Review Animations

STRONG · 89
Registry indexed

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

Downloads0
Stars7.9K
Version1.0.0
Quality100/100 · Excellent
Trust89/100 · Review then install
Audit95/100 · Safe to try

Supply asset profile

Coding and developer agents

Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.

Browse track

Scenario

GitHub automation

I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.

Agent fit

Claude Code + OpenAI Agents + Cursor

Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.

Install

Ready

npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills

Maintenance

fresh

1d since push

Risk

Safe to try

No major risk signals from available metadata

GitHub quality

7.9K

100/100 quality · 92/100 trust

Coverage tags

CodingGitHub automationdesign-creativeagent-skillanimation-review

Review notes

No major risk signals from available metadata

Agent adoption scorecard

Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance

These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.

Quality

Excellent
100

High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.

Trust

Review then install
89

Good shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.

Audit

Safe to try
95

Install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

Trust Score v5

Agent install candidate

Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.

Claude CodeCodexCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

7.9K GitHub stars

Repo activity

7.9K stars, 436 forks

Maintenance

1d since push

License

MIT

Install

npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills

Install safety

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

shell or command execution

Agent outcomes

No agent outcome data yet

Docs

Strong README/SKILL.md context

Risk summary

Low metadata risk

  • No major trust warnings detected from available metadata

Install readiness

Install path available

  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • License is declared
  • No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet

Agent-readable metadata

Machine-readable decision data for this skill.

Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.

Open JSON

Suited tasks

  • GitHub automation workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • teams that value GitHub adoption signals
  • Inspect repository metadata

Suited agents

Claude CodeCodexCursorOpenAgentSkill CLIOpenAI AgentsCLI

Install decision

Command
npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills
Policy
review
Human review
yes

Trust and risk

Trust
89/100
Audit
95/100
Risk level
Safe to try

Outcome loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event ID
resolve
Outcomes
5

Install command

npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills

Do not use when

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • high-compliance environments without internal security review
  • No major risk signals from current metadata
  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
  • No major trust warnings detected from available metadata

Agent safety v2

67/100 · Review before install

Reviewed with permission notesreview

Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.

Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.

Resolve via API

high

Shell or command execution

Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.

medium

Network access

Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.

medium

Filesystem access

Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.

  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution

Install targets

Install this skill in your agent workflow

Copy the registry command or an agent-specific install prompt for Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Use the registry command when your workflow supports the OpenAgentSkill installer.

$ npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills

Agent resolve plan

Let an agent verify fit before installing.

The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.

Open text plan

Agent should check

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copy prompt

Task: Use Review Animations in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Review%20Animations%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/emilkowalski-review-animations/install
Install command: npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent handoff

Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

Open install API

Agent prompt

Use Review Animations for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/emilkowalski-review-animations/install, then install with: npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills

Registry metadata

Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.

This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.

Open manifest

Agent fit

100/100

GitHub automation

Platforms

Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenAI Agents

Audit report

Safe to try · 95/100

Review install readiness, maintenance, trust, quality, and metadata warnings before adding this skill to an agent workflow.

View audit reportView eval report

Agent decision cockpit

Primary pick for GitHub automation

Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.

100
Readiness
Adopt
Stage

Role in stack

Primary pick

Primary fit

GitHub automation

Trust label

Production-ready

Install path

Command ready

Use when

  • GitHub automation workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • teams that value GitHub adoption signals

Evidence

  • 7,906 GitHub stars
  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • 100/100 quality profile
  • 6 OpenAgentSkill engagement events

Review first

  • No major risk signals from current metadata

Implementation path

  1. 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one GitHub automation task end to end.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Trust profile

Review then install

Good shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.

89
Trust score

GitHub adoption

PASS

7.9K GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

PASS

7.9K stars, 436 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

1d since push

License clarity

PASS

MIT

Good signals

  • Manually verified listing
  • AI review approved
  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • Recently maintained repository
  • Large GitHub adoption signal
  • Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
  • Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run

Review before install

  • No real agent outcome reports yet
  • Human review required before unattended installation

Recommended action

Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.

Quality profile

Excellent candidate for agent workflows

High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.

100
GitHub stars
7.9K
Freshness
1d ago
Install ready
Yes
License
MIT

Workflow fit

Use this skill in these scenarios

Stack fit

Add it to a complete workflow

Alternative shortlist

Compare before you install

Similar skills in this category, ranked with the same readiness and quality signals.

Compare all

Overview

--- name: review-animations description: Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned. disable-model-invocation: true ---

# Reviewing Animations

A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.

## Operating Posture

You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward **motion that feels right**, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, fires too often, or drops frames is a regression, not a pass. Default to flagging. Approval is earned, not assumed.

The substantive bar comes from Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy (animations.dev). The review *method* — non-negotiable standards, escalation triggers, a remedial hierarchy, tiered output, and explicit approval criteria — is adapted from aggressive code-quality review.

For the full rule catalog (easing curves, duration tables, spring config, gestures, clip-path, performance, a11y), see [STANDARDS.md](STANDARDS.md). Load it whenever a finding needs a precise value or citation.

## The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards

Every animation in the diff is measured against these. A violation is a finding.

1. **Justified motion.** Every animation must answer "why does this animate?" — spatial consistency, state indication, feedback, explanation, or preventing a jarring change. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a block.

2. **Frequency-appropriate.** Match motion to how often it's seen. Keyboard-initiated and 100+/day actions get **no** animation. Tens/day gets reduced motion. Occasional gets standard. Rare/first-time can have delight.

3. **Responsive easing.** Entering/exiting elements use `ease-out` or a strong custom curve. `ease-in` on UI is a block — it delays the moment the user watches most. Built-in CSS easings are too weak; expect custom cubic-beziers.

4. **Sub-300ms UI.** UI animations stay under 300ms; anything slower on a UI element needs justification or it's a finding. Per-element budgets live in [STANDARDS.md](STANDARDS.md).

5. **Origin & physical correctness.** Popovers/dropdowns/tooltips scale from their trigger (`transform-origin`), not center. Never animate from `scale(0)` — start from `scale(0.9–0.97)` + opacity (Modals are exempt — they stay centered.)

6. **Interruptibility.** Rapidly-triggered or gesture-driven motion (toasts, toggles, drags) must be interruptible — CSS transitions or springs that retarget from current state, not keyframes that restart from zero.

7. **GPU-only properties.** Animate `transform` and `opacity` only. Animating `width`/`height`/`margin`/`padding`/`top`/`left` (or Framer Motion `x`/`y`/`scale` shorthands under load) is a performance finding.

8. **Accessibility.** `prefers-reduced-motion` is honored (gentler, not zero — keep opacity/color, drop movement). Hover animations are gated behind `@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine)`.

9. **Asymmetric enter/exit.** Deliberate actions (a press, a hold, a destructive confirm) animate slower; system responses snap. Symmetric timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction is a finding.

10. **Cohesion.** Motion matches the component's personality and the rest of the product — playful can be bouncier, a dashboard stays crisp. Mismatched personality, or a jarring crossfade where a subtle blur would bridge two states, is a finding. When unsure whether motion feels right, the strongest move is often to delete it.

## Aggressive Escalation Triggers

Flag these on sight, hard:

- `transition: all` (unbounded property animation) - `scale(0)` or pure-fade entrances with no initial transform - `ease-in` on any UI interaction; weak built-in easing on a deliberate animation - Animation on a keyboard shortcut, command-palette toggle, or 100+/day action - UI duration > 300ms with no stated reason - `transform-origin: center` on a trigger-anchored popover/dropdown/tooltip - Keyframes on toasts, toggles, or anything added/triggered rapidly - Animating layout properties (`width`/`height`/`margin`/`padding`/`top`/`left`) - Framer Motion `x`/`y`/`scale` props on motion that runs while the page is busy - Updating a CSS variable on a parent to drive a child transform (style recalc storm) - Missing `prefers-reduced-motion` handling on movement - Ungated `:hover` motion - Symmetric enter/exit timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction - Everything-at-once entrance where a 30–80ms stagger belongs

## Remedial Preference Hierarchy

When proposing fixes, prefer earlier moves over later ones:

1. **Delete the animation** (high-frequency / no purpose / keyboard-triggered). 2. **Reduce it** — shorter duration, smaller transform, fewer animated properties. 3. **Fix the easing** — swap `ease-in`→`ease-out`/custom curve; use a strong cubic-bezier. 4. **Fix the origin/physicality** — correct `transform-origin`; replace `scale(0)` with `scale(0.95)`+opacity. 5. **Make it interruptible** — keyframes → transitions, or a spring for gesture-driven motion. 6. **Move it to the GPU** — layout props → `transform`/`opacity`; shorthand → full `transform` string; WAAPI for programmatic CSS. 7. **Asymmetric timing** — slow the deliberate phase, snap the response. 8. **Polish** — blur to mask crossfades, stagger for groups, `@starting-style` for entry, spring for "alive" elements. 9. **Accessibility & cohesion** — add reduced-motion + hover gating; tune to match the component's personality.

## Required Output Format

Two parts, in this order.

### Part 1 — Findings table (REQUIRED)

A single markdown table. One row per issue. Never a "Before:/After:" list.

| Before | After | Why | | --- | --- | --- | | `transition: all 300ms` | `transition: transform 200

Platform Compatibility

claude-codeFULL
codexFULL
cursorFULL

Technical Details

Version
1.0.0
License
MIT
Last Updated
7/10/2026
Published
7/10/2026

Frameworks & Tools

Claude CodeCodexCursor

Decision snapshot

Primary pick

100
Ready
Adopt
Stage

7,906 GitHub stars

Audit snapshot

Install review

Install and adoption review

95
Safe to try
Security
88/100
Maintenance
100/100
Install
92/100
Open full auditOpen eval report

Agent-proven evidence

Agent Proven evidence

Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.

0
Proven
Needs first agent runAuto-install: review firstLast: Unknown
Success rate
Recent failure
Outcomes
0
Output quality
Failed
0
Not relevant
0
Installs
0
Risk blocked
0
Setup needed
0
Production
0

No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.

Install

Add to agent workflow

Free and open source. Review the audit before production use.

Growth loop

Share kit

X

Scenario-led draft for Review Animations, ready for a manual X post.

Curator note
Most coding agents don't fail from lack of model power. They fail when repo context disappears.

Review Animations gives coding agents a repeatable way to plan, patch, review, or...

7.9K stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/emilkowalski-review-animations?ref=x
#AIAgents
Open X draft
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for Review Animations:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/emilkowalski-review-animations?ref=x

Install: npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills

Listing source

Registry indexed

Claimable

This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.

Indexed by
OpenAgentSkill community index

Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.

Claim this skill

Owner claim

Claim this skill listing

This registry indexed listing is attributed to Emil Kowalski but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.

Creator backlink kit

Add the evidence badges to your README

Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/emilkowalski-review-animations?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/emilkowalski-review-animations)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/emilkowalski-review-animations?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/emilkowalski-review-animations)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/emilkowalski-review-animations?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/emilkowalski-review-animations/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/emilkowalski-review-animations?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/emilkowalski-review-animations)

Author

E

Emil Kowalski

@emil-kowalski

Health Signals

GitHub stars
7.9K
Quality score
71/100
Last GitHub push
Jul 9, 2026
Framework hints
3
OpenAgentSkill views
1
Install copies
0
Outbound clicks
0

Community Signal

Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.

Trust & Safety

Review then install

89
  • GitHub adoption7.9K GitHub starsPASS
  • Stars/forks activity7.9K stars, 436 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataPASS
  • Recent maintenance1d since pushPASS
  • License clarityMITPASS
  • README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
  • Dependency/runtime riskno major dependency risk hints in public metadataPASS