Skill audit report

competitor-research-playbook Audit report.

Your competitor just launched. You have no idea how they grew so fast. Should you reverse-engineer their website? Track their social media? Map their growth flywheel? This gives you the complete SOP — from Wayback Machine snapshots to X/Twitter propagation analysis to growth flywheel scoring. Built from 150+ AI startup competitive analyses including the Lovable case study (4.3M views, 229K impressions launch day). By @WeiYipei. Inside: 4-step research framework (website → social → traffic → ad spend) · 3-version Wayback evolution analysis · X/Twitter propagation-chain mapping · growth-flywheel 6-stage scoring · KOL identification · content-effectiveness ranking · ICP + freemium pricing teardown · self-check checklist. New in 1.2: time-machine competitor archaeology — Google date-range search back to pre-fame years, star-history launch-day reconstruction (AppFlowy ~40-channel zero-budget launch teardown), competitor funding news as a launch-timing signal, and the "open source alternat

REVIEWED · REVIEWNeeds reviewGenerated Oct 13, 2026Heuristic metadata audit
79
Audit
78
Trust
61
Quality
83
Security
100
Maintain
92
Install

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

78
Strong shortlist

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.

GitHub adoption

WARN

48

83 GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

WARN

43

83 stars, 6 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

100

5d since push

License clarity

PASS

86

MIT

README/SKILL.md completeness

PASS

86

Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context

Dependency/runtime risk

PASS

90

no major dependency risk hints in public metadata

Install availability

PASS

92

npx skills add Gingiris-1031/gingiris-skills --skill competitor-research-playbook

Install command safety

PASS

92

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

PASS

100

no high-risk permission surface in public metadata

Repository evidence

PASS

86

https://github.com/Gingiris-1031/gingiris-skills/tree/main/skills/competitor-research-playbook

Review status

WARN

46

AI review approval is missing

Agent Proven outcomes

INFO

54

No agent outcome data yet

Checks

Install and adoption review

8 Passed · 10 Needs review

Install path

92

PASS

npx skills add Gingiris-1031/gingiris-skills --skill competitor-research-playbook

Repository

88

PASS

https://github.com/Gingiris-1031/gingiris-skills/tree/main/skills/competitor-research-playbook

License

86

PASS

MIT

Maintenance

100

PASS

5d since push

AI review

55

CHECK

Review approval is missing

README/SKILL.md completeness

86

PASS

Usable description available

Dependency risk

90

PASS

no major dependency risk hints in public metadata

Install command safety

92

PASS

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

100

PASS

no high-risk permission surface in public metadata

Stars/forks activity

43

FIX

83 stars, 6 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Adoption

68

INFO

83 GitHub stars

Financial decision safety

58

CHECK

Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.

Warnings

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
  • AI review approval is missing
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 83 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 83 stars, 6 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Review status: AI review approval is missing

Method

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.

Compare nearby options

Related skills to audit next