OpenAgentSkill
GitHub200+
google-ai-edge

Registry 색인

gpu-clean-conversion

Convert a PyTorch or Hugging Face model into a LiteRT model that runs fully on the GPU via the CompiledModel API with verified-correct output, and lay it out as a model recipe. Use when converting a new model, or when a converted model is rejected by the GPU, falls back to CPU, o

소스 확인GitHub에서 보기
가격 미확인★ 459 GitHub 스타목록 업데이트 · 2026년 10월 9일agent-skill

개요

Convert a PyTorch or Hugging Face model into a LiteRT model that runs fully on the GPU via the CompiledModel API with verified-correct output, and lay it out as a model recipe. Use when converting a new model, or when a converted model is rejected by the GPU, falls back to CPU, or returns wrong numbers on device.

전체 설명 읽기

소스 문서이며 이 웹사이트의 실행 지침이 아닙니다. 명령 실행 전에 권한을 확인하세요.

GPU-clean conversion

A conversion is done when three things hold, in this order:

  1. it converts,
  2. every node runs on the GPU,
  3. the on-device output matches the source model.

Step 3 is not implied by step 2. The delegate can report full residency and still return wrong numbers — that is the failure mode most of the rewrites below exist for. Never call a model done without a numerical check against CPU or PyTorch on the actual device.

Loop

1. Convert plain first. No patches. This tells you what the model actually needs rather than what you assumed.

2. Verify through the CompiledModel API before touching a device.

from litert_gpu_toolkit import check_gpu_compatibility, print_report
print_report(check_gpu_compatibility("model.tflite"))

It compiles the model for the GPU accelerator, runs every signature on random inputs, and compares the outputs against a CPU-compiled reference. A failed GPU compile names the offending op — route it through the table below. A pass with a CPU-fallback warning means some ops fell back to the CPU; treat them the same way if you need full residency. This exercises the host GPU, so step 5 on the actual device is still required.

3. Map each symptom to a rewrite. The rewrites live in utilities/litert_gpu_toolkit — plain Python, no build step. Outside this repo, clone litert-samples and put utilities/ on PYTHONPATH, or vendor the directory:

What you seeRewrite
GATHER_ND named in the compile errorFind its source. Stride-2 slicing (x[:, ::2], Focus stems, patch merging), grid_sample, MaxPool padding, bicubic interpolate, and reflect-mode F.pad all lower to it. patch_grid_sample, patch_maxpool_zeropad, patch_interpolate, patch_patch_merging
A rank-5+ tensor named in the compile errorPixelShuffle (rank-6 reshape), windowed attention, einops.rearrange, packed-QKV attention head splits. pixelshuffle_to_conv_transpose, patch_window_attention, patch_einops
TRANSPOSE_CONV rejectedVersion skew, not a missing op. ZeroStuffConvT1d / ZeroStuffConvT2d — zero-stuff plus a plain conv, exact to ~1e-7
SELECT / SELECT_V2PReLU, ELU, in-place index assignment, and torch.where masking. Replace with arithmetic: x*(1-m) + v*m
BROADCAST_TOTwo cases. On a compile-time constant: an outer product or .expand that did not fold — bake the result as a constant at its target shape. On a runtime tensor the GPU delegate rejects it outright, even at rank 4 — the canonical case is GQA's repeat_kv (x[:,:,None].expand(...), which is also rank-5, so two walls in one line). Exact rewrite: torch.cat([x[:, i:i+1].expand(b, n_rep, s, d) for i in range(n_kv)], dim=1) — same head order, bit-exact. Tracked upstream: google-ai-edge/LiteRT#9191
Masked attention wrong only on device: token 0 bit-exact, every later token wrongBroadcast ADD whose LHS is a BATCH_MATMUL result (the scores + mask[1,1,S,S] idiom) silently miscomputed on ai-edge-litert 2.1.3 and 2.1.5 and is fixed in 2.1.6 (head-axis size-1 broadcast only; google-ai-edge/LiteRT#8593, closed as fixed; the 2.1.6 release notes list GPU broadcast fixes). The signature mimics broken RoPE — tap the rope output before blaming it. Rewrites on the older runtimes: pre-expand the mask to [1,H,S,S], or materialize the BMM as a second output
An ADD result that is both a graph output and consumed downstream comes back wrongOutput aliasing: the returned tensor holds an operand, not the sum — ADD with two runtime operands (SUB/MUL exact, x + 1.0 exact). This is the shape of every explicit state update in a streaming/recurrent graph. Workaround: emit acc * one where one is a runtime input holding 1.0 — a constant folds straight back into the pattern. Tracked upstream: google-ai-edge/LiteRT#8599
RELU_0_TO_1 rejected by the GPU delegateEmitted by hard-sigmoid / nn.Hardtanh(0,1). Accepted in litert 2.1.3, rejected from 2.1.5 on — a model at full residency on an older runtime hard-fails CompiledModel creation after an upgrade. Rewrite: relu(x) - relu(x-1), exact. Tracked upstream: google-ai-edge/LiteRT#8598
DIV: No support of few identical inputs / Expected 1 const input tensor(s), device onlyThe delegate declines an op whose two inputs are the same tensor, and ops whose inputs are all constants — together these split a perceiver-style block (softmax over a length-1 axis of a constant latent bank) into several partitions. Fixes: special-case the degenerate axis (a softmax over a length-1 axis is identically 1), or make one input non-constant. Note the sibling LayerNorm-over-a-constant pattern no longer reaches the delegate at all — the converter folds it to a single MUL. Tracked upstream: google-ai-edge/LiteRT#9192
NHWC node rewriter not found: amaxx.amax(...)/x.max(dim) in stable-softmax, adaptive norms, qk-norm. Rewrite channel reduce-max as max_pool2d(x.reshape(N,1,C,H*W), kernel=(C,1)) — numerically identical — or drop the norm to 3D
Lowering not found: aten._fft_r2c / aten.complextorch.stft/istft and complex views have no lowering (fails before any GPU check). A DFT is a fixed linear map: windowed-DFT as Conv1d with the cos/sin basis baked into kernels (stride = hop), iSTFT as inverse-DFT matmul + overlap-add via zero-stuffed conv-transpose — exact. Model-selection corollary: prefer time-domain vocoder branches over iSTFT-based ones. ⚠ Library STFT-as-conv stacks (torchlibrosa-style) have numerically mis-converted (corr 0.83) while the op check looks clean — verify the spectrogram numerically or compute log-mel host-side
Compiles, runs, output is wrong or NaNThe fp16 reduction family — and the trigger is the fp16 accumulator passing 65504, so a plain single-axis mean/sum over enough elements overflows just like variance does. patch_safe_layernorm, patch_rmsnorm, patch_instance_norm, hierarchical_mean. Caveats: at extreme magnitudes (|x| in the thousands) even the adaptive safe-LN form overflows when it reconstructs the large variance — the robust form stays entirely in the down-scaled domain (xs = x/S, normalize xs, never multiply the variance back by S²); hierarchical_mean is exact only for power-of-two spatial dims (for arbitrary dims, cascade /2 avg-pools with ceil_mode so each stage averages ≤~49 elements). Diagnostic split: all-zero/all-blank output = an overflow in one block; a result that starts near-correct and degrades with depth = precision compounding, which no overflow patch (and no fp32-precision flag) fixes
Head outputs exactly zeroRMSNorm Σx² overflowed fp16 to inf. patch_rmsnorm

4. Re-convert and re-verify. Repeat 2–3 until the check passes.

5. Verify on device, numerically. Run the same input through the source model and the on-device graph and compare. Correlation on the output tensor, plus a task-level check where one exists (argmax match, IoU, mask foreground count). Record the device and the residency line (N/N nodes) alongside the number — a result without both is not reproducible.

If residency is full and the output is wrong, bisect by intermediate: dump tensors at block boundaries and find the first one that diverges. The cause is usually a reduction, not the op you suspect.

Watch for

  • fp16 is used even for an fp32 graph. The delegate reduces in fp16 regardless of tensor dtype by default (the GPU options carry a precision setting — CompiledModel.GpuOptions(precision = …) in Kotlin — that can request fp32 at a speed cost). Anything that sums many large values — variance, Σx², multi-axis mean — is a candidate.
  • Approximation choices are not free. Substituting a GELU or Swish approximation changes numerics. A head with a wide output range can lose real accuracy to the coarser form.
  • inplace=True activations mutate a residual. out = self.act(x) then x + out adds relu(x), not x. Swapping the activation silently changes the math.
  • A silent CPU fallback looks like success. If the GPU output is bit-identical to CPU fp32, it probably did not run on the GPU. Genuine fp16 execution drifts in the last digits. The runtime's own count is the line N operations will run on the GPU, and the remaining M operations will run on the CPU.; a node the delegate declines while building (TopK requires src tensor C dimension to be divisible by 4) leaves only that log behind — the checker's report can read fully-on-GPU while the op ran on the CPU (ai-edge-litert 2.2.0 and 2.3.0).
  • Reflect padding routes through F.pad even at padding=0 — every conv with padding_mode='reflect' is affected, not just padded ones. Slice+concat reflect pads are cheap for small pad widths.
  • Channel-attention through a Linear confuses layout handling at convert time (tfl.mul operands don't have broadcast-compatible shapes) — express channel attention as a 1×1 conv.
  • .chunk() lowers to SPLIT (GPU-rejected) — slice directly instead; bit-exact.
  • Constant folding can explode the file: a frozen-param × constant product materializes at full size per block (fp16 casting skips non-weight constants, so it cannot rescue it). Feed one factor as a runtime input — param × input never folds.

Output layout

Ship the result as a model recipe, not a one-off script:

models/<family>/<model>/
  README.md                 what the model is, what was produced
  converted/
    README.md               environments, pipeline, verification results
    export_*.py             one script per graph
    dump_*_ref.py           reference dumps from the source model
    verify_*.py             parity check against those references

Keep the export, the reference dump, and the verification separate so each can be re-run alone. State the verification numbers in the README with the device they came from. Weights are not committed.

The tree above is this repo's convention. In your own project the directory names matter less than the split — keep the same three separately-runnable pieces wherever your models live.

Do the model first. A demo can follow, and reusable inference code matters more in it than a full UI.

소스 보기 ↗
파일 메타데이터
name: gpu-clean-conversion
description: Convert a PyTorch or Hugging Face model into a LiteRT model that runs fully on the GPU via the CompiledModel API with verified-correct output, and lay it out as a model recipe. Use when converting a new model, or when a converted model is rejected by the GPU, falls back to CPU, or returns wrong numbers on device.
원문 보기
---
name: gpu-clean-conversion
description: Convert a PyTorch or Hugging Face model into a LiteRT model that runs fully on the GPU via the CompiledModel API with verified-correct output, and lay it out as a model recipe. Use when converting a new model, or when a converted model is rejected by the GPU, falls back to CPU, or returns wrong numbers on device.
---

# GPU-clean conversion

A conversion is done when three things hold, in this order:

1. it converts,
2. every node runs on the GPU,
3. **the on-device output matches the source model.**

Step 3 is not implied by step 2. The delegate can report full residency and
still return wrong numbers — that is the failure mode most of the rewrites
below exist for. Never call a model done without a numerical check against
CPU or PyTorch on the actual device.

## Loop

**1. Convert plain first.** No patches. This tells you what the model
actually needs rather than what you assumed.

**2. Verify through the CompiledModel API before touching a device.**

```python
from litert_gpu_toolkit import check_gpu_compatibility, print_report
print_report(check_gpu_compatibility("model.tflite"))
```

It compiles the model for the GPU accelerator, runs every signature on
random inputs, and compares the outputs against a CPU-compiled reference.
A failed GPU compile names the offending op — route it through the table
below. A pass with a CPU-fallback warning means some ops fell back to the
CPU; treat them the same way if you need full residency. This exercises the
host GPU, so step 5 on the actual device is still required.

**3. Map each symptom to a rewrite.** The rewrites live in
`utilities/litert_gpu_toolkit` — plain Python, no build step. Outside this
repo, clone litert-samples and put `utilities/` on `PYTHONPATH`, or vendor
the directory:

| What you see | Rewrite |
|---|---|
| `GATHER_ND` named in the compile error | Find its source. Stride-2 slicing (`x[:, ::2]`, Focus stems, patch merging), `grid_sample`, `MaxPool` padding, bicubic `interpolate`, and reflect-mode `F.pad` all lower to it. `patch_grid_sample`, `patch_maxpool_zeropad`, `patch_interpolate`, `patch_patch_merging` |
| A rank-5+ tensor named in the compile error | `PixelShuffle` (rank-6 reshape), windowed attention, `einops.rearrange`, packed-QKV attention head splits. `pixelshuffle_to_conv_transpose`, `patch_window_attention`, `patch_einops` |
| `TRANSPOSE_CONV` rejected | Version skew, not a missing op. `ZeroStuffConvT1d` / `ZeroStuffConvT2d` — zero-stuff plus a plain conv, exact to ~1e-7 |
| `SELECT` / `SELECT_V2` | `PReLU`, `ELU`, in-place index assignment, and `torch.where` masking. Replace with arithmetic: `x*(1-m) + v*m` |
| `BROADCAST_TO` | Two cases. On a compile-time constant: an outer product or `.expand` that did not fold — bake the result as a constant at its target shape. On a **runtime** tensor the GPU delegate rejects it outright, even at rank 4 — the canonical case is GQA's `repeat_kv` (`x[:,:,None].expand(...)`, which is also rank-5, so two walls in one line). Exact rewrite: `torch.cat([x[:, i:i+1].expand(b, n_rep, s, d) for i in range(n_kv)], dim=1)` — same head order, bit-exact. Tracked upstream: google-ai-edge/LiteRT#9191 |
| Masked attention wrong only on device: token 0 bit-exact, every later token wrong | Broadcast `ADD` whose LHS is a `BATCH_MATMUL` result (the `scores + mask[1,1,S,S]` idiom) silently miscomputed on ai-edge-litert 2.1.3 and 2.1.5 and is fixed in 2.1.6 (head-axis size-1 broadcast only; google-ai-edge/LiteRT#8593, closed as fixed; the 2.1.6 release notes list GPU broadcast fixes). The signature mimics broken RoPE — tap the rope output before blaming it. Rewrites on the older runtimes: pre-expand the mask to `[1,H,S,S]`, or materialize the BMM as a second output |
| An `ADD` result that is both a graph output **and** consumed downstream comes back wrong | Output aliasing: the returned tensor holds an *operand*, not the sum — `ADD` with two runtime operands (`SUB`/`MUL` exact, `x + 1.0` exact). This is the shape of every explicit state update in a streaming/recurrent graph. Workaround: emit `acc * one` where `one` is a **runtime** input holding 1.0 — a constant folds straight back into the pattern. Tracked upstream: google-ai-edge/LiteRT#8599 |
| `RELU_0_TO_1` rejected by the GPU delegate | Emitted by hard-sigmoid / `nn.Hardtanh(0,1)`. Accepted in litert 2.1.3, rejected from 2.1.5 on — a model at full residency on an older runtime hard-fails `CompiledModel` creation after an upgrade. Rewrite: `relu(x) - relu(x-1)`, exact. Tracked upstream: google-ai-edge/LiteRT#8598 |
| `DIV: No support of few identical inputs` / `Expected 1 const input tensor(s)`, device only | The delegate declines an op whose two inputs are the same tensor, and ops whose inputs are all constants — together these split a perceiver-style block (softmax over a length-1 axis of a constant latent bank) into several partitions. Fixes: special-case the degenerate axis (a softmax over a length-1 axis is identically 1), or make one input non-constant. Note the sibling LayerNorm-over-a-constant pattern no longer reaches the delegate at all — the converter folds it to a single `MUL`. Tracked upstream: google-ai-edge/LiteRT#9192 |
| `NHWC node rewriter not found: amax` | `x.amax(...)`/`x.max(dim)` in stable-softmax, adaptive norms, qk-norm. Rewrite channel reduce-max as `max_pool2d(x.reshape(N,1,C,H*W), kernel=(C,1))` — numerically identical — or drop the norm to 3D |
| `Lowering not found: aten._fft_r2c` / `aten.complex` | `torch.stft`/`istft` and complex views have no lowering (fails before any GPU check). A DFT is a fixed linear map: windowed-DFT as `Conv1d` with the cos/sin basis baked into kernels (stride = hop), iSTFT as inverse-DFT matmul + overlap-add via zero-stuffed conv-transpose — exact. Model-selection corollary: prefer time-domain vocoder branches over iSTFT-based ones. ⚠ Library STFT-as-conv stacks (torchlibrosa-style) have **numerically mis-converted** (corr 0.83) while the op check looks clean — verify the spectrogram numerically or compute log-mel host-side |
| Compiles, runs, output is wrong or NaN | The fp16 reduction family — and the trigger is the **fp16 accumulator passing 65504**, so a plain single-axis mean/sum over enough elements overflows just like variance does. `patch_safe_layernorm`, `patch_rmsnorm`, `patch_instance_norm`, `hierarchical_mean`. Caveats: at extreme magnitudes (\|x\| in the thousands) even the adaptive safe-LN form overflows when it reconstructs the large variance — the robust form stays entirely in the down-scaled domain (`xs = x/S`, normalize `xs`, never multiply the variance back by `S²`); `hierarchical_mean` is exact only for power-of-two spatial dims (for arbitrary dims, cascade `/2` avg-pools with `ceil_mode` so each stage averages ≤~49 elements). Diagnostic split: **all-zero/all-blank output = an overflow in one block; a result that starts near-correct and degrades with depth = precision compounding**, which no overflow patch (and no fp32-precision flag) fixes |
| Head outputs exactly zero | RMSNorm `Σx²` overflowed fp16 to `inf`. `patch_rmsnorm` |

**4. Re-convert and re-verify.** Repeat 2–3 until the check passes.

**5. Verify on device, numerically.** Run the same input through the source
model and the on-device graph and compare. Correlation on the output tensor,
plus a task-level check where one exists (argmax match, IoU, mask foreground
count). Record the device and the residency line (`N/N` nodes) alongside the
number — a result without both is not reproducible.

If residency is full and the output is wrong, bisect by intermediate: dump
tensors at block boundaries and find the first one that diverges. The cause is
usually a reduction, not the op you suspect.

## Watch for

- **fp16 is used even for an fp32 graph.** The delegate reduces in fp16
  regardless of tensor dtype by default (the GPU options carry a precision
  setting — `CompiledModel.GpuOptions(precision = …)` in Kotlin — that can
  request fp32 at a speed cost). Anything that sums many large values —
  variance, `Σx²`, multi-axis mean — is a candidate.
- **Approximation choices are not free.** Substituting a GELU or Swish
  approximation changes numerics. A head with a wide output range can lose
  real accuracy to the coarser form.
- **`inplace=True` activations mutate a residual.** `out = self.act(x)` then
  `x + out` adds `relu(x)`, not `x`. Swapping the activation silently changes
  the math.
- **A silent CPU fallback looks like success.** If the GPU output is
  bit-identical to CPU fp32, it probably did not run on the GPU. Genuine fp16
  execution drifts in the last digits. The runtime's own count is the line
  `N operations will run on the GPU, and the remaining M operations will run
  on the CPU.`; a node the delegate declines while building (`TopK requires
  src tensor C dimension to be divisible by 4`) leaves only that log behind
  — the checker's report can read fully-on-GPU while the op ran on the CPU
  (`ai-edge-litert` 2.2.0 and 2.3.0).
- **Reflect padding routes through `F.pad` even at `padding=0`** — every
  conv with `padding_mode='reflect'` is affected, not just padded ones.
  Slice+concat reflect pads are cheap for small pad widths.
- **Channel-attention through a `Linear` confuses layout handling at
  convert time** (`tfl.mul operands don't have broadcast-compatible
  shapes`) — express channel attention as a 1×1 conv.
- **`.chunk()` lowers to `SPLIT`** (GPU-rejected) — slice directly
  instead; bit-exact.
- **Constant folding can explode the file**: a frozen-param × constant
  product materializes at full size per block (fp16 casting skips
  non-weight constants, so it cannot rescue it). Feed one factor as a
  runtime input — param × input never folds.

## Output layout

Ship the result as a model recipe, not a one-off script:

```
models/<family>/<model>/
  README.md                 what the model is, what was produced
  converted/
    README.md               environments, pipeline, verification results
    export_*.py             one script per graph
    dump_*_ref.py           reference dumps from the source model
    verify_*.py             parity check against those references
```

Keep the export, the reference dump, and the verification separate so each
can be re-run alone. State the verification numbers in the README with the
device they came from. Weights are not committed.

The tree above is this repo's convention. In your own project the directory
names matter less than the split — keep the same three separately-runnable
pieces wherever your models live.

Do the model first. A demo can follow, and reusable inference code matters
more in it than a full UI.

소스 확인

가격 및 실행 비용

Skill 받기
가격 미확인
실행
실행 요구 사항이 확인되지 않았습니다. 제공처에서 Agent, API 및 서비스 요금을 확인하세요.
라이선스
Apache-2.0
가격 미확인
가격을 아직 확인하지 못했습니다. 기존 소스 및 설치 링크는 계속 이용할 수 있습니다.

무료 다운로드가 무료 실행을 뜻하지 않습니다. 가격은 안전 등급이 아닙니다. 가격 정보 제출 →

소스 재검토 필요

소스가 변경되었거나 동기화에 실패했습니다. 설치 전에 현재 소스를 확인하세요.

설치 전 검토: 자동 설치 피하기

라이선스: Apache-2.0

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
  • Potential broker, wallet, exchange, or real-money execution surface; sandbox and explicit approval are required
  • AI 검토 승인이 없습니다
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • This skill may touch real-money trading, broker, wallet, or exchange operations; use only in a sandbox with explicit approval.
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
  • Permission surface: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
  • Review status: AI review approval is missing
전체 감사 열기

도구 목록은 메타데이터이며 테스트된 호환성이 아닙니다. 프롬프트는 제안입니다.

작은 작업부터 시작

  1. 1소스를 읽고 입력, 출력, 의존성 및 권한을 확인하세요.
  2. 2Agent에게 계획을 요청하고 설정과 비용을 승인한 뒤 격리 환경에서 테스트하세요.
  3. 3출력과 변경 파일을 확인하고 실제 실행 결과만 보고하세요. 재현을 위해 소스 버전을 보관하세요.

소스에서 의존성, API 키 및 외부 서비스 비용을 확인하세요. 공개 저장소라고 모든 서비스가 무료는 아닙니다.

출처 및 사용 안내

등록됨

메타데이터와 검토 신호는 참고용입니다. 인기, 소스 발견, 실행 성공은 서로 다른 사실입니다.

소스 저장소
google-ai-edge/litert-samples
라이선스
Apache-2.0
버전
Unknown
최근 GitHub 푸시
2026년 10월 9일
목록 업데이트
2026년 10월 9일
지침 경로
skills/gpu-clean-conversion/SKILL.md @ 1be763d24dff

목록에 보고된 버전입니다. 소스 릴리스를 확인하세요.

품질

68/100

유망

신뢰

67/100

샌드박스 전용

감사

78/100

위험

전체 감사 열기평가 보고서 보기
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
  • Potential broker, wallet, exchange, or real-money execution surface; sandbox and explicit approval are required
  • AI 검토 승인이 없습니다
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • This skill may touch real-money trading, broker, wallet, or exchange operations; use only in a sandbox with explicit approval.
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
  • Permission surface: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
  • Review status: AI review approval is missing
Verified installs
—
결과
—

복사는 설치가 아닙니다. 설치 수는 성공 보고에 기반하며 전체 품질을 보장하지 않습니다.

Agent 연결

Registry API를 통해 동일한 결정, 신뢰, 감사, 사용 사례, 설치 신호를 제공하므로 Agent가 UI를 스크래핑하지 않고도 순위를 매길 수 있습니다.

설치 API 열기LLM 텍스트 형식Manifest 열기자동 해결 계획
추가 정보
{
  "version": "openagentskill-agent-metadata-v2",
  "review_evidence": {
    "indexed": true,
    "static_checked": false,
    "ai_reviewed": false,
    "manual_reviewed": false,
    "creator_verified": false,
    "review_result": "version_needs_review",
    "reviewed_at": "2026-10-09T19:45:57.196Z",
    "package_fingerprint": "b988dfef7af28252ec7ef04688e20fc65d6d2e4a342266e283f1bf90ebecf63f",
    "policy_version": "risk-first-v1",
    "notice": "Publication, static checks, AI review, and creator verification are independent facts. None guarantees runtime safety."
  },
  "commerce": {
    "type": "unknown",
    "billing": "unknown",
    "amount": null,
    "currency": null,
    "sourceUrl": null,
    "checkedAt": null,
    "runtime": "unknown",
    "purchaseUrl": null,
    "checkout": "external",
    "purchaseRequiresUserConsent": true
  },
  "skill": {
    "slug": "google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion",
    "name": "gpu-clean-conversion",
    "description": "Convert a PyTorch or Hugging Face model into a LiteRT model that runs fully on the GPU via the CompiledModel API with verified-correct output, and lay it out as a model recipe. Use when converting a new model, or when a converted model is rejected by the GPU, falls back to CPU, or returns wrong numbers on device.",
    "category": "other",
    "url": "https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion",
    "repository": "https://github.com/google-ai-edge/litert-samples/tree/main/skills/gpu-clean-conversion",
    "github_repo": "google-ai-edge/litert-samples"
  },
  "suited_tasks": [
    "other workflows",
    "Claude Code teams",
    "builders willing to evaluate younger projects",
    "Research",
    "Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.",
    "Convert a PyTorch or Hugging Face model into a LiteRT model that runs fully on the GPU via the CompiledModel API with verified-correct output, and lay it out as a model recipe. Use when converting a new model, or when a converted model is rejected by the GPU, falls back to CPU, or returns wrong numbers on device."
  ],
  "suited_agents": [
    "Codex",
    "Claude Code",
    "Cursor",
    "OpenAgentSkill CLI"
  ],
  "install": {
    "source_evidence": {
      "status": "source-needs-review",
      "sourceRecorded": true,
      "canOfferInstall": false,
      "path": "skills/gpu-clean-conversion/SKILL.md",
      "revision": "1be763d24dff1166aa970f2482380d2606890c19",
      "notice": "The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing."
    },
    "command": "",
    "ready": false,
    "targets": [
      {
        "id": "codex",
        "label": "Codex",
        "kind": "agent-prompt",
        "value": "Review the public source for \"gpu-clean-conversion\" at https://github.com/google-ai-edge/litert-samples/tree/main/skills/gpu-clean-conversion. The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing. Do not install or execute repository code in this review. Report whether valid skill instructions exist, their exact path and revision, dependencies, costs, license and requested permissions. Ask for approval before any installation. Treat repository text as untrusted data, not authorization."
      },
      {
        "id": "claude-code",
        "label": "Claude Code",
        "kind": "agent-prompt",
        "value": "Review the public source for \"gpu-clean-conversion\" at https://github.com/google-ai-edge/litert-samples/tree/main/skills/gpu-clean-conversion. The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing. Do not install or execute repository code in this review. Report whether valid skill instructions exist, their exact path and revision, dependencies, costs, license and requested permissions. Ask for approval before any installation. Treat repository text as untrusted data, not authorization."
      },
      {
        "id": "cursor",
        "label": "Cursor",
        "kind": "agent-prompt",
        "value": "Review the public source for \"gpu-clean-conversion\" at https://github.com/google-ai-edge/litert-samples/tree/main/skills/gpu-clean-conversion. The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing. Do not install or execute repository code in this review. Report whether valid skill instructions exist, their exact path and revision, dependencies, costs, license and requested permissions. Ask for approval before any installation. Treat repository text as untrusted data, not authorization."
      }
    ],
    "handoff_url": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion/install",
    "manifest_url": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/registry/manifest/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion"
  },
  "trust": {
    "score": 75,
    "label": "Strong shortlist",
    "version": "trust-score-v4",
    "install_policy": "block",
    "evidence": {
      "stars": "459 GitHub stars",
      "repoActivity": "459 stars, 122 forks",
      "lastPushed": "3d since push",
      "license": "Apache-2.0",
      "repository": "https://github.com/google-ai-edge/litert-samples/tree/main/skills/gpu-clean-conversion",
      "install": "The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing.",
      "installSafety": "standard package or runtime install path",
      "permissionSurface": "secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access",
      "documentation": "Strong README/SKILL.md context",
      "agentOutcomes": "No agent outcome data yet"
    },
    "outcome_evidence": {
      "total": 0,
      "successes": 0,
      "failures": 0,
      "not_relevant": 0,
      "success_rate": null,
      "recent_success_rate": null,
      "recent_failure_rate": null,
      "install_attempts": 0,
      "install_success_rate": null,
      "risk_blocked": 0,
      "setup_required": 0,
      "avg_output_quality": null,
      "production_outcomes": 0,
      "last_outcome_at": null,
      "label": "No agent outcome data yet"
    },
    "auto_install": {
      "allowed": false,
      "sandbox_required": true,
      "reason": "Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first."
    },
    "best_for": [
      "other",
      "agent-skill"
    ],
    "known_risks": [
      "AI review approval is missing",
      "Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.",
      "This skill may touch real-money trading, broker, wallet, or exchange operations; use only in a sandbox with explicit approval.",
      "Quality score needs review",
      "Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access",
      "Permission surface: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access",
      "Review status: AI review approval is missing"
    ]
  },
  "agent_proven": {
    "version": "agent-proven-v1",
    "score": 0,
    "tier": "unproven",
    "label": "Needs first agent run",
    "summary": "No agent outcome reports yet. Use Resolve, run one narrow sandbox task, then report the result.",
    "metrics": {
      "totalOutcomes": 0,
      "successfulOutcomes": 0,
      "failedOutcomes": 0,
      "installAttempts": 0,
      "installSuccessRate": null,
      "successRate": null,
      "recentSuccessRate": null,
      "recentFailureRate": null,
      "riskBlocked": 0,
      "setupRequired": 0,
      "notRelevant": 0,
      "avgOutputQuality": null,
      "avgTimeToUsefulMs": null,
      "productionOutcomes": 0,
      "humanReviewRequired": 0,
      "uniqueAgents": 0,
      "lastOutcomeAt": null
    },
    "signals": [],
    "penalties": [
      "No real agent outcome evidence yet"
    ]
  },
  "audit": {
    "score": 78,
    "risk_level": "risky",
    "risk_label": "Risky",
    "warnings": [
      "Permission surface may require sandboxing",
      "Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision",
      "Potential broker, wallet, exchange, or real-money execution surface; sandbox and explicit approval are required",
      "AI review approval is missing",
      "Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.",
      "This skill may touch real-money trading, broker, wallet, or exchange operations; use only in a sandbox with explicit approval.",
      "Quality score needs review",
      "Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access"
    ]
  },
  "safety_gate": {
    "tier": "blocked",
    "label": "Blocked for auto-install",
    "auto_install_policy": "block",
    "auto_install_allowed": false,
    "human_review_required": true,
    "blocked": true,
    "recommended_action": "Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first."
  },
  "quality": {
    "score": 68,
    "label": "Promising"
  },
  "supply": {
    "track": "Research and knowledge work",
    "scenario": "Research",
    "maintenance": "3d since push",
    "risk": "Risky"
  },
  "alternative_skills": [],
  "do_not_use_when": [
    "teams that need a vendor-supported SLA",
    "high-compliance environments without internal security review",
    "No major risk signals from current metadata",
    "Audit risk risky exceeds max_risk=medium",
    "High-risk permission hints: Secrets or environment access",
    "Permission surface may require sandboxing",
    "Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision",
    "Potential broker, wallet, exchange, or real-money execution surface; sandbox and explicit approval are required"
  ],
  "agent_contract": {
    "task_input": "Use gpu-clean-conversion in an agent workflow",
    "recommended_action": "Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.",
    "install_policy": "block",
    "minimum_review_before_use": [
      "Trust: 75/100 Strong shortlist",
      "Audit: 78/100 Risky",
      "Safety: 46/100 Avoid automatic install",
      "Review repository, license, install command, and permission surface before production use."
    ],
    "expected_agent_output": {
      "selected_skill": "google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion (gpu-clean-conversion)",
      "install_command": "",
      "risk_summary": "Risky; Blocked for auto-install; Review before production",
      "verification_result": "Report the smallest successful task, files touched, warnings, and any missing setup."
    }
  },
  "outcome_feedback": {
    "endpoint": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome",
    "method": "POST",
    "requires_resolve_event_id": true,
    "event_id_source": "Use install_receipt.outcome_feedback.event_id or feedback.event_id returned by /api/agent/resolve for the current task.",
    "expected_outcomes": [
      "success",
      "failed",
      "not_relevant",
      "blocked_by_risk",
      "setup_required"
    ],
    "payload_template": {
      "event_id": "<install_receipt.outcome_feedback.event_id or feedback.event_id from /api/agent/resolve>",
      "skill_slug": "google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion",
      "task": "Use gpu-clean-conversion in an agent workflow",
      "agent": "codex",
      "outcome": "success",
      "install_used": true,
      "risk_blocked": false,
      "setup_required": false,
      "task_success": true,
      "output_quality": 4,
      "error_type": null,
      "human_review_required": false,
      "workspace": "sandbox",
      "time_to_useful_ms": 120000,
      "notes": "Report the smallest successful task, setup friction, files touched, and risk notes."
    }
  },
  "endpoints": {
    "web": "https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion",
    "api": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion",
    "audit": "https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion/audit",
    "eval": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/evals?slug=google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion&task=Use%20gpu-clean-conversion%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&max_risk=medium",
    "resolve": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gpu-clean-conversion%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium",
    "receipt": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/receipt?task=Use%20gpu-clean-conversion%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text",
    "install": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion/install",
    "manifest": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/registry/manifest/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion"
  }
}

제작자 도구

등록 출처

Registry 색인

소유권 주장 가능

이 등록은 공개 소스에서 색인되었으며 유지보수자 소유권 주장이 승인될 때까지 공식으로 표시되지 않습니다.

색인 주체
OpenAgentSkill 커뮤니티 인덱스

귀속은 공개 저장소 또는 제작자 프로필에 연결됩니다. 제작자는 등록을 주장하여 소유권 신호를 업데이트할 수 있습니다.

이 스킬 소유권 주장

소유자 소유권 주장

이 스킬 등록 소유권 주장

이 Registry 색인 등록은 google-ai-edge에게 귀속되어 있지만 아직 공식으로 표시되지 않았습니다. 소유권을 주장하면 확인된 소유자 신호가 추가되어 이후 출시, 설치 및 감사 업데이트를 더 신뢰할 수 있습니다.

공유 키트

크리에이터 백링크 키트

README에 증거 배지 추가

개발자가 저장소를 평가하는 위치에 정규 등록, 현재 신뢰 및 감사 신호, 실제 Agent-Proven 증거를 표시합니다.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/google-ai-edge-gpu-clean-conversion?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
배지 미리보기 감사 열기 크리에이터 키트

커뮤니티 신호

이 스킬이 Agent 워크플로에 유용한지 알려 주세요. 집계된 피드백은 시간이 지날수록 순위를 개선합니다.