Informe de auditoría del skill
brainstorm-beagle Informe de auditoría.
Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
Adopción en GitHub
Advertencia48
80 estrellas de GitHub
Actividad de stars/forks
Advertencia43
80 estrellas y 8 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales
Mantenimiento reciente
Aprobado88
2 meses desde el último push
Claridad de licencia
Aprobado86
Apache-2.0
Completitud de README/SKILL.md
Aprobado86
Los metadatos incluyen suficiente contexto de uso y flujo de trabajo
Riesgo de dependencias/runtime
Info72
Superficie de ejecución de comandos
Disponibilidad de instalación
Aprobado92
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill brainstorm-beagle
Seguridad del comando de instalación
Aprobado92
Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución
Superficie de permisos
Info62
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Evidencia del repositorio
Aprobado86
https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle/tree/main/plugins/beagle-analysis/skills/brainstorm-beagle
Estado de revisión
Info66
Hay datos de revisión por IA disponibles
Resultados comprobados por Agent
Info54
Aún no hay datos de resultados del Agent
Comprobaciones
Revisión de instalación y adopción
Ruta de instalación
92
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill brainstorm-beagle
Repositorio
88
https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle/tree/main/plugins/beagle-analysis/skills/brainstorm-beagle
Licencia
86
Apache-2.0
Mantenimiento
88
2 meses desde el último push
Revisión por IA
55
Path inconsistency: SKILL.md says the spec is saved to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, but references/spec-template.md says save to `docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md`. This could cause agents to write specs to inconsistent locations.
Completitud de README/SKILL.md
86
Usable description available
Riesgo de dependencias
72
Superficie de ejecución de comandos
Seguridad del comando de instalación
92
Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución
Superficie de permisos
62
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Actividad de stars/forks
43
80 estrellas y 8 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales
Adopción
68
80 estrellas de GitHub
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.
Advertencias
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- Path inconsistency: SKILL.md says the spec is saved to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, but references/spec-template.md says save to `docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md`. This could cause agents to write specs to inconsistent locations.
- SKILL.md does not explicitly document operational limitations such as what to do if the user provides insufficient context, how to handle conflicting requirements, or when to stop asking questions. The workflow is clear but edge-case behavior is underspecified.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 80 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 80 stars, 8 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Método
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Comparar opciones cercanas
Skills relacionados para auditar después
mono-color
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
64K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría