Skill audit report
Edward de Bono's Concept Fan — climb from the current solution to the concept it serves by asking "what is this a way of doing?", then fan out alternative concepts and concrete implementations for each. Use when the current solution might be answering the wrong question, when all options look like variations of one idea, or to widen a decision before committing. Triggers include "concept fan", "zoom out", "what is this a way of doing", "wrong problem", "widen the options", "abstraction ladder". Do NOT use for analytical work like debugging, code review, or implementation tasks.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
INFO62
307 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
WARN57
307 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
10d since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
PASS90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add danium/lateral-thinking --skill concept-fan
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
PASS100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/danium/lateral-thinking/tree/main/skills/concept-fan
Review status
WARN46
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install path
92
npx skills add danium/lateral-thinking --skill concept-fan
Repository
88
https://github.com/danium/lateral-thinking/tree/main/skills/concept-fan
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
10d since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Warnings
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
169K Stars · Audit report
Platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Integrates with 25+ databases and any API.
41K Stars · Audit report
Implement work from an approved spec or ticket set, run focused and full tests, invoke code review, and commit the result to the current branch.
176K Stars · Audit report
Usable description available
Dependency risk
90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Stars/forks activity
57
307 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
68
307 GitHub stars
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.