Creator · guoliang1114-boop
Last updated · Aug 24, 2026
audit-risk-assessment
基于 ISA 315 (Revised 2019) 框架执行审计计划阶段的风险评估。当用户需要 (1) 制定审计计划 (2) 识别重大错报风险 (3) 评估内部控制 (4) 确定重要性水平 (5) 设计审计策略 时使用。输出结构化风险评估文档。
Sandbox only
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "audit-risk-assessment" agent skill from https://github.com/guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI/tree/main/skills/audit-risk-assessment. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: 基于 ISA 315 (Revised 2019) 框架执行审计计划阶段的风险评估。当用户需要 (1) 制定审计计划 (2) 识别重大错报风险 (3) 评估内部控制 (4) 确定重要性水平 (5) 设计审计策略 时使用。输出结构化风险评估文档。 After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment","task":"Install audit-risk-assessment","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Research and knowledge work
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Document processing
I need my agent to read PDFs, extract tables, and turn documents into structured data.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-risk-assessment
Maintenance
fresh
Pushed today
Risk
Needs review
Low GitHub adoption signal
GitHub quality
37
62/100 Quality · 77/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Low GitHub adoption signal · Quality score needs review
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
37 GitHub stars
Repo activity
37 stars, 2 forks
Maintenance
Pushed today
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-risk-assessment
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
filesystem or document access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Usable metadata, review docs
Risk summary
Review before production
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 37 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
View technical data+
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Document processing workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Read uploaded files
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-risk-assessment
- Policy
- review
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 69/100
- Audit
- 79/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-risk-assessmentDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 37 GitHub stars
Agent safety v2
63/100 · Review before install
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
Agent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20audit-risk-assessment%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20audit-risk-assessment%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use audit-risk-assessment in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20audit-risk-assessment%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment/install
Install command: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-risk-assessment
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=audit-risk-assessment&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use audit-risk-assessment for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment/install, then install with: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-risk-assessmentRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20audit-risk-assessment%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Document processing
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
Needs review · 79/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Fallback candidate for Document processing
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Document processing
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Document processing workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidence
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 62/100 quality profile
- 1 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- Low GitHub adoption signal
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Document processing task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Sandbox only
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
CHECK37 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASSPushed today
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 37 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Promising candidate for agent workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Parse messy files
Document processing
I need my agent to read PDFs, extract tables, and turn documents into structured data.
Search private knowledge
RAG and knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
RAG knowledge base
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Wazuh
Wazuh - The Open Source Security Platform. Unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads.
Maigret
🕵️♂️ Collect a dossier on a person by username from 3000+ sites
Nuclei
Nuclei is a fast, customizable vulnerability scanner powered by the global security community and built on a simple YAML-based DSL, enabling collaboration to tackle trending vulnerabilities on the internet. It helps you find vulnerabilities in your applications, APIs, networks, DNS, and cloud configurations.
Infisical
Infisical is the open-source platform for secrets, certificates, and privileged access management.
Overview
--- name: audit-risk-assessment description: "基于 ISA 315 (Revised 2019) 框架执行审计计划阶段的风险评估。当用户需要 (1) 制定审计计划 (2) 识别重大错报风险 (3) 评估内部控制 (4) 确定重要性水平 (5) 设计审计策略 时使用。输出结构化风险评估文档。" ---
# 审计计划与风险评估
基于国际审计准则 ISA 315 (Revised 2019) 框架,执行审计计划阶段的系统性风险评估。
## When To Use
- 用户需要为客户制定审计计划 - 用户需要识别和评估重大错报风险(RMM) - 用户需要了解被审计单位的内部控制 - 用户需要确定重要性水平 - 用户需要设计审计策略和审计程序的总体方向
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | `update_project_markdown_document` | 保存风险评估文档到项目空间 | | `write_project_office_document` | 生成风险评估报告(Word/PDF) |
## Framework: ISA 315 (Revised 2019)
### 核心概念
- **固有风险 (Inherent Risk, IR)**:在考虑相关控制之前,某项认定存在重大错报的可能性。ISA 315 要求在认定层面评估固有风险。 - **控制风险 (Control Risk, CR)**:某项重大错报未被实体的内部控制及时防止或发现并纠正的可能性。 - **检查风险 (Detection Risk, DR)**:审计师的程序未能发现存在的重大错报的风险。审计师的责任是控制检查风险。 - **重大错报风险 (Risk of Material Misstatement, RMM)**:固有风险与控制风险的组合。RMM = IR × CR。 - **重大账户 (Significant Accounts)**:存在合理可能性包含重大错报的账户。 - **认定 (Assertions)**:存在/发生、完整性、计价/分摊、权利和义务、列报和披露。
### 五步风险评估流程
#### Step 1:了解被审计单位及其环境
| 维度 | 了解内容 | |------|---------| | 行业因素 | 行业竞争格局、监管要求、技术变革、市场趋势 | | 所有权与治理 | 股权结构、董事会构成、管理层激励机制 | | 经营模式 | 主要业务流程、收入来源、成本结构、关键资产 | | 会计政策 | 重大会计估计、会计政策变更、复杂交易处理 | | 财务业绩 | 收入增长率、毛利率趋势、现金流与利润匹配度 |
#### Step 2:了解内部控制(COSO 五要素)
| 要素 | 关键问题 | |------|---------| | 控制环境 | 管理层诚信度、治理监督、权责分配、员工胜任能力 | | 风险评估过程 | 管理层如何识别和应对经营风险 | | 信息系统与沟通 | 财务报告相关的信息系统、内部控制沟通机制 | | 控制活动 | 审批授权、核对复核、资产保护、职责分离 | | 对控制的监督 | 持续监控、独立评估、缺陷报告机制 |
#### Step 3:识别重大账户、披露和相关认定
对每个账户评估以下风险因素: - 账户规模和构成 - 因错误或舞弊导致错报的敏感性 - 交易量、复杂性和同质性 - 账户性质 - 会计和报告复杂性 - 损失风险 - 重大或有负债的可能性 - 关联方交易的存在 - 与前期的变化
#### Step 4:识别可能的错报来源(WCGW 分析)
对每个重大账户/认定,回答: - **What Could Go Wrong?** 在交易的发起、授权、处理、记录环节中,哪些环节可能出现错报? - 管理层已实施了哪些控制? - 需要执行哪些穿行测试?
#### Step 5:评估重大错报风险
- 在认定层面评估每个重大账户的 RMM - 确定哪些风险是**显著风险**(需要特别审计关注) - 识别因舞弊导致的重大错报风险(ISA 240 联动) - 确定显著风险是否需要测试控制
## Workflow
``` 1. 收集 → 获取客户行业、经营、财务、内控基本信息 2. 了解 → 按 Step 1-2 系统了解被审计单位和内控 3. 识别 → 按 Step 3-4 识别重大账户和 WCGW 4. 评估 → 按 Step 5 在认定层面评估 RMM 5. 重要性 → 计算整体重要性和实际执行的重要性 6. 策略 → 基于风险评估设计审计策略 7. 输出 → 生成结构化风险评估文档 ```
## Output Format
```markdown # 审计计划与风险评估报告
## 一、被审计单位概况
| 项目 | 内容 | |------|------| | 客户名称 | [名称] | | 行业 | [行业] | | 审计期间 | [期间] | | 主要业务 | [描述] |
## 二、重要性水平
| 项目 | 金额 | 计算基础 | 比例 | |------|------|---------|------| | 整体重要性 | [金额] | [基准] | [比例] | | 实际执行的重要性 | [金额] | [整体重要性] | 50%-75% | | 明显微小错报临界值 | [金额] | — | — |
## 三、重大账户与认定识别
| 科目 | 金额 | 占比 | 相关认定 | 是否重大 | |------|------|------|---------|---------| | 收入 | ... | ... | 发生/完整性/截止 | ✅ | | 应收账款 | ... | ... | 存在/计价 | ✅ | | 存货 | ... | ... | 存在/计价/完整性 | ✅ | | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## 四、内部控制了解与评估
### 4.1 控制环境评价
| 维度 | 评价 | 风险等级 | |------|------|---------| | 管理层诚信 | [描述] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | 治理监督 | [描述] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | 权责分配 | [描述] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | 员工胜任能力 | [描述] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
### 4.2 关键业务流程控制
| 流程 | 关键控制点 | 设计评价 | 是否需测试运行有效性 | |------|-----------|---------|-------------------| | 销售到收款 | [控制点] | 有效/缺陷 | 是/否 | | 采购到付款 | [控制点] | 有效/缺陷 | 是/否 | | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## 五、WCGW 分析与风险评估矩阵
| 科目 | 认定 | WCGW(可能的错报) | 固有风险 | 控制风险 | RMM | 是否显著风险 | |------|------|-------------------|---------|---------|-----|------------| | 收入 | 发生 | 虚构销售交易 | 高 | 中 | 高 | ✅ | | 收入 | 截止 | 收入确认时点错误 | 中 | 中 | 中 | ❌ | | 应收账款 | 计价 | 坏账准备计提不足 | 高 | 中 | 高 | ✅ | | 存货 | 存在 | 虚构存货或数量高估 | 中 | 低 | 低 | ❌ | | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## 六、舞弊风险评估
| 舞弊风险 | 驱动因素 | 影响科目 | 应对措施 | |---------|---------|---------|---------| | 收入虚增 | 业绩压力/对赌 | 收入/应收账款 | [措施] | | 费用资本化 | 利润目标 | 固定资产/开发支出 | [措施] | | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## 七、审计策略
| 风险领域 | 审计策略 | 审计程序类型 | 时间安排 | |---------|---------|------------|---------| | 收入确认 | 增加实质性程序 | 细节测试+分析性复核 | 期末+期后 | | 关联方交易 | 扩大测试范围 | 函证+细节测试 | 期末 | | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## 八、未解决事项
| 事项 | 影响 | 待补充资料 | 责任人 | |------|------|-----------|--------| | ... | ... | ... | ... | ```
## Diagnostic Questions
当用户提供的信息不完整时,按以下优先级追问:
1. **行业与监管**: "客户所在行业有哪些特殊的会计处理或监管要求?" 2. **经营模式**: "客户的主要收入来源和商业模式是什么?" 3. **内控环境**: "客户的内控环境如何?是否有已知的内控缺陷?" 4. **历史问题": "上年审计有哪些发现或保留事项?" 5. **管理层关注**: "管理层或治理层特别关注哪些领域?"
## Verification
- [ ] 重要性水平已计算,且基准选择有合理依据 - [ ] 所有重大账户已识别,且认定已映射 - [ ] WCGW 分析覆盖每个重大账户/认定 - [ ] 显著风险已单独标识 - [ ] 舞弊风险已按 ISA 240 要求评估 - [ ] 审计策略与风险评估结果匹配 - [ ] 内部控制五要素均已了解和评价
## Saving
生成风险评估文档后,建议保存: - 作为 Markdown:`update_project_markdown_document` - 作为 Word:`write_project_office_document`(file_type=docx)
## Capability Upgrade
### Mode Selection
- **Quick**: 输出重大错报风险清单和初步审计响应。 - **Standard**: 形成风险评估矩阵、账户认定映射、控制了解和审计策略。 - **Deep**: 结合行业、财务波动、前期错报、舞弊风险、IT 环境和控制测试计划,形成完整计划阶段底稿。
### Assertion Mapping Model
每项风险必须映射到财务报表项目和认定:存在、完整性、准确性、截止、计价、权利义务、列报。没有认定映射的风险不能直接转化为审计程序。
### Quality Gates
- [ ] 风险来源包含行业、企业、账户、交易和舞弊维度。 - [ ] 每项重大风险都有认定、理由、证据和响应。 - [ ] 高风险账户与实质性程序设计相衔接。 - [ ] 内控了解结论没有被误写成控制有效性结论。 - [ ] 数据缺口和管理层假设已单独披露。
### Deliverable Catalog
| Deliverable | When to use | Minimum content | Format | |-------------|-------------|-----------------|--------| | Risk assessment memo | 审计计划阶段 | 行业风险、企业风险、账户风险、舞弊风险和审计响应 | Word / Markdown | | Risk and assertion matrix | 设计审计程序前 | 风险、账户、认定、固有风险、控制风险、响应程序 | Excel | | Fraud risk assessment | 必须评估舞弊风险 | 压力、机会、合理化、红旗信号和应对程序 | Markdown / Excel | | Internal control understanding note | 了解内控 | 流程、控制点、设计评价、资料来源和缺口 | Word | | Planning meeting pack | 项目组计划会 | 关键风险、重大性、审计策略、资源和时间安排 | PPT | | Data request list | 信息缺口明显 | 财务、流程、合同、系统、访谈和管理层说明清单 | Markdown / Excel |
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- Aug 24, 2026
- Published
- Aug 24, 2026
Decision snapshot
Fallback candidate
recent repository activity
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 86/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for audit-risk-assessment, ready for a manual X post.
audit-risk-assessment: 基于 ISA 315 (Revised 2019) 框架执行审计计划阶段的风险评估。当用户需要 (1) 制定审计计划 (2) 识别重大错报风险 (3) 评估内部控制 (4) 确定重要性水... 37 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for audit-risk-assessment: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment?ref=x Install: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-risk-assessment
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- guoliang1114-boop
- Source
- guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to guoliang1114-boop but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-risk-assessment)Author
guoliang1114-boop
@guoliang1114-boop
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 37
- Quality score
- 34/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 24, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 1
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Sandbox only
- GitHub adoption37 GitHub starsCHECK
- Stars/forks activity37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataCHECK
- Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
- License clarityMITPASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessPublic metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md contextINFO
- Dependency/runtime riskno major dependency risk hints in public metadataPASS
Related skills
Wazuh
Wazuh - The Open Source Security Platform. Unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads.
16.3K StarsMaigret
🕵️♂️ Collect a dossier on a person by username from 3000+ sites
32.9K StarsNuclei
Nuclei is a fast, customizable vulnerability scanner powered by the global security community and built on a simple YAML-based DSL, enabling collaboration to tackle trending vulnerabilities on the internet. It helps you find vulnerabilities in your applications, APIs, networks, DNS, and cloud configurations.
29.2K StarsInfisical
Infisical is the open-source platform for secrets, certificates, and privileged access management.
27.4K Stars