Creator · dev-core-busy
Last updated · Aug 24, 2026
code-delegate
>-
Do not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "code-delegate" agent skill from https://github.com/dev-core-busy/jarvis/tree/master/.claude/skills/code-delegate. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: >- After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"dev-core-busy-code-delegate","task":"Install code-delegate","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Coding and developer agents
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add dev-core-busy/jarvis --skill code-delegate
Maintenance
fresh
Pushed today
Risk
Needs review
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
23
60/100 Quality · 67/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
23 GitHub stars
Repo activity
23 stars, 7 forks
Maintenance
Pushed today
License
Apache-2.0
Install
npx skills add dev-core-busy/jarvis --skill code-delegate
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Usable metadata, review docs
Risk summary
Review before production
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 23 GitHub stars
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
View technical data+
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Coding agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Inspect source files
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add dev-core-busy/jarvis --skill code-delegate
- Policy
- block
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 59/100
- Audit
- 74/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add dev-core-busy/jarvis --skill code-delegateDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Alternative
Opencode
200.7K Stars
npx skills add anomalyco/opencode
Alternative
Code Review
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Alternative
Grill With Docs
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
Alternative
To Spec
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
Agent safety v2
34/100 · Avoid automatic install
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Shell or command execution
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
high
Secrets or environment access
Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Agent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20code-delegate%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20code-delegate%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use code-delegate in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20code-delegate%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate/install
Install command: npx skills add dev-core-busy/jarvis --skill code-delegate
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=code-delegate&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use code-delegate for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate/install, then install with: npx skills add dev-core-busy/jarvis --skill code-delegateRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/dev-core-busy-code-delegate
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/dev-core-busy-code-delegate?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/dev-core-busy-code-delegate
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20code-delegate%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Coding agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
Needs review · 74/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Fallback candidate for Coding agents
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Coding agents
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Coding agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidence
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 60/100 quality profile
- 5 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- Low GitHub adoption signal
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Coding agents task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
FIX23 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
FIX23 stars, 7 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASSPushed today
License clarity
PASSApache-2.0
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 23 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 23 stars, 7 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Promising candidate for agent workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Operate local tools
Local desktop
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Design, build, test, and ship interfaces
Frontend and UI
A practical workflow for agents that turn product briefs or Figma designs into polished frontend code, review the result, test it in a browser, and prepare a safe deployment.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Opencode
The open source coding agent.
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
Overview
--- name: code-delegate description: >- Gibt eine eng umrissene Codeaufgabe an den Jarvis-Agenten ab und holt sie als geprueften Patch zurueck – spart Anthropic-Tokens bei mechanischer Breitenarbeit. Nutzen, wenn eine Aenderung VIEL Datei-Lesen und WENIG Beschreibung braucht und eine vorhandene Testdatei das Ergebnis beweist. ---
# Codearbeit an Jarvis abgeben
Jarvis rechnet auf kostenlosen Tokens. Diese Faehigkeit verschiebt **Lesen und Suchen** dorthin – nicht das Denken.
## Die Entscheidungsregel
**Delegiere nur, wenn die Beschreibung kurz und die Dateiarbeit breit ist.**
Musst du den Code erst lesen, um eine brauchbare Spezifikation zu schreiben, hast du die Ersparnis schon ausgegeben. Dann mach es selbst.
### Geeignet
| Klasse | Beispiel | |---|---| | Mechanische Breitenarbeit | „`-localhost` an alle x11vnc-Aufrufe" (16 Stellen), „Cache-Buster an 40 Skript-Tags" | | Eine kleine Aenderung mit vorhandenem Waechter | „Variable ergaenzen, `tests/test_branding_aliase.py` muss gruen bleiben" | | Zwei Stellen, die zusammenpassen muessen | Deklaration in `:root` UND `body`, Feld in `create_*` UND der Whitelist von `update_*` |
### NICHT geeignet – hier selbst arbeiten
- **Alles Konventionslastige.** CLAUDE.md hat ~167.000 Token. Ein 35B-Modell wendet die Regeln darin nicht zuverlaessig an. - **Alles Sicherheitsrelevante** (Gates, Sandbox, Rechte, Auth). - **Zustandswechsel.** „Aendere X, miss, mach rueckgaengig" ist reproduzierbar gescheitert (17 Schritte, kein Ergebnis). **Eine Delegation = ein Zielzustand.** Den Rueckbau macht der Server per `git checkout`. - **Alles ohne mechanischen Riegel.** Kein Test, der es beweist → nicht delegieren. Die Modellantwort allein ist kein Nachweis.
## Ablauf
```bash S=deploy/claude_subagent/delegiere.py # im Repo versioniert, nicht in .claude/
# 1. Auftrag schreiben (Datei, damit Anfuehrungszeichen nicht stoeren) cat > /tmp/auftrag.txt <<'EOF' In frontend/css/chat.css im :root-Block die Variable ergaenzen: --accent-soft: color-mix(in srgb, var(--accent) 20%, transparent); EOF
# 2. Abgeben -> gibt die Auftragskennung aus ID=$(python3 $S senden --spec-datei /tmp/auftrag.txt \ --dateien frontend/css/chat.css \ --riegel tests/test_branding_aliase.py)
# 3. Warten; bei Erfolg kommt der Patch auf stdout, der Bericht auf stderr python3 $S warten "$ID" > /tmp/patch.diff ```
## Die Abbruchregel – ausnahmslos
Der Server prueft **alles-oder-nichts** und liefert nur dann einen Patch: Patch nicht leer · nur die freigegebenen Dateien angefasst · Riegel gruen · Patch nicht gekuerzt.
Kommt **kein** Patch (Exitcode ≠ 0), dann **mach die Aufgabe selbst**. Nicht nachbessern lassen, nicht ein zweites Mal delegieren, nicht „fast richtig" uebernehmen. Ein zweiter Versuch kostet mehr als die Ersparnis.
Kommt ein Patch, **lies ihn**, bevor du ihn anwendest:
```bash git apply --check /tmp/patch.diff && git apply /tmp/patch.diff ```
Ein gruener Riegel beweist, dass die Aenderung *funktioniert* – nicht, dass sie zu den Projektkonventionen passt (Einrueckung, Spaltenausrichtung, Kommentare). Das ist deine Aufgabe und der Grund, warum der Patch klein sein muss.
## Was der Auftragstext enthalten muss
Der Agent kennt die Projektregeln **nicht**. Schreibe deshalb:
- **Was genau** wo hinein soll – woertlich, wenn es ein fester Text ist. - **Keine** Begruendung, keine Historie, kein „wie ueblich". - **Kein** „raeum dabei auf", „formatiere mit", „pruefe auch noch".
Zahlen aus der Antwort des Agenten sind **wertlos** – er zaehlt nachweislich falsch (drei von drei Probelaeufen). Verlass dich auf Patch und Riegel; beides rechnet der Server selbst.
## Voraussetzungen
Diese Datei ist bereits auf DIESE Installation ausgestellt – die beiden Befehle unten sind vollstaendig, es fehlt nur der Schluessel:
```bash printf '%s' 'HIER-DEINEN-SCHLUESSEL-EINSETZEN' > ~/.jarvis-csa-key printf '%s' 'https://191.100.144.1' > ~/.jarvis-csa-url chmod 600 ~/.jarvis-csa-key ```
- **Schluessel** in `JARVIS_CSA_KEY` oder `~/.jarvis-csa-key` – in Jarvis unter `https://191.100.144.1/claude` erzeugen. **Nie ins Repo.** - **Adresse** ist oben schon eingesetzt: `https://191.100.144.1`. (Ueber `JARVIS_CSA_URL` bzw. die Datei laesst sich der Client auch gegen eine andere Installation richten – eine feste Vorgabe im Code gibt es bewusst nicht.) - Der lokale Stand muss auf `origin/master` liegen und die Zieldateien duerfen keine ungespeicherten Aenderungen haben – der Client prueft beides und bricht sonst ab.
Laeuft gegen **jede** Jarvis-Installation, auch produktive. Der Riegel ist dort verfuegbar, weil der Arbeitsbereich frisch von `origin/master` geklont wird – ein `sparse-checkout` auf dem Server (der `tests/` in `/opt/jarvis` ausblendet) wirkt nur auf dessen eigene Arbeitskopie, nicht auf einen neuen Klon.
## Beiblatt: CLAUDE.md schlank halten
Die Ausschlussregel „nichts Konventionslastiges" oben haengt an der Groesse von CLAUDE.md – je dicker die Datei, desto weniger laesst sich abgeben. Ein paste-fertiger Auftrag zum Verschlanken steht in **`claude-md-diaet.md`** (Download im Bereich `https://191.100.144.1/claude`, Abschnitt „Anleitung"). Er ist eigenstaendig – kein Jarvis, keine Delegation – und wird ausdruecklich **nicht** delegiert: CLAUDE.md ist die Konvention selbst.
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Last updated
- Aug 24, 2026
- Published
- Aug 24, 2026
Decision snapshot
Fallback candidate
recent repository activity
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 77/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for code-delegate, ready for a manual X post.
Before you hand an agent the next repo task, give it a repeatable starting point. code-delegate: >- 23 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for code-delegate: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate?ref=x Install: npx skills add dev-core-busy/jarvis --skill code-delegate
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- dev-core-busy
- Source
- dev-core-busy/jarvis
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to dev-core-busy but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/dev-core-busy-code-delegate)Author
dev-core-busy
@dev-core-busy
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 23
- Quality score
- 32/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 24, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 5
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Do not auto-install
- GitHub adoption23 GitHub starsFIX
- Stars/forks activity23 stars, 7 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataFIX
- Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
- License clarityApache-2.0PASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessPublic metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md contextINFO
- Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surface, credential or environment accessCHECK
Related skills
Opencode
The open source coding agent.
200.7K StarsCode Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarsTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K Stars