Creator · guoliang1114-boop
Last updated · Aug 24, 2026
audit-report-draft
起草审计报告,基于ISA 700/701/706框架,覆盖意见类型决策逻辑、关键审计事项、强调事项段等。
Sandbox only
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "audit-report-draft" agent skill from https://github.com/guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI/tree/main/skills/audit-report-draft. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: 起草审计报告,基于ISA 700/701/706框架,覆盖意见类型决策逻辑、关键审计事项、强调事项段等。 After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft","task":"Install audit-report-draft","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Research and knowledge work
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-report-draft
Maintenance
fresh
1d since push
Risk
Needs review
No explicit security considerations or permission boundaries described for the tools used, though no risky behavior is indicated.
GitHub quality
37
63/100 Quality · 72/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
No explicit security considerations or permission boundaries described for the tools used, though no risky behavior is indicated. · Low GitHub adoption signal
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
37 GitHub stars
Repo activity
37 stars, 2 forks
Maintenance
1d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-report-draft
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Thin public metadata
Risk summary
Review before production
- No explicit security considerations or permission boundaries described for the tools used, though no risky behavior is indicated.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 37 GitHub stars
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
View technical data+
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Research agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Search sources
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-report-draft
- Policy
- review
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 64/100
- Audit
- 77/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-report-draftDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- No explicit security considerations or permission boundaries described for the tools used, though no risky behavior is indicated.
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Agent safety v2
61/100 · Review before install
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
- No explicit security considerations or permission boundaries described for the tools used, though no risky behavior is indicated.
Agent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20audit-report-draft%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20audit-report-draft%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use audit-report-draft in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20audit-report-draft%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft/install
Install command: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-report-draft
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=audit-report-draft&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use audit-report-draft for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft/install, then install with: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-report-draftRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20audit-report-draft%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
Needs review · 77/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Fallback candidate for Research agents
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Research agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidence
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 63/100 quality profile
review first
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- No explicit security considerations or permission boundaries described for the tools used, though no risky behavior is indicated.
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Research agents task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Sandbox only
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
CHECK37 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS1d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- No explicit security considerations or permission boundaries described for the tools used, though no risky behavior is indicated.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 37 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- README/SKILL.md completeness: Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Promising candidate for agent workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Publish consistently
Content automation
I need my agent to turn research and product updates into useful content drafts.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Overview
--- name: audit-report-draft description: "起草审计报告,基于ISA 700/701/706框架,覆盖意见类型决策逻辑、关键审计事项、强调事项段等。" --- # 审计报告起草
## When To Use - 审计完成阶段需要出具审计报告 - 需要确定适当的审计意见类型 - 需要编制关键审计事项(KAM)部分 - 需要添加强调事项段或其他事项段 - 需要与管理层和治理层沟通过审计报告内容
## Tools - `search` — 搜索审计结论、未更正错报、重大事项 - `read` — 读取审计调整汇总、风险评估、重要性水平 - `write` — 生成审计报告草稿 - `edit` — 修改意见措辞、更新KAM内容
## Framework
### 意见类型决策逻辑(ISA 700第14-22条)
``` 审计证据是否充分适当? ├── 是 → 财务报表是否在所有重大方面公允反映? │ ├── 是 → 无保留意见(Unmodified) │ └── 否 → 错报是否重大且广泛? │ ├── 是 → 否定意见(Adverse) │ └── 否 → 保留意见(Qualified) └── 否 → 无法获取充分审计证据的原因是否重大且广泛? ├── 是 → 无法表示意见(Disclaimer) └── 否 → 保留意见(Qualified) ```
### 无保留意见(ISA 700第24-28条) - 财务报表在所有重大方面按照适用的财务报告编制基础编制 - 审计师已获取充分、适当的审计证据 - 不存在需要修改意见的事项
### 保留意见(ISA 700第29-33条) - 存在错报或范围受限,但影响重大但不广泛 - 在意见段前增加"形成保留意见的基础"段 - 使用"除……的影响外"措辞
### 否定意见(ISA 700第34-36条) - 错报重大且广泛 - 在意见段前增加"形成否定意见的基础"段 - 使用"由于……的影响,财务报表未能在所有重大方面公允反映"措辞
### 无法表示意见(ISA 700第37-40条) - 无法获取充分、适当的审计证据,且影响重大且广泛 - 在意见段前增加"形成无法表示意见的基础"段 - 使用"由于……,我们无法对财务报表发表审计意见"措辞 - 不得在无法表示意见的审计报告中包含KAM
### 关键审计事项(ISA 701) 1. 从与治理层沟通的事项中识别最重要的事项 2. 考虑重大错报风险最高的领域 3. 考虑涉及重大管理层判断的领域 4. 考虑对财务报表有重大影响的交易或事项 5. 描述KAM:事项、审计应对及结果
### 强调事项段(ISA 706第6-8条) - 不影响审计意见的类型 - 用于提醒使用者关注已在财务报表中恰当列报或披露的事项 - 常见情形:重大不确定性、持续经营、重大会计政策变更
### 其他事项段(ISA 706第9-11条) - 用于沟通与使用者理解审计工作相关的事项 - 不影响审计意见
## Workflow 1. 汇总审计结论和发现的所有重大事项 2. 运用决策逻辑确定适当的审计意见类型 3. 识别并描述关键审计事项 4. 判断是否需要添加强调事项段或其他事项段 5. 起草审计报告全文 6. 与管理层和治理层沟通报告内容 7. 最终定稿并出具
## Output Format
```markdown # 审计报告
## 审计意见
我们审计了[被审计单位名称]的财务报表,包括[日期]的资产负债表,[期间]的利润表、现金流量表、所有者权益变动表以及相关财务报表附注。
我们认为,后附的财务报表在所有重大方面按照[适用的财务报告编制基础]编制,公允反映了[被审计单位名称][日期]的财务状况以及[期间]的经营成果和现金流量。
[如为保留/否定/无法表示意见,在此段前增加"形成意见的基础"段]
## 形成审计意见的基础 [如适用,描述导致保留/否定/无法表示意见的事项]
## 关键审计事项
关键审计事项是我们根据职业判断,认为对本期财务报表审计最为重要的事项。这些事项是在对财务报表整体进行审计并形成意见的背景下进行处理的,我们不对这些事项提供单独的意见。
### [关键审计事项1标题] **事项描述:** [描述该事项为何被认定为关键审计事项]
**审计应对:** [描述针对该事项执行的具体审计程序]
**审计结论:** [描述审计程序的结果和结论]
### [关键审计事项2标题] [同上格式]
## 强调事项段(如适用) 我们提醒财务报表使用者关注,如财务报表附注[X]所述,[描述需要强调的事项]。该事项不影响已发表的审计意见。
## 管理层和治理层对财务报表的责任 [描述管理层编制财务报表的责任和治理层监督财务报告过程的责任]
## 审计师对财务报表审计的责任 [描述审计师的责任,包括按照审计准则执行审计工作]
[审计师签名] [审计报告日期] ```
## Diagnostic Questions - 是否存在导致修改审计意见的事项? - 未更正错报是否影响审计意见类型? - 哪些事项应被认定为关键审计事项? - 是否存在需要在强调事项段中提及的重大不确定性? - 审计报告的措辞是否符合ISA 700的格式要求?
## Verification - 核实意见类型决策与实际情况一致 - 确认KAM的描述准确反映了审计关注点 - 验证报告格式符合ISA 700/701/706的要求 - 复核报告中的日期、名称、金额等关键信息
## Saving 将审计报告保存至 `audit-workpapers/[年份]/report/audit-report-draft.md`,最终版本保存至 `audit-reports/[年份]/[被审计单位名称]-audit-report.md`。
## Capability Upgrade
### Mode Selection
- **Quick**: 根据给定事实判断审计意见类型和报告关键段落。 - **Standard**: 起草完整审计报告,覆盖意见、基础、KAM、强调事项和其他信息。 - **Deep**: 结合审计调整、未更正错报、KAM 底稿、治理层沟通和管理层声明,形成可复核报告包。
### Opinion Decision Gate
必须先判断:证据是否充分适当、错报是否重大、影响是否广泛、披露是否充分、持续经营是否存在重大不确定性。报告文字必须能回溯到对应底稿和治理层沟通记录。
### Quality Gates
- [ ] 意见类型与错报/范围受限判断一致。 - [ ] KAM 描述包含为何重要、如何应对和相关披露。 - [ ] 强调事项不替代修正意见。 - [ ] 公司名称、期间、报表组成和日期准确。 - [ ] 报告版本与最终财务报表一致。
### Deliverable Catalog
| Deliverable | When to use | Minimum content | Format | |-------------|-------------|-----------------|--------| | Audit opinion decision memo | 判断报告意见类型 | 事实、错报/范围受限、重大性、广泛性、意见结论 | Markdown / Word | | Draft audit report | 起草正式报告 | 意见段、基础段、KAM、强调事项、其他信息和日期 | Word | | KAM analysis memo | 评估关键审计事项 | 事项背景、为何重要、审计应对、披露引用 | Markdown / Word | | Going concern reporting note | 存续经营不确定性 | 事项、管理层计划、审计证据、报告影响 | Markdown | | Governance reporting pack | 与治理层沟通 | 未更正错报、重大判断、报告影响、决策请求 | PPT / Word | | Final report checklist | 发布前复核 | 名称、期间、报表、意见、日期、签署和版本一致性 | Checklist |
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- Aug 24, 2026
- Published
- Aug 24, 2026
Decision snapshot
Fallback candidate
recent repository activity
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 81/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for audit-report-draft, ready for a manual X post.
For the next repo task, this is a skill worth shortlisting before another blank prompt. audit-report-draft: 起草审计报告,基于ISA 700/701/706框架,覆盖意见类型决策逻辑、关键审计事项、强调事项段等。 37 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for audit-report-draft: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft?ref=x Install: npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill audit-report-draft
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- guoliang1114-boop
- Source
- guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to guoliang1114-boop but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/guoliang1114-boop-audit-report-draft)Author
guoliang1114-boop
@guoliang1114-boop
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 37
- Quality score
- 35/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 24, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 0
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Sandbox only
- GitHub adoption37 GitHub starsCHECK
- Stars/forks activity37 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataCHECK
- Recent maintenance1d since pushPASS
- License clarityMITPASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessPublic metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md contextCHECK
- Dependency/runtime riskno major dependency risk hints in public metadataPASS
