agentfootprint
Use when building AI agents with agentfootprint — LLMCall, Agent, skills, RAG, memory, control flow, Swarm concepts, mock/anthropic/openai/ollama providers, tools, recorders, resilience, and streaming. Also use when someone asks how agentfootprint works or wants to understand the
Asset-Profil
Recherche und Wissensarbeit
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Szenario
RAG and knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Agent-Fit
Claude Code + OpenAI Agents + Cursor
Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.
Installieren
Bereit
npx skills add footprintjs/agentfootprint --skill agentfootprint
Wartung
Aktuell
1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Risiko
Riskant
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub-Qualität
20
60/100 Qualität · 63/100 Vertrauen
Abdeckungs-Tags
Review-Notizen
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent-Adoptionskarte
Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick
Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.
Qualität
VielversprechendUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Vertrauen
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
RiskantMaschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Nur Sandbox
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
20 GitHub-Stars
Repository-Aktivität
20 Stars und 3 Forks
Wartung
1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenz
MIT
Installieren
npx skills add footprintjs/agentfootprint --skill agentfootprint
Installationssicherheit
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsfläche
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent-Ergebnisse
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten
Dokumentation
Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext
Risikoübersicht
Vor Produktion prüfen
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated, but the provided content is comprehensive and well-structured.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- This skill may touch real-money trading, broker, wallet, or exchange operations; use only in a sandbox with explicit approval.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
Installationsbereitschaft
Installationspfad verfügbar
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Lizenz ist angegeben
- Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege
Agent-lesbare Metadaten
Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.
Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.
Geeignete Aufgaben
- RAG and knowledge-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Chunk documents
Geeignete Agents
Installationsentscheidung
- Befehl
- npx skills add footprintjs/agentfootprint --skill agentfootprint
- Richtlinie
- Blockieren
- Menschliche Prüfung
- Ja
Vertrauen und Risiko
- Vertrauen
- 55/100
- Audit
- 71/100
- Risikoebene
- Riskant
Ergebnis-Loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event-ID
- resolve
- Ergebnisse
- 5
Installationsbefehl
npx skills add footprintjs/agentfootprint --skill agentfootprintNicht verwenden, wenn
- Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated, but the provided content is comprehensive and well-structured.
- Audit risk risky exceeds max_risk=medium
Alternative
Frontend Design
170.9K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill frontend-design
Alternative
Taste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
79.0K Stars
npx skills add Leonxlnx/taste-skill --skill design-taste-frontend
Alternative
Canvas Design
170.9K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill canvas-design
Alternative
Anthropic Brand Guidelines
170.9K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill brand-guidelines
Agent-Sicherheit v2
23/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
Hoch
Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.
Mittel
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
Mittel
Netzwerkzugriff
Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.
Mittel
Dateisystemzugriff
Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.
- Audit risk risky exceeds max_risk=medium
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Installationsziele
Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install footprintjs-agentfootprintAgent-Auflösungsplan
Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.
Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.
JSON öffnen
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agentfootprint%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve-Text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agentfootprint%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint/install
Agent sollte prüfen
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Prompt kopieren
Task: Use agentfootprint in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agentfootprint%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint/install
Install command: npx skills add footprintjs/agentfootprint --skill agentfootprint
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent-Übergabe
Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint/install
LLM-Textformat
/api/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint/install?format=text
Alternativen finden
/api/skills/search?q=agentfootprint&limit=3
Agent-Prompt
Use agentfootprint for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint/install, then install with: npx skills add footprintjs/agentfootprint --skill agentfootprintRegistry-Metadaten
Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.
Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/footprintjs-agentfootprint
LLM-Text
/api/registry/manifest/footprintjs-agentfootprint?format=text
Installationsalias
/api/registry/install/footprintjs-agentfootprint
Empfehlen
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20agentfootprint%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent-Fit
RAG and knowledge
Use-Case-Tags
Plattformen
Claude Code, OpenAI Agents, Cursor
Audit-Bericht
Riskant · 71/100
Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
Agent-Entscheidungspanel
Fallback candidate for RAG and knowledge
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rolle im Stack
Fallback-Kandidat
Primäre Eignung
RAG and knowledge
Vertrauenslabel
Zuerst prototypisieren
Installationspfad
Befehl bereit
Verwenden wenn
- RAG and knowledge-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidenz
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- Qualitätsprofil 60/100
- 4 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen
zuerst prüfen
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated, but the provided content is comprehensive and well-structured.
Implementierungspfad
- 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine RAG and knowledge-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Vertrauensprofil
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub-Akzeptanz
Beheben20 GitHub-Stars
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
Beheben20 Stars und 3 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Aktuelle Wartung
Bestanden1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenzklarheit
BestandenMIT
Positive Signale
- KI-Prüfung genehmigt
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
- Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
- Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf
Vor Installation prüfen
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated, but the provided content is comprehensive and well-structured.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- This skill may touch real-money trading, broker, wallet, or exchange operations; use only in a sandbox with explicit approval.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 20 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 20 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
- Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich
Empfohlene Aktion
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Qualitätsprofil
Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow-Eignung
Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen
Search private knowledge
RAG and knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Workflow-Eignung
Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
RAG knowledge base
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternativen-Shortlist
Vor Installation vergleichen
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Frontend Design
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
Taste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
Canvas Design
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
Anthropic Brand Guidelines
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
Übersicht
--- name: agentfootprint description: Use when building AI agents with agentfootprint — LLMCall, Agent, skills, RAG, memory, control flow, Swarm concepts, mock/anthropic/openai/ollama providers, tools, recorders, resilience, and streaming. Also use when someone asks how agentfootprint works or wants to understand the framework. ---
# agentfootprint — The Explainable Agent Framework
agentfootprint structures AI agents as composable flowcharts, so every injection, read, write, decision and tool call becomes connected evidence as the run happens. Every concept takes an `LLMProvider` — swap `mock({...})` for `anthropic({...})` with zero code changes.
**Core principles:** - Adapter-swap testing ($0 test runs, deterministic assertions) - The ladder: `mock` → `ollama` (free, local, real model) → a paid provider - Declare context (facts, steering, skills); the framework decides WHEN it fires and WHICH slot it lands in - Collect during traversal, never post-process (inherited from footprintjs)
```bash npm install agentfootprint footprintjs ```
## Read this first — what does NOT exist
These are not hypothetical. A capable author, working from a correct mental model of this library, invented all four in one document. Treat them as the things you are most likely to get wrong here.
| You will reach for | The reality | |---|---| | `startRun(...)` | **No such function.** The door is `agent.run(input, options?)`, where `AgentInput = { message: string; identity?; continueFrom? }` and `AgentOutput = string`. `run()` returns `AgentOutput \| RunnerPauseOutcome` — a run paused for a human returns a checkpoint; discriminate with `isPaused(result)`. | | `RunStep` as skill/route history | **`RunStep` is real and it is something else** — the footprintjs flowchart TOPOLOGY slider, exported from `agentfootprint/observe`. Its `kind` is `'sequential' \| 'fork' \| 'merge' \| 'decide' \| 'iteration' \| 'iteration-exit' \| 'react'`. Nothing in it concerns skills. Importing it succeeds, which is exactly why it is dangerous. For route history use `routeRecorder()` from the same door. | | the LLM classifier as routing "tier 3" | **It is a tier-2 strategy.** Tier 1 = declared start rules. Tier 2 = the configured scorer — `llmClassifier(provider)` OR `keywordScorer()` OR `embeddingScorer(e)` OR the entry scorer; near-ties fall through rather than argmax. Tier 3 = a menu the model resolves in-band through `read_skill`'s own description, reached only when tier 2 was NOT decisive. | | a skill's tools being gated to that skill automatically | **They are not, by default.** `defineSkill({ tools })` puts them in the agent's static tool list at build time — visible from iteration 1 whether the skill ever activates or not. Ask for the gate: `.toolsFromActiveSkill()` (agent-wide), `skillGraph({ scopeTools: true })` (graph-wide), or `autoActivate: 'currentSkill'` (per skill). `.tree()` leaves are the one shape scoped by default. |
Two more absences: there is **no runtime force-stop governor** (`routeRecorder().getTrips()` only *labels* a spinning run; `maxIterations` is the hard stop), and there is **no automatic re-delivery of an ageing skill body** (`refreshPolicy` is stored and never read on any version — use `surfaceMode: 'both'`).
## Subpath map — 13 doors
`agentfootprint` (main barrel: `Agent`, `LLMCall`, `defineTool`, control flow, patterns, `defineRAG`, pause/resume) · `/providers` (`mock`, `anthropic`, `openai`, `bedrock`, `ollama`, `mcpClient`, embedders — every provider, so bundlers never walk the vendor SDKs from the main barrel) · `/context` (`defineSkill`, `defineFact`, `defineSteering`, `defineInstruction`, `skillGraph`, `skillsFromDir`, the scorers) · `/memory` (`defineMemory`, `InMemoryStore`, `mockEmbedder`, the stores) · `/rag` (stores + loaders; `defineRAG` itself is on the main barrel) · `/observe` (recorders, tracing, `RunStep`) · `/resilience` (provider decorators) · `/reliability` (the rules-based fail-fast gate) · `/cache` (prefix-cache strategies; importing it registers them) · `/security` · `/hosting` · `/events` · `/skill-graph` (the routing layer with no framework attached, for a host that is not this agent).
## Core Concepts
### LLMCall — a single LLM call, no tools
```typescript import { LLMCall } from 'agentfootprint'; import { mock } from 'agentfootprint/providers';
const caller = LLMCall.create({ provider: mock({ reply: 'Hello!' }), model: 'mock' }).system('You are helpful.').build(); const result = await caller.run({ message: 'Hi' }); ```
### Agent — a ReAct agent with tools
```typescript import { Agent, defineTool } from 'agentfootprint'; import { mock } from 'agentfootprint/providers';
const weather = defineTool({ name: 'weather', description: 'Get current weather for a city.', inputSchema: { type: 'object', properties: { city: { type: 'string' } }, required: ['city'] }, execute: async ({ city }: { city: string }) => `${city}: 72°F, sunny`, });
const agent = Agent.create({ provider: mock({ reply: 'It is 72°F.' }), model: 'mock' }) .system('You answer weather questions using the weather tool.') .tool(weather) .maxIterations(5) .build();
const result = await agent.run({ message: 'Weather in Paris?' }); ```
### Context — facts, steering, skills, and declared routing
```typescript import { defineFact, defineSteering, defineSkill, skillGraph } from 'agentfootprint/context';
Agent.create({ provider, model }) .fact(defineFact({ id: 'user-profile', data: 'Plan: Pro · Customer since 2022' })) .steering(defineSteering({ id: 'policy', prompt: 'Never promise a refund before checking.' })) .skill(defineSkill({ id: 'refunds', description: 'Refund procedure.', body: '…', tools: [issueRefund] })) .build(); ```
`defineSkill` bodies load on demand — the model opens one with `read_skill`, or a `skillGraph()` routes to it:
```typescript const graph = skillGraph() .entry(triage, { when: (c) => /order/.test(c.userMessage) }) // where the turn STARTS .route(triage, refunds, { onToolReturn: 'lookup_order' }) // a declared handoff .build();
Agent.create({ provider, model }).skillGraph(graph).build(); graph.toMermaid(); // declared === drawn ```
`.entry()` and `.route()` take the skill OBJECTS, not their ids. The object form is the other door — `skillGraph({ skills, start, steps })` returns a finished graph with nothing to chain.
A skill is active exactly while the cursor is on it — one skill's turn at a time. An `.entry(x)` with **no** `when` is the persistent base (`always`), on beside whatever the cursor is on.
**The cursor is a program counter, not a per-turn classifier.** Nine causes move it (or decline to), reported as `cursorMove.by` on `agentfootprint.context.evaluated` and as `outcome` on `routeRecorder().getHops()`:
`'entry'` (cold start) · `'route'` (a declared `from`-gated edge fired) · `'tool-proposal'` (a TOOL RESULT proposed a transition and the graph accepted it) · `'model-pick'` (a gate-accepted `read_skill`) · `'intent'` (the tier-2 scorer was decisive) · `'continuity'` (the cursor inherited from the previous turn held) · `'decider'` (an out-of-band menu resolver) · `'stay'` (nothing fired — sticky, and a recorded decision, not an absence) · `'none'` (no cursor at all: nothing to enter, or a `tree()`, which has no cursor). `routeRecorder`'s `RouteOutcome` is those eight minus `'none'` (no cursor, no hop) plus `'rejected'` — nine values. Precedence when several want it at once: **declared edge > accepted tool proposal > model pick > stay.** A suppressed pick emits `agentfootprint.skill.reroute_superseded`; a parallel batch matching different targets emits `agentfootprint.skill.route_conflict`.
**The cursor is per RUN by default.** A second `run()` starts cold at the entry. `.skillGraph(graph, { continuity: 'conversation' })` makes it span the conversation.
**`read_skill` has a three-way design, not one list.** Per iteration a skill is *reachable* (named under "Reachable from here"), *refusable* (named under "Not reachable from here" — a graph refusal is about WHERE THE CURSOR IS, so naming it lets the model route in one step), or *hidden* (absent entirely — a hidden skill is about WHO IS ASKING, and naming it would leak the shape of somebody else's permissions; needs a `PermissionChecker` governing `skill_read`). **The enum stays the full catalog in every case** — narrowing it would turn a policy refusal into a generic schema error the model never reads.
A refused pick gets one teaching sentence back and moves nothing:
```text read_skill("audit-log") is not reachable from here. Reachable skills: billing. Pick one of these, or finish. ```
**The authority rule.** A tool result is written into the conversation once and then only ages; the system prompt is rebuilt from nothing every iteration (`reactMode: 'dynamic'`, the default, re-runs the InjectionEngine and all three slots). So standing instructions belong in the recomposed surface. `reactMode: 'classic'` caches system-prompt and tools after turn 1 — do **not** use it with skills.
### RAG — retrieve, augment, generate
```typescript import { defineRAG } from 'agentfootprint'; // wiring lives on the main barrel import { InMemoryStore, mockEmbedder } from 'agentfootprint/memory';
Agent.create({ provider, model }) .rag(defineRAG({ id: 'docs', store: new InMemoryStore(), embedder: mockEmbedder(), topK: 5 })) .build(); ```
### Control flow + patterns — compose runners
```typescript import { Sequence, Parallel, Loop, Conditional, workflow, graph } from 'agentfootprint'; import { swarm, debate, reflection, selfConsistency, mapReduce, tot } from 'agentfootprint'; // patterns
const pipeline = Sequence.create().step('research', researchAgent).step('write', writerAgent).build();
const desk = swarm({ agents: [{ id: 'research', runner: researchAgent }, { id: 'write', runner: writerAgent }], route: ({ message }) => (/write/.test(message) ? 'write' : 'research'), }); ```
## Providers
```typescript import { mock, anthropic, openai, bedrock, ollama } from 'agentfootprint/providers';
const provider = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY! }) : ollama('llama3.2'); // free local model; or mock({...}) for determinism ```
`mock` takes `{ reply }` (one fixed answer), `{ replies: [...] }` (consumed in order — exhaustion throws loud), or `{ respond: (req) => … }` (build the answer from the request, including `toolCalls`).
## Tools
```typescript import { defineTool } from 'agentfootprint';
const calculator = defineTool({ name: 'calculator', // `name`, not `id` description: 'Perform arithmetic', inputSchema: { type: 'object', properties: { expression: { type: 'string' } } }, execute: async ({ expression }: { expression: string }) => String(evaluate(expression)), }); ```
### A long tool that says where it is
```typescript execute: async (args, ctx) => { for (const [i, hop] of hops.entries()) { await visit(hop); ctx.progress({ done: i + 1, total: hops.length }); // → stream.tool_progress } return summarize(hops); }, ```
`ctx.progress` is always present, never throws, never blocks, and never reaches the model — the framework stamps `toolCallId` / `toolName` / `iteration`, you own `payload`. `agent.on('agentfootprint.stream.*')` and `toSSE(agent)` carry it with no extra wiring.
### When a tool finds nothing, and what a clean result does not cover
```typescript import { absent, coverage, defineTool } from 'agentfootprint';
// "I looked and there is nothing" — never readable as "I could not look". execute: ({ port }) => rows.length ? rows : absent({ what: `FLOGI entries on ${port}`, checked: ['shq-fab-a: the live fcns database', 'window: the last 24h'], notChecked: [{ what: 'the archived history', why: 'older than the 24h window' }], cannotCover: [{ what: 'the peer fabric', why: 'this collector is scoped to one fabric' }],
Technische Details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Lizenz
- MIT
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 20. Aug. 2026
- Veröffentlicht
- 20. Aug. 2026
Entscheidungsübersicht
Fallback-Kandidat
recent repository activity
Audit
Installationsprüfung
Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung
- Sicherheit
- 68/100
- Wartung
- 100/100
- Installieren
- 92/100
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.
- Erfolgsrate
- —
- Letzter Fehler
- —
- Ergebnisse
- 0
- Ausgabequalität
- —
- Fehlgeschlagen
- 0
- Nicht relevant
- 0
- Installationen
- 0
- Durch Risiko blockiert
- 0
- Einrichtung erforderlich
- 0
- Produktion
- 0
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.
Installieren
Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen
Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.
Wachstums-Loop
Share-Kit
Szenariobasierter Entwurf für agentfootprint, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.
agentfootprint: Use when building AI agents with agentfootprint — LLMCall, Agent, skills, RAG, memory, contro... 20 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint?ref=x
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for agentfootprint: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint?ref=x Install: npx skills add footprintjs/agentfootprint --skill agentfootprint
Quelle des Eintrags
Registry-indexiert
Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.
- Ersteller
- footprintjs
- Indexiert von
- OpenAgentSkill Community-Index
Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.
Diesen Skill beanspruchenEigentümeranspruch
Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen
Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird footprintjs zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.
Creator-Backlink-Kit
Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen
Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/footprintjs-agentfootprint)Autor
footprintjs
@footprintjs
Tags
Plattform-Fit
Gesundheitssignale
- GitHub-Stars
- 20
- Qualitätswert
- 33/100
- Letzter GitHub-Push
- 20. Aug. 2026
- Framework-Hinweise
- Unbekannt
- OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
- 4
- Installationskopien
- 0
- Externe Klicks
- 0
Community-Signal
Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.
Vertrauen & Sicherheit
Do not auto-install
- GitHub-Akzeptanz20 GitHub-StarsBeheben
- Star-/Fork-Aktivität20 Stars und 3 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarBeheben
- Aktuelle Wartung1 Tage seit dem letzten PushBestanden
- LizenzklarheitMITBestanden
- README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
- Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikocommand execution surface, credential or environment accessBeheben
Ähnliche Skills
Frontend Design
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
170.9K StarsTaste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
79.0K StarsCanvas Design
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
170.9K StarsAnthropic Brand Guidelines
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
170.9K Stars