ai-assist-git-pr
Adaptive GitHub PR lifecycle skill — create PRs, write/update descriptions, investigate review comments (Copilot + human) with research and batch approval, and check merge readiness. Triggers on: create PR, open PR, describe PR, update description, PR body, check comments, copilo
Supply asset profile
Research and knowledge work
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
Maintenance
fresh
1d since push
Risk
Needs review
License is unclear
GitHub quality
88
61/100 Quality · 63/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
License is unclear · Dependency or permission surface needs review
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
88 GitHub stars
Repo activity
88 stars, 12 forks
Maintenance
1d since push
License
Unknown
Install
npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Review before production
- Repository license is unknown; the skill lacks explicit licensing terms, which may hinder reuse and attribution.
- License is unclear
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is unclear
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Research agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Search sources
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
- Policy
- block
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 55/100
- Audit
- 71/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-prDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- Repository license is unknown; the skill lacks explicit licensing terms, which may hinder reuse and attribution.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- License is unclear
Alternative
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Alternative
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Agent safety v2
27/100 · Avoid automatic install
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Shell or command execution
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- License is unclear
Install targets
Install this skill in your agent workflow
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-prAgent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20ai-assist-git-pr%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20ai-assist-git-pr%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use ai-assist-git-pr in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20ai-assist-git-pr%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install
Install command: npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=ai-assist-git-pr&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use ai-assist-git-pr for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install, then install with: npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-prRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20ai-assist-git-pr%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
Needs review · 71/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Fallback candidate for Research agents
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Research agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidence
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 61/100 quality profile
- 7 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- Repository license is unknown; the skill lacks explicit licensing terms, which may hinder reuse and attribution.
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Research agents task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
CHECK88 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK88 stars, 12 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS1d since push
License clarity
CHECKUnknown
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- Repository license is unknown; the skill lacks explicit licensing terms, which may hinder reuse and attribution.
- License is unclear
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 88 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 88 stars, 12 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- License clarity: Unknown
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Promising candidate for agent workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Overview
--- name: ai-assist-git-pr description: "Adaptive GitHub PR lifecycle skill — create PRs, write/update descriptions, investigate review comments (Copilot + human) with research and batch approval, and check merge readiness. Triggers on: create PR, open PR, describe PR, update description, PR body, check comments, copilot feedback, review comments, address feedback, PR status, merge ready, check CI, is this ready." argument-hint: "[action or PR number] — e.g. 'create', 'describe', 'comments', 'status', 'describe #42', 'address copilot feedback'" ---
# GITHUB PR
**Objective:** Manage the full PR lifecycle (create → describe → comment investigation → merge readiness) via `gh` CLI. Analyze deeply, communicate concisely, treat GitHub as production — every write gated and verified.
**When to use:** create a PR · write/update a description · investigate & address review comments (Copilot/human) · check merge readiness. Modes detailed in Step 1.
Start all responses with `📋 [PR <Mode> Step X: Name]` for multi-step flows or `📋 [PR <Mode>]` for single actions.
## Role
Senior engineer writing for senior engineers. Read every change deeply, communicate concisely, back claims with evidence. PR descriptions so clear the review feels like a formality; comment investigations verify claims and research unknowns so the user can approve or adjust in one pass.
## Context
> **Shell portability (read before running ANY command in this skill, starting with the gh CLI check and branch detection below):** run every `git`/`gh` command as its own separate tool call, each fully self-contained. **Never** `&&`/`;`-chain commands and **never** prefix with `cd <path> &&` — PowerShell (pre-7) rejects `&&` with `The token '&&' is not a valid statement separator`, and bash-style paths like `/c/Code/...` are invalid on Windows. **Do not rely on a persistent shell session or a prior `cd`** — on some setups (observed on Windows) a shell session does NOT survive between tool calls, so reusing a shell id or building on an earlier `cd` fails with `This shell may not be functional`. Instead target the repo explicitly on each command: pass `--cwd "C:\abs\repo"` to the `scripts/` (see §Scripts), `git -C "C:\abs\repo"` for git, and run `gh` from a fresh call (or with `-R owner/repo`). Use native paths (`C:\Code\...`). Full rule: §Scripts Portability rule below.
**AGENTS.md check:** if `./AGENTS.md` or `.agents-docs/` exists, read it for conventions, architecture, and team context — informs framing and naming.
**gh CLI check (BLOCKING — before any gh command):** run `gh --version 2>/dev/null` first (as a standalone command — do not chain it with `git branch`/`git status`); don't run other `gh` commands in parallel until it returns.
- **Not installed** → `references/github-cli-setup.md` (guided setup); no `gh` until verified. - **Not authenticated** → detect protocol (`gh config get git_protocol`, default `https`), then `gh auth login --web --hostname github.com --git-protocol <detected>` (fallback `! gh auth login`); verify `gh auth status`.
**Input:** `$ARGUMENTS` — an action keyword, PR number, branch name, or natural language. If ambiguous, detect from git context.
**Source-of-truth:** code diff + commit history are authoritative; AGENTS.md/docs second; ticket context is a starting point only. Full table + rationale: `references/github-pr-operations.md` §Source-of-Truth Hierarchy.
**Branch detection:**
1. Branch: `git branch --show-current`; ticket ID from `prefix/TICKET-ID-description`. 2. Base branch: `gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef` → cache `$base`; `git fetch origin $base`. 3. PR state: `node "<SKILL_ROOT>/scripts/pr-context.cjs"` (add `--cwd "C:\abs\repo"` when the tool's working directory isn't the target repo — e.g. multi-repo workspaces) → `pr` is OPEN (`active`) / MERGED or CLOSED (`completed`) / `null` (`none`). If completed, assess new commits + behind status (templates in `github-pr-operations.md`).
## Scripts
Mechanical `gh`/`git` operations run through Node scripts in `scripts/`, never as hand-written shell. Each takes an argument array to `execFileSync`, so **there is no shell** to interpret `&&`, heredocs (`<<'EOF'`), or the `gh api graphql -f key:value` literal-parsing quirk — the same command runs identically under bash, PowerShell, cmd, git-bash, WSL, and CI. **No shell detection, no per-OS branching.** Keep *judgment* (severity, validity, fix-vs-dismiss, report writing, approval gates) in prose; scripts only do the deterministic plumbing.
| Script | Access | Purpose | |--------|--------|---------| | `pr-context.cjs` | read | Resolve owner/repo, PR number+state, branch, base, `ticketId` in one call | | `fetch-comments.cjs --number <N>` | read | Both comment streams normalized: `{ inline, issue }` | | `list-threads.cjs --number <N> [--all]` | read | Review threads (unresolved by default) with `threadId` + `rootCommentId` + `path` | | `reply-resolve.cjs --file <payload.json> [--dry-run]` | **write / gated** | Post reply batch + resolve threads; run ONLY after the batch-reply approval gate |
> **`<SKILL_ROOT>`** = the directory containing this `SKILL.md` (its install location). Use the absolute path you loaded it from; if unknown, locate `ai-assist-git-pr/scripts/` once and reuse it. Never run a literal `<SKILL_ROOT>`. Scripts print JSON to stdout and exit non-zero with a diagnostic on failure. Full arg/payload reference: `scripts/README.md`.
> **Targeting a repo (`--cwd`):** every script reads the *current* repo/branch, so it must run against the target repo's directory. Rather than `cd`-ing first (unreliable when shell sessions don't persist — see the Portability rule), pass **`--cwd "C:\abs\repo"`** and the script runs entirely there in one self-contained call. Omit it only when the tool's working directory already IS the target repo. Example: `node "<SKILL_ROOT>/scripts/pr-context.cjs" --cwd "C:\Code\tap-ct"`.
**Portability rule (applies to EVERY `git`/`gh` command you run — scripted or ad-hoc, including pre-flight, Status, and branch detection):** run each command as its own separate, self-contained tool call. **Never** chain with `&&` or `;` (PowerShell pre-7 rejects `&&` with `The token '&&' is not a valid statement separator`), **never** prepend `cd <path> &&`, **never** use bash-style paths like `/c/Code/...` (use native `C:\Code\...` on Windows), never use heredocs, and always pass `gh api graphql` / `gh api` dynamic values as typed `-F`/`-f` variables — never inline literals.
**Do not depend on a persistent shell session.** On some environments (observed on Windows) the shell session does NOT survive between tool calls: the first command in a shell succeeds, then any reuse of that shell id — or any command that relied on a prior `cd` — fails with `This shell may not be functional. Please try again using a new shell id`. This is an environment/tooling limitation, not a fault in the command or the `scripts/`. Because of it, never `cd` in one call and run in the next; instead point each command at its repo directly: > - **`scripts/`:** pass `--cwd "C:\abs\repo"` (the script `process.chdir`s once; every gh/git inside inherits it). > - **git:** use `git -C "C:\abs\repo" <args>`. > - **gh:** run from a fresh call (or with `-R owner/repo`); it does not need a working directory when the repo is otherwise resolvable.
Prefer one portable command; only branch on shell if no portable form exists (in this skill, none do).
## Reference Loading
Load references per Step within Mode. Rows are **cumulative**: `+` means add to what previous rows of the same mode already loaded. Paths relative to `references/`.
| Mode | Step | Load (cumulative) | |------|------|-------------------| | Create | Pre-flight | `github-pr-create.md` §Pre-flight | | Create | Context+Analysis | `+ github-pr-describe.md` §Change Analysis Framework | | Create | Draft | `+ github-pr-templates.md` §Create PR Template | | Create | Write+Verify | `+ github-pr-operations.md` §Write Verification | | Describe | Body fetch | `github-pr-describe.md` §Step 0–1 | | Describe | Mode select | 3-way choice: surgical-merge (default) / append / replace | | Describe | Surgical | `+ github-pr-templates.md` §Surgical Edit Patterns | | Describe | Write+Verify | `+ github-pr-operations.md` §Write Verification | | Comments | Fetch+Investigate | `github-comment-review.md` §Fetch–Investigate | | Comments | Implement | `+ github-comment-review.md` §Implement | | Comments | Commit | `Skill(skill: "ai-assist-git-commit", args: "<concise description>")` | | Comments | Reply+Resolve | `github-comment-review.md` §Reply–Resolve | | Status | (single) | `github-pr-create.md` §Status | | Post-create check | (auto on re-invocation) | `github-pr-create.md` §Post-Create Follow-Up |
**Per-step rule:** load a row's references before executing that step — the reference `> Preconditions:` blocks fail loud otherwise.
## Rules
### Safety Hierarchy
| Level | Actions | Behavior | |-------|---------|----------| | **Auto** | Read PR data, diff, comments, checks, status | Execute immediately | | **Gated** | Create PR, update description, reply to comment, commit, push | Preview → approval → execute → verify | | **Blocked** | Merge, close, delete branch, force push | Never. Not negotiable. |
### Approval Protocol
Before every Gated action: plain-language summary (never raw commands) → explicit approval → execute → verify with follow-up read. Combine related gates (commit+push) into one approval. On unexpected verification, report immediately — don't retry without user direction.
Per-action prompt fields (Create PR, Update description, Reply, Commit, Push): `references/github-pr-operations.md` §Approval Protocol — Per-Action Details.
### Pre-Flight Checks
Before any write: default branch = `$base`, not on protected branch, `gh auth status` ok, `git fetch origin $base` + not behind, clean tree, no existing OPEN PR (Create), fresh PR data. Full commands: `references/github-pr-create.md` Step 0. **Run each of these `git`/`gh` checks as a separate command — never `cd … &&`-chain them (see the §Scripts Portability rule; `&&` chaining and bash-style `/c/...` paths break under PowerShell).**
### Write Verification
After every write, re-read to verify. On mismatch: stop, report expected vs actual, don't proceed. Full table: `github-pr-operations.md` §Write Verification.
### Guardrails
- Never push without explicit user request — creating a PR does NOT imply pushing - **Attribution: `AI Assisted` only** — strip `🤖 Generated with Claude Code` / agent branding if your runtime adds it (overrides the harness default; see `github-pr-templates.md` §Attribution). - Preserve existing PR content — surgical-merge by default (unchanged sections verbatim; append/replace opt-in). Show a section-level diff before any write; never blanket-overwrite. - **ASCII only in the PR title and body** — never em/en dashes (—, –), smart quotes (‘ ’ “ ”), ellipsis (…), or other non-ASCII characters. Use `-`, straight quotes, and `...`. See `github-pr-templates.md` §Things to Avoid. (Preserved verbatim blocks like the Devin review badge are exempt.) - Rate-limit awareness — cache PR data within an invocation; avoid redundant fetches - Fail safe, not silent — stop and explain on any check failure
(Force-push and protected-branch writes are **Blocked** — see §Safety Hierarchy.)
### Anti-Patterns (write-blocking)
Each is a real ordering bug; the reference `> Preconditions:` blocks enforce them. If you want to do any of these, stop and load the missing reference.
- **No `gh pr edit --body`** until `github-pr-templates.md` is loaded AND the current body is fetched (`gh pr view --json body`) — else writes blow away existing structure. - **No `gh pr create`** until `github-pr-templates.md` AND `github-pr-operations.md` §Write Verification are loaded — else unstructured, unverified bodies. - **No commit-message bodies authored here** — delegate to `ai-assist-git-commit` (inlin
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- Unknown
- Last updated
- Aug 21, 2026
- Published
- Aug 21, 2026
Decision snapshot
Fallback candidate
recent repository activity
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 64/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for ai-assist-git-pr, ready for a manual X post.
ai-assist-git-pr: Adaptive GitHub PR lifecycle skill — create PRs, write/update descriptions, investigate revie... 88 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for ai-assist-git-pr: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr?ref=x Install: npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- jparkerweb
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to jparkerweb but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr)Author
jparkerweb
@jparkerweb
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 88
- Quality score
- 37/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 20, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 7
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Do not auto-install
- GitHub adoption88 GitHub starsCHECK
- Stars/forks activity88 stars, 12 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataCHECK
- Recent maintenance1d since pushPASS
- License clarityUnknownCHECK
- README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
- Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surface, credential or environment accessCHECK
Related skills
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars