Rapport d’audit du skill

brainstorm-beagle Rapport d’audit.

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

Expérimental · RevoirRevue nécessaireGénéré 13 oct. 2026Audit heuristique des métadonnées
73
Audit
67
Confiance
62
Qualité
77
Sécurité
88
Maintain
92
Installer

Trust Score OpenAgentSkill

67
Revue manuelle

Trust Score OpenAgentSkill

The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.

Adoption GitHub

Avertissement

48

80 stars GitHub

Activité stars/forks

Avertissement

43

80 stars et 8 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles

Maintenance récente

Validé

88

2 mois depuis le dernier push

Clarté de licence

Validé

86

Apache-2.0

Complétude README/SKILL.md

Validé

86

Les métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflow

Risque dépendances/runtime

Info

72

Surface d’exécution de commandes

Disponibilité de l’installation

Validé

92

npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill brainstorm-beagle

Sécurité de la commande d’installation

Validé

92

Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime

Surface de permissions

Info

62

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Preuve du dépôt

Validé

86

https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle/tree/main/plugins/beagle-analysis/skills/brainstorm-beagle

État de revue

Info

66

Données de revue IA disponibles

Résultats prouvés par Agent

Info

54

Pas encore de données de résultats Agent

Vérifications

Revue d’installation et d’adoption

6 Validé · 12 Revue nécessaire

Chemin d’installation

92

Validé

npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill brainstorm-beagle

Dépôt

88

Validé

https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle/tree/main/plugins/beagle-analysis/skills/brainstorm-beagle

Licence

86

Validé

Apache-2.0

Maintenance

88

Validé

2 mois depuis le dernier push

Revue IA

55

Vérifier

Path inconsistency: SKILL.md says the spec is saved to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, but references/spec-template.md says save to `docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md`. This could cause agents to write specs to inconsistent locations.

Complétude README/SKILL.md

86

Validé

Usable description available

Risque de dépendances

72

Vérifier

Surface d’exécution de commandes

Sécurité de la commande d’installation

92

Validé

Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime

Surface de permissions

62

Vérifier

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Activité stars/forks

43

Corriger

80 stars et 8 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles

Adoption

68

Info

80 stars GitHub

Financial decision safety

58

Vérifier

Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.

Avertissements

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
  • Path inconsistency: SKILL.md says the spec is saved to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, but references/spec-template.md says save to `docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md`. This could cause agents to write specs to inconsistent locations.
  • SKILL.md does not explicitly document operational limitations such as what to do if the user provides insufficient context, how to handle conflicting requirements, or when to stop asking questions. The workflow is clear but edge-case behavior is underspecified.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 80 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 80 stars, 8 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Méthode

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.

Comparer les options proches

Skills associés à auditer ensuite