customer-onboarding-call
Place a one-off welcome and onboarding call to a customer who just signed up, capture a structured result such as business type, goal, pain points, sentiment, and activation status, then write that result back to a CRM and queue a human follow-up task when the customer asks for o
공급 자산 프로필
마케팅 및 성장 자동화
SEO, 콘텐츠 운영, 리드 생성, CRM, 이메일 자동화, 분석 및 성장 워크플로입니다.
시나리오
Sales and CRM
I need my agent to enrich leads, update CRM records, and prepare sales follow-ups.
Agent 적합도
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI 또는 맞춤형 Agent에 적합합니다.
설치
준비됨
npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call
유지보수
최신
마지막 푸시 후 1일
위험
검토 필요
Permission surface may require sandboxing
GitHub 품질
63
65/100 품질 · 68/100 신뢰
커버리지 태그
검토 메모
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Agent 채택 스코어카드
신뢰, 감사, 설치 준비 상태를 한눈에 확인하세요
이 점수는 공개 저장소 메타데이터, OpenAgentSkill 검토 신호, 유지보수 최신성, 설치 준비 상태를 결합합니다. 후보 선정 신호일 뿐, 사람의 검토를 대체하지 않습니다.
품질
유망유용한 후보이지만 채택 전에 대안과 비교하세요.
신뢰
샌드박스 전용신뢰 신호가 부족하거나 혼재된 유용한 후보입니다. 결과 루프가 작업 적합성을 입증할 때까지 격리된 작업 공간에서 사용하세요.
감사
검토 필요설치 준비 상태, 보안 메타데이터, 유지보수 및 채택 위험에 대한 기계 판독형 검토입니다.
OpenAgentSkill 신뢰 점수 v5
설치 전 사람 검토
실제 작업에 사용하기 전 샌드박스에서만 실행하고 유사 대안과 비교하세요.
스타
GitHub 스타 63
저장소 활동
스타 63, 포크 127
유지보수
마지막 푸시 후 1일
라이선스
MIT
설치
npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call
설치 안전성
표준 패키지 또는 런타임 설치 경로
권한 범위
shell or command execution, network or browser access
Agent 결과
아직 Agent 결과 데이터가 없습니다
문서
README/SKILL.md 맥락이 충분합니다
위험 요약
프로덕션 전 검토
- The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, network or browser access
설치 준비 상태
설치 경로 사용 가능
- 설치 경로를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 저장소 근거를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 라이선스가 명시되었습니다
- 아직 Agent 검증 결과 근거가 없습니다
Agent 읽기용 메타데이터
이 스킬의 기계 판독형 의사결정 데이터.
이 블록 또는 포함된 JSON을 사용해 Agent가 이 스킬을 설치할지, 대안을 고를지, 먼저 사람의 검토를 요청할지 판단할 수 있습니다.
적합한 작업
- Customer support 워크플로
- Claude Code 팀
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Read user messages
적합한 Agent
설치 결정
- 명령어
- npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call
- 정책
- 검토
- 사람 검토
- 예
신뢰와 위험
- 신뢰
- 60/100
- 감사
- 75/100
- 위험 수준
- 검토 필요
결과 루프
- 엔드포인트
- /api/agent/outcome
- 이벤트 ID
- resolve
- 결과
- 5
설치 명령어
npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call사용하지 말아야 할 경우
- 벤더 지원 SLA가 필요한 팀
- production agents without a repository review
- The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.
- 고위험 권한 힌트: Shell 또는 명령 실행
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent 안전 v2
47/100 · 자동 설치 피하기
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
높음
Shell 또는 명령 실행
Skill 메타데이터가 터미널, CLI, Shell, 하위 프로세스 또는 명령 실행 워크플로를 참조합니다.
중간
네트워크 접근
Skill은 원격 페이지, API, 저장소 또는 외부 서비스에 접근할 수 있습니다.
중간
데이터베이스 접근
Skill은 스키마를 검사하고 데이터베이스를 질의하거나 영구 저장소를 다룰 수 있습니다.
- 고위험 권한 힌트: Shell 또는 명령 실행
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
설치 대상
Agent 워크플로에 이 스킬 설치
공개 설치 엔드포인트에서 명령어, 안전 체크리스트, 대상 프롬프트와 정규 링크를 가져옵니다.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install calle-ai-customer-onboarding-callAgent 해결 계획
설치 전에 Agent가 적합성을 검증하게 하세요.
Resolve API는 최우선 스킬, 대안, 안전 정책, 감사 메모, 설치 대상 및 Agent가 페이지를 스크래핑하지 않고 사용할 수 있는 프롬프트를 반환합니다.
JSON 열기
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20customer-onboarding-call%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve 텍스트
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20customer-onboarding-call%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
설치 핸드오프
/api/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/install
Agent가 확인할 항목
- Resolve API에서 작업 적합도와 대안을 확인합니다.
- 감사 점수, 신뢰 점수 및 안전 정책 경고를 확인합니다.
- Codex, Claude Code, Cursor 또는 CLI의 설치 대상 호환성을 확인합니다.
프롬프트 복사
Task: Use customer-onboarding-call in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20customer-onboarding-call%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/install
Install command: npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent 핸드오프
또 다른 디렉터리 페이지 대신 설치 경로를 Agent에게 제공합니다.
공개 설치 엔드포인트에서 명령어, 안전 체크리스트, 대상 프롬프트와 정규 링크를 가져옵니다.
설치 핸드오프
/api/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/install
LLM 텍스트 형식
/api/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/install?format=text
대안 찾기
/api/skills/search?q=customer-onboarding-call&limit=3
Agent 프롬프트
Use customer-onboarding-call for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/install, then install with: npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-callRegistry 메타데이터
자동 스킬 선택을 위한 Agent 읽기용 프로필.
Registry API를 통해 동일한 결정, 신뢰, 감사, 사용 사례, 설치 신호를 제공하므로 Agent가 UI를 스크래핑하지 않고도 순위를 매길 수 있습니다.
Agent 결정 패널
Fallback candidate for Customer support
먼저 이 스킬로 프로토타입을 만들고 대체 후보를 준비하세요.
스택 내 역할
대체 후보
주요 적합도
Customer support
신뢰 라벨
먼저 프로토타입
설치 경로
명령어 준비됨
사용 시점
- Customer support 워크플로
- Claude Code 팀
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
근거
- 최근 저장소 활동
- 설치 명령 또는 GitHub 저장소를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 품질 프로필 65/100
- OpenAgentSkill 상호작용 4건
먼저 검토
- The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.
구현 경로
- 1샌드박스 Agent에 설치하고 Customer support 작업을 처음부터 끝까지 한 번 실행하세요.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
신뢰 프로필
샌드박스 전용
신뢰 신호가 부족하거나 혼재된 유용한 후보입니다. 결과 루프가 작업 적합성을 입증할 때까지 격리된 작업 공간에서 사용하세요.
GitHub 채택도
확인GitHub 스타 63
스타/포크 활동
확인스타 63, 포크 127; 현재 메타데이터에서 이슈 활동을 확인할 수 없습니다
최근 유지보수
통과마지막 푸시 후 1일
라이선스 명확성
통과MIT
긍정 신호
- AI 검토 승인됨
- 설치 경로를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 저장소 근거를 사용할 수 있습니다
- 최근 유지보수된 저장소
- 설치 명령에서 뚜렷한 고위험 패턴이 발견되지 않았습니다
- 결과 루프는 준비되었지만 첫 실제 Agent 실행이 필요합니다
설치 전 검토
- The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, network or browser access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 127 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, network or browser access
- 아직 실제 Agent 결과 보고서가 없습니다
- 무인 설치 전에 사람 검토가 필요합니다
권장 작업
실제 작업에 사용하기 전 샌드박스에서만 실행하고 유사 대안과 비교하세요.
품질 프로필
유망 Agent 워크플로용 후보
유용한 후보이지만 채택 전에 대안과 비교하세요.
워크플로 적합도
이 스킬을 사용할 시나리오
Answer users
Customer support
I need my agent to triage support requests and draft useful replies from product knowledge.
Automate repeated work
Workflow automation
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Review risk
Legal and compliance
I need my agent to review contracts, privacy policies, or compliance documents and summarize risks.
워크플로 적합도
완전한 워크플로에 추가
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Scrape, clean, and reuse web data
Web data pipeline
A practical workflow for agents that crawl public pages, extract clean content, normalize data, and hand it to downstream research or RAG workflows.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
대안 후보
설치 전 비교
이 작업에 적합할 수 있는 유사 스킬입니다.
개요
--- name: customer-onboarding-call description: Place a one-off welcome and onboarding call to a customer who just signed up, capture a structured result such as business type, goal, pain points, sentiment, and activation status, then write that result back to a CRM and queue a human follow-up task when the customer asks for one. license: MIT ---
# Customer Onboarding Call
Use this skill when a new signup should receive a short welcome call and the business wants the conversation to end as structured data rather than as an unread recording.
`customer-onboarding-call` turns one signup event into at most one **conversation**, one structured result, and at most one follow-up task. Obtaining that conversation may take up to three attempts on an unreliable corridor, with only one attempt in flight at a time; see *Attempts, Retries, and Cancellation*. It does not create recurring schedules, call campaigns, or contact lists. Recurrence, if the business wants it, belongs to the host scheduler; see [`call-reminder`](../call-reminder/).
The workflow is deliberately narrow: welcome, consent, discovery, next-step offer, wrap-up. A call that tries to sell, negotiate, collect payment, or resolve a support ticket is out of scope.
## When To Use
Use this skill for:
- welcoming a customer who just signed up and confirming they can get started - collecting first-party onboarding context: business type, goal, prior tooling, blockers - detecting whether a customer wants a human to follow up - turning a spoken answer into a CRM field and an assigned task - measuring activation coverage when a team cannot call every signup manually
## When Not To Use
Do not use this skill to:
- call people who did not sign up or otherwise ask to be contacted - run sales, collections, renewal, or win-back calls - deliver medical, legal, financial, or emergency instructions - read pricing, delivery windows, contractual terms, or policy from memory - retry indefinitely after a customer declines or asks not to be called - re-call a customer who has already completed an onboarding call, unless the user explicitly asks
## Required Fields
For each call, require:
- `customerName` - `phoneNumber` in E.164 - `companyName` for the agent to introduce itself as - `companyDescription`, one sentence the agent may state as fact
Optional:
- `businessName` - `locale` and `region` hints for the conversation
Ask for any missing required field. Do not infer a phone number, country code, or region from a locale, an IP address, an email domain, or unrelated prior context.
## Core Workflow
1. Confirm the signup is real and recent, and that this customer has not already been called. 2. Build the call task from the required fields. Keep the script to roughly two minutes. 3. Attach a structured result schema so the provider returns fields, not just a transcript. See [`references/structured-result.md`](references/structured-result.md). 4. Persist an attempt record under a uniqueness constraint on `(signup_id, attempt_no)` **before** dialing, and derive the provider idempotency key from it. Refuse to start a new attempt while another is in flight for the same signup. 5. Place the call for that attempt. 6. Receive the terminal result on a webhook. Treat delivery as at-least-once and key ingestion on the provider event id. 7. Classify the outcome before writing anything: Stage A decides whether a human took part, and only then does Stage B read consent. See *Outcome Classification* below. 8. Write only what the outcome permits, then queue a follow-up task only when the outcome is `onboarded` and the customer asked for one. 9. Schedule or cancel a retry according to *Attempts, Retries, and Cancellation*.
Use this shape:
```text signup -> attempt record -> call task + result schema -> attempt -> terminal webhook -> classify -> permitted CRM write -> follow-up or retry or suppress ```
## Conversation Shape
Keep the call in this order. Allow interruption at any point.
1. **Greet and identify.** Name the customer, name the company, state that the call may be recorded if that is true in your jurisdiction. 2. **Ask consent.** Ask whether now is a good time for a short call. If the answer is no, offer to call back later and end. Do not continue discovery after a soft refusal. 3. **Discovery.** Ask what kind of business they run, why they signed up, what problem they want solved, and whether they have used something similar before. One question at a time. 4. **Offer the next step.** Invite the concrete first action, and offer a human if they prefer. 5. **Wrap up.** Summarize what will happen next, thank them, end.
The agent may answer only from `companyDescription` and any knowledge base you explicitly supply. For anything else — price, delivery time, policy, availability — it must say it will have a human follow up. Inventing these is the most common failure mode of onboarding-call agents.
## State Machine
The full contract in one view. Every arrow that ends in a call is guarded; every terminal state says what it permits.
```text signup | v [ allocate attempt no > cap? ]---- yes -->( manual handling ) | ^ no | v | [ attempt live (leased) ] | | | +-------------------+--------------------+ | | | | | terminal result lease expires create failed | | | | | | v | | | [ reconcile with provider ] | | | | | | | | | terminal still live unknown | | | | | | | | +<------------+ v | | | | ( ambiguous )-+-------+ | | | (late result re-enters) | v | | == STAGE A: was a human reached? == | reachability from CALL EVIDENCE, not from "is there a result" | | | +-- refusal evidence present? --> ( declined ) | | | no-human — CLOSED evidence set only: voicemail / carrier msg / ring-out / no-answer / silence / provider machine signal | +--> ( not-reached ) ------------------ retry allowed ---+ | | +--> ( failed ) provider positively says NO CALL PLACED --+ | +--> ( needs-review ) indeterminate: provider unreachable, | unknown attempt, expired lease, extractor-only NotReached, | billing charge with no obtainable outcome. NO RETRY. | human v == STAGE B: consent governs == | +--> ( declined ) terminal. suppress per scope. no follow-up, no retry, ever. +--> ( needs-review ) no result at all, unusable consent fields, or indeterminate | reachability. terminal until a human decides. NO auto retry. +--> ( partial ) write captured fields only. retry ONLY with callback consent | or human authorisation, and only under the cap. +--> ( onboarded ) write insight. follow-up only if requested. ```
Invariants the diagram encodes:
- **A redial requires positive no-human evidence from a closed set.** A missing result, an extractor-claimed `NotReached`, an unreachable provider, an expired lease, and a billing charge are all *unknown* — they route to `needs-review`, never to a retry. - **Releasing a stuck attempt and authorising a redial are separate decisions.** Unblocking the slot is bookkeeping; dialling again needs evidence. - **Refusal evidence dominates.** It routes to `declined` from anywhere, with or without a result. - **Only Stage B can suppress a number**, and only via `declined`. - **Only Stage A outcomes retry automatically.** Every Stage B redial needs consent or a human, and anything uncertain lands in `needs-review`, which never retries. - **No state is permanent-by-accident.** A live attempt is leased, and `ambiguous` is provisional — a late result re-enters classification from the top. - **The cap bounds every path**, including callback-consented redials.
## Outcome Classification
A call that reaches a terminal state has not necessarily reached a consenting human. Providers commonly return a completed call with an empty structured result when the agent talked to a carrier message, voicemail, or silence. A call can also produce a perfectly well-formed structured result while the customer was refusing to take part.
**The presence of a structured result is not evidence of consent.** Classification is therefore driven by an evidence-backed `disposition` field, not by whether a result exists. See [`references/structured-result.md`](references/structured-result.md).
Classify in **two stages, in this order**. Stage A decides whether a human took part at all. Only if one did does Stage B read consent.
The staging is the contract, not a presentation choice. Consent fields are meaningless when nobody answered — a voicemail grants no consent, so `consent_granted` is `false` there. Reading consent before establishing that a human was reached turns every no-answer into a refusal.
### Stage A — was a human reached?
**Reachability is decided on call evidence, never on whether a structured result exists.** A real conversation can return no result at all: extraction failed, the result failed validation, or the customer refused and rang off before the model emitted anything. Inferring "nobody answered" from a missing result would auto-retry those calls and redial a person who may have just refused.
#### The no-human evidence set
Exactly one thing authorises an automatic redial: **observed evidence from the call itself that no person took part.** This is a closed list.
| Counts as no-human evidence | | | --- | --- | | voicemail or answering-machine greeting | carrier or network announcement | | ring-out with no answer | the provider's own answered-by-machine / no-answer signal | | silence throughout after the agent spoke | |
**Nothing else qualifies.** In particular these are *not* no-human evidence, however tempting:
- a missing or empty structured result - the extractor's own `disposition: NotReached` — that is a model claim about the call, not an observation of it, and the same extractor mislabels refusals - a provider that is unreachable, times out, or has no record of the attempt - an expired lease - a billing charge or usage record — that shows a call *was placed*, which if anything makes a conversation more likely, not less
Every one of those means **we do not know**. Unknown is `needs-review`, never a retry. The asymmetry is deliberate: a needless manual check costs a minute, and a wrong redial reaches someone who may have already refused.
#### Establishing reachability
| Reachability | Evidence | | --- | --- | | `human` | the provider reports a human answered, **or** the transcript contains customer speech that is not carrier or IVR audio | | `no-human` | at least one item from the no-human evidence set above, and no contradicting customer speech | | `indeterminate` | anything else, including every "not evidence" item listed above |
#### Then
기술 세부 사항
- 버전
- 1.0.0
- 라이선스
- MIT
- 최근 업데이트
- 2026년 8월 21일
- 게시일
- 2026년 8월 21일
결정 스냅샷
대체 후보
최근 저장소 활동
Agent 검증 증거
Agent 검증 증거
Resolve, 검토, 설치 및 한 번의 제한된 실행 후 결과 보고서입니다.
- 성공률
- —
- 최근 실패
- —
- 결과
- 0
- 출력 품질
- —
- 실패
- 0
- 관련 없음
- 0
- 설치
- 0
- 위험 차단
- 0
- 설정 필요
- 0
- 프로덕션
- 0
아직 Agent 결과 데이터가 없습니다. 첫 실행은 /api/agent/outcome을 통해 성공, 설정 필요, 위험 차단, 실패 또는 비관련 결과를 보고할 수 있습니다.
성장 루프
공유 키트
customer-onboarding-call용 시나리오 기반 초안입니다. X에 수동으로 게시할 수 있습니다.
customer-onboarding-call: Place a one-off welcome and onboarding call to a customer who just signed up, capture a struc... 63 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call?ref=x
선택 사항: 설치 명령이 포함된 답글
Listing + install path for customer-onboarding-call: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call?ref=x Install: npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call
등록 출처
Registry 색인
이 등록은 공개 소스에서 색인되었으며 유지보수자 소유권 주장이 승인될 때까지 공식으로 표시되지 않습니다.
- 제작자
- CALLE-AI
- 색인 주체
- OpenAgentSkill 커뮤니티 인덱스
귀속은 공개 저장소 또는 제작자 프로필에 연결됩니다. 제작자는 등록을 주장하여 소유권 신호를 업데이트할 수 있습니다.
이 스킬 소유권 주장소유자 소유권 주장
이 스킬 등록 소유권 주장
이 Registry 색인 등록은 CALLE-AI에게 귀속되어 있지만 아직 공식으로 표시되지 않았습니다. 소유권을 주장하면 확인된 소유자 신호가 추가되어 이후 출시, 설치 및 감사 업데이트를 더 신뢰할 수 있습니다.
크리에이터 백링크 키트
README에 증거 배지 추가
개발자가 저장소를 평가하는 위치에 정규 등록, 현재 신뢰 및 감사 신호, 실제 Agent-Proven 증거를 표시합니다.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call)작성자
CALLE-AI
@calle-ai
플랫폼 적합도
상태 신호
- GitHub 스타
- 63
- 품질 점수
- 36/100
- 최근 GitHub 푸시
- 2026년 8월 21일
- 프레임워크 힌트
- 알 수 없음
- OpenAgentSkill 조회수
- 4
- 설치 명령 복사
- 0
- 외부 클릭
- 0
커뮤니티 신호
이 스킬이 Agent 워크플로에 유용한지 알려 주세요. 집계된 피드백은 시간이 지날수록 순위를 개선합니다.
신뢰와 안전
샌드박스 전용
- GitHub 채택도GitHub 스타 63확인
- 스타/포크 활동스타 63, 포크 127; 현재 메타데이터에서 이슈 활동을 확인할 수 없습니다확인
- 최근 유지보수마지막 푸시 후 1일통과
- 라이선스 명확성MIT통과
- README/SKILL.md 완성도메타데이터에 충분한 사용 및 워크플로 맥락이 포함되어 있습니다통과
- 의존성/런타임 위험command execution surface, network or browser surface정보