angularjs-unit-testing
Use this skill for AngularJS unit testing, maintenance, and migration tasks
Profil de l’actif
Agents de code et de développement
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scénario
Testing and QA
I need my agent to test a web app, reproduce bugs, and verify fixes.
Adéquation Agent
Claude Code + Browser agents + CLI
Compatible avec Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI ou des Agents personnalisés.
Installer
Prêt
npx skills add greedychipmunk/agent-skills --skill angularjs-unit-testing
Maintenance
À jour
Mis à jour aujourd’hui
Risque
Revue nécessaire
Dependency or permission surface needs review
Qualité GitHub
14
59/100 Qualité · 57/100 Confiance
Tags de couverture
Notes de revue
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Carte d’adoption Agent
Confiance, audit et préparation à l’installation en un coup d’œil
Ces scores combinent les métadonnées publiques du dépôt, les signaux de revue OpenAgentSkill, la fraîcheur de maintenance et la préparation à l’installation. Ils servent à présélectionner et ne remplacent pas la revue humaine.
Qualité
PrometteurUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Confiance
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Revue nécessaireRevue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5
Revue humaine avant installation
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
14 stars GitHub
Activité du dépôt
14 stars et 1 forks
Maintenance
Mis à jour aujourd’hui
Licence
MIT
Installer
npx skills add greedychipmunk/agent-skills --skill angularjs-unit-testing
Sécurité d’installation
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Résultats Agent
Pas encore de données de résultats Agent
Documentation
Usable metadata, review docs
Résumé des risques
Revue approfondie requise
- The SKILL.md excerpt appears truncated at 'Test Organization' – ensure the full document is present and complete.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
Préparation à l’installation
Chemin d’installation disponible
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- La licence est déclarée
- Pas encore de preuve de résultat Agent-Proven
Métadonnées lisibles par Agent
Données de décision lisibles par machine pour ce skill.
Utilisez ce bloc ou le JSON intégré pour décider si un Agent doit installer ce skill, choisir une alternative ou demander d’abord une revue humaine.
Tâches adaptées
- workflows Browser automation
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Navigate pages
Agents adaptés
Décision d’installation
- Commande
- npx skills add greedychipmunk/agent-skills --skill angularjs-unit-testing
- Politique
- Bloquer
- Revue humaine
- Oui
Confiance et risque
- Confiance
- 45/100
- Audit
- 69/100
- Niveau de risque
- Revue nécessaire
Boucle de résultat
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- ID d’événement
- resolve
- Résultats
- 5
Commande d’installation
npx skills add greedychipmunk/agent-skills --skill angularjs-unit-testingNe pas utiliser quand
- Équipes qui nécessitent un SLA soutenu par le fournisseur
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt appears truncated at 'Test Organization' – ensure the full document is present and complete.
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Skill alternatif
Code Review
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Skill alternatif
Grill With Docs
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
Skill alternatif
To Spec
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
Skill alternatif
To Tickets
176.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets
Sécurité Agent v2
21/100 · Éviter l’installation automatique
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
Élevé
Exécution shell ou de commande
Les métadonnées de la skill font référence à des workflows de terminal, CLI, shell, sous-processus ou exécution de commande.
Moyen
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
Moyen
Accès réseau
La skill récupère probablement des pages distantes, API, dépôts ou services externes.
Moyen
Accès au système de fichiers
La skill peut lire ou écrire des fichiers de projet, documents, artefacts générés ou l’état local de l’espace de travail.
- Indices de permissions à haut risque : Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Cibles d’installation
Installer ce skill dans votre workflow Agent
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testingPlan de résolution Agent
Laissez un Agent vérifier la pertinence avant l’installation.
L’API Resolve renvoie la skill sélectionnée, des alternatives, la politique de sécurité, les notes d’audit, la cible d’installation et un prompt prêt à l’emploi.
Ouvrir JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20angularjs-unit-testing%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Texte Resolve
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20angularjs-unit-testing%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing/install
L’Agent doit vérifier
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copier le prompt
Task: Use angularjs-unit-testing in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20angularjs-unit-testing%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing/install
Install command: npx skills add greedychipmunk/agent-skills --skill angularjs-unit-testing
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Relais Agent
Donnez à l’Agent le chemin d’installation, pas un autre annuaire.
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing/install
Format texte LLM
/api/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing/install?format=text
Trouver des alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=angularjs-unit-testing&limit=3
Prompt Agent
Use angularjs-unit-testing for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing/install, then install with: npx skills add greedychipmunk/agent-skills --skill angularjs-unit-testingMétadonnées Registry
Profil lisible par Agent pour la sélection automatique de skills.
L’API Registry fournit les signaux de décision, confiance, audit, cas d’usage et installation sans analyser l’interface.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing
Texte LLM
/api/registry/manifest/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing?format=text
Alias d’installation
/api/registry/install/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing
Recommander
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20angularjs-unit-testing%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Adéquation Agent
Browser automation
Tags de cas d’usage
Plateformes
Claude Code, Browser agents
Rapport d’audit
Revue nécessaire · 69/100
Revue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Panneau de décision Agent
Fallback candidate for Browser automation
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rôle dans la pile
Candidate de secours
Pertinence principale
Browser automation
Libellé de confiance
Prototyper d’abord
Chemin d’installation
Commande prête
À utiliser lorsque
- workflows Browser automation
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Preuves
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- profil qualité 59/100
revoir d’abord
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt appears truncated at 'Test Organization' – ensure the full document is present and complete.
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Chemin d’implémentation
- 1Installez-le dans un Agent en sandbox et exécutez une tâche de Browser automation de bout en bout.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Profil de confiance
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Adoption GitHub
Corriger14 stars GitHub
Activité stars/forks
Corriger14 stars et 1 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Maintenance récente
ValidéMis à jour aujourd’hui
Clarté de licence
ValidéMIT
Signaux positifs
- Revue IA approuvée
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- Dépôt maintenu récemment
- La commande d’installation ne présente aucun motif de haut risque évident
- La boucle de résultats est prête mais nécessite la première exécution réelle de l’Agent
Réviser avant installation
- The SKILL.md excerpt appears truncated at 'Test Organization' – ensure the full document is present and complete.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 14 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 14 stars, 1 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Pas encore de rapports de résultats Agent réels
- Une revue humaine est requise avant une installation sans surveillance
Action recommandée
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Profil qualité
Prometteur candidat pour les workflows Agent
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Adéquation au workflow
Utilisez cette skill dans ces scénarios
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Verify behavior
Testing and QA
I need my agent to test a web app, reproduce bugs, and verify fixes.
Automate repeated work
Workflow automation
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Adéquation au workflow
Ajouter à un workflow complet
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Scrape, clean, and reuse web data
Web data pipeline
A practical workflow for agents that crawl public pages, extract clean content, normalize data, and hand it to downstream research or RAG workflows.
Liste d’alternatives
Comparer avant installation
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
To Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
Vue d’ensemble
--- name: angularjs-unit-testing description: Use this skill for AngularJS unit testing, maintenance, and migration tasks ---
# AngularJS Unit Testing Skill
## Overview
This skill specializes in writing, refactoring, and maintaining high-quality unit tests for AngularJS (1.x) applications. It covers controllers, services, filters, directives, HTTP mocking, promises, and dependency injection — everything you need to keep an AngularJS codebase well-tested and reliable.
> **Note**: AngularJS reached end-of-life in December 2021. It receives only critical security fixes. New projects should use Angular 19+. For teams maintaining AngularJS codebases, this skill provides the latest testing patterns, tooling, and migration guidance. See [Migration Path](#migration-path-angularjs--angular) at the bottom of this document.
## Skill Capabilities
### Core Testing Competencies
- **Controllers**: Write tests for controller logic, state management, and event handling - **Services**: Test factory/service dependencies, HTTP calls, and business logic - **Filters**: Validate filter transformations and edge cases - **Directives**: Test directive compilation, linking, and DOM manipulation - **HTTP Mocking**: Mock HTTP calls using `$httpBackend` (Jasmine/Karma) or MSW/fetch mocks (Jest) - **Promises & Async**: Handle `$q`, deferred objects, and `$timeout` - **Dependency Injection**: Test with mocked and real dependencies - **Scope Management**: Test scope lifecycle, watchers, and event broadcasting - **Coverage Analysis**: Generate and interpret code coverage reports - **Test Organization**: Structure tests following best practices and maintainability principles - **Framework Choice**: Jest for new work and hybrid repos; Jasmine/Karma for existing suites
### Testing Patterns
This skill implements the following testing patterns:
1. **AAA Pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)** - Organize tests with clear setup, execution, and verification phases - Improves readability and maintainability
2. **Mocking & Spying** - Use Jasmine spies or Jest mocks to mock functions and verify calls - Mock HTTP responses and service dependencies - Simulate user interactions
3. **Test Fixtures** - Create reusable test data and helper functions - Use beforeEach/afterEach for common setup/teardown - Reduce test duplication
4. **Edge Case Testing** - Test boundary conditions, empty states, and error scenarios - Validate error handling and graceful degradation - Test asynchronous operations and race conditions
5. **Snapshot Testing** (Jest) - Capture expected component output - Detect unintended changes in UI rendering
6. **Deterministic Async** - Prefer fake timers, controlled promises, and isolated state over timing-sensitive assertions
## Testing Frameworks & Test Runners
### Jasmine (Legacy Default)
Jasmine remains the safest choice when you are preserving an existing AngularJS + Karma suite.
**Key Concepts**: - `describe()`: Group related tests into a test suite - `it()`: Define individual test cases - `expect()`: Create assertions - `beforeEach()` / `afterEach()`: Setup and teardown hooks - `spyOn()` / `jasmine.createSpy()`: Mock functions and track calls
**Setup**: ```bash npm install --save-dev jasmine karma karma-jasmine karma-chrome-launcher ```
**Use when**: - You are maintaining an existing Jasmine/Karma suite - You want the smallest possible change set for legacy AngularJS code
### Jest (Recommended)
Jest is the modern default for AngularJS test maintenance and migration work. It runs tests in parallel, has stronger mocking APIs, supports snapshots, and includes built-in coverage reporting.
**Key Concepts**: - `describe()`: Group related tests - `test()` or `it()`: Define individual test cases - `expect()`: Create assertions - `beforeEach()` / `afterEach()`: Setup and teardown hooks - `jest.fn()`: Create mock functions - `jest.spyOn()`: Spy on existing methods - `jest.mock()`: Mock modules
**Setup**: ```bash npm install --save-dev jest jest-preset-angular angular-mocks npm install @angular/core ```
**Jest Configuration** (`jest.config.js`): ```javascript module.exports = { preset: 'jest-preset-angular', testEnvironment: 'jsdom', setupFilesAfterEnv: ['<rootDir>/setup-jest.js'], transform: { '^.+\.js$': 'babel-jest' }, collectCoverage: true, collectCoverageFrom: ['src/**/*.js', '!src/**/*.spec.js'] }; ```
**Use when**: - You want faster feedback from parallel execution - You need better mocking, snapshots, and coverage out of the box - You are preparing an AngularJS codebase for an Angular migration
### Karma (Legacy Runner)
Karma is the legacy browser test runner traditionally paired with Jasmine. It is still usable for existing suites, but it has seen no major releases since 2021 and should not be the basis for new investment.
**Configuration**: - `karma.conf.js`: Main configuration file - Specifies browser environment, files to load, and plugins - Supports code coverage reporting and CI integration
## Jest Migration Guide
Use these steps when moving an AngularJS test suite from Jasmine/Karma to Jest:
1. **Install the core tooling** ```bash npm install --save-dev jest jest-preset-angular angular-mocks npm install @angular/core ``` Add `@angular/core` when the repo is hybrid or actively migrating toward Angular.
2. **Create a Jest setup file** - Add `setup-jest.js` or `setup-jest.ts` - Load `angular`, `angular-mocks`, and any shared test polyfills there
3. **Configure Jest for AngularJS files** - Use `jest.config.js` with `testEnvironment: 'jsdom'` - Add a transform for legacy JavaScript sources - Keep template or DOM-specific setup in the Jest bootstrap file
4. **Load AngularJS modules in Jest** ```javascript beforeEach(() => { require('angular'); require('angular-mocks'); angular.mock.module('myApp'); }); ```
5. **Migrate spies and stubs** - `spyOn(obj, 'method')` → `jest.spyOn(obj, 'method')` - `jasmine.createSpy()` → `jest.fn()` - `jasmine.createSpyObj()` → `jest.fn()` or explicit mock objects
6. **Replace `$httpBackend` where practical** - Prefer `fetch` mocks or MSW for new Jest tests - Keep `$httpBackend` only for legacy tests that are expensive to rewrite immediately
7. **Reset state between tests** - Use `jest.clearAllMocks()` / `jest.resetAllMocks()` - Recreate AngularJS modules and services in `beforeEach()`
## Handling Environmental Flakiness
Legacy AngularJS suites often fail because the environment is unstable, not because the code is broken.
**Common sources of flakiness**: - Timing issues and race conditions - Shared state between tests - Browser environment differences - Network-dependent tests and real external services - Time zone, locale, and date-sensitive logic
**Deterministic test patterns**: - Use fake timers for scheduled work and debounce/throttle logic - Keep async work controlled with explicit promise resolution and digest flushing - Reset shared state, mocks, and module caches in `afterEach()` - Avoid real browser/network dependencies in unit tests - Prefer fixed test data over generated or time-based values
**js-env-sanitizer pattern**: - Snapshot and restore environment-dependent globals around each test - Isolate `window`, `document`, `localStorage`, `Date`, `Math.random`, feature flags, and DOM mutations - This is especially useful in long-lived AngularJS suites where hidden environment coupling causes intermittent failures
## Test Pyramid Guidance for Legacy Codebases
Legacy AngularJS codebases often have an inverted test pyramid: too many end-to-end tests and too few unit tests.
**Recommended shape**: - **Base**: many fast unit tests for controllers, services, filters, and directives - **Middle**: fewer integration tests for module wiring, routing, and API boundaries - **Top**: a small number of end-to-end tests for critical user journeys only
**Guidance**: - Shift coverage toward unit tests first - Keep integration tests as the middle layer, not the base - Use e2e tests sparingly because they are slower and more environment-sensitive
## Test Structure
### Jasmine Test Structure (Legacy Default)
All Jasmine tests follow this standard structure:
```javascript describe('Component Name', function() { var componentUnderTest, dependencies;
beforeEach(module('myApp'));
beforeEach(inject(function($injector) { componentUnderTest = $injector.get('ComponentName'); dependencies = $injector.get('DependencyName'); }));
afterEach(function() { // Cleanup code });
describe('Functionality Group', function() { it('should do something specific', function() { // Arrange var input = 'test';
// Act var result = componentUnderTest.method(input);
// Assert expect(result).toBe('expected'); }); }); }); ```
### Jest Test Structure (Recommended)
Jest tests follow a similar structure with modern mocking and cleaner teardown:
```javascript describe('Component Name', () => { let componentUnderTest; let dependency;
beforeEach(() => { jest.clearAllMocks(); // Setup code or mock initialization dependency = { method: jest.fn() }; componentUnderTest = require('./component'); });
afterEach(() => { // Cleanup code });
describe('Functionality Group', () => { test('should do something specific', () => { // Arrange const input = 'test';
// Act const result = componentUnderTest.method(input, dependency);
// Assert expect(result).toBe('expected'); }); }); }); ```
**Key Differences**: - Jest uses `jest.fn()` / `jest.spyOn()` instead of Jasmine spies for modern test code - Jest uses `test()` or `it()` (both work) - Jest auto-discovers `.spec.js` and `.test.js` files - Jest provides built-in snapshot testing and code coverage
## Best Practices
### 1. Test Organization - One test file per component (e.g., `controller.spec.js` for `controller.js`) - Organize tests into logical groups using `describe()` - Use meaningful test names that describe expected behavior
### 2. DRY Principle (Don't Repeat Yourself) - Extract common setup into `beforeEach()` blocks - Create reusable test data fixtures - Use helper functions to reduce duplication
### 3. Test Independence - Each test should be independent and runnable in any order - Clean up resources in `afterEach()` - Avoid shared state between tests
### 4. Realistic Mocks - Mock external dependencies realistically - Use actual data structures when possible - Avoid overly simplified or unrealistic mocks
### 5. Comprehensive Coverage - Aim for 80%+ code coverage - Test happy paths, edge cases, and error scenarios - Test async operations and race conditions
### 6. Performance - Keep tests fast - Use in-memory mocks instead of real HTTP requests - Avoid unnecessary database operations
### 7. Maintainability - Write tests that are easy to understand - Use the AAA pattern for clarity - Document complex test logic with comments - Refactor tests when the component changes
## Common Testing Scenarios
### Testing Controllers
```javascript describe('UserController', function() { var $scope, controller;
beforeEach(module('myApp')); beforeEach(inject(function($controller, $rootScope) { $scope = $rootScope.$new(); controller = $controller('UserController', { $scope: $scope }); }));
it('should initialize with default values', function() { expect($scope.users).toBeDefined(); });
it('should load users on init', function() { expect($scope.users.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); }); }); ```
### Testing Services
```javascript describe('UserService', function() { var userService, $httpBackend;
beforeEach(module('myApp')); beforeEach(inject(function(_UserService_, _$httpBackend_) { userService = _UserService_; $httpBackend = _$httpBackend_; }));
afterEach(function() { $httpBackend.ver
Détails techniques
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Licence
- MIT
- Dernière mise à jour
- 22 août 2026
- Publié
- 22 août 2026
Instantané de décision
Candidate de secours
recent repository activity
Audit
Revue d’installation
Revue d’installation et d’adoption
- Sécurité
- 66/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Installer
- 92/100
Preuves validées par Agent
Preuves validées par Agent
Rapports après resolve, revue, installation et une exécution limitée.
- Taux de réussite
- —
- Échec récent
- —
- Résultats
- 0
- Qualité de sortie
- —
- Échecs
- 0
- Non pertinent
- 0
- Installations
- 0
- Bloqué par le risque
- 0
- Configuration requise
- 0
- Production
- 0
Aucune donnée de résultat Agent pour l’instant. La première exécution peut signaler succès, besoin de configuration, blocage de risque, échec ou non-pertinence via /api/agent/outcome.
Installer
Ajouter au workflow Agent
Gratuit et open source. Examinez le rapport avant l’installation dans des Agents de production.
Boucle de croissance
Kit de partage
Brouillon guidé par scénario pour angularjs-unit-testing, prêt pour une publication manuelle sur X.
Before you hand an agent a repeatable workflow, give it a repeatable starting point. angularjs-unit-testing: Use this skill for AngularJS unit testing, maintenance, and migration tasks 14 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing?ref=x
Réponse facultative avec commande d’installation
Listing + install path for angularjs-unit-testing: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing?ref=x Install: npx skills add greedychipmunk/agent-skills --skill angularjs-unit-testing
Source de la fiche
Indexé par Registry
Cette fiche a été indexée à partir de sources publiques et n’est pas marquée officielle tant qu’une revendication de mainteneur n’est pas approuvée.
- Créateur
- greedychipmunk
- Indexé par
- Index communautaire OpenAgentSkill
L’attribution renvoie au dépôt public ou au profil du créateur. Les créateurs peuvent revendiquer la fiche pour mettre à jour les signaux de propriété.
Revendiquer ce skillRevendication du propriétaire
Revendiquer cette fiche de skill
Cette fiche Indexé par Registry est attribuée à greedychipmunk, mais n’est pas encore marquée officielle. Revendiquez-la pour ajouter un signal de propriétaire vérifié et rendre les futures mises à jour de lancement, d’installation et d’audit plus fiables.
Kit de backlinks créateur
Ajoutez les badges de preuve à votre README
Affichez la fiche canonique, les signaux actuels de confiance et d’audit, ainsi que de vraies preuves Agent-Proven là où les développeurs évaluent le dépôt.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/greedychipmunk-angularjs-unit-testing)Auteur
greedychipmunk
@greedychipmunk
Tags
Adéquation plateforme
Signaux de santé
- Stars GitHub
- 14
- Score de qualité
- 32/100
- Dernier push GitHub
- 22 août 2026
- Indications de framework
- Inconnu
- Vues OpenAgentSkill
- 0
- Copies d’installation
- 0
- Clics sortants
- 0
Signal de communauté
Indiquez si ce skill semble utile à votre workflow Agent. Les retours agrégés améliorent le classement au fil du temps.
Confiance et sécurité
Do not auto-install
- Adoption GitHub14 stars GitHubCorriger
- Activité stars/forks14 stars et 1 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuellesCorriger
- Maintenance récenteMis à jour aujourd’huiValidé
- Clarté de licenceMITValidé
- Complétude README/SKILL.mdLes métadonnées publiques nécessitent davantage de contexte README/SKILL.mdInfo
- Risque dépendances/runtimecommand execution surface, credential or environment accessCorriger
Skills associés
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarsTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K StarsTo Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
176.7K Stars