event-study-cars

Prüfen · 57
Im Registry indexiert

>-

Verified installs0
Stars47
Version1.0.0
Qualität64/100 · Vielversprechend
Vertrauen57/100 · Do not auto-install
Audit75/100 · Prüfung nötig

Asset-Profil

Recherche und Wissensarbeit

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Bereich ansehen

Szenario

Recherche-Agents

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Agent-Fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.

Installieren

Bereit

npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Wartung

Aktuell

Heute gepusht

Risiko

Prüfung nötig

Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

GitHub-Qualität

47

64/100 Qualität · 65/100 Vertrauen

Abdeckungs-Tags

RechercheRecherche-Agentsautomationagent-skill

Review-Notizen

Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.

Agent-Adoptionskarte

Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick

Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.

Qualität

Vielversprechend
64

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Vertrauen

Do not auto-install
57

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Audit

Prüfung nötig
75

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

47 GitHub-Stars

Repository-Aktivität

47 Stars und 0 Forks

Wartung

Heute gepusht

Lizenz

MIT

Installieren

npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Installationssicherheit

Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad

Berechtigungsfläche

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Agent-Ergebnisse

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten

Dokumentation

Thin public metadata

Risikoübersicht

Vor Produktion prüfen

  • SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review

Installationsbereitschaft

Installationspfad verfügbar

  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Lizenz ist angegeben
  • Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege

Agent-lesbare Metadaten

Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.

Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.

JSON öffnen

Geeignete Aufgaben

  • Finanz- und Quant-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Retrieve market data

Geeignete Agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Installationsentscheidung

Befehl
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Richtlinie
Prüfen
Menschliche Prüfung
Ja

Vertrauen und Risiko

Vertrauen
57/100
Audit
75/100
Risikoebene
Prüfung nötig

Ergebnis-Loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event-ID
resolve
Ergebnisse
5

Installationsbefehl

npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Nicht verwenden, wenn

  • Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
  • Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung

Agent-Sicherheit v2

47/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden

ExperimentellPrüfen

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Per API auflösen

Hoch

Shell- oder Befehlsausführung

Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.

Mittel

Netzwerkzugriff

Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.

Mittel

Dateisystemzugriff

Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.

  • Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

Installationsziele

Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars

Agent-Auflösungsplan

Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.

Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.

Textplan öffnen

Agent sollte prüfen

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Prompt kopieren

Task: Use event-study-cars in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
Install command: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent-Übergabe

Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

Installations-API öffnen

Agent-Prompt

Use event-study-cars for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install, then install with: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Registry-Metadaten

Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.

Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.

Manifest öffnen

Agent-Fit

64/100

Finanz und Quant

Plattformen

Claude Code

Audit-Bericht

Prüfung nötig · 75/100

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

Audit-Bericht ansehenEval-Bericht ansehen

Agent-Entscheidungspanel

Fallback candidate for Finance and quant

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

64
Bereitschaft
Prototyp
Phase

Rolle im Stack

Fallback-Kandidat

Primäre Eignung

Finanz und Quant

Vertrauenslabel

Zuerst prototypisieren

Installationspfad

Befehl bereit

Verwenden wenn

  • Finanz- und Quant-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidenz

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • Qualitätsprofil 64/100
  • 3 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen

zuerst prüfen

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.

Implementierungspfad

  1. 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Finanz und Quant-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Vertrauensprofil

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

57
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub-Akzeptanz

Prüfen

47 GitHub-Stars

Star-/Fork-Aktivität

Prüfen

47 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar

Aktuelle Wartung

Bestanden

Heute gepusht

Lizenzklarheit

Bestanden

MIT

Positive Signale

  • KI-Prüfung genehmigt
  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
  • Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
  • Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf

Vor Installation prüfen

  • SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • README/SKILL.md completeness: Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
  • Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
  • Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich

Empfohlene Aktion

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Qualitätsprofil

Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

64
GitHub-Stars
47
Aktualität
Heute
Installationsbereit
Ja
Lizenz
MIT
Vor Installation prüfen: Low GitHub adoption signal · SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.

Workflow-Eignung

Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen

Workflow-Eignung

Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen

Alternativen-Shortlist

Vor Installation vergleichen

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Alle vergleichen

Übersicht

--- name: event-study-cars description: >- Complete methodology for computing publication-quality cumulative abnormal returns with proper event-study test statistics, matching the robustness of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 for Stata. Covers dateline construction, event-date mapping, estimation and event windows, thin-trading adjustment, OLS with Theil prediction error correction, abnormal return computation, CAR/CAAR/AAR accumulation, boundary contamination guards, and common tests such as Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen, generalized sign, Wilcoxon, and GRANK-T. Use when the user mentions abnormal returns, event windows, market-model regressions, CARs, CAAR, AAR, eventstudy2, thin trading, trade-to-trade returns, or event-study test statistics. ---

# Event Study: Cumulative Abnormal Returns (CARs)

A complete methodology reference for computing publication-quality CARs with robust test statistics, matching the rigor of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 (v3.2b) for Stata. This skill is **generic** — applicable to any market, asset class, or event type.

## Use the shipped engine first (do not rewrite it)

`scripts/eventstudy.py` is a complete, runnable Python replication of eventstudy2, validated against the Stata package to floating-point precision (AR ~1e-8, CAR ~6e-8, CAAR and the implemented test statistics ~1e-7) on a generic CRSP sample across all four models (FM, COMEAN, MA, RAW). It is generic — all column names, the model, windows, thin-trading, and log handling are CLI flags. When a user wants CARs computed, **run this engine**; do not author a new pipeline.

```bash python scripts/eventstudy.py --selftest # synthetic self-check, no inputs python scripts/eventstudy.py \ --returns returns.csv --market market.csv --events events.csv \ --id-col permno --ret-col ret --event-date-col event_date --mkt-col vwretd \ --model FM --car-windows "-1,1;-5,5;-10,10" \ --eswlb -250 --eswub -30 --evwlb -10 --evwub 10 --out-dir out/ ```

Inputs are CSV/Parquet: returns (`id, date, ret`), market/factors (`date, mkt[, factors]`), events (`id, event_date`). Outputs: `ar_panel.csv`, `car_panel.csv`, `test_statistics.csv`. Requires numpy/pandas/scipy. Run `--help` for all flags (`--factor-cols smb,hml`, `--model MA`, `--no-thin-trading`, ...). The sections below document the methodology the engine implements; read them to audit, extend, or port it.

## Methodology Overview: The 8-Step Pipeline

### Step 1: Build Trading Calendar (Dateline)

Construct a master list of valid trading dates from the security returns file.

1. Collect all unique dates on which at least one security has a non-missing return (or, if using a factor model, dates where market/factor returns exist). 2. Count the number of securities with valid returns on each date. 3. Optionally drop weekends (`delweekend`). 4. Apply `dateline_threshold`: drop dates where the count of return observations falls below `threshold × mean(daily_count)`. A threshold of 0.2 works well for international samples with heterogeneous holidays. 5. The resulting date vector is the **dateline** — all downstream windows are defined in dateline time (relative trading days), not calendar time.

### Step 2: Map Event Dates to Nearest Valid Trading Day

For each event: 1. Find the nearest dateline date **on or after** the event date. 2. If the shift exceeds `max_shift` calendar days (default: 3), **exclude** the event entirely — do not silently map it to a distant trading day. 3. Events with missing dates, or dates outside the dateline range, are also excluded and logged with the reason.

### Step 3: Construct Estimation and Event Windows

For each firm-event pair, define windows in **relative trading time** (offsets from the event day on the dateline):

- **Estimation window**: `[esw_lb, esw_ub]` — default `[-250, -30]`. - **Event window**: `[evw_lb, evw_ub]` — determined by the widest CAR window requested. - Enforce a **gap** between the estimation and event windows to prevent event contamination of the benchmark model.

**Exclusion checks** (per firm-event): - Insufficient estimation-window observations (fewer than `min_esw_obs`, default 120). - Insufficient event-window observations. - **IPO/delisting guard**: if the stock's first observed return date falls after `evw_lb` or last observed return date falls before `evw_ub`, exclude the firm-event. These are survivorship-biased observations.

### Step 4: Apply Thin-Trading Adjustment

For markets with non-trivially thin trading (most markets outside US mega-caps), apply the Maynes-Rumsey (1993) trade-to-trade transformation **by default**.

> Read `references/thin_trading.md` for the complete transformation, including > the `cum_periods` construction, the regression specification with `nocons`, > and the boundary contamination guard.

**Summary**: Non-trading days accumulate into the next trading day's return. All variables (returns, factors, intercept) are divided by `sqrt(cum_periods)`. OLS is run with `nocons` because the intercept regressor `1/sqrt(d)` replaces the standard constant. This is a GLS correction for the heteroscedasticity introduced by multi-period returns.

### Step 5: Run OLS and Compute STDF

For each firm-event pair, estimate the benchmark model over the estimation window and compute the **standard deviation of forecast** (STDF) for every observation (estimation + event window).

> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for model specifications (RAW, > COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR).

**STDF** (Theil 1971 prediction error correction):

For each observation t, the forecast standard deviation is:

STDF_it = sigma_hat_i * sqrt(1 + x'_t (X'X)^{-1} x_t)

where `x_t` is the regressor vector at time t, `X` is the estimation-window design matrix, and `sigma_hat_i = sqrt(SSR / (T_i - 2 - df))` is the OLS residual standard deviation. `df` is the number of additional factors beyond the market (0 for market model, 2 for FF3, etc.).

The STDF accounts for both the inherent noise in returns (sigma) and the estimation uncertainty in the model coefficients (which grows when event-window factor values are far from estimation-window means).

**Python**: after `numpy.linalg.lstsq`, compute the hat matrix `H = X @ inv(X'X) @ X'` and `h_t = x'_t @ inv(X'X) @ x_t` for each event-window observation. Then `STDF_t = sigma_hat * sqrt(1 + h_t)`.

### Step 6: Compute Abnormal Returns

AR_it = R_it - predicted_it

where `predicted_it` comes from the estimated benchmark model applied to event-window factor values.

**Critical rule**: do NOT zero-fill missing event-window returns. A missing return means the stock did not trade — setting it to zero biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. Leave it as NaN and let the accumulation step handle the count of valid ARs.

### Step 7: Accumulate CARs

For each requested CAR window `[lb, ub]` and each firm-event:

CAR_i = sum of AR_it for t in [lb, ub] where AR_it is not NaN

**Boundary contamination guard** (from eventstudy2): - If the **first** day of the CAR window has `cum_periods > 1`, the return on that day spans back before the window start. Set CAR = NaN. - If the **last** day of the CAR window has a missing AR, the firm-event lacks coverage at the window boundary. Set CAR = NaN. - For AAR (day-by-day) output: any day with `cum_periods > 1` has its AR set to NaN (the multi-period return cannot be attributed to a single day).

Track `n_valid_ar` per CAR: the count of non-NaN ARs in the window. A valid CAR should have `n_valid_ar == window_length`. CARs with fewer valid days should be flagged or excluded depending on the analysis.

### Step 8: Compute Test Statistics

Compute at minimum: **Patell (1976)**, **BMP (Boehmer et al. 1991)**, **Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP**, and the **generalized sign test (Cowan 1992)**. For maximum rigor, compute all 13 tests.

> Read `references/test_statistics.md` for exact formulas, null hypotheses, > distributions, and Python implementation notes for all 13 tests.

> Read `references/kolari_pynnonen.md` for the cross-correlation adjustment > procedure (ADJ factor) and the GRANK-T test.

Test statistics are reported at two levels: - **AAR level**: one test statistic per event day (tests whether the average AR across firms is significantly different from zero on that day). - **CAAR level**: one test statistic per CAR window (tests whether the cumulative average AR is significantly different from zero over the window).

---

## Model Selection

> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for full mathematical specifications.

| Model | When to Use | |-------|-------------| | **RAW** | Baseline/diagnostic only. No benchmark subtracted. | | **COMEAN** | Simplest parametric benchmark (constant mean return). | | **MA** (market-adjusted) | When factor data is unavailable. Subtracts market return directly. | | **FM** (factor model) | Standard choice for short-window event studies. Market model (1 factor) or FF3/FF5/Carhart (multi-factor). | | **BHAR** | Long-horizon event studies (months/years). Requires skewness-adjusted bootstrap (Lyon et al. 1999). |

Default: **FM with market model** (1 factor) for short-window studies.

---

## Critical Rules

1. **NEVER** replace missing event-window returns with zero. This biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. The only exception is BHAR models, which assume continuous holding.

2. **NEVER** compute CARs when the stock's first/last trading date falls inside the event window (IPO/delisting bias).

3. **NEVER** sum CARs when a boundary day has `cum_periods > 1` — the return spans outside the intended window.

4. **NEVER** run OLS with a standard constant when using the trade-to-trade transformation. Use `nocons` with `1/sqrt(cum_periods)` as the intercept regressor.

5. **NEVER** report CARs without at least one parametric and one non-parametric test statistic.

6. **NEVER** mix log and simple returns between the LHS and RHS of the market model. If stock returns are in logs, factor returns must also be in logs (or convert both via `ln(1+R)` before estimation). Jensen's inequality creates bias otherwise.

---

## Output Contract

A valid CAR output dataset must contain:

**Identifiers** (column names vary by project): - `firm_id`, `event_id`, `event_date`

**Estimation diagnostics** (per firm-event, per model): - `alpha`, `beta` (per factor), `nobs`, `r2`, `sigma_hat`

**Per CAR window per model**: - `car_value` — NaN if invalid - `n_valid_ar` — count of non-NaN ARs in the window

**Exclusion reason** (per firm-event): - `insufficient_est_obs`, `insufficient_evt_obs`, `ipo_in_window`, `delisting_in_window`, `event_off_dateline`, `boundary_contamination`

**Test statistics** (separate output): - AAR-level and CAAR-level tests, each with test statistic value and p-value - Minimum: Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP, generalized sign test

---

## Sensible Defaults

These can be overridden by the user:

| Parameter | Default | Notes | |-----------|---------|-------| | Estimation window | `[-250, -30]` | ~1 year of trading days | | Min estimation obs | 120 | Conservative; eventstudy2 defaults to 30 | | Event window | Widest CAR window | Determined by user's CAR windows | | Max event-date shift | 3 calendar days | Beyond this, exclude the event | | Dateline threshold | 0.0 | Include all trading days (set ~0.2 for international samples) | | Thin-trading adjustment | ON | Disable only for extremely liquid markets | | Log returns | Convert via `ln(1+R)` | Unless input is already in logs | | Min event-window obs | 1 | Per eventstudy2 default | | Kolari-Pynnonen ADJ | Computed | Skip only if N > 500 firms (O(N^2) cost) |

---

## Reference Files

Read these for detailed formulas and implementation guidance:

| File | Contents | When to Read | |------|----------|--------------| | `references/estimation_models.md` | RAW, COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR model specs | When choosing or implementing a benchmark mo

Technische Details

Version
1.0.0
Lizenz
MIT
Letzte Aktualisierung
24. Aug. 2026
Veröffentlicht
24. Aug. 2026

Entscheidungsübersicht

Fallback-Kandidat

64
Bereit
Prototyp
Phase

recent repository activity

Audit

Installationsprüfung

Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung

75
Prüfung nötig
Sicherheit
76/100
Wartung
100/100
Installieren
92/100
Vollständiges Audit öffnenEval-Bericht ansehen

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.

0
Belegt
Needs first agent runAuto-Installation: zuerst prüfenLetzter: Unbekannt
Erfolgsrate
Letzter Fehler
Ergebnisse
0
Ausgabequalität
Fehlgeschlagen
0
Nicht relevant
0
Installationen
0
Durch Risiko blockiert
0
Einrichtung erforderlich
0
Produktion
0

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.

Installieren

Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen

Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.

Wachstums-Loop

Share-Kit

X

Szenariobasierter Entwurf für event-study-cars, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.

Kuratorenhinweis
A practical pick for a repeatable workflow:

event-study-cars: >-

47 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x
X-Entwurf öffnen
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for event-study-cars:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x

Install: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Antwortentwurf öffnen

Quelle des Eintrags

Registry-indexiert

Beanspruchbar

Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.

Ersteller
kennethkhoocy
Indexiert von
OpenAgentSkill Community-Index

Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.

Diesen Skill beanspruchen

Eigentümeranspruch

Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen

Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird kennethkhoocy zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.

Creator-Backlink-Kit

Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen

Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)

Autor

K

kennethkhoocy

@kennethkhoocy

Plattform-Fit

Gesundheitssignale

GitHub-Stars
47
Qualitätswert
35/100
Letzter GitHub-Push
24. Aug. 2026
Framework-Hinweise
Unbekannt
OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
3
Installationskopien
0
Externe Klicks
0

Community-Signal

Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.

Vertrauen & Sicherheit

Do not auto-install

57
  • GitHub-Akzeptanz47 GitHub-StarsPrüfen
  • Star-/Fork-Aktivität47 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarPrüfen
  • Aktuelle WartungHeute gepushtBestanden
  • LizenzklarheitMITBestanden
  • README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitÖffentliche Metadaten benötigen mehr README/SKILL.md-KontextPrüfen
  • Abhängigkeits-/LaufzeitrisikoBefehlsausführungsflächeInfo