event-study-cars

REVIEW · 57
Registry indexed

>-

Verified installs0
Stars47
Version1.0.0
Quality64/100 · Promising
Trust57/100 · Do not auto-install
Audit75/100 · Needs review

Supply asset profile

Research and knowledge work

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Browse track

Scenario

Research agents

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Agent fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.

Install

Ready

npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Maintenance

fresh

Pushed today

Risk

Needs review

Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

GitHub quality

47

64/100 Quality · 65/100 Trust

Coverage tags

ResearchResearch agentsautomationagent-skill

Review notes

Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.

Agent adoption scorecard

Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance

These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.

Quality

Promising
64

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Trust

Do not auto-install
57

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Audit

Needs review
75

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Human review before install

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

47 GitHub stars

Repo activity

47 stars, 0 forks

Maintenance

Pushed today

License

MIT

Install

npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Install safety

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Agent outcomes

No agent outcome data yet

Docs

Thin public metadata

Risk summary

Review before production

  • SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review

Install readiness

Install path available

  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • License is declared
  • No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet

Agent-readable metadata

Machine-readable decision data for this skill.

Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.

Open JSON

Suited tasks

  • Finance and quant workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Retrieve market data

Suited agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Install decision

Command
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Policy
review
Human review
yes

Trust and risk

Trust
57/100
Audit
75/100
Risk level
Needs review

Outcome loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event ID
resolve
Outcomes
5

Install command

npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Do not use when

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution

Agent safety v2

47/100 · Avoid automatic install

Experimentalreview

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Resolve via API

high

Shell or command execution

Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.

medium

Network access

Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.

medium

Filesystem access

Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.

  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

Install targets

Install this skill in your agent workflow

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars

Agent resolve plan

Let an agent verify fit before installing.

The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.

Open text plan

Agent should check

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copy prompt

Task: Use event-study-cars in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20event-study-cars%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install
Install command: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent handoff

Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

Open install API

Agent prompt

Use event-study-cars for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/install, then install with: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Registry metadata

Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.

This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.

Open manifest

Agent fit

64/100

Finance and quant

Platforms

Claude Code

Audit report

Needs review · 75/100

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

View audit reportView eval report

Agent decision cockpit

Fallback candidate for Finance and quant

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

64
Readiness
Prototype
Stage

Role in stack

Fallback candidate

Primary fit

Finance and quant

Trust label

Prototype first

Install path

Command ready

Use when

  • Finance and quant workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidence

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • 64/100 quality profile
  • 3 OpenAgentSkill engagement events

review first

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.

Implementation path

  1. 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Finance and quant task end to end.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Trust profile

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

57
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub adoption

CHECK

47 GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

CHECK

47 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

Pushed today

License clarity

PASS

MIT

Good signals

  • AI review approved
  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • Recently maintained repository
  • Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
  • Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run

Review before install

  • SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • README/SKILL.md completeness: Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
  • No real agent outcome reports yet
  • Human review required before unattended installation

Recommended action

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Quality profile

Promising candidate for agent workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

64
GitHub stars
47
Freshness
Today
Install ready
Yes
License
MIT
Review before install: Low GitHub adoption signal · SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided documentation, but the full file appears comprehensive based on the excerpt and accompanying files.

Workflow fit

Use this skill in these scenarios

Workflow fit

Add it to a complete workflow

Alternative shortlist

Compare before you install

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Compare all

Overview

--- name: event-study-cars description: >- Complete methodology for computing publication-quality cumulative abnormal returns with proper event-study test statistics, matching the robustness of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 for Stata. Covers dateline construction, event-date mapping, estimation and event windows, thin-trading adjustment, OLS with Theil prediction error correction, abnormal return computation, CAR/CAAR/AAR accumulation, boundary contamination guards, and common tests such as Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen, generalized sign, Wilcoxon, and GRANK-T. Use when the user mentions abnormal returns, event windows, market-model regressions, CARs, CAAR, AAR, eventstudy2, thin trading, trade-to-trade returns, or event-study test statistics. ---

# Event Study: Cumulative Abnormal Returns (CARs)

A complete methodology reference for computing publication-quality CARs with robust test statistics, matching the rigor of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 (v3.2b) for Stata. This skill is **generic** — applicable to any market, asset class, or event type.

## Use the shipped engine first (do not rewrite it)

`scripts/eventstudy.py` is a complete, runnable Python replication of eventstudy2, validated against the Stata package to floating-point precision (AR ~1e-8, CAR ~6e-8, CAAR and the implemented test statistics ~1e-7) on a generic CRSP sample across all four models (FM, COMEAN, MA, RAW). It is generic — all column names, the model, windows, thin-trading, and log handling are CLI flags. When a user wants CARs computed, **run this engine**; do not author a new pipeline.

```bash python scripts/eventstudy.py --selftest # synthetic self-check, no inputs python scripts/eventstudy.py \ --returns returns.csv --market market.csv --events events.csv \ --id-col permno --ret-col ret --event-date-col event_date --mkt-col vwretd \ --model FM --car-windows "-1,1;-5,5;-10,10" \ --eswlb -250 --eswub -30 --evwlb -10 --evwub 10 --out-dir out/ ```

Inputs are CSV/Parquet: returns (`id, date, ret`), market/factors (`date, mkt[, factors]`), events (`id, event_date`). Outputs: `ar_panel.csv`, `car_panel.csv`, `test_statistics.csv`. Requires numpy/pandas/scipy. Run `--help` for all flags (`--factor-cols smb,hml`, `--model MA`, `--no-thin-trading`, ...). The sections below document the methodology the engine implements; read them to audit, extend, or port it.

## Methodology Overview: The 8-Step Pipeline

### Step 1: Build Trading Calendar (Dateline)

Construct a master list of valid trading dates from the security returns file.

1. Collect all unique dates on which at least one security has a non-missing return (or, if using a factor model, dates where market/factor returns exist). 2. Count the number of securities with valid returns on each date. 3. Optionally drop weekends (`delweekend`). 4. Apply `dateline_threshold`: drop dates where the count of return observations falls below `threshold × mean(daily_count)`. A threshold of 0.2 works well for international samples with heterogeneous holidays. 5. The resulting date vector is the **dateline** — all downstream windows are defined in dateline time (relative trading days), not calendar time.

### Step 2: Map Event Dates to Nearest Valid Trading Day

For each event: 1. Find the nearest dateline date **on or after** the event date. 2. If the shift exceeds `max_shift` calendar days (default: 3), **exclude** the event entirely — do not silently map it to a distant trading day. 3. Events with missing dates, or dates outside the dateline range, are also excluded and logged with the reason.

### Step 3: Construct Estimation and Event Windows

For each firm-event pair, define windows in **relative trading time** (offsets from the event day on the dateline):

- **Estimation window**: `[esw_lb, esw_ub]` — default `[-250, -30]`. - **Event window**: `[evw_lb, evw_ub]` — determined by the widest CAR window requested. - Enforce a **gap** between the estimation and event windows to prevent event contamination of the benchmark model.

**Exclusion checks** (per firm-event): - Insufficient estimation-window observations (fewer than `min_esw_obs`, default 120). - Insufficient event-window observations. - **IPO/delisting guard**: if the stock's first observed return date falls after `evw_lb` or last observed return date falls before `evw_ub`, exclude the firm-event. These are survivorship-biased observations.

### Step 4: Apply Thin-Trading Adjustment

For markets with non-trivially thin trading (most markets outside US mega-caps), apply the Maynes-Rumsey (1993) trade-to-trade transformation **by default**.

> Read `references/thin_trading.md` for the complete transformation, including > the `cum_periods` construction, the regression specification with `nocons`, > and the boundary contamination guard.

**Summary**: Non-trading days accumulate into the next trading day's return. All variables (returns, factors, intercept) are divided by `sqrt(cum_periods)`. OLS is run with `nocons` because the intercept regressor `1/sqrt(d)` replaces the standard constant. This is a GLS correction for the heteroscedasticity introduced by multi-period returns.

### Step 5: Run OLS and Compute STDF

For each firm-event pair, estimate the benchmark model over the estimation window and compute the **standard deviation of forecast** (STDF) for every observation (estimation + event window).

> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for model specifications (RAW, > COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR).

**STDF** (Theil 1971 prediction error correction):

For each observation t, the forecast standard deviation is:

STDF_it = sigma_hat_i * sqrt(1 + x'_t (X'X)^{-1} x_t)

where `x_t` is the regressor vector at time t, `X` is the estimation-window design matrix, and `sigma_hat_i = sqrt(SSR / (T_i - 2 - df))` is the OLS residual standard deviation. `df` is the number of additional factors beyond the market (0 for market model, 2 for FF3, etc.).

The STDF accounts for both the inherent noise in returns (sigma) and the estimation uncertainty in the model coefficients (which grows when event-window factor values are far from estimation-window means).

**Python**: after `numpy.linalg.lstsq`, compute the hat matrix `H = X @ inv(X'X) @ X'` and `h_t = x'_t @ inv(X'X) @ x_t` for each event-window observation. Then `STDF_t = sigma_hat * sqrt(1 + h_t)`.

### Step 6: Compute Abnormal Returns

AR_it = R_it - predicted_it

where `predicted_it` comes from the estimated benchmark model applied to event-window factor values.

**Critical rule**: do NOT zero-fill missing event-window returns. A missing return means the stock did not trade — setting it to zero biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. Leave it as NaN and let the accumulation step handle the count of valid ARs.

### Step 7: Accumulate CARs

For each requested CAR window `[lb, ub]` and each firm-event:

CAR_i = sum of AR_it for t in [lb, ub] where AR_it is not NaN

**Boundary contamination guard** (from eventstudy2): - If the **first** day of the CAR window has `cum_periods > 1`, the return on that day spans back before the window start. Set CAR = NaN. - If the **last** day of the CAR window has a missing AR, the firm-event lacks coverage at the window boundary. Set CAR = NaN. - For AAR (day-by-day) output: any day with `cum_periods > 1` has its AR set to NaN (the multi-period return cannot be attributed to a single day).

Track `n_valid_ar` per CAR: the count of non-NaN ARs in the window. A valid CAR should have `n_valid_ar == window_length`. CARs with fewer valid days should be flagged or excluded depending on the analysis.

### Step 8: Compute Test Statistics

Compute at minimum: **Patell (1976)**, **BMP (Boehmer et al. 1991)**, **Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP**, and the **generalized sign test (Cowan 1992)**. For maximum rigor, compute all 13 tests.

> Read `references/test_statistics.md` for exact formulas, null hypotheses, > distributions, and Python implementation notes for all 13 tests.

> Read `references/kolari_pynnonen.md` for the cross-correlation adjustment > procedure (ADJ factor) and the GRANK-T test.

Test statistics are reported at two levels: - **AAR level**: one test statistic per event day (tests whether the average AR across firms is significantly different from zero on that day). - **CAAR level**: one test statistic per CAR window (tests whether the cumulative average AR is significantly different from zero over the window).

---

## Model Selection

> Read `references/estimation_models.md` for full mathematical specifications.

| Model | When to Use | |-------|-------------| | **RAW** | Baseline/diagnostic only. No benchmark subtracted. | | **COMEAN** | Simplest parametric benchmark (constant mean return). | | **MA** (market-adjusted) | When factor data is unavailable. Subtracts market return directly. | | **FM** (factor model) | Standard choice for short-window event studies. Market model (1 factor) or FF3/FF5/Carhart (multi-factor). | | **BHAR** | Long-horizon event studies (months/years). Requires skewness-adjusted bootstrap (Lyon et al. 1999). |

Default: **FM with market model** (1 factor) for short-window studies.

---

## Critical Rules

1. **NEVER** replace missing event-window returns with zero. This biases CARs toward zero for illiquid stocks. The only exception is BHAR models, which assume continuous holding.

2. **NEVER** compute CARs when the stock's first/last trading date falls inside the event window (IPO/delisting bias).

3. **NEVER** sum CARs when a boundary day has `cum_periods > 1` — the return spans outside the intended window.

4. **NEVER** run OLS with a standard constant when using the trade-to-trade transformation. Use `nocons` with `1/sqrt(cum_periods)` as the intercept regressor.

5. **NEVER** report CARs without at least one parametric and one non-parametric test statistic.

6. **NEVER** mix log and simple returns between the LHS and RHS of the market model. If stock returns are in logs, factor returns must also be in logs (or convert both via `ln(1+R)` before estimation). Jensen's inequality creates bias otherwise.

---

## Output Contract

A valid CAR output dataset must contain:

**Identifiers** (column names vary by project): - `firm_id`, `event_id`, `event_date`

**Estimation diagnostics** (per firm-event, per model): - `alpha`, `beta` (per factor), `nobs`, `r2`, `sigma_hat`

**Per CAR window per model**: - `car_value` — NaN if invalid - `n_valid_ar` — count of non-NaN ARs in the window

**Exclusion reason** (per firm-event): - `insufficient_est_obs`, `insufficient_evt_obs`, `ipo_in_window`, `delisting_in_window`, `event_off_dateline`, `boundary_contamination`

**Test statistics** (separate output): - AAR-level and CAAR-level tests, each with test statistic value and p-value - Minimum: Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen adjusted BMP, generalized sign test

---

## Sensible Defaults

These can be overridden by the user:

| Parameter | Default | Notes | |-----------|---------|-------| | Estimation window | `[-250, -30]` | ~1 year of trading days | | Min estimation obs | 120 | Conservative; eventstudy2 defaults to 30 | | Event window | Widest CAR window | Determined by user's CAR windows | | Max event-date shift | 3 calendar days | Beyond this, exclude the event | | Dateline threshold | 0.0 | Include all trading days (set ~0.2 for international samples) | | Thin-trading adjustment | ON | Disable only for extremely liquid markets | | Log returns | Convert via `ln(1+R)` | Unless input is already in logs | | Min event-window obs | 1 | Per eventstudy2 default | | Kolari-Pynnonen ADJ | Computed | Skip only if N > 500 firms (O(N^2) cost) |

---

## Reference Files

Read these for detailed formulas and implementation guidance:

| File | Contents | When to Read | |------|----------|--------------| | `references/estimation_models.md` | RAW, COMEAN, MA, FM, BHAR model specs | When choosing or implementing a benchmark mo

Technical details

Version
1.0.0
License
MIT
Last updated
Aug 24, 2026
Published
Aug 24, 2026

Decision snapshot

Fallback candidate

64
Ready
Prototype
Stage

recent repository activity

Audit

Install review

Install and adoption review

75
Needs review
Security
76/100
Maintenance
100/100
Install
92/100
Open full auditView eval report

Agent-proven evidence

Agent-proven evidence

Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.

0
Proven
Needs first agent runAuto-install: review firstLast: Unknown
Success rate
Recent failure
Outcomes
0
Output quality
Failed
0
Not relevant
0
Installs
0
Risk blocked
0
Setup needed
0
Production
0

No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.

Install

Add to agent workflow

Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.

Growth loop

Share kit

X

Scenario-led draft for event-study-cars, ready for a manual X post.

Curator note
A practical pick for a repeatable workflow:

event-study-cars: >-

47 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x
Open X draft
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for event-study-cars:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?ref=x

Install: npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill event-study-cars

Listing source

Registry indexed

Claimable

This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.

Indexed by
OpenAgentSkill community index

Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.

Claim this skill

Owner claim

Claim this skill listing

This Registry indexed listing is attributed to kennethkhoocy but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.

Creator backlink kit

Add the evidence badges to your README

Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/kennethkhoocy-event-study-cars)

Author

K

kennethkhoocy

@kennethkhoocy

Platform fit

Health signals

GitHub stars
47
Quality score
35/100
Last GitHub push
Aug 24, 2026
Framework hints
Unknown
OpenAgentSkill views
3
Install copies
0
Outbound clicks
0

Community signal

Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.

Trust & safety

Do not auto-install

57
  • GitHub adoption47 GitHub starsCHECK
  • Stars/forks activity47 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataCHECK
  • Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
  • License clarityMITPASS
  • README/SKILL.md completenessPublic metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md contextCHECK
  • Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surfaceINFO