@guoliang1114-boop

Creator · guoliang1114-boop

Last updated · Aug 24, 2026

audit-substantive-procedures

REVIEW · 61Registry indexed

设计和执行实质性审计程序,覆盖细节测试、实质性分析程序、函证程序和审计抽样,基于ISA 330框架。

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
61/100

Sandbox only

Quality62/100
Audit76/100
Stars37
Verified installs0

Install targets

Codex install prompt

Install the "audit-substantive-procedures" agent skill from https://github.com/guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI/tree/main/skills/audit-substantive-procedures. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: 设计和执行实质性审计程序,覆盖细节测试、实质性分析程序、函证程序和审计抽样,基于ISA 330框架。 After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures","task":"Install audit-substantive-procedures","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.

Supply asset profile

Research and knowledge work

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Browse track

Scenario

Research agents

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Agent fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.

Install

Ready

npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-substantive-procedures

Maintenance

fresh

Pushed today

Risk

Needs review

No explicit limitations section delineating when this skill should not be used (e.g., regulatory constraints, data privacy, or non-ISA environments).

GitHub quality

37

62/100 Quality · 69/100 Trust

Coverage tags

ResearchResearch agentssecurityagent-skill

Review notes

No explicit limitations section delineating when this skill should not be used (e.g., regulatory constraints, data privacy, or non-ISA environments). · The skill relies on tools (search, read, write, edit) but does not specify how to obtain the data sources or handle missing data beyond mentioning 'material gaps' in Aria Context Enrichment.

Agent adoption scorecard

Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance

These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.

Quality

Promising
62

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Trust

Sandbox only
61

Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.

Audit

Needs review
76

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Human review before install

Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

37 GitHub stars

Repo activity

37 stars, 2 forks

Maintenance

Pushed today

License

MIT

Install

npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-substantive-procedures

Install safety

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

no high-risk permission surface in public metadata

Agent outcomes

No agent outcome data yet

Docs

Thin public metadata

Risk summary

Review before production

  • No explicit limitations section delineating when this skill should not be used (e.g., regulatory constraints, data privacy, or non-ISA environments).
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 37 GitHub stars

Install readiness

Install path available

  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • License is declared
  • No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet

Agent-readable metadata

Machine-readable decision data for this skill.

Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.

View technical data+

Suited tasks

  • Content automation workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Summarize source material

Suited agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Install decision

Command
npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-substantive-procedures
Policy
review
Human review
yes

Trust and risk

Trust
61/100
Audit
76/100
Risk level
Needs review

Outcome loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event ID
resolve
Outcomes
5

Install command

npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-substantive-procedures

Do not use when

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • No explicit limitations section delineating when this skill should not be used (e.g., regulatory constraints, data privacy, or non-ISA environments).
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Agent safety v2

60/100 · Review before install

Reviewed with permission notesreview

Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.

Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.

Resolve via API

medium

Network access

Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.

medium

Filesystem access

Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.

  • No explicit limitations section delineating when this skill should not be used (e.g., regulatory constraints, data privacy, or non-ISA environments).

Agent resolve plan

Let an agent verify fit before installing.

The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.

Open text plan

Agent should check

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copy prompt

Task: Use audit-substantive-procedures in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20audit-substantive-procedures%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures/install
Install command: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-substantive-procedures
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent handoff

Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

Open install API

Agent prompt

Use audit-substantive-procedures for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures/install, then install with: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-substantive-procedures

Registry metadata

Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.

This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.

Open manifest

Agent fit

61/100

Content automation

Platforms

Claude Code

Audit report

Needs review · 76/100

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

View audit reportView eval report

Agent decision cockpit

Fallback candidate for Content automation

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

61
Readiness
Prototype
Stage

Role in stack

Fallback candidate

Primary fit

Content automation

Trust label

Prototype first

Install path

Command ready

Use when

  • Content automation workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidence

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • 62/100 quality profile

review first

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • No explicit limitations section delineating when this skill should not be used (e.g., regulatory constraints, data privacy, or non-ISA environments).
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Implementation path

  1. 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Content automation task end to end.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Trust profile

Sandbox only

Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.

61
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub adoption

CHECK

37 GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

CHECK

37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

Pushed today

License clarity

PASS

MIT

Good signals

  • AI review approved
  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • Recently maintained repository
  • Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
  • Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run

Review before install

  • No explicit limitations section delineating when this skill should not be used (e.g., regulatory constraints, data privacy, or non-ISA environments).
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 37 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • README/SKILL.md completeness: Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
  • No real agent outcome reports yet
  • Human review required before unattended installation

Recommended action

Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.

Quality profile

Promising candidate for agent workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

62
GitHub stars
37
Freshness
Today
Install ready
Yes
License
MIT
Review before install: Low GitHub adoption signal · No explicit limitations section delineating when this skill should not be used (e.g., regulatory constraints, data privacy, or non-ISA environments).

Workflow fit

Use this skill in these scenarios

Workflow fit

Add it to a complete workflow

Alternative shortlist

Compare before you install

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Compare all

Overview

--- name: audit-substantive-procedures description: "设计和执行实质性审计程序,覆盖细节测试、实质性分析程序、函证程序和审计抽样,基于ISA 330框架。" --- # 实质性审计程序设计与执行

## When To Use - 需要针对已评估的认定层次重大错报风险设计审计应对程序 - 执行实质性程序以获取充分、适当的审计证据 - 对账户余额、交易类别和披露实施细节测试 - 执行实质性分析程序以验证财务数据的合理性 - 设计函证程序并评估回函结果

## Tools - `search` — 搜索被审计单位财务数据、账户明细、历史审计工作底稿 - `read` — 读取风险评估结果、控制测试结论、重要性水平设定 - `write` — 生成实质性程序工作底稿 - `edit` — 修改程序设计、更新测试结果

## Framework

### NTE框架(Nature, Timing, Extent) 基于ISA 330第6-12条,审计师应从性质、时间安排和范围三个维度设计实质性程序:

1. **性质(Nature)** — 选择程序类型 - 细节测试:针对重大交易、余额和披露的测试 - 实质性分析程序:当预期关系稳定且可预测时使用 - 函证:针对应收账款、银行存款、法律事项等第三方确认 - 重新计算:验证会计估计和计算的准确性

2. **时间安排(Timing)** — 确定执行时点 - 期中测试 + 期后覆盖:对期中余额执行程序,并覆盖剩余期间 - 期末测试:针对重大风险或期中测试不可行的情况 - 期后事项审查:关注资产负债表日后的事项

3. **范围(Extent)** — 确定样本量和覆盖范围 - 考虑评估的重大错报风险水平 - 考虑已获取的其他审计证据的说服力 - 考虑审计抽样方法的适当性

### 细节测试实施步骤(ISA 330第18-21条) 1. 识别需要测试的认定(存在、完整性、准确性、截止、分类、计价) 2. 选取测试项目(全部测试/选取特定项目/审计抽样) 3. 设计审计程序并记录预期结果 4. 执行程序并记录实际结果 5. 评估差异是否构成错报

### 实质性分析程序(ISA 520) 1. 确定预期值的精确度要求 2. 建立数据间预期关系(趋势分析、比率分析、合理性测试) 3. 评估预期值的可靠性 4. 确定可接受差异额 5. 调查并核实不可接受的差异

### 函证程序(ISA 505) 1. 确定函证范围和对象 2. 设计询证函格式(积极式/消极式) 3. 控制函证的发送和收回 4. 评估回函结果和替代程序

### 审计抽样(ISA 530) 1. 确定抽样总体和抽样单元 2. 选择抽样方法(统计抽样/非统计抽样) 3. 确定样本量(考虑可容忍错报、预计总体错报、置信水平) 4. 评价样本结果并推断总体

## Workflow 1. 从风险评估程序获取已识别的重大错报风险 2. 运用NTE框架确定实质性程序的性质、时间安排和范围 3. 针对每个重要账户和认定设计具体程序 4. 执行细节测试、分析程序和函证程序 5. 记录测试结果,识别和评价错报 6. 汇总发现的错报并与管理层沟通 7. 评估获取的审计证据是否充分、适当

## Output Format

```markdown # 实质性程序工作底稿 — [账户名称]

## 一、基本信息 | 项目 | 内容 | |------|------| | 被审计单位 | [公司名称] | | 审计期间 | [期间] | | 账户/认定 | [账户名称] / [相关认定] | | 执行人/日期 | [姓名] / [日期] | | 复核人/日期 | [姓名] / [日期] |

## 二、风险评估结果 - 已识别的重大错报风险:[描述] - 风险水平:[高/中] - 相关认定:[存在/完整性/准确性/截止/计价]

## 三、NTE设计决策 | 维度 | 决策 | 理由 | |------|------|------| | 性质 | [细节测试/分析程序/函证] | [理由] | | 时间安排 | [期中+期后/期末] | [理由] | | 范围 | [样本量/覆盖比例] | [理由] |

## 四、审计程序及结果 | 序号 | 审计程序 | 预期结果 | 实际结果 | 差异 | 结论 | |------|----------|----------|----------|------|------| | 1 | [程序描述] | [预期] | [实际] | [差异额] | [结论] |

## 五、函证程序(如适用) | 函证对象 | 金额 | 函证方式 | 回函情况 | 差异及原因 | |----------|------|----------|----------|------------| | [单位] | [金额] | [积极/消极] | [相符/不符/未回] | [说明] |

## 六、抽样结果(如适用) | 项目 | 数值 | |------|------| | 总体规模 | [数量] | | 样本量 | [数量] | | 样本错报额 | [金额] | | 推断总体错报 | [金额] | | 可容忍错报 | [金额] |

## 七、结论 - [ ] 获取了充分、适当的审计证据 - 识别的错报汇总:[金额] - 是否需要调整:[是/否] ```

## Diagnostic Questions - 风险评估结果中哪些认定涉及重大错报风险? - 是否对所有重要账户的认定设计了实质性程序? - 实质性分析程序的预期关系是否稳定可靠? - 函证程序是否受到被审计单位的限制? - 审计抽样的可容忍错报是否考虑了重要性水平?

## Verification - 核实所有已识别的重大错报风险均有对应的实质性程序覆盖 - 验证样本量满足ISA 530的要求 - 确认函证过程的独立性和控制有效性 - 复核错报汇总的完整性

## Saving 将工作底稿保存至 `audit-workpapers/[年份]/substantive-procedures/[账户名称].md`,确保包含执行人和复核人签字及日期。

## Capability Upgrade

### Mode Selection

- **Quick**: 根据账户和风险认定,给出实质性程序建议清单。 - **Standard**: 设计 NTE、样本策略、函证/替代程序、分析程序和工作底稿模板。 - **Deep**: 结合风险评估、重要性、控制测试结果、历史错报和数据明细,形成可执行审计程序包和复核清单。

### Aria Context Enrichment

优先读取审计风险评估、重要性水平、试算平衡表、账户明细、上期审计调整、控制测试结果和管理层解释。若缺少关键资料,先列资料缺口,并说明会影响性质、时间或范围中的哪一项。

### NTE Decision Engine

| 风险条件 | 性质 Nature | 时间 Timing | 范围 Extent | |----------|-------------|-------------|-------------| | 重大错报风险高,控制不可依赖 | 细节测试为主,必要时函证 | 期末或接近期末 | 扩大样本,覆盖高金额和异常项目 | | 风险中等,预期关系稳定 | 分析程序 + 有限细节测试 | 期中结合期末滚动 | 标准样本,关注波动项目 | | 控制测试有效,风险较低 | 分析程序或定向测试 | 可期中执行 | 缩小范围,但保留不可预见性 | | 管理层限制函证或资料不完整 | 替代程序 + 风险升级 | 期末 | 扩大替代程序并评估范围受限 |

### Exception Handling

发现差异时必须判断:

1. 是否为事实错报、判断错报或推断错报。 2. 是否需要扩大样本或追加程序。 3. 是否影响同类账户、披露或相关认定。 4. 是否需要汇总至审计调整表或沟通治理层。

### Quality Gates

- [ ] 每个重大认定都有对应程序,不存在风险未响应。 - [ ] 样本选择逻辑能复核,覆盖高金额、异常和随机样本。 - [ ] 函证过程独立控制,未回函有替代程序。 - [ ] 所有差异都有原因、金额、影响和处理结论。 - [ ] 工作底稿可以支持充分、适当审计证据的结论。

### Deliverable Catalog

| Deliverable | When to use | Minimum content | Format | |-------------|-------------|-----------------|--------| | Substantive audit program | 设计账户审计程序 | 账户、认定、风险、程序、时间、范围和负责人 | Excel / Markdown | | NTE decision memo | 程序设计需要解释 | Nature、Timing、Extent、依据和风险响应 | Markdown | | Sampling workpaper | 使用抽样测试 | 总体、样本、方法、差异、推断错报和结论 | Excel | | Confirmation control log | 执行函证 | 对象、金额、发函、回函、差异、替代程序 | Excel | | Misstatement summary | 发现差异 | 事实错报、判断错报、推断错报、调整建议 | Excel | | Completion workpaper | 账户完工 | 程序执行结果、证据、复核点和结论 | Word / Markdown |

Technical details

Version
1.0.0
License
MIT
Last updated
Aug 24, 2026
Published
Aug 24, 2026

Decision snapshot

Fallback candidate

61
Ready
Prototype
Stage

recent repository activity

Audit

Install review

Install and adoption review

76
Needs review
Security
81/100
Maintenance
100/100
Install
92/100
Open full auditView eval report

Agent-proven evidence

Agent-proven evidence

Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.

0
Proven
Needs first agent runAuto-install: review firstLast: Unknown
Success rate
Recent failure
Outcomes
0
Output quality
Failed
0
Not relevant
0
Installs
0
Risk blocked
0
Setup needed
0
Production
0

No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.

Install

Add to agent workflow

Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.

Growth loop

Share kit

X

Scenario-led draft for audit-substantive-procedures, ready for a manual X post.

Curator note
For a real agent workflow, this is a skill worth shortlisting before another blank prompt.

audit-substantive-procedures: 设计和执行实质性审计程序,覆盖细节测试、实质性分析程序、函证程序和审计抽样,基于ISA 330框架。

37 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures?ref=x
Open X draft
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for audit-substantive-procedures:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures?ref=x

Install: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-substantive-procedures

Listing source

Registry indexed

Claimable

This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.

Indexed by
OpenAgentSkill community index

Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.

Claim this skill

Owner claim

Claim this skill listing

This Registry indexed listing is attributed to guoliang1114-boop but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.

Creator backlink kit

Add the evidence badges to your README

Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-substantive-procedures)

Author

G

guoliang1114-boop

@guoliang1114-boop

Platform fit

Health signals

GitHub stars
37
Quality score
34/100
Last GitHub push
Aug 24, 2026
Framework hints
Unknown
OpenAgentSkill views
0
Install copies
0
Outbound clicks
0

Community signal

Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.

Trust & safety

Sandbox only

61
  • GitHub adoption37 GitHub starsCHECK
  • Stars/forks activity37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataCHECK
  • Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
  • License clarityMITPASS
  • README/SKILL.md completenessPublic metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md contextCHECK
  • Dependency/runtime riskno major dependency risk hints in public metadataPASS