Skill audit report
Edward de Bono's Random Stimulus technique — force-fit a random unrelated object, place, or phenomenon onto a creative target to break familiar association patterns. Use for product ideation, feature naming, brand direction, copywriting, architecture and design choices when ideas from outside the problem space would help. Triggers include "random stimulus", "random word", "force-fit", "de Bono", "inject a random object", "stare out the window", "see the tree and squeeze an idea". Do NOT use for analytical work like debugging, code review, or implementation tasks.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
INFO62
307 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
WARN57
307 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
4d since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
PASS90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add danium/lateral-thinking --skill random-stimulus
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
PASS100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/danium/lateral-thinking/tree/main/skills/random-stimulus
Review status
WARN46
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install path
92
npx skills add danium/lateral-thinking --skill random-stimulus
Repository
88
https://github.com/danium/lateral-thinking/tree/main/skills/random-stimulus
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
4d since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Warnings
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
177K Stars · Audit report
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
177K Stars · Audit report
Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.
34K Stars · Audit report
Usable description available
Dependency risk
90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Stars/forks activity
57
307 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
68
307 GitHub stars