setup-architecture-as-code
Establish architecture-as-code practice using C4 modeling and Structurizr DSL. Use after bootstrap-project, when establishing architecture documentation, or when migrating from diagram-based to code-based architecture.
Asset-Profil
Coding- und Entwickler-Agents
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Szenario
Coding-Agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent-Fit
Claude Code + Browser agents + CLI
Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.
Installieren
Bereit
npx skills add jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills --skill setup-architecture-as-code
Wartung
Aktuell
1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Risiko
Prüfung nötig
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub-Qualität
14
58/100 Qualität · 65/100 Vertrauen
Abdeckungs-Tags
Review-Notizen
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent-Adoptionskarte
Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick
Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.
Qualität
VielversprechendUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Vertrauen
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Prüfung nötigMaschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
14 GitHub-Stars
Repository-Aktivität
14 Stars und 0 Forks
Wartung
1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenz
MIT
Installieren
npx skills add jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills --skill setup-architecture-as-code
Installationssicherheit
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsfläche
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent-Ergebnisse
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten
Dokumentation
Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext
Risikoübersicht
Vor Produktion prüfen
- The skill uses a symlink command that is Unix-specific; Windows users may need an alternative approach.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Installationsbereitschaft
Installationspfad verfügbar
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Lizenz ist angegeben
- Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege
Agent-lesbare Metadaten
Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.
Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.
Geeignete Aufgaben
- Coding-Agents-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Inspect source files
Geeignete Agents
Installationsentscheidung
- Befehl
- npx skills add jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills --skill setup-architecture-as-code
- Richtlinie
- Blockieren
- Menschliche Prüfung
- Ja
Vertrauen und Risiko
- Vertrauen
- 57/100
- Audit
- 72/100
- Risikoebene
- Prüfung nötig
Ergebnis-Loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event-ID
- resolve
- Ergebnisse
- 5
Installationsbefehl
npx skills add jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills --skill setup-architecture-as-codeNicht verwenden, wenn
- Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The skill uses a symlink command that is Unix-specific; Windows users may need an alternative approach.
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
Alternative
Code Review
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Alternative
Grill With Docs
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
Alternative
To Spec
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
Alternative
To Tickets
176.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets
Agent-Sicherheit v2
28/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
Hoch
Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.
Mittel
Netzwerkzugriff
Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.
Mittel
Dateisystemzugriff
Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.
Hoch
Secrets or environment access
Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Installationsziele
Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-codeAgent-Auflösungsplan
Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.
Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.
JSON öffnen
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20setup-architecture-as-code%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve-Text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20setup-architecture-as-code%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code/install
Agent sollte prüfen
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Prompt kopieren
Task: Use setup-architecture-as-code in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20setup-architecture-as-code%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code/install
Install command: npx skills add jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills --skill setup-architecture-as-code
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent-Übergabe
Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code/install
LLM-Textformat
/api/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code/install?format=text
Alternativen finden
/api/skills/search?q=setup-architecture-as-code&limit=3
Agent-Prompt
Use setup-architecture-as-code for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code/install, then install with: npx skills add jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills --skill setup-architecture-as-codeRegistry-Metadaten
Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.
Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code
LLM-Text
/api/registry/manifest/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code?format=text
Installationsalias
/api/registry/install/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code
Empfehlen
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20setup-architecture-as-code%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent-Fit
Coding-Agents
Use-Case-Tags
Plattformen
Claude Code, Browser agents
Audit-Bericht
Prüfung nötig · 72/100
Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
Agent-Entscheidungspanel
Fallback candidate for Coding agents
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rolle im Stack
Fallback-Kandidat
Primäre Eignung
Coding-Agents
Vertrauenslabel
Zuerst prototypisieren
Installationspfad
Befehl bereit
Verwenden wenn
- Coding-Agents-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidenz
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- Qualitätsprofil 58/100
- 11 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen
zuerst prüfen
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The skill uses a symlink command that is Unix-specific; Windows users may need an alternative approach.
Implementierungspfad
- 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Coding-Agents-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Vertrauensprofil
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub-Akzeptanz
Beheben14 GitHub-Stars
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
Beheben14 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Aktuelle Wartung
Bestanden1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenzklarheit
BestandenMIT
Positive Signale
- KI-Prüfung genehmigt
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
- Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
- Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf
Vor Installation prüfen
- The skill uses a symlink command that is Unix-specific; Windows users may need an alternative approach.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 14 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 14 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, external package install surface
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
- Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich
Empfohlene Aktion
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Qualitätsprofil
Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow-Eignung
Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Operate local tools
Local desktop
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Workflow-Eignung
Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Scrape, clean, and reuse web data
Web data pipeline
A practical workflow for agents that crawl public pages, extract clean content, normalize data, and hand it to downstream research or RAG workflows.
Alternativen-Shortlist
Vor Installation vergleichen
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
To Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
Übersicht
--- name: setup-architecture-as-code description: Establish architecture-as-code practice using C4 modeling and Structurizr DSL. Use after bootstrap-project, when establishing architecture documentation, or when migrating from diagram-based to code-based architecture. metadata: author: "Georges Martin <jrjsmrtn@gmail.com>" version: "0.1.34" license: MIT ---
# Setup Architecture-as-Code
Establish architecture-as-code practice using C4 modeling and Structurizr DSL.
## When to Use
- After running `bootstrap-project` skill - When establishing architecture documentation for a project - When migrating from diagram-based to code-based architecture documentation - When you need version-controlled, validated architecture models
## What is Architecture-as-Code?
Architecture-as-Code treats architecture documentation like source code:
| Traditional Diagrams | Architecture-as-Code | |---------------------|---------------------| | Draw in GUI tools | Define in text/DSL | | Manual updates | Automated validation | | Binary files (PNG, VSDX) | Text files (version control friendly) | | Diagrams diverge from reality | Single source of truth | | Hard to review changes | PR-reviewable changes | | No validation | Syntax + semantic validation |
**Implementation Stack**: - **Modeling Approach**: C4 Model (Context, Container, Component, Code) - **Definition Language**: Structurizr DSL - **Validation & Inspection**: structurizr/structurizr (consolidated image, replaces deprecated `structurizr/cli` and `structurizr/lite`) - **Visualization**: structurizr/structurizr `local` subcommand or Structurizr Cloud
## Required Inputs
1. **Project/System name** 2. **System description** (1-2 sentences) 3. **Key users/personas** (who interacts with the system) 4. **External systems** (what the system integrates with) 5. **Main containers** (applications, databases, services) 6. **Technology stack** (languages, frameworks, databases)
## C4 Model Overview
The C4 model provides four levels of abstraction (zoom levels):
| Level | Name | Purpose | Audience | |-------|------|---------|----------| | 1 | System Context | System in its environment | Everyone | | 2 | Container | Deployable units | Technical staff | | 3 | Component | Internal structure | Developers | | 4 | Code | Class/module level | Developers (often generated) |
**Key Principle**: Start with Level 1-2, add Level 3 only when needed. Level 4 is usually generated from code.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Create Directory Structure
```bash mkdir -p architecture/shared mkdir -p docs/architecture # Structurizr-specific docs (h2-first, numbered files) # Symlink so !adrs and !docs directives can reach docs/ from architecture/ ln -s ../docs architecture/docs ```
The symlink is required because Structurizr restricts `!adrs` and `!docs` paths to the same directory or subdirectories of the DSL file — it cannot traverse parent directories.
**Why `docs/architecture/` and not `docs/explanation/`?** Structurizr silently strips h1 headings (it auto-generates h1 from the element name). Diátaxis docs use h1 as their title, so pointing `!docs` at a Diátaxis directory would lose those titles. Keep Structurizr docs in a dedicated directory with h2-first files.
### Step 2: Create Workspace File
Create `architecture/workspace.dsl`:
```dsl workspace "[Project Name]" "[Brief description]" {
!identifiers hierarchical !adrs docs/adr !docs docs/architecture
model { # ===== USERS/ACTORS ===== user = person "User" "Primary user of the system" "User"
# Add other personas as needed: # admin = person "Administrator" "System administrator" "Admin" # developer = person "Developer" "API consumer" "Developer"
# ===== EXTERNAL SYSTEMS ===== # externalSystem = softwareSystem "External System" "Description" "External"
# ===== THE SYSTEM ===== system = softwareSystem "[System Name]" "[System description]" {
# ----- CONTAINERS -----
# Web Application (if applicable) webApp = container "Web Application" "Provides user interface" "[Framework]" "Web"
# API Service (if applicable) api = container "API Service" "Provides REST/GraphQL API" "[Framework]" "API"
# Database database = container "Database" "Stores application data" "[Database Technology]" "Database"
# Background Workers (if applicable) # worker = container "Background Worker" "Processes async tasks" "[Technology]" "Worker"
# ----- COMPONENTS (for main container) ----- # Uncomment and customize for your architecture:
# api { # authComponent = component "Authentication" "Handles user auth" "[Module]" # businessComponent = component "Business Logic" "Core domain logic" "[Module]" # dataComponent = component "Data Access" "Database operations" "[Module]" # } }
# ===== RELATIONSHIPS =====
# User interactions user -> system "Uses" user -> system.webApp "Interacts with" "HTTPS"
# Internal relationships system.webApp -> system.api "Makes API calls to" "HTTP/JSON" system.api -> system.database "Reads from and writes to" "SQL"
# External system relationships (if any) # system.api -> externalSystem "Integrates with" "HTTPS" }
views { # ===== SYSTEM CONTEXT VIEW ===== systemContext system "SystemContext" { include * autoLayout description "System Context diagram showing [System Name] and its environment" }
# ===== CONTAINER VIEW ===== container system "Containers" { include * autoLayout description "Container diagram showing the main deployable units" }
# ===== COMPONENT VIEW (optional) ===== # Uncomment when you have components defined: # component system.api "Components" { # include * # autoLayout # description "Component diagram for the API service" # }
# ===== STYLES ===== styles { element "Person" { shape Person background #08427B color #ffffff } element "Software System" { background #1168BD color #ffffff } element "External" { background #999999 color #ffffff } element "Container" { background #438DD5 color #ffffff } element "Component" { background #85BBF0 color #000000 } element "Database" { shape Cylinder } element "Web" { shape WebBrowser } element "API" { shape Hexagon } element "Worker" { shape Robot } } } } ```
### Step 3: Create Technology-Specific Templates
#### Elixir/Phoenix Template
```dsl workspace "[Project Name]" "Elixir/Phoenix application" {
!identifiers hierarchical !adrs docs/adr !docs docs/architecture
model { user = person "User" "Application user" "User"
system = softwareSystem "[System Name]" "Phoenix web application" {
phoenix = container "Phoenix Application" "Web application and API" "Elixir/Phoenix" "Web"
liveview = container "LiveView UI" "Real-time user interface" "Phoenix LiveView" "Web"
# If using Ash Framework: # ash = container "Ash Resources" "Domain logic and resources" "Ash Framework" "Component"
postgres = container "PostgreSQL" "Primary data store" "PostgreSQL 16" "Database"
# Optional: Background jobs # oban = container "Oban Workers" "Background job processing" "Oban" "Worker" }
user -> system.liveview "Uses" "HTTPS" system.liveview -> system.phoenix "LiveView connections" "WebSocket" system.phoenix -> system.postgres "Queries" "Ecto" }
views { systemContext system "SystemContext" { include * autoLayout }
container system "Containers" { include * autoLayout }
styles { element "Person" { shape Person background #08427B color #ffffff } element "Software System" { background #6B4C9A color #ffffff } element "Container" { background #9B59B6 color #ffffff } element "Database" { shape Cylinder background #336791 } element "Web" { shape WebBrowser } } } } ```
#### Python/FastAPI Template
```dsl workspace "[Project Name]" "Python FastAPI application" {
!identifiers hierarchical !adrs docs/adr !docs docs/architecture
model { user = person "User" "API consumer" "User"
system = softwareSystem "[System Name]" "FastAPI service" {
api = container "FastAPI Service" "REST API" "Python/FastAPI" "API"
postgres = container "PostgreSQL" "Primary data store" "PostgreSQL 16" "Database"
# Optional: Redis for caching/sessions # redis = container "Redis" "Cache and session store" "Redis" "Database"
# Optional: Celery workers # celery = container "Celery Workers" "Async task processing" "Celery" "Worker" }
user -> system.api "Calls" "HTTPS/JSON" system.api -> system.postgres "Queries" "SQLAlchemy" }
views { systemContext system "SystemContext" { include * autoLayout }
container system "Containers" { include * autoLayout }
styles { element "Person" { shape Person background #08427B color #ffffff } element "Software System" { background #306998 color #ffffff } element "Container" { background #FFD43B color #000000 } element "Database" { shape Cylinder background #336791 } element "API" { shape Hexagon } } } } ```
### Step 4: Create Model Overview
Create `architecture/README.md`:
```markdown # [Project Name] Architecture-as-Code
## What is Architecture-as-Code?
This project uses **Architecture-as-Code**: architecture models defined in text files (Structurizr DSL), version-controlled alongside source code, and validated automatically.
**Benefits**: - **Version Control**: Architecture changes tracked in git history - **Code Review**: Architecture changes reviewable in PRs - **Validation**: Syntax and semantic errors caught automatically - **Single Source of Truth**: Model generates diagrams, not vice versa - **AI-Friendly**: Text-based format readable by AI assistants
## Model Structure
``` architecture/ ├── workspace.dsl # C4 model definition (THE source of truth) ├── shared/ # Shared DSL fragments (!include targets) │ └── _styles.dsl # Unified element/relationship styles ├── docs -> ../docs # Symlink (enables !adrs and !docs directives) ├── README.md # This file └── diagrams/ # Generated exports (optional, gitignored) ```
The `docs` symlink allows workspace files to use `!adrs docs/adr` and `!docs docs/architecture` — Structurizr requires these
Technische Details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Lizenz
- MIT
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 21. Aug. 2026
- Veröffentlicht
- 21. Aug. 2026
Entscheidungsübersicht
Fallback-Kandidat
recent repository activity
Audit
Installationsprüfung
Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung
- Sicherheit
- 70/100
- Wartung
- 100/100
- Installieren
- 92/100
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.
- Erfolgsrate
- —
- Letzter Fehler
- —
- Ergebnisse
- 0
- Ausgabequalität
- —
- Fehlgeschlagen
- 0
- Nicht relevant
- 0
- Installationen
- 0
- Durch Risiko blockiert
- 0
- Einrichtung erforderlich
- 0
- Produktion
- 0
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.
Installieren
Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen
Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.
Wachstums-Loop
Share-Kit
Szenariobasierter Entwurf für setup-architecture-as-code, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.
setup-architecture-as-code: Establish architecture-as-code practice using C4 modeling and Structurizr DSL. Use after boot... 14 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code?ref=x
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for setup-architecture-as-code: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code?ref=x Install: npx skills add jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills --skill setup-architecture-a...
Quelle des Eintrags
Registry-indexiert
Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.
- Ersteller
- jrjsmrtn
- Indexiert von
- OpenAgentSkill Community-Index
Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.
Diesen Skill beanspruchenEigentümeranspruch
Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen
Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird jrjsmrtn zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.
Creator-Backlink-Kit
Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen
Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jrjsmrtn-setup-architecture-as-code)Autor
jrjsmrtn
@jrjsmrtn
Tags
Plattform-Fit
Gesundheitssignale
- GitHub-Stars
- 14
- Qualitätswert
- 32/100
- Letzter GitHub-Push
- 21. Aug. 2026
- Framework-Hinweise
- Unbekannt
- OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
- 11
- Installationskopien
- 0
- Externe Klicks
- 0
Community-Signal
Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.
Vertrauen & Sicherheit
Do not auto-install
- GitHub-Akzeptanz14 GitHub-StarsBeheben
- Star-/Fork-Aktivität14 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarBeheben
- Aktuelle Wartung1 Tage seit dem letzten PushBestanden
- LizenzklarheitMITBestanden
- README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
- Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikocommand execution surface, external package install surfacePrüfen
Ähnliche Skills
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarsTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K StarsTo Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
176.7K Stars