · 65/100 Vertrauen
Abdeckungs-Tags
Review-Notizen
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
Agent-Adoptionskarte
Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick
Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.
Qualität
VielversprechendUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Vertrauen
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Prüfung nötigMaschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
47 GitHub-Stars
Repository-Aktivität
47 Stars und 0 Forks
Wartung
Heute gepusht
Lizenz
MIT
Installieren
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Installationssicherheit
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsfläche
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent-Ergebnisse
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten
Dokumentation
Thin public metadata
Risikoübersicht
Vor Produktion prüfen
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
Installationsbereitschaft
Installationspfad verfügbar
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Lizenz ist angegeben
- Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege
Agent-lesbare Metadaten
Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.
Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.
Geeignete Aufgaben
- Finanz- und Quant-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Retrieve market data
Geeignete Agents
Installationsentscheidung
- Befehl
- npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
- Richtlinie
- Prüfen
- Menschliche Prüfung
- Ja
Vertrauen und Risiko
- Vertrauen
- 57/100
- Audit
- 75/100
- Risikoebene
- Prüfung nötig
Ergebnis-Loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event-ID
- resolve
- Ergebnisse
- 5
Installationsbefehl
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-carsNicht verwenden, wenn
- Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
Agent-Sicherheit v2
47/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Hoch
Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.
Mittel
Netzwerkzugriff
Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.
Mittel
Dateisystemzugriff
Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Installationsziele
Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install kennethkhoocy-event-study-carsAgent-Auflösungsplan
Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.
Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.
JSON öffnen
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve-Text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
Agent sollte prüfen
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Prompt kopieren
Task: Use event-study-cars in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
Install command: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent-Übergabe
Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
LLM-Textformat
/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install?format=text
Alternativen finden
/api/skills/search?q=event-study-cars&limit=3
Agent-Prompt
Use event-study-cars for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install, then install with: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-carsRegistry-Metadaten
Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.
Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars
LLM-Text
/api/registry/manifest/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?format=text
Installationsalias
/api/registry/install/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars
Empfehlen
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent-Fit
Finanz und Quant
Use-Case-Tags
Plattformen
Claude Code
Audit-Bericht
Prüfung nötig · 75/100
Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
Agent-Entscheidungspanel
Fallback candidate for Finance and quant
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rolle im Stack
Fallback-Kandidat
Primäre Eignung
Finanz und Quant
Vertrauenslabel
Zuerst prototypisieren
Installationspfad
Befehl bereit
Verwenden wenn
- Finanz- und Quant-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidenz
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- Qualitätsprofil 64/100
- 3 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen
zuerst prüfen
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
Implementierungspfad
- 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Finanz und Quant-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Vertrauensprofil
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub-Akzeptanz
Prüfen47 GitHub-Stars
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
Prüfen47 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Aktuelle Wartung
BestandenHeute gepusht
Lizenzklarheit
BestandenMIT
Positive Signale
- KI-Prüfung genehmigt
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
- Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
- Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf
Vor Installation prüfen
- SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- README/SKILL.md completeness: Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
- Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
- Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich
Empfohlene Aktion
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Qualitätsprofil
Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow-Eignung
Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen
Analyze markets
Finance and quant
I need my agent to analyze markets, financial data, filings, portfolios, and quant strategies.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Workflow-Eignung
Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Alternativen-Shortlist
Vor Installation vergleichen
Similar skills that may fit this task.
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
MoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
Cua
Open-source infrastructure for Computer-Use Agents. Sandboxes, SDKs, and benchmarks to train and evaluate AI agents that can control full desktops (macOS, Linux, Windows).
Übersicht
--- name: event-study-cars description: >- Complete methodology for computing publication-quality cumulative abnormal returns with proper event-study test statistics, matching the robustness of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 for Stata. Covers dateline construction, event-date mapping, estimation and event windows, thin-trading adjustment, OLS with Theil prediction error correction, abnormal return computation, CAR/CAAR/AAR accumulation, boundary contamination guards, and common tests such as Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen, generalized sign, Wilcoxon, and GRANK-T. Use when the user mentions abnormal returns, event windows, market-model regressions, CARs, CAAR, AAR, eventstudy2, thin trading, trade-to-trade returns, or event-study test statistics. ---
# Event Study: Cumulative Abnormal Returns (CARs)
A complete methodology reference for computing publication-quality CARs with robust test statistics, matching the rigor of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 (v3.2b) for Stata. This skill is **generic** — applicable to any market, asset class, or event type.
## Use the shipped engine first (do not rewrite it)
`scripts/eventstudy.py` is a complete, runnable Python replication of eventstudy2, validated against the Stata package to floating-point precision (AR ~1e-8, CAR ~6e-8, CAAR and the implemented test statistics ~1e-7) on a generic CRSP sample across all four models (FM, COMEAN, MA, RAW). It is generic — all column names, the model, windows, thin-trading, and log handling are CLI flags. When a user wants CARs computed, **run this engine**; do not author a new pipeline.
```bash python scripts/eventstudy.py --selftest # synthetic self-check, no inputs python scripts/eventstudy.py \ --returns returns.csv --market market.csv --events events.csv \ --id-col permno --ret-col ret --event-date-col event_date --mkt-col vwretd \ --model FM --car-windows "-1,1;-5,5;-10,10" \ --eswlb -250 --eswub -30 --evwlb -10 --evwub 10 --out-dir out/ ```
Inputs are CSV/Parquet: returns (`id, date, ret`), market/factors (`date, mkt[, factors]`), events (`id, event_date`). Outputs: `ar_panel.csv`, `car_panel.csv`, `test_statistics.csv`. Requires numpy/pandas/scipy. Run `--help` for all flags (`--factor-cols smb,hml`, `--model MA`, `--no-thin-trading`, ...). The sections below document the methodology the engine implements; read them to audit, extend, or port it.
## Methodology Overview: The 8-Step Pipeline
### Step 1: Build Trading Calendar (Dateline)
Construct a master list of valid trading dates from the security returns file.
1. Collect all unique dates on which at least one security has a non-missing return (or, if using a factor model, dates where market/factor returns exist). 2. Count the number of securities with valid returns on each date. 3. Optionally drop weekends (`delweekend`). 4. Apply `dateline_threshold`: drop dates where the count of return observations falls below `threshold × mean(daily_count)`. A threshold of 0.2 works well for international samples with heterogeneous holidays. 5. The resulting date vector is the **dateline** — all downstream windows are defined in dateline time (relative trading days), not calendar time.
### Step 2: Map Event Dates to Nearest Valid Trading Day
For each event: 1. Find the nearest dateline date **on or after** the event date. 2. If the shift exceeds `max_shift` calendar days (default: 3), **exclude** the event entirely — do not silently map it to a distant trading day. 3. Events with missing dates, or dates outside the dateline range, are also excluded and logged with the reason.
### Step 3: Construct Estimation and Event Windows
For each firm-event pair, define windows in **relative trading time** (offsets from the event day on the dateline):
- **Estimation window**: `[esw_lb, esw_ub]` — default `[-250, -30]`. - **Event window**: `[evw_lb, evw_ub]` — determined by the widest CAR window requested. - Enforce a **gap** between the estimation and event windows to prevent event contamination of the benchmark model.
**Exclusion checks** (per firm-event): - Insufficient estimation-window observations (fewer than `min_esw_obs`, default 120). - Insufficient event-window observations. - **IPO/delisting guard**: if the stock's first observed return date falls after `evw_lb` or last observed return date falls before `evw_ub`, exclude the firm-event. These are survivorship-biased observations.
### Step 4: Apply Thin-Trading Adjustment
For markets with non-trivially thin trading (most markets outside US mega-caps), apply the Maynes-Rumsey (1993) trade-to-trade transformation **by default**.
> Read `references/thin_trading.md` for the complete transformation, including > the `cum_periods` construction, the regression specification with `nocons`, > and the boundary contamination guard.
**Summary**: Non-trading days accumulate into the next trading day's return. All variables (returns, factors, intercept) are divided by `sqrt(cum_periods)`. OLS is run with `nocons` because the intercept regressor `1/sqrt(d)` replaces the standard constant. This is a GLS correction for the heteroscedasticity introduced by multi-period returns.
### Step 5: Run OLS and Compute STDF
For each firm-event pair, estimate the benchmark model over the estimation window and compute the **standard deviation of forecast** (STDF) for every observation (estimation + event window).
> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for model specifications (RAW, > COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR).
**STDF** (Theil 1971 prediction error correction):
For each observation t, the forecast standard deviation is:
STDF_it = sigma_hat_i * sqrt(1 + x'_t (X'X)^{-1} x_t)
where `x_t` is the regressor vector at time t, `X` is the estimation-window design matrix, and `sigma_hat_i = sqrt(SSR / (T_i - 2 - df))` is the OLS residual standard deviation. `df` is the number of additional factors beyond the market (0 for market model, 2 for FF3, etc.).
The STDF accounts for both the inherent noise in returns (sigma) and the estimation uncertainty in the model coefficients (which grows when event-window factor values are far from estimation-window means).
**Python**: after `numpy.linalg.lstsq`, compute the hat matrix `H = X @ inv(X'X) @ X'` and `h_t = x'_t @ inv(X'X) @ x_t` for each event-window observation. Then `STDF_t = sigma_hat * sqrt(1 + h_t)`.
### Step 6: Compute Abnormal Returns
AR_it = R_it - predicted_it
where `predicted_it` comes from the estimated benchmark model applied to event-window factor values.
**Critical rule**: do NOT zero-fill missing event-window returns. A missing return means the stock did not trade — setting it to zero biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. Leave it as NaN and let the accumulation step handle the count of valid ARs.
### Step 7: Accumulate CARs
For each requested CAR window `[lb, ub]` and each firm-event:
CAR_i = sum of AR_it for t in [lb, ub] where AR_it is not NaN
**Boundary contamination guard** (from eventstudy2): - If the **first** day of the CAR window has `cum_periods > 1`, the return on that day spans back before the window start. Set CAR = NaN. - If the **last** day of the CAR window has a missing AR, the firm-event lacks coverage at the window boundary. Set CAR = NaN. - For AAR (day-by-day) output: any day with `cum_periods > 1` has its AR set to NaN (the multi-period return cannot be attributed to a single day).
Track `n_valid_ar` per CAR: the count of non-NaN ARs in the window. A valid CAR should have `n_valid_ar == window_length`. CARs with fewer valid days should be flagged or excluded depending on the analysis.
### Step 8: Compute Test Statistics
Compute at minimum: **Patell (1976)**, **BMP (Boehmer et al. 1991)**, **Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP**, and the **generalized sign test (Cowan 1992)**. For maximum rigor, compute all 13 tests.
> Read `references/test_statistics.md` for exact formulas, null hypotheses, > distributions, and Python implementation notes for all 13 tests.
> Read `references/kolari_pynnonen.md` for the cross-correlation adjustment > procedure (ADJ factor) and the GRANK-T test.
Test statistics are reported at two levels: - **AAR level**: one test statistic per event day (tests whether the average AR across firms is significantly different from zero on that day). - **CAAR level**: one test statistic per CAR window (tests whether the cumulative average AR is significantly different from zero over the window).
---
## Model Selection
> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for full mathematical specifications.
| Model | When to Use | |-------|-------------| | **RAW** | Baseline/diagnostic only. No benchmark subtracted. | | **COMEAN** | Simplest parametric benchmark (constant mean return). | | **MA** (market-adjusted) | When factor data is unavailable. Subtracts market return directly. | | **FM** (factor model) | Standard choice for short-window event studies. Market model (1 factor) or FF3/FF5/Carhart (multi-factor). | | **BHAR** | Long-horizon event studies (months/years). Requires skewness-adjusted bootstrap (Lyon et al. 1999). |
Default: **FM with market model** (1 factor) for short-window studies.
---
## Critical Rules
1. **NEVER** replace missing event-window returns with zero. This biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. The only exception is BHAR models, which assume continuous holding.
2. **NEVER** compute CARs when the stock's first/last trading date falls inside the event window (IPO/delisting bias).
3. **NEVER** sum CARs when a boundary day has `cum_periods > 1` — the return spans outside the intended window.
4. **NEVER** run OLS with a standard constant when using the trade-to-trade transformation. Use `nocons` with `1/sqrt(cum_periods)` as the intercept regressor.
5. **NEVER** report CARs without at least one parametric and one non-parametric test statistic.
6. **NEVER** mix log and simple returns between the LHS and RHS of the market model. If stock returns are in logs, factor returns must also be in logs (or convert both via `ln(1+R)` before estimation). Jensen's inequality creates bias otherwise.
---
## Output Contract
A valid CAR output dataset must contain:
**Identifiers** (column names vary by project): - `firm_id`, `event_id`, `event_date`
**Estimation diagnostics** (per firm-event, per model): - `alpha`, `beta` (per factor), `nobs`, `r2`, `sigma_hat`
**Per CAR window per model**: - `car_value` — NaN if invalid - `n_valid_ar` — count of non-NaN ARs in the window
**Exclusion reason** (per firm-event): - `insufficient_est_obs`, `insufficient_evt_obs`, `ipo_in_window`, `delisting_in_window`, `event_off_dateline`, `boundary_contamination`
**Test statistics** (separate output): - AAR-level and CAAR-level tests, each with test statistic value and p-value - Minimum: Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP, generalized sign test
---
## Sensible Defaults
These can be overridden by the user:
| Parameter | Default | Notes | |-----------|---------|-------| | Estimation window | `[-250, -30]` | ~1 year of trading days | | Min estimation obs | 120 | Conservative; eventstudy2 defaults to 30 | | Event window | Widest CAR window | Determined by user's CAR windows | | Max event-date shift | 3 calendar days | Beyond this, exclude the event | | Dateline threshold | 0.0 | Include all trading days (set ~0.2 for international samples) | | Thin-trading adjustment | ON | Disable only for extremely liquid markets | | Log returns | Convert via `ln(1+R)` | Unless input is already in logs | | Min event-window obs | 1 | Per eventstudy2 default | | Kolari-Pynnonen ADJ | Computed | Skip only if N > 500 firms (O(N^2) cost) |
---
## Reference Files
Read these for detailed formulas and implementation guidance:
| File | Contents | When to Read | |------|----------|--------------| | `references/estimation_models.md` | RAW, COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR model specs | When choosing or implementing a benchmark mo
Technische Details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Lizenz
- MIT
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 24. Aug. 2026
- Veröffentlicht
- 24. Aug. 2026
Entscheidungsübersicht
Fallback-Kandidat
recent repository activity
Audit
Installationsprüfung
Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung
- Sicherheit
- 76/100
- Wartung
- 100/100
- Installieren
- 92/100
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.
- Erfolgsrate
- —
- Letzter Fehler
- —
- Ergebnisse
- 0
- Ausgabequalität
- —
- Fehlgeschlagen
- 0
- Nicht relevant
- 0
- Installationen
- 0
- Durch Risiko blockiert
- 0
- Einrichtung erforderlich
- 0
- Produktion
- 0
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.
Installieren
Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen
Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.
Wachstums-Loop
Share-Kit
Szenariobasierter Entwurf für event-study-cars, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.
A practical pick for a repeatable workflow: event-study-cars: >- 47 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for event-study-cars: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x Install: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Quelle des Eintrags
Registry-indexiert
Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.
- Ersteller
- kennethkhoocy
- Indexiert von
- OpenAgentSkill Community-Index
Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.
Diesen Skill beanspruchenEigentümeranspruch
Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen
Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird kennethkhoocy zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.
Creator-Backlink-Kit
Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen
Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)Autor
kennethkhoocy
@kennethkhoocy
Tags
Plattform-Fit
Gesundheitssignale
- GitHub-Stars
- 47
- Qualitätswert
- 35/100
- Letzter GitHub-Push
- 24. Aug. 2026
- Framework-Hinweise
- Unbekannt
- OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
- 3
- Installationskopien
- 0
- Externe Klicks
- 0
Community-Signal
Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.
Vertrauen & Sicherheit
Do not auto-install
- GitHub-Akzeptanz47 GitHub-StarsPrüfen
- Star-/Fork-Aktivität47 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarPrüfen
- Aktuelle WartungHeute gepushtBestanden
- LizenzklarheitMITBestanden
- README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitÖffentliche Metadaten benötigen mehr README/SKILL.md-KontextPrüfen
- Abhängigkeits-/LaufzeitrisikoBefehlsausführungsflächeInfo
Ähnliche Skills
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
37.0K StarsMoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
88.5K StarsCua
Open-source infrastructure for Computer-Use Agents. Sandboxes, SDKs, and benchmarks to train and evaluate AI agents that can control full desktops (macOS, Linux, Windows).
21.4K Stars