Skill audit report
Adversarially review a code change — assume it's broken, try to break it, and only report findings that survive an independent refutation pass. Use when the user wants a deep, skeptical review of a diff, PR, or branch ("adversarial review", "try to break this", "find what's wrong before I ship", "review this like a skeptic", "what will break in production"). Scales from a single inline pass to a multi-agent fan-out (one skeptic per domain → adversarial verify → synthesis). Distinct from a normal code review: it leads with concrete failure scenarios over style, distrusts the tests, and is honest about what it could not verify.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
INFO62
289 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
WARN57
289 stars, 40 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
24d since push
License clarity
PASS86
Apache-2.0
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
INFO74
network or browser surface, database surface
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add boraoztunc/skills --skill adversarial-review
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
FAIL36
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/boraoztunc/skills/tree/main/adversarial-review
Review status
PASS88
AI review data available
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install path
92
npx skills add boraoztunc/skills --skill adversarial-review
Repository
88
https://github.com/boraoztunc/skills/tree/main/adversarial-review
License
86
Apache-2.0
Maintenance
100
24d since push
AI review
88
Approved with no listed issues
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Warnings
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
169K Stars · Audit report
Platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Integrates with 25+ databases and any API.
41K Stars · Audit report
Implement work from an approved spec or ticket set, run focused and full tests, invoke code review, and commit the result to the current branch.
176K Stars · Audit report
Usable description available
Dependency risk
74
network or browser surface, database surface
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
36
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Stars/forks activity
57
289 stars, 40 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
68
289 GitHub stars
Agent safety v2
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Shell or command execution
highSkill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
Network access
mediumSkill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
Filesystem access
mediumSkill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
Database access
mediumSkill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.