Skill audit report
Cross-check the agent's own answer with independent reviewers before bringing it to the user. Use when the user says 'second opinion', 'sanity check', 'cross-check', 'am I missing something', 'stress-test', 'devil's advocate', 'run a full review', 'this is important', 'high-stakes', 'help me choose between', 'critique this', or similar. Three review styles: Devil's Advocate (single critique), Boardroom Debate (parallel multi-reviewer validation), Round-Table (multi-round brainstorm for choosing between paths). Not for factual lookups — use WebSearch for those.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
WARN48
34 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
WARN43
34 stars, 7 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
7d since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
INFO76
Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
Dependency/runtime risk
INFO64
command execution surface, network or browser surface
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add awrshift/agent-memory-kit --skill second-opinion
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
WARN48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/awrshift/agent-memory-kit/tree/main/plugins/memory-kit/skills/second-opinion
Review status
WARN46
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install path
92
npx skills add awrshift/agent-memory-kit --skill second-opinion
Repository
88
https://github.com/awrshift/agent-memory-kit/tree/main/plugins/memory-kit/skills/second-opinion
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
7d since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
84
Warnings
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K Stars · Audit report
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
62K Stars · Audit report
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38K Stars · Audit report
Usable description available
Dependency risk
64
command execution surface, network or browser surface
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Stars/forks activity
43
34 stars, 7 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
42
34 GitHub stars
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.