Skill audit report

deliberation Audit report.

Multi-perspective synthesis structure — Innovator (propose) → Devil-Advocate (challenge) → Mediator (synthesize) 3-layer execution. Outputs conditional verdicts without binary win/loss. Activates on "deliberation", "battle this out", "weigh the pros and cons", "review from multiple angles", "which side is right?". Optional deep-insight persona jurors for domain-specific views. Designed for design decisions, skill proposals, and architectural choices.

EXPERIMENTAL · REVIEWNeeds reviewGenerated Nov 6, 2026Heuristic metadata audit
71
Audit
65
Trust
55
Quality
77
Security
88
Maintain
92
Install

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

65
Manual review

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.

GitHub adoption

FAIL

30

14 GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

FAIL

32

14 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

88

2mo since push

License clarity

PASS

86

MIT

README/SKILL.md completeness

PASS

86

Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context

Dependency/runtime risk

INFO

72

command execution surface

Install availability

PASS

92

npx skills add chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill deliberation

Install command safety

PASS

92

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

INFO

76

shell or command execution

Repository evidence

PASS

86

https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness/tree/main/plugins/fh-commons/skills/deliberation

Review status

INFO

66

AI review data available

Agent Proven outcomes

INFO

54

No agent outcome data yet

Checks

Install and adoption review

6 Passed · 11 Needs review

Install path

92

PASS

npx skills add chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill deliberation

Repository

88

PASS

https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness/tree/main/plugins/fh-commons/skills/deliberation

License

86

PASS

MIT

Maintenance

88

PASS

2mo since push

AI review

55

CHECK

No explicit security considerations are documented, but the skill does not appear to execute arbitrary commands or access secrets.

README/SKILL.md completeness

86

PASS

Usable description available

Dependency risk

72

CHECK

command execution surface

Install command safety

92

PASS

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

76

CHECK

shell or command execution

Stars/forks activity

32

FIX

14 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Adoption

42

CHECK

14 GitHub stars

Warnings

  • No explicit security considerations are documented, but the skill does not appear to execute arbitrary commands or access secrets.
  • The skill depends on optional external 'deep-insight' personas; fallback is provided, but the quality of fallback execution may vary.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 14 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 14 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Method

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.

Compare nearby options

Related skills to audit next