Rapport d’audit du skill
brand-manager Rapport d’audit.
Set up or update a brand profile: colors, fonts, logo, voice, platforms, compliance rules. \"update our brand colors\"
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
Adoption GitHub
Avertissement48
39 stars GitHub
Activité stars/forks
Avertissement43
39 stars et 8 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Maintenance récente
Validé100
5 jours depuis le dernier push
Clarté de licence
Validé86
MIT
Complétude README/SKILL.md
Info76
Les métadonnées publiques nécessitent davantage de contexte README/SKILL.md
Risque dépendances/runtime
Info64
credential or environment access, network or browser surface
Disponibilité de l’installation
Validé92
npx skills add indranilbanerjee/socialforge --skill brand-manager
Sécurité de la commande d’installation
Validé92
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
Avertissement46
secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
Preuve du dépôt
Validé86
https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/socialforge/tree/main/skills/brand-manager
État de revue
Avertissement46
L’approbation de revue IA est absente
Résultats prouvés par Agent
Info54
Pas encore de données de résultats Agent
Vérifications
Revue d’installation et d’adoption
Chemin d’installation
92
npx skills add indranilbanerjee/socialforge --skill brand-manager
Dépôt
88
https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/socialforge/tree/main/skills/brand-manager
Licence
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
5 jours depuis le dernier push
Revue IA
55
Review approval is missing
Complétude README/SKILL.md
84
Usable description available
Risque de dépendances
64
credential or environment access, network or browser surface
Sécurité de la commande d’installation
92
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
46
secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
Activité stars/forks
43
39 stars et 8 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Adoption
42
39 stars GitHub
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.
Avertissements
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- L’approbation de revue IA est absente
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 39 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 39 stars, 8 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
- Review status: AI review approval is missing
Méthode
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Comparer les options proches
Skills associés à auditer ensuite
gh-create-pr
Create or update GitHub pull requests using the repository-required workflow and template compliance. Use when asked to create/open/update a PR so the assistant reads `.github/pull_request_template.md`, fills every template section, preserves markdown structure exactly, and marks missing data as N/A or None instead of skipping sections.
52K Stars · Rapport d’audit
translation
Translate, transcreate, review, or maintain multilingual product and marketing content, including source locking, glossary decisions, language style, machine-assisted workflows, legal-content safeguards, QA, and source-change synchronization. Use localization-strategy for market scope, locale architecture, rollout, and production release planning.
1.0K Stars · Rapport d’audit
anti-defensive-writing
Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.
1.0K Stars · Rapport d’audit