Rapport d’audit du skill
comparison-post-writer Rapport d’audit.
Write "X vs Y" comparison blog posts that help readers choose between two competing products. Triggers on: "write a comparison post", "X vs Y blog post", "compare [product A] and [product B]", "which is better [A] or [B]", "head to head comparison", "[product] vs [product] article", "comparison review", "write a versus article", "side by side comparison blog", "which should I choose [A] or [B]", "compare these two products for my blog".
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
Adoption GitHub
Info76
639 stars GitHub
Activité stars/forks
Info71
639 stars et 199 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Maintenance récente
Info76
4 mois depuis le dernier push
Clarté de licence
Validé86
MIT
Complétude README/SKILL.md
Validé94
Les métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflow
Risque dépendances/runtime
Avertissement56
command execution surface, network or browser surface
Disponibilité de l’installation
Validé92
npx skills add Affitor/affiliate-skills --skill comparison-post-writer
Sécurité de la commande d’installation
Validé92
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
Avertissement50
shell or command execution, network or browser access
Preuve du dépôt
Validé86
https://github.com/Affitor/affiliate-skills/tree/main/skills/blog/comparison-post-writer
État de revue
Validé88
Données de revue IA disponibles
Résultats prouvés par Agent
Info54
Pas encore de données de résultats Agent
Vérifications
Revue d’installation et d’adoption
Chemin d’installation
92
npx skills add Affitor/affiliate-skills --skill comparison-post-writer
Dépôt
88
https://github.com/Affitor/affiliate-skills/tree/main/skills/blog/comparison-post-writer
Licence
86
MIT
Maintenance
76
4 mois depuis le dernier push
Revue IA
88
Approved with no listed issues
Complétude README/SKILL.md
94
Usable description available
Risque de dépendances
56
command execution surface, network or browser surface
Sécurité de la commande d’installation
92
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
50
shell or command execution, network or browser access
Activité stars/forks
71
639 stars et 199 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Adoption
88
639 stars GitHub
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.
Avertissements
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, network or browser access
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, network or browser surface
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, network or browser access
Méthode
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Comparer les options proches
Skills associés à auditer ensuite
stop-slop
Eliminates predictable AI writing patterns from prose while preserving specific meaning and reader trust.
16K Stars · Rapport d’audit
unslop
Applies Cursor's prose-discipline rules to remove filler and AI writing tells from agent-facing and user-facing text.
4.8K Stars · Rapport d’audit
Humanizer
Rewrites AI-sounding text so it reads naturally while preserving every factual claim and matching the writer's voice.
37K Stars · Rapport d’audit