continue-claude-code-work Eval-Bericht.

Validierungsplan

Was der Agent als Nächstes tun sollte

1. 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
2. 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
3. 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
4. 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
5. 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.

Nicht verwenden, wenn

Bedingungen für eine andere Skill

• Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
• production agents without a repository review
• The skill depends on `daymade-claude-code:read-claude-code-history` but does not document installation, required version, permissions, or behavior if that companion skill is unavailable.
• Historical transcripts are treated as evidence for the original business outcome and user corrections, but there is no explicit guardrail against prompt injection embedded in prior Claude Code history. A malicious transcript could influence the contract and lead to unintended actions.
• The workflow lacks a clear safe operating boundary for destructive or irreversible actions; it should require confirmation before executing high-impact write, delete, or external commands recovered from prior sessions.
• Quality score needs review