Skill-Audit-Bericht
azure-ninja Audit-Bericht.
Master orchestrator for 40 Azure agent skills from Microsoft official and community repositories. Use when working with ANY Azure service, architecture, deployment, operations, security, cost optimization, diagnostics, or development task. Routes to the optimal specialized skill based on context. Triggers: Azure, Microsoft, AKS, Kubernetes, App Service, Functions, Cosmos DB, Entra, Bicep, ARM, azd, DevOps, Container Apps, Static Web Apps, Storage, Event Hubs, Service Bus, AI, OpenAI, Foundry, cost, migration, compliance, reliability, or any Azure service name.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub-Akzeptanz
Warnung48
33 GitHub-Stars
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
Warnung43
33 Stars und 4 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Aktuelle Wartung
Bestanden100
2 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenzklarheit
Bestanden86
MIT
README/SKILL.md-Vollständigkeit
Bestanden86
Metadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-Kontext
Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisiko
Fehlgeschlagen28
command execution surface, credential or environment access
Installationsverfügbarkeit
Bestanden92
npx skills add fabricioctelles/jump-skills --skill azure-ninja
Sicherheit des Installationsbefehls
Bestanden92
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsumfang
Fehlgeschlagen18
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Repository-Nachweis
Bestanden86
https://github.com/fabricioctelles/jump-skills/tree/main/ninjas/azure-ninja
Prüfstatus
Warnung46
KI-Prüffreigabe fehlt
Agent-validierte Ergebnisse
Info54
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten
Prüfungen
Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung
Installationspfad
92
npx skills add fabricioctelles/jump-skills --skill azure-ninja
Repository
88
https://github.com/fabricioctelles/jump-skills/tree/main/ninjas/azure-ninja
Lizenz
86
MIT
Wartung
100
2 Tage seit dem letzten Push
KI-Prüfung
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md-Vollständigkeit
86
Usable description available
Abhängigkeitsrisiko
28
command execution surface, credential or environment access
Sicherheit des Installationsbefehls
92
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsumfang
18
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
43
33 Stars und 4 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Akzeptanz
42
33 GitHub-Stars
Warnungen
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- KI-Prüffreigabe fehlt
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 33 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 33 stars, 4 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Review status: AI review approval is missing
Methode
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Nahe Optionen vergleichen
Ähnliche Skills als Nächstes prüfen
gh-create-pr
Create or update GitHub pull requests using the repository-required workflow and template compliance. Use when asked to create/open/update a PR so the assistant reads `.github/pull_request_template.md`, fills every template section, preserves markdown structure exactly, and marks missing data as N/A or None instead of skipping sections.
52K Stars · Audit-Bericht
translation
Translate, transcreate, review, or maintain multilingual product and marketing content, including source locking, glossary decisions, language style, machine-assisted workflows, legal-content safeguards, QA, and source-change synchronization. Use localization-strategy for market scope, locale architecture, rollout, and production release planning.
1.0K Stars · Audit-Bericht
anti-defensive-writing
Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.
1.0K Stars · Audit-Bericht