customer-onboarding-call

Prüfen · 60
Im Registry indexiert

Place a one-off welcome and onboarding call to a customer who just signed up, capture a structured result such as business type, goal, pain points, sentiment, and activation status, then write that result back to a CRM and queue a human follow-up task when the customer asks for o

Verified installs0
Stars63
Version1.0.0
Qualität65/100 · Vielversprechend
Vertrauen60/100 · Nur Sandbox
Audit75/100 · Prüfung nötig

Asset-Profil

Marketing- und Wachstumsautomatisierung

SEO, content operations, lead generation, CRM, email automation, analytics, and growth workflows.

Bereich ansehen

Szenario

Sales and CRM

I need my agent to enrich leads, update CRM records, and prepare sales follow-ups.

Agent-Fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.

Installieren

Bereit

npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call

Wartung

Aktuell

1 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Risiko

Prüfung nötig

Permission surface may require sandboxing

GitHub-Qualität

63

65/100 Qualität · 68/100 Vertrauen

Abdeckungs-Tags

MarketingSales and CRMbusinessagent-skill

Review-Notizen

Permission surface may require sandboxing · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

Agent-Adoptionskarte

Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick

Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.

Qualität

Vielversprechend
65

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Vertrauen

Nur Sandbox
60

Nützlicher Kandidat mit fehlenden oder gemischten Vertrauenssignalen. Bis der Ergebniszyklus die Passung belegt, in einem isolierten Arbeitsbereich verwenden.

Audit

Prüfung nötig
75

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation

Nur in einer Sandbox ausführen und nahe Alternativen vergleichen, bevor sie produktiv eingesetzt wird.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

63 GitHub-Stars

Repository-Aktivität

63 Stars und 127 Forks

Wartung

1 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Lizenz

MIT

Installieren

npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call

Installationssicherheit

Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad

Berechtigungsfläche

shell or command execution, network or browser access

Agent-Ergebnisse

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten

Dokumentation

Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext

Risikoübersicht

Vor Produktion prüfen

  • The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, network or browser access

Installationsbereitschaft

Installationspfad verfügbar

  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Lizenz ist angegeben
  • Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege

Agent-lesbare Metadaten

Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.

Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.

JSON öffnen

Geeignete Aufgaben

  • Customer support-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Read user messages

Geeignete Agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Installationsentscheidung

Befehl
npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call
Richtlinie
Prüfen
Menschliche Prüfung
Ja

Vertrauen und Risiko

Vertrauen
60/100
Audit
75/100
Risikoebene
Prüfung nötig

Ergebnis-Loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event-ID
resolve
Ergebnisse
5

Installationsbefehl

npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call

Nicht verwenden, wenn

  • Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
  • production agents without a repository review
  • The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.
  • Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Agent-Sicherheit v2

47/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden

ExperimentellPrüfen

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Per API auflösen

Hoch

Shell- oder Befehlsausführung

Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.

Mittel

Netzwerkzugriff

Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.

Mittel

Datenbankzugriff

Die Skill kann Schemata prüfen, Datenbanken abfragen oder mit persistenten Speichern arbeiten.

  • Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Installationsziele

Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call

Agent-Auflösungsplan

Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.

Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.

Textplan öffnen

Agent sollte prüfen

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Prompt kopieren

Task: Use customer-onboarding-call in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20customer-onboarding-call%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/install
Install command: npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent-Übergabe

Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

Installations-API öffnen

Agent-Prompt

Use customer-onboarding-call for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/install, then install with: npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call

Registry-Metadaten

Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.

Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.

Manifest öffnen

Agent-Fit

66/100

Customer support

Plattformen

Claude Code

Audit-Bericht

Prüfung nötig · 75/100

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

Audit-Bericht ansehenEval-Bericht ansehen

Agent-Entscheidungspanel

Fallback candidate for Customer support

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

66
Bereitschaft
Prototyp
Phase

Rolle im Stack

Fallback-Kandidat

Primäre Eignung

Customer support

Vertrauenslabel

Zuerst prototypisieren

Installationspfad

Befehl bereit

Verwenden wenn

  • Customer support-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidenz

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • Qualitätsprofil 65/100
  • 4 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen

zuerst prüfen

  • The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.

Implementierungspfad

  1. 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Customer support-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Vertrauensprofil

Nur Sandbox

Nützlicher Kandidat mit fehlenden oder gemischten Vertrauenssignalen. Bis der Ergebniszyklus die Passung belegt, in einem isolierten Arbeitsbereich verwenden.

60
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub-Akzeptanz

Prüfen

63 GitHub-Stars

Star-/Fork-Aktivität

Prüfen

63 Stars und 127 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar

Aktuelle Wartung

Bestanden

1 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Lizenzklarheit

Bestanden

MIT

Positive Signale

  • KI-Prüfung genehmigt
  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
  • Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
  • Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf

Vor Installation prüfen

  • The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, network or browser access
  • GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 127 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: shell or command execution, network or browser access
  • Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
  • Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich

Empfohlene Aktion

Nur in einer Sandbox ausführen und nahe Alternativen vergleichen, bevor sie produktiv eingesetzt wird.

Qualitätsprofil

Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

65
GitHub-Stars
63
Aktualität
vor 1 Tagen
Installationsbereit
Ja
Lizenz
MIT
Vor Installation prüfen: The skill does not explicitly address how to handle failures when writing to the CRM or when the provider does not return structured results as expected.

Workflow-Eignung

Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen

Workflow-Eignung

Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen

Alternativen-Shortlist

Vor Installation vergleichen

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Alle vergleichen

Übersicht

--- name: customer-onboarding-call description: Place a one-off welcome and onboarding call to a customer who just signed up, capture a structured result such as business type, goal, pain points, sentiment, and activation status, then write that result back to a CRM and queue a human follow-up task when the customer asks for one. license: MIT ---

# Customer Onboarding Call

Use this skill when a new signup should receive a short welcome call and the business wants the conversation to end as structured data rather than as an unread recording.

`customer-onboarding-call` turns one signup event into at most one **conversation**, one structured result, and at most one follow-up task. Obtaining that conversation may take up to three attempts on an unreliable corridor, with only one attempt in flight at a time; see *Attempts, Retries, and Cancellation*. It does not create recurring schedules, call campaigns, or contact lists. Recurrence, if the business wants it, belongs to the host scheduler; see [`call-reminder`](../call-reminder/).

The workflow is deliberately narrow: welcome, consent, discovery, next-step offer, wrap-up. A call that tries to sell, negotiate, collect payment, or resolve a support ticket is out of scope.

## When To Use

Use this skill for:

- welcoming a customer who just signed up and confirming they can get started - collecting first-party onboarding context: business type, goal, prior tooling, blockers - detecting whether a customer wants a human to follow up - turning a spoken answer into a CRM field and an assigned task - measuring activation coverage when a team cannot call every signup manually

## When Not To Use

Do not use this skill to:

- call people who did not sign up or otherwise ask to be contacted - run sales, collections, renewal, or win-back calls - deliver medical, legal, financial, or emergency instructions - read pricing, delivery windows, contractual terms, or policy from memory - retry indefinitely after a customer declines or asks not to be called - re-call a customer who has already completed an onboarding call, unless the user explicitly asks

## Required Fields

For each call, require:

- `customerName` - `phoneNumber` in E.164 - `companyName` for the agent to introduce itself as - `companyDescription`, one sentence the agent may state as fact

Optional:

- `businessName` - `locale` and `region` hints for the conversation

Ask for any missing required field. Do not infer a phone number, country code, or region from a locale, an IP address, an email domain, or unrelated prior context.

## Core Workflow

1. Confirm the signup is real and recent, and that this customer has not already been called. 2. Build the call task from the required fields. Keep the script to roughly two minutes. 3. Attach a structured result schema so the provider returns fields, not just a transcript. See [`references/structured-result.md`](references/structured-result.md). 4. Persist an attempt record under a uniqueness constraint on `(signup_id, attempt_no)` **before** dialing, and derive the provider idempotency key from it. Refuse to start a new attempt while another is in flight for the same signup. 5. Place the call for that attempt. 6. Receive the terminal result on a webhook. Treat delivery as at-least-once and key ingestion on the provider event id. 7. Classify the outcome before writing anything: Stage A decides whether a human took part, and only then does Stage B read consent. See *Outcome Classification* below. 8. Write only what the outcome permits, then queue a follow-up task only when the outcome is `onboarded` and the customer asked for one. 9. Schedule or cancel a retry according to *Attempts, Retries, and Cancellation*.

Use this shape:

```text signup -> attempt record -> call task + result schema -> attempt -> terminal webhook -> classify -> permitted CRM write -> follow-up or retry or suppress ```

## Conversation Shape

Keep the call in this order. Allow interruption at any point.

1. **Greet and identify.** Name the customer, name the company, state that the call may be recorded if that is true in your jurisdiction. 2. **Ask consent.** Ask whether now is a good time for a short call. If the answer is no, offer to call back later and end. Do not continue discovery after a soft refusal. 3. **Discovery.** Ask what kind of business they run, why they signed up, what problem they want solved, and whether they have used something similar before. One question at a time. 4. **Offer the next step.** Invite the concrete first action, and offer a human if they prefer. 5. **Wrap up.** Summarize what will happen next, thank them, end.

The agent may answer only from `companyDescription` and any knowledge base you explicitly supply. For anything else — price, delivery time, policy, availability — it must say it will have a human follow up. Inventing these is the most common failure mode of onboarding-call agents.

## State Machine

The full contract in one view. Every arrow that ends in a call is guarded; every terminal state says what it permits.

```text signup | v [ allocate attempt no > cap? ]---- yes -->( manual handling ) | ^ no | v | [ attempt live (leased) ] | | | +-------------------+--------------------+ | | | | | terminal result lease expires create failed | | | | | | v | | | [ reconcile with provider ] | | | | | | | | | terminal still live unknown | | | | | | | | +<------------+ v | | | | ( ambiguous )-+-------+ | | | (late result re-enters) | v | | == STAGE A: was a human reached? == | reachability from CALL EVIDENCE, not from "is there a result" | | | +-- refusal evidence present? --> ( declined ) | | | no-human — CLOSED evidence set only: voicemail / carrier msg / ring-out / no-answer / silence / provider machine signal | +--> ( not-reached ) ------------------ retry allowed ---+ | | +--> ( failed ) provider positively says NO CALL PLACED --+ | +--> ( needs-review ) indeterminate: provider unreachable, | unknown attempt, expired lease, extractor-only NotReached, | billing charge with no obtainable outcome. NO RETRY. | human v == STAGE B: consent governs == | +--> ( declined ) terminal. suppress per scope. no follow-up, no retry, ever. +--> ( needs-review ) no result at all, unusable consent fields, or indeterminate | reachability. terminal until a human decides. NO auto retry. +--> ( partial ) write captured fields only. retry ONLY with callback consent | or human authorisation, and only under the cap. +--> ( onboarded ) write insight. follow-up only if requested. ```

Invariants the diagram encodes:

- **A redial requires positive no-human evidence from a closed set.** A missing result, an extractor-claimed `NotReached`, an unreachable provider, an expired lease, and a billing charge are all *unknown* — they route to `needs-review`, never to a retry. - **Releasing a stuck attempt and authorising a redial are separate decisions.** Unblocking the slot is bookkeeping; dialling again needs evidence. - **Refusal evidence dominates.** It routes to `declined` from anywhere, with or without a result. - **Only Stage B can suppress a number**, and only via `declined`. - **Only Stage A outcomes retry automatically.** Every Stage B redial needs consent or a human, and anything uncertain lands in `needs-review`, which never retries. - **No state is permanent-by-accident.** A live attempt is leased, and `ambiguous` is provisional — a late result re-enters classification from the top. - **The cap bounds every path**, including callback-consented redials.

## Outcome Classification

A call that reaches a terminal state has not necessarily reached a consenting human. Providers commonly return a completed call with an empty structured result when the agent talked to a carrier message, voicemail, or silence. A call can also produce a perfectly well-formed structured result while the customer was refusing to take part.

**The presence of a structured result is not evidence of consent.** Classification is therefore driven by an evidence-backed `disposition` field, not by whether a result exists. See [`references/structured-result.md`](references/structured-result.md).

Classify in **two stages, in this order**. Stage A decides whether a human took part at all. Only if one did does Stage B read consent.

The staging is the contract, not a presentation choice. Consent fields are meaningless when nobody answered — a voicemail grants no consent, so `consent_granted` is `false` there. Reading consent before establishing that a human was reached turns every no-answer into a refusal.

### Stage A — was a human reached?

**Reachability is decided on call evidence, never on whether a structured result exists.** A real conversation can return no result at all: extraction failed, the result failed validation, or the customer refused and rang off before the model emitted anything. Inferring "nobody answered" from a missing result would auto-retry those calls and redial a person who may have just refused.

#### The no-human evidence set

Exactly one thing authorises an automatic redial: **observed evidence from the call itself that no person took part.** This is a closed list.

| Counts as no-human evidence | | | --- | --- | | voicemail or answering-machine greeting | carrier or network announcement | | ring-out with no answer | the provider's own answered-by-machine / no-answer signal | | silence throughout after the agent spoke | |

**Nothing else qualifies.** In particular these are *not* no-human evidence, however tempting:

- a missing or empty structured result - the extractor's own `disposition: NotReached` — that is a model claim about the call, not an observation of it, and the same extractor mislabels refusals - a provider that is unreachable, times out, or has no record of the attempt - an expired lease - a billing charge or usage record — that shows a call *was placed*, which if anything makes a conversation more likely, not less

Every one of those means **we do not know**. Unknown is `needs-review`, never a retry. The asymmetry is deliberate: a needless manual check costs a minute, and a wrong redial reaches someone who may have already refused.

#### Establishing reachability

| Reachability | Evidence | | --- | --- | | `human` | the provider reports a human answered, **or** the transcript contains customer speech that is not carrier or IVR audio | | `no-human` | at least one item from the no-human evidence set above, and no contradicting customer speech | | `indeterminate` | anything else, including every "not evidence" item listed above |

#### Then

Technische Details

Version
1.0.0
Lizenz
MIT
Letzte Aktualisierung
21. Aug. 2026
Veröffentlicht
21. Aug. 2026

Entscheidungsübersicht

Fallback-Kandidat

66
Bereit
Prototyp
Phase

recent repository activity

Audit

Installationsprüfung

Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung

75
Prüfung nötig
Sicherheit
75/100
Wartung
100/100
Installieren
92/100
Vollständiges Audit öffnenEval-Bericht ansehen

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.

0
Belegt
Needs first agent runAuto-Installation: zuerst prüfenLetzter: Unbekannt
Erfolgsrate
Letzter Fehler
Ergebnisse
0
Ausgabequalität
Fehlgeschlagen
0
Nicht relevant
0
Installationen
0
Durch Risiko blockiert
0
Einrichtung erforderlich
0
Produktion
0

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.

Installieren

Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen

Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.

Wachstums-Loop

Share-Kit

X

Szenariobasierter Entwurf für customer-onboarding-call, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.

Kuratorenhinweis
customer-onboarding-call: Place a one-off welcome and onboarding call to a customer who just signed up, capture a struc...

63 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call?ref=x
X-Entwurf öffnen
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for customer-onboarding-call:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call?ref=x

Install: npx skills add CALLE-AI/awesome-phone-call-agents --skill customer-onboarding-call
Antwortentwurf öffnen

Quelle des Eintrags

Registry-indexiert

Beanspruchbar

Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.

Ersteller
CALLE-AI
Indexiert von
OpenAgentSkill Community-Index

Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.

Diesen Skill beanspruchen

Eigentümeranspruch

Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen

Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird CALLE-AI zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.

Creator-Backlink-Kit

Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen

Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/calle-ai-customer-onboarding-call)

Autor

C

CALLE-AI

@calle-ai

Plattform-Fit

Gesundheitssignale

GitHub-Stars
63
Qualitätswert
36/100
Letzter GitHub-Push
21. Aug. 2026
Framework-Hinweise
Unbekannt
OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
4
Installationskopien
0
Externe Klicks
0

Community-Signal

Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.

Vertrauen & Sicherheit

Nur Sandbox

60
  • GitHub-Akzeptanz63 GitHub-StarsPrüfen
  • Star-/Fork-Aktivität63 Stars und 127 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarPrüfen
  • Aktuelle Wartung1 Tage seit dem letzten PushBestanden
  • LizenzklarheitMITBestanden
  • README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
  • Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikocommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceInfo