Creator · datadog-labs
Last updated · Sep 1, 2026
End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized ban
Creator · datadog-labs
Last updated · Sep 1, 2026
End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized ban
Creator · datadog-labs
Last updated · Sep 1, 2026
End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized ban
Creator · datadog-labs
Last updated · Sep 1, 2026
End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized ban
Do not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "agent-observability-eval-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/datadog-labs/agent-skills/tree/main/agent-observability/agent-observability-eval-pipeline. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized banner and a "continue" checkpoint between each. Pure orchestration over the agent-observability sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). Use when user says "run the eval pipeline", "go from traces to evals", "bootstrap evals end to end", "classify then RCA then bootstrap", "build an eval set from scratch", "onboard me to datasets and experiments", "walk me through experiments", "I have an ml_app, now what", "Agent Observability onboarding", "guided experiment setup", "from traces to experiments", or wants a deterministic, narrated tour from produ After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline","task":"Install agent-observability-eval-pipeline","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Maintenance
fresh
9d since push
Risk
Needs review
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
158
69/100 Quality · 64/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
158 GitHub stars
Repo activity
158 stars, 25 forks
Maintenance
9d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipelineDo not use when
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill frontend-design
Alternative
84.4K Stars
npx skills add Leonxlnx/taste-skill --skill design-taste-frontend
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill canvas-design
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill brand-guidelines
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
high
Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use agent-observability-eval-pipeline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
Install command: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=agent-observability-eval-pipeline&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use agent-observability-eval-pipeline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install, then install with: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipelineRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
INFO158 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK158 stars, 25 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS9d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Investigate faster
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Workflow fit
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
--- name: agent-observability-eval-pipeline description: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized banner and a "continue" checkpoint between each. Pure orchestration over the agent-observability sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). Use when user says "run the eval pipeline", "go from traces to evals", "bootstrap evals end to end", "classify then RCA then bootstrap", "build an eval set from scratch", "onboard me to datasets and experiments", "walk me through experiments", "I have an ml_app, now what", "Agent Observability onboarding", "guided experiment setup", "from traces to experiments", or wants a deterministic, narrated tour from production data through evaluators, datasets, and experiments. Stop early with `--stop-after <phase>` to short-circuit at evaluators or dataset, or resume mid-flow with `--start-at <phase>`. ---
## Backend
**Detection** — At the start of every invocation, before taking any action, determine which backend to use:
1. If the user passed `--backend pup` anywhere in their invocation → use **pup mode** immediately, regardless of whether MCP tools are present. Skip steps 2–4. 2. Check whether MCP tools are present in your active tool list. The canonical signal is whether `mcp__datadog-llmo-mcp__search_llmobs_spans` appears in your available tools. 3. If MCP tools are present → use **MCP mode** throughout. Call MCP tools exactly as named in the sub-skill workflow sections. 4. If MCP tools are absent → check whether `pup` is executable: run `pup --version` via Bash. A JSON response containing `"version"` confirms pup is available. 5. If pup responds → use **pup mode** throughout. Each sub-skill carries its own Tool Reference appendix with the full MCP→pup mapping. 6. If neither is available → stop and tell the user: > "Neither the Datadog MCP server nor the pup CLI is available. Connect the MCP server (`claude mcp add --scope user --transport http datadog-llmo-mcp 'https://mcp.datadoghq.com/api/unstable/mcp-server/mcp?toolsets=llmobs'`) or install pup."
`--backend pup` is accepted anywhere in the invocation arguments. Strip it from args before passing to sub-skills, but carry the pup-mode decision forward — every sub-skill must also operate in pup mode for the entire pipeline run.
**Sub-skill backend propagation**: The backend detected at startup applies to all sub-skills invoked across the six phases. Do not re-detect per phase. Announce once at startup: - MCP mode: "(Running in MCP mode — all features available.)" - pup mode: "(Running in pup mode — pup commands used throughout. All features available.)"
**Invocation ID:** At the very start of each invocation, before any MCP tool call, generate an 8-character hex invocation ID (e.g., `3a9f1c2b`). Keep it constant for the entire invocation.
**Intent tagging:** On every MCP tool call, prefix `telemetry.intent` with `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline[<inv_id>] — ` followed by a description of why the tool is being called. On the **first MCP tool call only**, use `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline:start[<inv_id>] — ` instead (note the `:start` suffix). Example first call: `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline:start[3a9f1c2b] — Precheck: verify ml_app has traces in the last 7 days`
---
# Agent Observability Eval Pipeline — Classify → RCA → Eval Bootstrap → Dataset → Experiment → Analyze
A deterministic, six-phase guided pipeline for an already-instrumented `ml_app` owner. Each phase has the same envelope — a banner that names the entity being produced, an explanation of its purpose, the action (a sub-skill call or a small executable step), and a checkpoint. **You always know where you are.**
``` [Precheck] verify ml_app, project, backend, credentials, output dir ↓ [Phase 1: Classify ml_app traces] entity: ml_app, trace, span ↓ [Phase 2: Root cause analysis] entity: failure mode, root cause ↓ [Phase 3: Bootstrap evaluators] entity: evaluator, LLM judge ↓ (stop here with --stop-after eval-bootstrap ↓ for the classic eval-pipeline behavior) [Phase 4: Create + publish dataset] entity: dataset record, published dataset ↓ (executes: LLMObs.create_dataset) [Phase 5: Generate + run experiment] entity: experiment, task, evaluator, run ↓ (executes: python <generated_file>) ↓ (in-phase review beat before run) [Phase 6: Analyze experiment] entity: metric, comparison, recommendation ```
This skill is **pure orchestration plus pedagogy** — no new analytical logic. The work happens inside the sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). What this skill adds is the deterministic envelope: every phase has the same shape, the same checkpoint contract, and the same entity-explanation banner — so the user gets a consistent, narrated experience regardless of how they phrased the original request.
## Usage
``` /agent-observability-eval-pipeline <ml_app> [--project-name <name>] [--timeframe <window>] [--trace-limit <N>] [--format py|ipynb] [--evaluator-style function|class|remote] [--offline-evaluators | --online-evaluators | --data-only] [--start-at classify|rca|eval-bootstrap|dataset|experiment|analyze] [--stop-after classify|rca|eval-bootstrap|dataset|experiment|analyze] [--classification-summary <path>] [--rca-report <path>] [--dataset-file <path>] [--dataset-name <name>] [--experiment-file <path>] [--experiment-id <uuid> | --experiment-url <url>] [--app-root <path>] [--env-file <path>] [--output-dir <dir>] [--backend pup] ```
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
### Inputs
| Input | Required | Default | Description | |-------|----------|---------|-------------| | `ml_app` | Yes | — | The instrumented LLM app to onboard / evaluate against. The precheck verifies it has recent traces. | | `--project-name` | No | derived from `pyproject.toml` / `setup.cfg` / `setup.py` / `package.json` / cwd (same order as `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`); falls back to `experiment-sdk-default` | The Datadog **project** the pipeline writes datasets and experiments into. The SDK lazily creates the project on first use via `LLMObs.enable(project_name=...)`. Surface this in the Precheck so the user can confirm before anything is created. | | `--timeframe` | No | `now-7d` | Lookback window for Phase 1 classification and Phase 4 dataset sampling. | | `--trace-limit` | No | `20` | Sampling cap for Phase 4. Phase 1 internally uses `min(20, --trace-limit)` for the classification sample. | | `--format` | No | `py` | Passed to `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap` in Phase 5: `py` (script) or `ipynb` (Jupyter notebook). | | `--evaluator-style` | No | `function` | Passed to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` (Phase 3) and `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap` (Phase 5): `function`, `class`, or `remote`. | | `--offline-evaluators` | No | on (default) | Phase 3: emit a Python SDK evaluator suite (BaseEvaluator / LLMJudge classes) that runs inside an experiment against a dataset. Maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `sdk_code` mode. | | `--online-evaluators` | No | off | Phase 3: publish online LLM-judge evaluators directly to Datadog (created as disabled drafts; enable in the UI). Online evaluators run on production spans as they're emitted. Maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `publish` mode (was `--publish`). | | `--data-only` | No | off | Phase 3: emit a local data blob only — no executable evaluator code or online publish. At Phase 3 entry the skill **prompts** the user to pick one of: (a) a `DatasetRecordRaw[]` JSON suitable for experiment use (maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap --emit-dataset`), or (b) a framework-agnostic JSON evaluator spec for local analysis (maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `data_only` mode). | | `--stop-after <phase>` | No | `analyze` (run everything) | Stop after the named phase completes. `classify` = Phase 1 only. `rca` = through Phase 2. `eval-bootstrap` = through Phase 3 (matches the classic eval-pipeline). `dataset` = through Phase 4 (dataset created + published). `experiment` = through Phase 5 (experiment generated + run). `analyze` = all six phases (default). | | `--start-at <phase>` | No | `classify` (start at the top) | Skip earlier phases and start at the named phase. Same vocabulary as `--stop-after`. The skill auto-loads any required prior-phase artifacts from `<output-dir>/state/` (see "State persistence and entry/exit" section). For phases that need an artifact the auto-load can't find, supply it via one of the override flags below. Combinable with `--stop-after` to run a contiguous slice of the pipeline. | | `--classification-summary <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/01-classification.md` if `--start-at rca` or later | Override the Phase 1 output that Phase 2 consumes. Useful when the prior state file is missing or you want to point at a hand-edited version. | | `--rca-report <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/02-rca-report.md` if `--start-at eval-bootstrap` or later | Override the Phase 2 output that Phase 3 consumes. | | `--dataset-file <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/04-published-dataset.json`'s `dataset_file` field (or the most recent `<output-dir>/dataset_<ml_app>_*.json`) | The local `DatasetRecordRaw[]` JSON. Used by Phase 4's publish sub-step when re-publishing without re-sampling. | | `--dataset-name <name>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/04-published-dataset.json` if `--start-at experiment` | The name of a published Datadog dataset that Phase 5 wires the experiment to. | | `--experiment-file <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/05-experiment-run.json`'s `experiment_file` field if `--start-at experiment` and the file already exists | The generated experiment file. When present, Phase 5 skips the codegen sub-step (5a) and goes straight to the review beat (5b) → run (5c). | | `--experiment-id <uuid>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/05-experiment-run.json` if `--start-at analyze` | The Datadog experiment ID Phase 6 analyzes. Mutually exclusive with `--experiment-url`. | | `--experiment-url <url>` | No | auto-loaded as above | Alternative to `--experiment-id`. The skill parses the trailing UUID out of the URL. | | `--app-root` | No | resolved from cwd / `pyproject.toml` etc. | Restricts `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`'s task-function introspection to this directory tree. | | `--env-file` | No | none (auto-discovery walks standard locations) | Explicit `.env` path for credential loading. Surfaced in the Precheck and baked into the generated experiment as `ENV_FILE_OVERRIDE`. | | `--output-dir` | No | `./experiments` | Where the dataset JSON, publish script, and generated experiment file are written. | | `--backend` | No | auto-detect | `pup` forces pup mode regardless of MCP availability. |
If `ml_app` is not provided, ask the user before proceeding. The three evaluator-output flags (`-
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for agent-observability-eval-pipeline, ready for a manual X post.
agent-observability-eval-pipeline: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production trac... 158 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=x
Listing + install path for agent-observability-eval-pipeline: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=x Install: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to datadog-labs but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)datadog-labs
@datadog-labs
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Do not auto-install
Frontend Design
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
174.2K StarsTaste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
84.4K StarsCanvas Design
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
174.2K StarsAnthropic Brand Guidelines
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
174.2K StarsDo not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "agent-observability-eval-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/datadog-labs/agent-skills/tree/main/agent-observability/agent-observability-eval-pipeline. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized banner and a "continue" checkpoint between each. Pure orchestration over the agent-observability sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). Use when user says "run the eval pipeline", "go from traces to evals", "bootstrap evals end to end", "classify then RCA then bootstrap", "build an eval set from scratch", "onboard me to datasets and experiments", "walk me through experiments", "I have an ml_app, now what", "Agent Observability onboarding", "guided experiment setup", "from traces to experiments", or wants a deterministic, narrated tour from produ After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline","task":"Install agent-observability-eval-pipeline","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Maintenance
fresh
9d since push
Risk
Needs review
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
158
69/100 Quality · 64/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
158 GitHub stars
Repo activity
158 stars, 25 forks
Maintenance
9d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipelineDo not use when
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill frontend-design
Alternative
84.4K Stars
npx skills add Leonxlnx/taste-skill --skill design-taste-frontend
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill canvas-design
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill brand-guidelines
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
high
Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use agent-observability-eval-pipeline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
Install command: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=agent-observability-eval-pipeline&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use agent-observability-eval-pipeline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install, then install with: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipelineRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
INFO158 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK158 stars, 25 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS9d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Investigate faster
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Workflow fit
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
--- name: agent-observability-eval-pipeline description: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized banner and a "continue" checkpoint between each. Pure orchestration over the agent-observability sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). Use when user says "run the eval pipeline", "go from traces to evals", "bootstrap evals end to end", "classify then RCA then bootstrap", "build an eval set from scratch", "onboard me to datasets and experiments", "walk me through experiments", "I have an ml_app, now what", "Agent Observability onboarding", "guided experiment setup", "from traces to experiments", or wants a deterministic, narrated tour from production data through evaluators, datasets, and experiments. Stop early with `--stop-after <phase>` to short-circuit at evaluators or dataset, or resume mid-flow with `--start-at <phase>`. ---
## Backend
**Detection** — At the start of every invocation, before taking any action, determine which backend to use:
1. If the user passed `--backend pup` anywhere in their invocation → use **pup mode** immediately, regardless of whether MCP tools are present. Skip steps 2–4. 2. Check whether MCP tools are present in your active tool list. The canonical signal is whether `mcp__datadog-llmo-mcp__search_llmobs_spans` appears in your available tools. 3. If MCP tools are present → use **MCP mode** throughout. Call MCP tools exactly as named in the sub-skill workflow sections. 4. If MCP tools are absent → check whether `pup` is executable: run `pup --version` via Bash. A JSON response containing `"version"` confirms pup is available. 5. If pup responds → use **pup mode** throughout. Each sub-skill carries its own Tool Reference appendix with the full MCP→pup mapping. 6. If neither is available → stop and tell the user: > "Neither the Datadog MCP server nor the pup CLI is available. Connect the MCP server (`claude mcp add --scope user --transport http datadog-llmo-mcp 'https://mcp.datadoghq.com/api/unstable/mcp-server/mcp?toolsets=llmobs'`) or install pup."
`--backend pup` is accepted anywhere in the invocation arguments. Strip it from args before passing to sub-skills, but carry the pup-mode decision forward — every sub-skill must also operate in pup mode for the entire pipeline run.
**Sub-skill backend propagation**: The backend detected at startup applies to all sub-skills invoked across the six phases. Do not re-detect per phase. Announce once at startup: - MCP mode: "(Running in MCP mode — all features available.)" - pup mode: "(Running in pup mode — pup commands used throughout. All features available.)"
**Invocation ID:** At the very start of each invocation, before any MCP tool call, generate an 8-character hex invocation ID (e.g., `3a9f1c2b`). Keep it constant for the entire invocation.
**Intent tagging:** On every MCP tool call, prefix `telemetry.intent` with `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline[<inv_id>] — ` followed by a description of why the tool is being called. On the **first MCP tool call only**, use `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline:start[<inv_id>] — ` instead (note the `:start` suffix). Example first call: `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline:start[3a9f1c2b] — Precheck: verify ml_app has traces in the last 7 days`
---
# Agent Observability Eval Pipeline — Classify → RCA → Eval Bootstrap → Dataset → Experiment → Analyze
A deterministic, six-phase guided pipeline for an already-instrumented `ml_app` owner. Each phase has the same envelope — a banner that names the entity being produced, an explanation of its purpose, the action (a sub-skill call or a small executable step), and a checkpoint. **You always know where you are.**
``` [Precheck] verify ml_app, project, backend, credentials, output dir ↓ [Phase 1: Classify ml_app traces] entity: ml_app, trace, span ↓ [Phase 2: Root cause analysis] entity: failure mode, root cause ↓ [Phase 3: Bootstrap evaluators] entity: evaluator, LLM judge ↓ (stop here with --stop-after eval-bootstrap ↓ for the classic eval-pipeline behavior) [Phase 4: Create + publish dataset] entity: dataset record, published dataset ↓ (executes: LLMObs.create_dataset) [Phase 5: Generate + run experiment] entity: experiment, task, evaluator, run ↓ (executes: python <generated_file>) ↓ (in-phase review beat before run) [Phase 6: Analyze experiment] entity: metric, comparison, recommendation ```
This skill is **pure orchestration plus pedagogy** — no new analytical logic. The work happens inside the sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). What this skill adds is the deterministic envelope: every phase has the same shape, the same checkpoint contract, and the same entity-explanation banner — so the user gets a consistent, narrated experience regardless of how they phrased the original request.
## Usage
``` /agent-observability-eval-pipeline <ml_app> [--project-name <name>] [--timeframe <window>] [--trace-limit <N>] [--format py|ipynb] [--evaluator-style function|class|remote] [--offline-evaluators | --online-evaluators | --data-only] [--start-at classify|rca|eval-bootstrap|dataset|experiment|analyze] [--stop-after classify|rca|eval-bootstrap|dataset|experiment|analyze] [--classification-summary <path>] [--rca-report <path>] [--dataset-file <path>] [--dataset-name <name>] [--experiment-file <path>] [--experiment-id <uuid> | --experiment-url <url>] [--app-root <path>] [--env-file <path>] [--output-dir <dir>] [--backend pup] ```
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
### Inputs
| Input | Required | Default | Description | |-------|----------|---------|-------------| | `ml_app` | Yes | — | The instrumented LLM app to onboard / evaluate against. The precheck verifies it has recent traces. | | `--project-name` | No | derived from `pyproject.toml` / `setup.cfg` / `setup.py` / `package.json` / cwd (same order as `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`); falls back to `experiment-sdk-default` | The Datadog **project** the pipeline writes datasets and experiments into. The SDK lazily creates the project on first use via `LLMObs.enable(project_name=...)`. Surface this in the Precheck so the user can confirm before anything is created. | | `--timeframe` | No | `now-7d` | Lookback window for Phase 1 classification and Phase 4 dataset sampling. | | `--trace-limit` | No | `20` | Sampling cap for Phase 4. Phase 1 internally uses `min(20, --trace-limit)` for the classification sample. | | `--format` | No | `py` | Passed to `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap` in Phase 5: `py` (script) or `ipynb` (Jupyter notebook). | | `--evaluator-style` | No | `function` | Passed to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` (Phase 3) and `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap` (Phase 5): `function`, `class`, or `remote`. | | `--offline-evaluators` | No | on (default) | Phase 3: emit a Python SDK evaluator suite (BaseEvaluator / LLMJudge classes) that runs inside an experiment against a dataset. Maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `sdk_code` mode. | | `--online-evaluators` | No | off | Phase 3: publish online LLM-judge evaluators directly to Datadog (created as disabled drafts; enable in the UI). Online evaluators run on production spans as they're emitted. Maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `publish` mode (was `--publish`). | | `--data-only` | No | off | Phase 3: emit a local data blob only — no executable evaluator code or online publish. At Phase 3 entry the skill **prompts** the user to pick one of: (a) a `DatasetRecordRaw[]` JSON suitable for experiment use (maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap --emit-dataset`), or (b) a framework-agnostic JSON evaluator spec for local analysis (maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `data_only` mode). | | `--stop-after <phase>` | No | `analyze` (run everything) | Stop after the named phase completes. `classify` = Phase 1 only. `rca` = through Phase 2. `eval-bootstrap` = through Phase 3 (matches the classic eval-pipeline). `dataset` = through Phase 4 (dataset created + published). `experiment` = through Phase 5 (experiment generated + run). `analyze` = all six phases (default). | | `--start-at <phase>` | No | `classify` (start at the top) | Skip earlier phases and start at the named phase. Same vocabulary as `--stop-after`. The skill auto-loads any required prior-phase artifacts from `<output-dir>/state/` (see "State persistence and entry/exit" section). For phases that need an artifact the auto-load can't find, supply it via one of the override flags below. Combinable with `--stop-after` to run a contiguous slice of the pipeline. | | `--classification-summary <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/01-classification.md` if `--start-at rca` or later | Override the Phase 1 output that Phase 2 consumes. Useful when the prior state file is missing or you want to point at a hand-edited version. | | `--rca-report <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/02-rca-report.md` if `--start-at eval-bootstrap` or later | Override the Phase 2 output that Phase 3 consumes. | | `--dataset-file <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/04-published-dataset.json`'s `dataset_file` field (or the most recent `<output-dir>/dataset_<ml_app>_*.json`) | The local `DatasetRecordRaw[]` JSON. Used by Phase 4's publish sub-step when re-publishing without re-sampling. | | `--dataset-name <name>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/04-published-dataset.json` if `--start-at experiment` | The name of a published Datadog dataset that Phase 5 wires the experiment to. | | `--experiment-file <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/05-experiment-run.json`'s `experiment_file` field if `--start-at experiment` and the file already exists | The generated experiment file. When present, Phase 5 skips the codegen sub-step (5a) and goes straight to the review beat (5b) → run (5c). | | `--experiment-id <uuid>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/05-experiment-run.json` if `--start-at analyze` | The Datadog experiment ID Phase 6 analyzes. Mutually exclusive with `--experiment-url`. | | `--experiment-url <url>` | No | auto-loaded as above | Alternative to `--experiment-id`. The skill parses the trailing UUID out of the URL. | | `--app-root` | No | resolved from cwd / `pyproject.toml` etc. | Restricts `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`'s task-function introspection to this directory tree. | | `--env-file` | No | none (auto-discovery walks standard locations) | Explicit `.env` path for credential loading. Surfaced in the Precheck and baked into the generated experiment as `ENV_FILE_OVERRIDE`. | | `--output-dir` | No | `./experiments` | Where the dataset JSON, publish script, and generated experiment file are written. | | `--backend` | No | auto-detect | `pup` forces pup mode regardless of MCP availability. |
If `ml_app` is not provided, ask the user before proceeding. The three evaluator-output flags (`-
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for agent-observability-eval-pipeline, ready for a manual X post.
agent-observability-eval-pipeline: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production trac... 158 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=x
Listing + install path for agent-observability-eval-pipeline: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=x Install: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to datadog-labs but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)datadog-labs
@datadog-labs
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Do not auto-install
Frontend Design
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
174.2K StarsTaste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
84.4K StarsCanvas Design
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
174.2K StarsAnthropic Brand Guidelines
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
174.2K StarsDo not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "agent-observability-eval-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/datadog-labs/agent-skills/tree/main/agent-observability/agent-observability-eval-pipeline. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized banner and a "continue" checkpoint between each. Pure orchestration over the agent-observability sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). Use when user says "run the eval pipeline", "go from traces to evals", "bootstrap evals end to end", "classify then RCA then bootstrap", "build an eval set from scratch", "onboard me to datasets and experiments", "walk me through experiments", "I have an ml_app, now what", "Agent Observability onboarding", "guided experiment setup", "from traces to experiments", or wants a deterministic, narrated tour from produ After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline","task":"Install agent-observability-eval-pipeline","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Maintenance
fresh
9d since push
Risk
Needs review
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
158
69/100 Quality · 64/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
158 GitHub stars
Repo activity
158 stars, 25 forks
Maintenance
9d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipelineDo not use when
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill frontend-design
Alternative
84.4K Stars
npx skills add Leonxlnx/taste-skill --skill design-taste-frontend
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill canvas-design
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill brand-guidelines
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
high
Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use agent-observability-eval-pipeline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
Install command: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=agent-observability-eval-pipeline&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use agent-observability-eval-pipeline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install, then install with: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipelineRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
INFO158 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK158 stars, 25 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS9d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Investigate faster
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Workflow fit
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
--- name: agent-observability-eval-pipeline description: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized banner and a "continue" checkpoint between each. Pure orchestration over the agent-observability sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). Use when user says "run the eval pipeline", "go from traces to evals", "bootstrap evals end to end", "classify then RCA then bootstrap", "build an eval set from scratch", "onboard me to datasets and experiments", "walk me through experiments", "I have an ml_app, now what", "Agent Observability onboarding", "guided experiment setup", "from traces to experiments", or wants a deterministic, narrated tour from production data through evaluators, datasets, and experiments. Stop early with `--stop-after <phase>` to short-circuit at evaluators or dataset, or resume mid-flow with `--start-at <phase>`. ---
## Backend
**Detection** — At the start of every invocation, before taking any action, determine which backend to use:
1. If the user passed `--backend pup` anywhere in their invocation → use **pup mode** immediately, regardless of whether MCP tools are present. Skip steps 2–4. 2. Check whether MCP tools are present in your active tool list. The canonical signal is whether `mcp__datadog-llmo-mcp__search_llmobs_spans` appears in your available tools. 3. If MCP tools are present → use **MCP mode** throughout. Call MCP tools exactly as named in the sub-skill workflow sections. 4. If MCP tools are absent → check whether `pup` is executable: run `pup --version` via Bash. A JSON response containing `"version"` confirms pup is available. 5. If pup responds → use **pup mode** throughout. Each sub-skill carries its own Tool Reference appendix with the full MCP→pup mapping. 6. If neither is available → stop and tell the user: > "Neither the Datadog MCP server nor the pup CLI is available. Connect the MCP server (`claude mcp add --scope user --transport http datadog-llmo-mcp 'https://mcp.datadoghq.com/api/unstable/mcp-server/mcp?toolsets=llmobs'`) or install pup."
`--backend pup` is accepted anywhere in the invocation arguments. Strip it from args before passing to sub-skills, but carry the pup-mode decision forward — every sub-skill must also operate in pup mode for the entire pipeline run.
**Sub-skill backend propagation**: The backend detected at startup applies to all sub-skills invoked across the six phases. Do not re-detect per phase. Announce once at startup: - MCP mode: "(Running in MCP mode — all features available.)" - pup mode: "(Running in pup mode — pup commands used throughout. All features available.)"
**Invocation ID:** At the very start of each invocation, before any MCP tool call, generate an 8-character hex invocation ID (e.g., `3a9f1c2b`). Keep it constant for the entire invocation.
**Intent tagging:** On every MCP tool call, prefix `telemetry.intent` with `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline[<inv_id>] — ` followed by a description of why the tool is being called. On the **first MCP tool call only**, use `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline:start[<inv_id>] — ` instead (note the `:start` suffix). Example first call: `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline:start[3a9f1c2b] — Precheck: verify ml_app has traces in the last 7 days`
---
# Agent Observability Eval Pipeline — Classify → RCA → Eval Bootstrap → Dataset → Experiment → Analyze
A deterministic, six-phase guided pipeline for an already-instrumented `ml_app` owner. Each phase has the same envelope — a banner that names the entity being produced, an explanation of its purpose, the action (a sub-skill call or a small executable step), and a checkpoint. **You always know where you are.**
``` [Precheck] verify ml_app, project, backend, credentials, output dir ↓ [Phase 1: Classify ml_app traces] entity: ml_app, trace, span ↓ [Phase 2: Root cause analysis] entity: failure mode, root cause ↓ [Phase 3: Bootstrap evaluators] entity: evaluator, LLM judge ↓ (stop here with --stop-after eval-bootstrap ↓ for the classic eval-pipeline behavior) [Phase 4: Create + publish dataset] entity: dataset record, published dataset ↓ (executes: LLMObs.create_dataset) [Phase 5: Generate + run experiment] entity: experiment, task, evaluator, run ↓ (executes: python <generated_file>) ↓ (in-phase review beat before run) [Phase 6: Analyze experiment] entity: metric, comparison, recommendation ```
This skill is **pure orchestration plus pedagogy** — no new analytical logic. The work happens inside the sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). What this skill adds is the deterministic envelope: every phase has the same shape, the same checkpoint contract, and the same entity-explanation banner — so the user gets a consistent, narrated experience regardless of how they phrased the original request.
## Usage
``` /agent-observability-eval-pipeline <ml_app> [--project-name <name>] [--timeframe <window>] [--trace-limit <N>] [--format py|ipynb] [--evaluator-style function|class|remote] [--offline-evaluators | --online-evaluators | --data-only] [--start-at classify|rca|eval-bootstrap|dataset|experiment|analyze] [--stop-after classify|rca|eval-bootstrap|dataset|experiment|analyze] [--classification-summary <path>] [--rca-report <path>] [--dataset-file <path>] [--dataset-name <name>] [--experiment-file <path>] [--experiment-id <uuid> | --experiment-url <url>] [--app-root <path>] [--env-file <path>] [--output-dir <dir>] [--backend pup] ```
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
### Inputs
| Input | Required | Default | Description | |-------|----------|---------|-------------| | `ml_app` | Yes | — | The instrumented LLM app to onboard / evaluate against. The precheck verifies it has recent traces. | | `--project-name` | No | derived from `pyproject.toml` / `setup.cfg` / `setup.py` / `package.json` / cwd (same order as `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`); falls back to `experiment-sdk-default` | The Datadog **project** the pipeline writes datasets and experiments into. The SDK lazily creates the project on first use via `LLMObs.enable(project_name=...)`. Surface this in the Precheck so the user can confirm before anything is created. | | `--timeframe` | No | `now-7d` | Lookback window for Phase 1 classification and Phase 4 dataset sampling. | | `--trace-limit` | No | `20` | Sampling cap for Phase 4. Phase 1 internally uses `min(20, --trace-limit)` for the classification sample. | | `--format` | No | `py` | Passed to `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap` in Phase 5: `py` (script) or `ipynb` (Jupyter notebook). | | `--evaluator-style` | No | `function` | Passed to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` (Phase 3) and `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap` (Phase 5): `function`, `class`, or `remote`. | | `--offline-evaluators` | No | on (default) | Phase 3: emit a Python SDK evaluator suite (BaseEvaluator / LLMJudge classes) that runs inside an experiment against a dataset. Maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `sdk_code` mode. | | `--online-evaluators` | No | off | Phase 3: publish online LLM-judge evaluators directly to Datadog (created as disabled drafts; enable in the UI). Online evaluators run on production spans as they're emitted. Maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `publish` mode (was `--publish`). | | `--data-only` | No | off | Phase 3: emit a local data blob only — no executable evaluator code or online publish. At Phase 3 entry the skill **prompts** the user to pick one of: (a) a `DatasetRecordRaw[]` JSON suitable for experiment use (maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap --emit-dataset`), or (b) a framework-agnostic JSON evaluator spec for local analysis (maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `data_only` mode). | | `--stop-after <phase>` | No | `analyze` (run everything) | Stop after the named phase completes. `classify` = Phase 1 only. `rca` = through Phase 2. `eval-bootstrap` = through Phase 3 (matches the classic eval-pipeline). `dataset` = through Phase 4 (dataset created + published). `experiment` = through Phase 5 (experiment generated + run). `analyze` = all six phases (default). | | `--start-at <phase>` | No | `classify` (start at the top) | Skip earlier phases and start at the named phase. Same vocabulary as `--stop-after`. The skill auto-loads any required prior-phase artifacts from `<output-dir>/state/` (see "State persistence and entry/exit" section). For phases that need an artifact the auto-load can't find, supply it via one of the override flags below. Combinable with `--stop-after` to run a contiguous slice of the pipeline. | | `--classification-summary <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/01-classification.md` if `--start-at rca` or later | Override the Phase 1 output that Phase 2 consumes. Useful when the prior state file is missing or you want to point at a hand-edited version. | | `--rca-report <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/02-rca-report.md` if `--start-at eval-bootstrap` or later | Override the Phase 2 output that Phase 3 consumes. | | `--dataset-file <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/04-published-dataset.json`'s `dataset_file` field (or the most recent `<output-dir>/dataset_<ml_app>_*.json`) | The local `DatasetRecordRaw[]` JSON. Used by Phase 4's publish sub-step when re-publishing without re-sampling. | | `--dataset-name <name>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/04-published-dataset.json` if `--start-at experiment` | The name of a published Datadog dataset that Phase 5 wires the experiment to. | | `--experiment-file <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/05-experiment-run.json`'s `experiment_file` field if `--start-at experiment` and the file already exists | The generated experiment file. When present, Phase 5 skips the codegen sub-step (5a) and goes straight to the review beat (5b) → run (5c). | | `--experiment-id <uuid>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/05-experiment-run.json` if `--start-at analyze` | The Datadog experiment ID Phase 6 analyzes. Mutually exclusive with `--experiment-url`. | | `--experiment-url <url>` | No | auto-loaded as above | Alternative to `--experiment-id`. The skill parses the trailing UUID out of the URL. | | `--app-root` | No | resolved from cwd / `pyproject.toml` etc. | Restricts `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`'s task-function introspection to this directory tree. | | `--env-file` | No | none (auto-discovery walks standard locations) | Explicit `.env` path for credential loading. Surfaced in the Precheck and baked into the generated experiment as `ENV_FILE_OVERRIDE`. | | `--output-dir` | No | `./experiments` | Where the dataset JSON, publish script, and generated experiment file are written. | | `--backend` | No | auto-detect | `pup` forces pup mode regardless of MCP availability. |
If `ml_app` is not provided, ask the user before proceeding. The three evaluator-output flags (`-
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for agent-observability-eval-pipeline, ready for a manual X post.
agent-observability-eval-pipeline: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production trac... 158 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=x
Listing + install path for agent-observability-eval-pipeline: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=x Install: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to datadog-labs but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)datadog-labs
@datadog-labs
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Do not auto-install
Frontend Design
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
174.2K StarsTaste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
84.4K StarsCanvas Design
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
174.2K StarsAnthropic Brand Guidelines
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
174.2K StarsDo not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "agent-observability-eval-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/datadog-labs/agent-skills/tree/main/agent-observability/agent-observability-eval-pipeline. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized banner and a "continue" checkpoint between each. Pure orchestration over the agent-observability sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). Use when user says "run the eval pipeline", "go from traces to evals", "bootstrap evals end to end", "classify then RCA then bootstrap", "build an eval set from scratch", "onboard me to datasets and experiments", "walk me through experiments", "I have an ml_app, now what", "Agent Observability onboarding", "guided experiment setup", "from traces to experiments", or wants a deterministic, narrated tour from produ After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline","task":"Install agent-observability-eval-pipeline","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Maintenance
fresh
9d since push
Risk
Needs review
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
158
69/100 Quality · 64/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
158 GitHub stars
Repo activity
158 stars, 25 forks
Maintenance
9d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipelineDo not use when
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill frontend-design
Alternative
84.4K Stars
npx skills add Leonxlnx/taste-skill --skill design-taste-frontend
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill canvas-design
Alternative
174.2K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill brand-guidelines
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
high
Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use agent-observability-eval-pipeline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
Install command: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=agent-observability-eval-pipeline&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use agent-observability-eval-pipeline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/install, then install with: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipelineRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20agent-observability-eval-pipeline%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
INFO158 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK158 stars, 25 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS9d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Investigate faster
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Workflow fit
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
--- name: agent-observability-eval-pipeline description: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production traces, root-cause failures, bootstrap evaluators, then (optionally) sample + publish a dataset, generate + run an experiment, and analyze results. Six narrated phases with a standardized banner and a "continue" checkpoint between each. Pure orchestration over the agent-observability sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). Use when user says "run the eval pipeline", "go from traces to evals", "bootstrap evals end to end", "classify then RCA then bootstrap", "build an eval set from scratch", "onboard me to datasets and experiments", "walk me through experiments", "I have an ml_app, now what", "Agent Observability onboarding", "guided experiment setup", "from traces to experiments", or wants a deterministic, narrated tour from production data through evaluators, datasets, and experiments. Stop early with `--stop-after <phase>` to short-circuit at evaluators or dataset, or resume mid-flow with `--start-at <phase>`. ---
## Backend
**Detection** — At the start of every invocation, before taking any action, determine which backend to use:
1. If the user passed `--backend pup` anywhere in their invocation → use **pup mode** immediately, regardless of whether MCP tools are present. Skip steps 2–4. 2. Check whether MCP tools are present in your active tool list. The canonical signal is whether `mcp__datadog-llmo-mcp__search_llmobs_spans` appears in your available tools. 3. If MCP tools are present → use **MCP mode** throughout. Call MCP tools exactly as named in the sub-skill workflow sections. 4. If MCP tools are absent → check whether `pup` is executable: run `pup --version` via Bash. A JSON response containing `"version"` confirms pup is available. 5. If pup responds → use **pup mode** throughout. Each sub-skill carries its own Tool Reference appendix with the full MCP→pup mapping. 6. If neither is available → stop and tell the user: > "Neither the Datadog MCP server nor the pup CLI is available. Connect the MCP server (`claude mcp add --scope user --transport http datadog-llmo-mcp 'https://mcp.datadoghq.com/api/unstable/mcp-server/mcp?toolsets=llmobs'`) or install pup."
`--backend pup` is accepted anywhere in the invocation arguments. Strip it from args before passing to sub-skills, but carry the pup-mode decision forward — every sub-skill must also operate in pup mode for the entire pipeline run.
**Sub-skill backend propagation**: The backend detected at startup applies to all sub-skills invoked across the six phases. Do not re-detect per phase. Announce once at startup: - MCP mode: "(Running in MCP mode — all features available.)" - pup mode: "(Running in pup mode — pup commands used throughout. All features available.)"
**Invocation ID:** At the very start of each invocation, before any MCP tool call, generate an 8-character hex invocation ID (e.g., `3a9f1c2b`). Keep it constant for the entire invocation.
**Intent tagging:** On every MCP tool call, prefix `telemetry.intent` with `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline[<inv_id>] — ` followed by a description of why the tool is being called. On the **first MCP tool call only**, use `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline:start[<inv_id>] — ` instead (note the `:start` suffix). Example first call: `skill:agent-observability-eval-pipeline:start[3a9f1c2b] — Precheck: verify ml_app has traces in the last 7 days`
---
# Agent Observability Eval Pipeline — Classify → RCA → Eval Bootstrap → Dataset → Experiment → Analyze
A deterministic, six-phase guided pipeline for an already-instrumented `ml_app` owner. Each phase has the same envelope — a banner that names the entity being produced, an explanation of its purpose, the action (a sub-skill call or a small executable step), and a checkpoint. **You always know where you are.**
``` [Precheck] verify ml_app, project, backend, credentials, output dir ↓ [Phase 1: Classify ml_app traces] entity: ml_app, trace, span ↓ [Phase 2: Root cause analysis] entity: failure mode, root cause ↓ [Phase 3: Bootstrap evaluators] entity: evaluator, LLM judge ↓ (stop here with --stop-after eval-bootstrap ↓ for the classic eval-pipeline behavior) [Phase 4: Create + publish dataset] entity: dataset record, published dataset ↓ (executes: LLMObs.create_dataset) [Phase 5: Generate + run experiment] entity: experiment, task, evaluator, run ↓ (executes: python <generated_file>) ↓ (in-phase review beat before run) [Phase 6: Analyze experiment] entity: metric, comparison, recommendation ```
This skill is **pure orchestration plus pedagogy** — no new analytical logic. The work happens inside the sub-skills (`agent-observability-session-classify`, `agent-observability-trace-rca`, `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`, `agent-observability-experiment-analyzer`). What this skill adds is the deterministic envelope: every phase has the same shape, the same checkpoint contract, and the same entity-explanation banner — so the user gets a consistent, narrated experience regardless of how they phrased the original request.
## Usage
``` /agent-observability-eval-pipeline <ml_app> [--project-name <name>] [--timeframe <window>] [--trace-limit <N>] [--format py|ipynb] [--evaluator-style function|class|remote] [--offline-evaluators | --online-evaluators | --data-only] [--start-at classify|rca|eval-bootstrap|dataset|experiment|analyze] [--stop-after classify|rca|eval-bootstrap|dataset|experiment|analyze] [--classification-summary <path>] [--rca-report <path>] [--dataset-file <path>] [--dataset-name <name>] [--experiment-file <path>] [--experiment-id <uuid> | --experiment-url <url>] [--app-root <path>] [--env-file <path>] [--output-dir <dir>] [--backend pup] ```
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
### Inputs
| Input | Required | Default | Description | |-------|----------|---------|-------------| | `ml_app` | Yes | — | The instrumented LLM app to onboard / evaluate against. The precheck verifies it has recent traces. | | `--project-name` | No | derived from `pyproject.toml` / `setup.cfg` / `setup.py` / `package.json` / cwd (same order as `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`); falls back to `experiment-sdk-default` | The Datadog **project** the pipeline writes datasets and experiments into. The SDK lazily creates the project on first use via `LLMObs.enable(project_name=...)`. Surface this in the Precheck so the user can confirm before anything is created. | | `--timeframe` | No | `now-7d` | Lookback window for Phase 1 classification and Phase 4 dataset sampling. | | `--trace-limit` | No | `20` | Sampling cap for Phase 4. Phase 1 internally uses `min(20, --trace-limit)` for the classification sample. | | `--format` | No | `py` | Passed to `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap` in Phase 5: `py` (script) or `ipynb` (Jupyter notebook). | | `--evaluator-style` | No | `function` | Passed to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` (Phase 3) and `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap` (Phase 5): `function`, `class`, or `remote`. | | `--offline-evaluators` | No | on (default) | Phase 3: emit a Python SDK evaluator suite (BaseEvaluator / LLMJudge classes) that runs inside an experiment against a dataset. Maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `sdk_code` mode. | | `--online-evaluators` | No | off | Phase 3: publish online LLM-judge evaluators directly to Datadog (created as disabled drafts; enable in the UI). Online evaluators run on production spans as they're emitted. Maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `publish` mode (was `--publish`). | | `--data-only` | No | off | Phase 3: emit a local data blob only — no executable evaluator code or online publish. At Phase 3 entry the skill **prompts** the user to pick one of: (a) a `DatasetRecordRaw[]` JSON suitable for experiment use (maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap --emit-dataset`), or (b) a framework-agnostic JSON evaluator spec for local analysis (maps internally to `agent-observability-eval-bootstrap` `data_only` mode). | | `--stop-after <phase>` | No | `analyze` (run everything) | Stop after the named phase completes. `classify` = Phase 1 only. `rca` = through Phase 2. `eval-bootstrap` = through Phase 3 (matches the classic eval-pipeline). `dataset` = through Phase 4 (dataset created + published). `experiment` = through Phase 5 (experiment generated + run). `analyze` = all six phases (default). | | `--start-at <phase>` | No | `classify` (start at the top) | Skip earlier phases and start at the named phase. Same vocabulary as `--stop-after`. The skill auto-loads any required prior-phase artifacts from `<output-dir>/state/` (see "State persistence and entry/exit" section). For phases that need an artifact the auto-load can't find, supply it via one of the override flags below. Combinable with `--stop-after` to run a contiguous slice of the pipeline. | | `--classification-summary <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/01-classification.md` if `--start-at rca` or later | Override the Phase 1 output that Phase 2 consumes. Useful when the prior state file is missing or you want to point at a hand-edited version. | | `--rca-report <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/02-rca-report.md` if `--start-at eval-bootstrap` or later | Override the Phase 2 output that Phase 3 consumes. | | `--dataset-file <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/04-published-dataset.json`'s `dataset_file` field (or the most recent `<output-dir>/dataset_<ml_app>_*.json`) | The local `DatasetRecordRaw[]` JSON. Used by Phase 4's publish sub-step when re-publishing without re-sampling. | | `--dataset-name <name>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/04-published-dataset.json` if `--start-at experiment` | The name of a published Datadog dataset that Phase 5 wires the experiment to. | | `--experiment-file <path>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/05-experiment-run.json`'s `experiment_file` field if `--start-at experiment` and the file already exists | The generated experiment file. When present, Phase 5 skips the codegen sub-step (5a) and goes straight to the review beat (5b) → run (5c). | | `--experiment-id <uuid>` | No | auto-loaded from `<output-dir>/state/05-experiment-run.json` if `--start-at analyze` | The Datadog experiment ID Phase 6 analyzes. Mutually exclusive with `--experiment-url`. | | `--experiment-url <url>` | No | auto-loaded as above | Alternative to `--experiment-id`. The skill parses the trailing UUID out of the URL. | | `--app-root` | No | resolved from cwd / `pyproject.toml` etc. | Restricts `agent-observability-experiment-bootstrap`'s task-function introspection to this directory tree. | | `--env-file` | No | none (auto-discovery walks standard locations) | Explicit `.env` path for credential loading. Surfaced in the Precheck and baked into the generated experiment as `ENV_FILE_OVERRIDE`. | | `--output-dir` | No | `./experiments` | Where the dataset JSON, publish script, and generated experiment file are written. | | `--backend` | No | auto-detect | `pup` forces pup mode regardless of MCP availability. |
If `ml_app` is not provided, ask the user before proceeding. The three evaluator-output flags (`-
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for agent-observability-eval-pipeline, ready for a manual X post.
agent-observability-eval-pipeline: End-to-end Agent Observability pipeline for an instrumented ml_app — classify production trac... 158 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=x
Listing + install path for agent-observability-eval-pipeline: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=x Install: npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-observability-eval-pipeline
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to datadog-labs but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/datadog-labs-agent-observability-eval-pipeline?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)datadog-labs
@datadog-labs
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Do not auto-install
Frontend Design
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
174.2K StarsTaste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
84.4K StarsCanvas Design
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
174.2K StarsAnthropic Brand Guidelines
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
174.2K StarsPermission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness