accessible-html
Use whenever writing, editing, or reviewing markup or UI code — HTML, JSX/TSX, Vue/Svelte/Angular templates, web components, email HTML, or CSS that affects text size, color, focus, motion, layout order, or hit area. Also use when adding a button, link, form, input, modal, dropdo
Asset-Profil
Design und kreative Produktion
Design assets, images, video, audio, multimodal media, presentation, and creative production skills.
Szenario
Design und Kreativität
I need my agent to produce design assets, UI directions, presentations, or creative media workflows.
Agent-Fit
Claude Code + Cursor + CLI
Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.
Installieren
Bereit
npx skills add AlemTuzlak/skills --skill accessible-html
Wartung
Aktuell
2 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Risiko
Prüfung nötig
Lizenz ist unklar
GitHub-Qualität
39
57/100 Qualität · 68/100 Vertrauen
Abdeckungs-Tags
Review-Notizen
Lizenz ist unklar · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent-Adoptionskarte
Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick
Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.
Qualität
VielversprechendUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Vertrauen
Nur SandboxNützlicher Kandidat mit fehlenden oder gemischten Vertrauenssignalen. Bis der Ergebniszyklus die Passung belegt, in einem isolierten Arbeitsbereich verwenden.
Audit
Prüfung nötigMaschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation
Nur in einer Sandbox ausführen und nahe Alternativen vergleichen, bevor sie produktiv eingesetzt wird.
Stars
39 GitHub-Stars
Repository-Aktivität
39 Stars und 0 Forks
Wartung
2 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenz
Unbekannt
Installieren
npx skills add AlemTuzlak/skills --skill accessible-html
Installationssicherheit
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsfläche
secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
Agent-Ergebnisse
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten
Dokumentation
Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext
Risikoübersicht
Vor Produktion prüfen
- Repository license is unknown; no license file detected. This creates ambiguity about usage rights and redistribution.
- Lizenz ist unklar
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
Installationsbereitschaft
Installationspfad verfügbar
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Lizenz ist unklar
- Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege
Agent-lesbare Metadaten
Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.
Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.
Geeignete Aufgaben
- GitHub automation-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Inspect repository metadata
Geeignete Agents
Installationsentscheidung
- Befehl
- npx skills add AlemTuzlak/skills --skill accessible-html
- Richtlinie
- Prüfen
- Menschliche Prüfung
- Ja
Vertrauen und Risiko
- Vertrauen
- 60/100
- Audit
- 72/100
- Risikoebene
- Prüfung nötig
Ergebnis-Loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event-ID
- resolve
- Ergebnisse
- 5
Installationsbefehl
npx skills add AlemTuzlak/skills --skill accessible-htmlNicht verwenden, wenn
- Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Repository license is unknown; no license file detected. This creates ambiguity about usage rights and redistribution.
- Lizenz ist unklar
Alternative
Frontend Design
170.9K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill frontend-design
Alternative
Taste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
79.0K Stars
npx skills add Leonxlnx/taste-skill --skill design-taste-frontend
Alternative
Canvas Design
170.9K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill canvas-design
Alternative
Anthropic Brand Guidelines
170.9K Stars
npx skills add anthropics/skills --skill brand-guidelines
Agent-Sicherheit v2
52/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Mittel
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
Mittel
Netzwerkzugriff
Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.
Mittel
Dateisystemzugriff
Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.
- Lizenz ist unklar
Installationsziele
Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install alemtuzlak-accessible-htmlAgent-Auflösungsplan
Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.
Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.
JSON öffnen
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20accessible-html%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve-Text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20accessible-html%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html/install
Agent sollte prüfen
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Prompt kopieren
Task: Use accessible-html in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20accessible-html%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html/install
Install command: npx skills add AlemTuzlak/skills --skill accessible-html
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent-Übergabe
Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html/install
LLM-Textformat
/api/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html/install?format=text
Alternativen finden
/api/skills/search?q=accessible-html&limit=3
Agent-Prompt
Use accessible-html for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html/install, then install with: npx skills add AlemTuzlak/skills --skill accessible-htmlRegistry-Metadaten
Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.
Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/alemtuzlak-accessible-html
LLM-Text
/api/registry/manifest/alemtuzlak-accessible-html?format=text
Installationsalias
/api/registry/install/alemtuzlak-accessible-html
Empfehlen
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20accessible-html%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent-Fit
GitHub automation
Use-Case-Tags
Plattformen
Claude Code, Cursor
Audit-Bericht
Prüfung nötig · 72/100
Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
Agent-Entscheidungspanel
Fallback candidate for GitHub automation
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rolle im Stack
Fallback-Kandidat
Primäre Eignung
GitHub automation
Vertrauenslabel
Zuerst prototypisieren
Installationspfad
Befehl bereit
Verwenden wenn
- GitHub automation-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidenz
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- Qualitätsprofil 57/100
- 7 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen
zuerst prüfen
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Repository license is unknown; no license file detected. This creates ambiguity about usage rights and redistribution.
Implementierungspfad
- 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine GitHub automation-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Vertrauensprofil
Nur Sandbox
Nützlicher Kandidat mit fehlenden oder gemischten Vertrauenssignalen. Bis der Ergebniszyklus die Passung belegt, in einem isolierten Arbeitsbereich verwenden.
GitHub-Akzeptanz
Prüfen39 GitHub-Stars
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
Prüfen39 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Aktuelle Wartung
Bestanden2 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenzklarheit
PrüfenUnbekannt
Positive Signale
- KI-Prüfung genehmigt
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
- Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
- Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf
Vor Installation prüfen
- Repository license is unknown; no license file detected. This creates ambiguity about usage rights and redistribution.
- Lizenz ist unklar
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 39 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 39 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- License clarity: Unknown
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
- Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
- Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich
Empfohlene Aktion
Nur in einer Sandbox ausführen und nahe Alternativen vergleichen, bevor sie produktiv eingesetzt wird.
Qualitätsprofil
Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow-Eignung
Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Verify behavior
Testing and QA
I need my agent to test a web app, reproduce bugs, and verify fixes.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Workflow-Eignung
Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen
Design, build, test, and ship interfaces
Frontend and UI
A practical workflow for agents that turn product briefs or Figma designs into polished frontend code, review the result, test it in a browser, and prepare a safe deployment.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Alternativen-Shortlist
Vor Installation vergleichen
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Frontend Design
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
Taste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
Canvas Design
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
Anthropic Brand Guidelines
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
Übersicht
--- name: accessible-html description: Use whenever writing, editing, or reviewing markup or UI code — HTML, JSX/TSX, Vue/Svelte/Angular templates, web components, email HTML, or CSS that affects text size, color, focus, motion, layout order, or hit area. Also use when adding a button, link, form, input, modal, dropdown, menu, tabs, tooltip, toast, icon, image, iframe, table, list, keyboard shortcut, drag interaction, or any click handler; when a design has to become code; and when the user says "accessibility", "a11y", "WCAG", "screen reader", "keyboard navigation", "focus", "aria", "contrast", "alt text", or "axe". ---
# accessible-html
Accessible markup is not a pass you make later. It is how you write the markup the first time. There is no "accessible version" of a `<div onclick>` — you either used the right element or you built a trap for someone.
**One rule above all: use the native HTML element that already does the job.** Native elements ship focus, keyboard handling, state, and a role for free. Every ARIA attribute you write is a promise you must now implement by hand.
Target **WCAG 2.2 Level AA** unless told otherwise. That is the normal legal and contractual bar.
## Non-negotiables (every file, every time)
| Do this | Never this | |---|---| | `<button type="button">` for actions, `<a href>` for navigation | `<div onclick>`, `<span onclick>`, `<div role="button">`, `<a>` with no `href` | | `<label for=id>` or a wrapping `<label>` on every input | placeholder as the only label | | Every image has `alt` — describe it, or `alt=""` if decorative | missing `alt`; `alt="image"`, `alt="icon"`, filename as alt | | Real accessible name on every control (visible text, or visually-hidden text beside an `aria-hidden="true"` icon) | icon-only button with no name; empty link; `title` as the name | | One `<h1>`, then `h2`→`h3`→`h4` with no skipped level | headings chosen for how big the text looks | | `<html lang="en">`; `lang` on foreign phrases too | no `lang` | | Landmarks: `<header> <nav> <main> <footer>`; one `<main>`; label each `<nav>` | div soup | | `<title>` unique per page; skip link to `<main>` | same title everywhere | | Every `<iframe>` has a `title` | untitled embeds | | Real lists in `<ul>/<ol>/<dl>`; add `role="list"` if you set `list-style: none` | fake lists of divs | | Text contrast ≥ 4.5:1 (≥ 3:1 large text, UI borders, icons, focus rings) | grey-on-grey; "design QA will catch it" | | `rem` for font size, including `clamp()` bounds | `px` font size on `:root`/`html`/`body` | | Visible focus ring: `:focus-visible`, ≥ 2px, ≥ 3:1 contrast, uses `outline` | `outline: none`; ring only from `box-shadow` | | DOM order == visual order | `flex-direction: row-reverse`, `order:`, or grid placement to reorder content | | Interactive targets ≥ 24×24 CSS px (aim 44×44 on touch) | 12px icon hit areas | | `<table>` + `<caption>` + `<th scope>` for data | tables for layout; div grids for tabular data | | `<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">` | `user-scalable=no`, `maximum-scale=1` | | Unique `id` per element | duplicate ids (silently breaks `for` and `aria-labelledby`) | | Single-character shortcut (`j`, `/`, `x`) ships with an off switch, a remap, or focus scoping | bare single-key shortcuts with no escape hatch (WCAG 2.1.4, **Level A**) |
If a control is not reachable and operable with Tab / Shift+Tab / Enter / Space / arrows / Escape, it is broken. A keyboard user cannot use your feature at all — that is not a "nice to have".
Never nest interactive elements: no button in a button, no link in a link, no control inside a `<label>` that already labels another control.
## The four rules of ARIA
1. Native element first. Always. `<button>` over `role="button"`. 2. Do not change native semantics. Wrap instead: `<div role="tab"><h3>…</h3></div>`, not `<h3 role="tab">`. 3. Every interactive ARIA widget must be fully keyboard operable — you write those key handlers. 4. Never put `aria-hidden="true"` or `role="presentation"` on a focusable element, or on an ancestor of one.
**No ARIA is better than bad ARIA.** And `aria-label` is *ignored* on generic elements — on a `<div>` or `<span>` with no role it does nothing at all.
## Naming things
- Visible text is the best accessible name. Prefer it over `aria-label`: sighted users, voice-control users, and translation tools all read it. - **Label in name:** if a control has visible text, its accessible name must contain that text. A button reading "Cancel" with `aria-label="Close"` breaks voice control — the user says "click Cancel" and nothing happens. - `aria-label` / `aria-labelledby`: only when there is no visible text to point at (icon button, unlabelled landmark, a `<section>` that needs to be a landmark). - `aria-describedby` for hints. `aria-errormessage` + `aria-invalid="true"` for errors. - `title` is not an accessible name. It never appears on touch, is unreliable on keyboard, and has poor contrast. Use a real label. - Do not use visually-hidden text to fight pronunciation ("$99 per month"), or to say something sighted users also need. If the text is needed, show it. - Same link text to different destinations is a bug. "Read more about accessible design", not "Read more". Say when a link opens a new tab.
## Do not surprise the user
- No change of context on focus or on input. A `<select>` must not navigate on change; an OTP field must not auto-advance focus in a way that traps; nothing auto-submits. - No `autofocus`. No stealing focus on load. - Activate on pointer-**up**, not pointer-down, and let the user abort by dragging off. - Session timeouts must be extendable, and warn before expiring. - Do not require re-entering data the user already gave, and never require a memory or puzzle test to log in. Do not block paste in password fields. - Errors: text, not colour alone. Say what to do. Move focus to the error summary or first bad field.
## Read-first gate
**If your task matches a row below, open that file before writing code.** Not after, not "if there's time". These patterns have exact contracts you cannot reconstruct from memory, and a deadline in the request is not an exemption — reading one file costs seconds and is the difference between a working widget and one that only looks like it works.
| Task involves | Open this first | |---|---| | Any `keydown` handler, shortcut, `tabindex`, `.focus()`, focus trap, arrow-key navigation | `references/keyboard-and-focus.md` | | Dialog, popover, dropdown, menu, combobox, autocomplete, tabs, accordion, tooltip, toast, live region, drag-reorder, data table, carousel | `references/components.md` | | Contrast, font scale, zoom, reflow, dark mode, animation, scroll effects, cursors, high contrast | `references/visual-and-motion.md` | | Saying the work is done | `references/audit.md` |
Each of these features ships a fixed set of parts. Ship all of them or you have not built the feature:
- **Keyboard shortcuts** → typing guard · **user-controlled off switch for bare single-key shortcuts (WCAG 2.1.4, Level A — this is the part that gets skipped)** · handlers · discoverable `?` list. - **Dialog** → focus moves in · focus returns to the opener on close · Escape closes · background inert · named by its heading. - **Dropdown/menu** → `aria-expanded` on the trigger · arrow keys + Home/End + type-ahead if you claimed `role="menu"` · Escape closes and returns focus · roving tabindex. No arrow keys? Then it is a `<nav><ul>` of links, not a menu. - **Combobox** → focus stays in the input · `aria-activedescendant` · result count announced. - **Async status** → a live region that already exists in the DOM · focus handled if content vanished.
## Adding to code that is already inaccessible
This is the single most common way an agent ships a defect: asked to add a fourth item next to three broken ones, in a file that is "already reviewed", "already approved", or "do not refactor".
Where you have latitude, use it: if you can add the item without adding a new instance of the defect — `tabindex="-1"` instead of continuing `1, 2, 3`, a `<button>` instead of another `<div onclick>`, a `<label>` instead of another bare input — do that, and say in one line why yours differs.
When the request is specific enough that you have no latitude ("follow the exact existing pattern"), the instruction wins. Comply. **Your reply then has exactly three parts:**
1. **The item, added as asked.** 2. **A comment at the insertion point naming the defect**, so the next person finds it without having to rediscover it. This is not refactoring — it adds no behaviour and changes no line. 3. **Three sentences, in this order:** what it costs a real user, the fix with its line count, and one direct question. Then stop.
### Worked example — this exact scenario
Asked: add a "Ruby" tab, follow the exact existing pattern, do not refactor, ships tonight.
```html <div class="tablist" aria-label="Language"> <!-- a11y debt: these are divs with positive tabindex and outline:none — keyboard users cannot reach or activate any tab. New entries copy the defect. Fix: role="tab" + roving tabindex (~15 lines). --> <div class="tab selected" tabindex="1" onclick="pick(0)">JavaScript</div> <div class="tab" tabindex="2" onclick="pick(1)">Python</div> <div class="tab" tabindex="3" onclick="pick(2)">Ruby</div> </div> ```
> Added as asked. Right now nobody using a keyboard or screen reader can switch these tabs at all — > that is three code samples they cannot read, not a style issue. The fix is `<button role="tab">` > with roving `tabindex` and a `:focus-visible` ring, about 15 lines in this one file, no API change. > Do you want it tonight in the same PR, or as a follow-up I open now so it does not get lost?
What makes this pass is not the flag. It is that the cost is stated in **users**, the fix is **sized**, and there is a **question** the human can answer in one word. "Worth a follow-up ticket sometime" is none of those — that is a note that evaporates, and it is why this kept failing.
If the human says ship it anyway, ship it. That was their call to make, and you made it an informed one.
## Rationalizations — every one of these is wrong
| Excuse | Reality | |---|---| | "The file already does it this way, I'm just following the pattern" | You are adding a new defect. New code is correct code, even in an old file. | | "Don't refactor" means I must copy the bug | It means leave the other lines alone. Write your own line properly. | | "It's already approved / already reviewed" | The review missed it. Approval does not make a keyboard trap usable. | | "I flagged it in my notes" | A note is not a fix. Flagging costs nothing and changes nothing. | | "It's a pre-existing gap, not my regression" | You tripled it. That is a regression. | | "The designer / PM / brand guide signed off" | They signed off on a look, not on locking people out. Offer the nearest compliant value — a darker grey, a hidden label, a non-blue focus ring — and say what you changed. | | "There's no time before the deadline" | The compliant version of a label, a `<button>`, or an off switch is the same size as the broken one. There was never a time saving. | | "I'll do it as a follow-up ticket" | Follow-up tickets for accessibility do not get done. This one is 4 lines. Do it now. | | "I skipped the arrow keys to hit the deadline" | Then do not claim `role="menu"`. Ship a list of links that works, not a widget that lies. | | "The user explicitly asked for `user-scalable=no`" | They asked for a layout that does not break. Give them that without blocking zoom. | | "It's an internal tool" | Your colleagues have disabilities too, and internal tools become external ones. |
**Naming the violation is not an alternative to not committing it.**
## Red flags — stop, you are about to ship an inaccessible UI
- "I'll add `aria-label` to make this div accessible." - "It's just a wrapp
Technische Details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Lizenz
- Unknown
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 20. Aug. 2026
- Veröffentlicht
- 19. Aug. 2026
Entscheidungsübersicht
Fallback-Kandidat
recent repository activity
Audit
Installationsprüfung
Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung
- Sicherheit
- 70/100
- Wartung
- 100/100
- Installieren
- 92/100
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.
- Erfolgsrate
- —
- Letzter Fehler
- —
- Ergebnisse
- 0
- Ausgabequalität
- —
- Fehlgeschlagen
- 0
- Nicht relevant
- 0
- Installationen
- 0
- Durch Risiko blockiert
- 0
- Einrichtung erforderlich
- 0
- Produktion
- 0
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.
Installieren
Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen
Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.
Wachstums-Loop
Share-Kit
Szenariobasierter Entwurf für accessible-html, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.
accessible-html: Use whenever writing, editing, or reviewing markup or UI code — HTML, JSX/TSX, Vue/Svelte/Ang... 39 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html?ref=x
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for accessible-html: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html?ref=x Install: npx skills add AlemTuzlak/skills --skill accessible-html
Quelle des Eintrags
Registry-indexiert
Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.
- Ersteller
- AlemTuzlak
- Quelle
- AlemTuzlak/skills
- Indexiert von
- OpenAgentSkill Community-Index
Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.
Diesen Skill beanspruchenEigentümeranspruch
Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen
Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird AlemTuzlak zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.
Creator-Backlink-Kit
Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen
Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/alemtuzlak-accessible-html)Autor
AlemTuzlak
@alemtuzlak
Tags
Plattform-Fit
Gesundheitssignale
- GitHub-Stars
- 39
- Qualitätswert
- 34/100
- Letzter GitHub-Push
- 20. Aug. 2026
- Framework-Hinweise
- Unbekannt
- OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
- 7
- Installationskopien
- 0
- Externe Klicks
- 0
Community-Signal
Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.
Vertrauen & Sicherheit
Nur Sandbox
- GitHub-Akzeptanz39 GitHub-StarsPrüfen
- Star-/Fork-Aktivität39 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarPrüfen
- Aktuelle Wartung2 Tage seit dem letzten PushBestanden
- LizenzklarheitUnbekanntPrüfen
- README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
- Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikonetwork or browser surfaceBestanden
Ähnliche Skills
Frontend Design
Guidance for distinctive, intentional UI design, typography, visual direction, and non-template-like product interfaces.
170.9K StarsTaste Skill: Anti-Slop Frontend
Design and implementation guidance for distinctive landing pages, portfolios, product demos, and purposeful redesigns.
79.0K StarsCanvas Design
Create original visual art, posters, PNG assets, and PDF documents through a clear design philosophy.
170.9K StarsAnthropic Brand Guidelines
Apply Anthropic official brand colors, typography, and visual standards to appropriate Anthropic-related artifacts.
170.9K Stars