Creator · addyosmani
Last updated · Sep 1, 2026
Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happen
Creator · addyosmani
Last updated · Sep 1, 2026
Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happen
Creator · addyosmani
Last updated · Sep 1, 2026
Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happen
Creator · addyosmani
Last updated · Sep 1, 2026
Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happen
Review then install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "observability-and-instrumentation" agent skill from https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/observability-and-instrumentation. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation","task":"Install observability-and-instrumentation","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Maintenance
fresh
8d since push
Risk
Needs review
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
GitHub quality
91K
95/100 Quality · 87/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
ExcellentHigh-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Trust
Review then installGood shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.
Stars
91K GitHub stars
Repo activity
91K stars, 9.8K forks
Maintenance
8d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentationDo not use when
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use observability-and-instrumentation in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
Install command: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=observability-and-instrumentation&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use observability-and-instrumentation for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install, then install with: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentationRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Role in stack
Primary pick
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Production-ready
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Good shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.
GitHub adoption
PASS91K GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
PASS91K stars, 9.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS8d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.
Quality profile
High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Workflow fit
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Answer users
I need my agent to triage support requests and draft useful replies from product knowledge.
Build and ship code
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Workflow fit
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Apache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browser
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. :bar_chart::chart_with_upwards_trend::tada:
Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 160,000+ scientists worldwide. 140 ready-to-use skills plus 100+ scientific databases covering biology, chemistry, medicine, and drug discovery. Compatible with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, Antigravity, and the open Agent Skills standard.
Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
--- name: observability-and-instrumentation description: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data. ---
# Observability and Instrumentation
## Overview
Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.
## When to Use
- Building any feature that will run in production - Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration - A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened") - Setting up or reviewing alerting rules - Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls
**NOT for:** - Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the `debugging-and-error-recovery` skill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time) - Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the `performance-optimization` skill - Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the `shipping-and-launch` skill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them
## Process
### 1. Define "working" before instrumenting
Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
``` FEATURE: checkout payment retry QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK: 1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry? 2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?) 3. Is the payment provider slower than usual? → Every signal below must help answer one of these. ```
If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.
### 2. Pick the right signal for each question
| Signal | Answers | Cost profile | Example | |---|---|---|---| | **Structured log** | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event; grows with traffic | `payment_failed` with provider error code | | **Metric** | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series; cheap to query | p99 latency of provider calls | | **Trace** | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request; usually sampled | One slow checkout, broken down by hop |
Rule of thumb: metrics tell you **that** something is wrong, traces tell you **where**, logs tell you **why**.
### 3. Structured logging
Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:
```typescript // BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);
// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields logger.warn({ event: 'payment_failed', paymentId: id, provider: 'stripe', errorCode: err.code, attempt: n, }, 'payment failed'); ```
**Log levels — use them consistently:**
| Level | Meaning | On-call action | |---|---|---| | `error` | Invariant broken; someone may need to act | Investigate | | `warn` | Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) | Watch for trends | | `info` | Significant business event (order placed, job finished) | None | | `debug` | Diagnostic detail | Off in production by default |
**Correlation IDs are mandatory.** Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:
```typescript // Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream app.use((req, res, next) => { req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID(); req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id }); res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id); next(); }); ```
**Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII.** This is a hard rule from the `security-and-hardening` skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.
### 4. Metrics
For request-driven services, instrument **RED** on every endpoint and every external dependency: **R**ate (requests/sec), **E**rrors (failure rate), **D**uration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use **USE**: **U**tilization, **S**aturation, **E**rrors.
As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' `prom-client` — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.
```typescript import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';
const httpDuration = new Histogram({ name: 'http_request_duration_seconds', help: 'HTTP request duration', labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'], // '2xx', not '200' buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5], }); ```
**Cardinality is the failure mode.** Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.
``` OK as label: route="/api/tasks/:id" status_class="5xx" provider="stripe" NEVER a label: user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text ```
Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.
### 5. Distributed tracing
Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
```typescript // tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node'; import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
const sdk = new NodeSDK({ serviceName: 'checkout-service', instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()], }); sdk.start(); ```
Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., `applyDiscounts`, `chargeProvider`) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.
### 6. Alerting
Alert on **symptoms users feel**, not on causes:
``` SYMPTOM (page-worthy): CAUSE (dashboard, not a page): error rate > 1% for 5 min CPU at 85% p99 latency > 2s one pod restarted queue age > 10 min disk at 70% ```
Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.
Rules for every alert you create:
1. **It must be actionable.** If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert. 2. **It links to a runbook** — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path. 3. **It has a threshold and duration** justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess. 4. Use two severities only: **page** (user-facing, act now) and **ticket** (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
### 7. Verify the telemetry itself
Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:
- Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by `requestId`, confirm fields are structured (not `[object Object]`) - Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values - Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans - Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works
## Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | "I'll add logging after it works" | "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build. | | "More logs = more observability" | Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines. | | "console.log is fine for now" | Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once. | | "We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" | Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions. | | "Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" | A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does. | | "User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" | It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces. | | "Tracing is overkill for our two services" | Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial. |
## Red Flags
- A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry - Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields - No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan - Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb) - Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles - Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action - Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored - Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs - "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy
## Verification
After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
- [ ] The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one - [ ] All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line - [ ] No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output) - [ ] RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets - [ ] Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable - [ ] A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans - [ ] Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once - [ ] An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source
For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see `../../references/observability-checklist.md`.
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
91,373 GitHub stars
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for observability-and-instrumentation, ready for a manual X post.
observability-and-instrumentation: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging,... 91.4K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=x
Listing + install path for observability-and-instrumentation: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=x Install: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to addyosmani but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)addyosmani
@addyosmani
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Review then install
Echarts
Apache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browser
67.2K StarsD3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. :bar_chart::chart_with_upwards_trend::tada:
113.1K StarsScientific Agent Skills
Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 160,000+ scientists worldwide. 140 ready-to-use skills plus 100+ scientific databases covering biology, chemistry, medicine, and drug discovery. Compatible with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, Antigravity, and the open Agent Skills standard.
33.5K StarsSuperset
Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
74.7K StarsReview then install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "observability-and-instrumentation" agent skill from https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/observability-and-instrumentation. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation","task":"Install observability-and-instrumentation","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Maintenance
fresh
8d since push
Risk
Needs review
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
GitHub quality
91K
95/100 Quality · 87/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
ExcellentHigh-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Trust
Review then installGood shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.
Stars
91K GitHub stars
Repo activity
91K stars, 9.8K forks
Maintenance
8d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentationDo not use when
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use observability-and-instrumentation in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
Install command: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=observability-and-instrumentation&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use observability-and-instrumentation for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install, then install with: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentationRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Role in stack
Primary pick
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Production-ready
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Good shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.
GitHub adoption
PASS91K GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
PASS91K stars, 9.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS8d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.
Quality profile
High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Workflow fit
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Answer users
I need my agent to triage support requests and draft useful replies from product knowledge.
Build and ship code
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Workflow fit
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Apache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browser
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. :bar_chart::chart_with_upwards_trend::tada:
Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 160,000+ scientists worldwide. 140 ready-to-use skills plus 100+ scientific databases covering biology, chemistry, medicine, and drug discovery. Compatible with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, Antigravity, and the open Agent Skills standard.
Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
--- name: observability-and-instrumentation description: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data. ---
# Observability and Instrumentation
## Overview
Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.
## When to Use
- Building any feature that will run in production - Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration - A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened") - Setting up or reviewing alerting rules - Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls
**NOT for:** - Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the `debugging-and-error-recovery` skill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time) - Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the `performance-optimization` skill - Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the `shipping-and-launch` skill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them
## Process
### 1. Define "working" before instrumenting
Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
``` FEATURE: checkout payment retry QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK: 1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry? 2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?) 3. Is the payment provider slower than usual? → Every signal below must help answer one of these. ```
If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.
### 2. Pick the right signal for each question
| Signal | Answers | Cost profile | Example | |---|---|---|---| | **Structured log** | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event; grows with traffic | `payment_failed` with provider error code | | **Metric** | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series; cheap to query | p99 latency of provider calls | | **Trace** | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request; usually sampled | One slow checkout, broken down by hop |
Rule of thumb: metrics tell you **that** something is wrong, traces tell you **where**, logs tell you **why**.
### 3. Structured logging
Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:
```typescript // BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);
// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields logger.warn({ event: 'payment_failed', paymentId: id, provider: 'stripe', errorCode: err.code, attempt: n, }, 'payment failed'); ```
**Log levels — use them consistently:**
| Level | Meaning | On-call action | |---|---|---| | `error` | Invariant broken; someone may need to act | Investigate | | `warn` | Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) | Watch for trends | | `info` | Significant business event (order placed, job finished) | None | | `debug` | Diagnostic detail | Off in production by default |
**Correlation IDs are mandatory.** Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:
```typescript // Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream app.use((req, res, next) => { req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID(); req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id }); res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id); next(); }); ```
**Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII.** This is a hard rule from the `security-and-hardening` skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.
### 4. Metrics
For request-driven services, instrument **RED** on every endpoint and every external dependency: **R**ate (requests/sec), **E**rrors (failure rate), **D**uration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use **USE**: **U**tilization, **S**aturation, **E**rrors.
As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' `prom-client` — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.
```typescript import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';
const httpDuration = new Histogram({ name: 'http_request_duration_seconds', help: 'HTTP request duration', labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'], // '2xx', not '200' buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5], }); ```
**Cardinality is the failure mode.** Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.
``` OK as label: route="/api/tasks/:id" status_class="5xx" provider="stripe" NEVER a label: user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text ```
Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.
### 5. Distributed tracing
Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
```typescript // tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node'; import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
const sdk = new NodeSDK({ serviceName: 'checkout-service', instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()], }); sdk.start(); ```
Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., `applyDiscounts`, `chargeProvider`) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.
### 6. Alerting
Alert on **symptoms users feel**, not on causes:
``` SYMPTOM (page-worthy): CAUSE (dashboard, not a page): error rate > 1% for 5 min CPU at 85% p99 latency > 2s one pod restarted queue age > 10 min disk at 70% ```
Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.
Rules for every alert you create:
1. **It must be actionable.** If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert. 2. **It links to a runbook** — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path. 3. **It has a threshold and duration** justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess. 4. Use two severities only: **page** (user-facing, act now) and **ticket** (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
### 7. Verify the telemetry itself
Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:
- Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by `requestId`, confirm fields are structured (not `[object Object]`) - Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values - Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans - Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works
## Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | "I'll add logging after it works" | "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build. | | "More logs = more observability" | Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines. | | "console.log is fine for now" | Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once. | | "We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" | Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions. | | "Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" | A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does. | | "User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" | It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces. | | "Tracing is overkill for our two services" | Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial. |
## Red Flags
- A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry - Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields - No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan - Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb) - Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles - Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action - Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored - Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs - "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy
## Verification
After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
- [ ] The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one - [ ] All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line - [ ] No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output) - [ ] RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets - [ ] Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable - [ ] A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans - [ ] Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once - [ ] An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source
For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see `../../references/observability-checklist.md`.
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
91,373 GitHub stars
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for observability-and-instrumentation, ready for a manual X post.
observability-and-instrumentation: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging,... 91.4K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=x
Listing + install path for observability-and-instrumentation: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=x Install: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to addyosmani but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)addyosmani
@addyosmani
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Review then install
Echarts
Apache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browser
67.2K StarsD3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. :bar_chart::chart_with_upwards_trend::tada:
113.1K StarsScientific Agent Skills
Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 160,000+ scientists worldwide. 140 ready-to-use skills plus 100+ scientific databases covering biology, chemistry, medicine, and drug discovery. Compatible with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, Antigravity, and the open Agent Skills standard.
33.5K StarsSuperset
Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
74.7K StarsReview then install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "observability-and-instrumentation" agent skill from https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/observability-and-instrumentation. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation","task":"Install observability-and-instrumentation","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Maintenance
fresh
8d since push
Risk
Needs review
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
GitHub quality
91K
95/100 Quality · 87/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
ExcellentHigh-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Trust
Review then installGood shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.
Stars
91K GitHub stars
Repo activity
91K stars, 9.8K forks
Maintenance
8d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentationDo not use when
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use observability-and-instrumentation in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
Install command: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=observability-and-instrumentation&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use observability-and-instrumentation for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install, then install with: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentationRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Role in stack
Primary pick
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Production-ready
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Good shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.
GitHub adoption
PASS91K GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
PASS91K stars, 9.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS8d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.
Quality profile
High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Workflow fit
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Answer users
I need my agent to triage support requests and draft useful replies from product knowledge.
Build and ship code
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Workflow fit
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Apache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browser
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. :bar_chart::chart_with_upwards_trend::tada:
Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 160,000+ scientists worldwide. 140 ready-to-use skills plus 100+ scientific databases covering biology, chemistry, medicine, and drug discovery. Compatible with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, Antigravity, and the open Agent Skills standard.
Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
--- name: observability-and-instrumentation description: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data. ---
# Observability and Instrumentation
## Overview
Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.
## When to Use
- Building any feature that will run in production - Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration - A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened") - Setting up or reviewing alerting rules - Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls
**NOT for:** - Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the `debugging-and-error-recovery` skill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time) - Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the `performance-optimization` skill - Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the `shipping-and-launch` skill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them
## Process
### 1. Define "working" before instrumenting
Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
``` FEATURE: checkout payment retry QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK: 1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry? 2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?) 3. Is the payment provider slower than usual? → Every signal below must help answer one of these. ```
If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.
### 2. Pick the right signal for each question
| Signal | Answers | Cost profile | Example | |---|---|---|---| | **Structured log** | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event; grows with traffic | `payment_failed` with provider error code | | **Metric** | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series; cheap to query | p99 latency of provider calls | | **Trace** | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request; usually sampled | One slow checkout, broken down by hop |
Rule of thumb: metrics tell you **that** something is wrong, traces tell you **where**, logs tell you **why**.
### 3. Structured logging
Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:
```typescript // BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);
// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields logger.warn({ event: 'payment_failed', paymentId: id, provider: 'stripe', errorCode: err.code, attempt: n, }, 'payment failed'); ```
**Log levels — use them consistently:**
| Level | Meaning | On-call action | |---|---|---| | `error` | Invariant broken; someone may need to act | Investigate | | `warn` | Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) | Watch for trends | | `info` | Significant business event (order placed, job finished) | None | | `debug` | Diagnostic detail | Off in production by default |
**Correlation IDs are mandatory.** Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:
```typescript // Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream app.use((req, res, next) => { req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID(); req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id }); res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id); next(); }); ```
**Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII.** This is a hard rule from the `security-and-hardening` skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.
### 4. Metrics
For request-driven services, instrument **RED** on every endpoint and every external dependency: **R**ate (requests/sec), **E**rrors (failure rate), **D**uration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use **USE**: **U**tilization, **S**aturation, **E**rrors.
As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' `prom-client` — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.
```typescript import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';
const httpDuration = new Histogram({ name: 'http_request_duration_seconds', help: 'HTTP request duration', labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'], // '2xx', not '200' buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5], }); ```
**Cardinality is the failure mode.** Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.
``` OK as label: route="/api/tasks/:id" status_class="5xx" provider="stripe" NEVER a label: user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text ```
Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.
### 5. Distributed tracing
Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
```typescript // tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node'; import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
const sdk = new NodeSDK({ serviceName: 'checkout-service', instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()], }); sdk.start(); ```
Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., `applyDiscounts`, `chargeProvider`) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.
### 6. Alerting
Alert on **symptoms users feel**, not on causes:
``` SYMPTOM (page-worthy): CAUSE (dashboard, not a page): error rate > 1% for 5 min CPU at 85% p99 latency > 2s one pod restarted queue age > 10 min disk at 70% ```
Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.
Rules for every alert you create:
1. **It must be actionable.** If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert. 2. **It links to a runbook** — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path. 3. **It has a threshold and duration** justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess. 4. Use two severities only: **page** (user-facing, act now) and **ticket** (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
### 7. Verify the telemetry itself
Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:
- Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by `requestId`, confirm fields are structured (not `[object Object]`) - Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values - Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans - Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works
## Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | "I'll add logging after it works" | "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build. | | "More logs = more observability" | Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines. | | "console.log is fine for now" | Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once. | | "We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" | Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions. | | "Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" | A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does. | | "User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" | It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces. | | "Tracing is overkill for our two services" | Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial. |
## Red Flags
- A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry - Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields - No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan - Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb) - Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles - Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action - Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored - Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs - "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy
## Verification
After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
- [ ] The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one - [ ] All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line - [ ] No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output) - [ ] RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets - [ ] Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable - [ ] A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans - [ ] Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once - [ ] An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source
For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see `../../references/observability-checklist.md`.
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
91,373 GitHub stars
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for observability-and-instrumentation, ready for a manual X post.
observability-and-instrumentation: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging,... 91.4K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=x
Listing + install path for observability-and-instrumentation: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=x Install: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to addyosmani but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)addyosmani
@addyosmani
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Review then install
Echarts
Apache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browser
67.2K StarsD3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. :bar_chart::chart_with_upwards_trend::tada:
113.1K StarsScientific Agent Skills
Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 160,000+ scientists worldwide. 140 ready-to-use skills plus 100+ scientific databases covering biology, chemistry, medicine, and drug discovery. Compatible with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, Antigravity, and the open Agent Skills standard.
33.5K StarsSuperset
Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
74.7K StarsReview then install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "observability-and-instrumentation" agent skill from https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/observability-and-instrumentation. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation","task":"Install observability-and-instrumentation","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Maintenance
fresh
8d since push
Risk
Needs review
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
GitHub quality
91K
95/100 Quality · 87/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
ExcellentHigh-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Trust
Review then installGood shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.
Stars
91K GitHub stars
Repo activity
91K stars, 9.8K forks
Maintenance
8d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentationDo not use when
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use observability-and-instrumentation in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
Install command: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=observability-and-instrumentation&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use observability-and-instrumentation for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/install, then install with: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentationRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20observability-and-instrumentation%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Role in stack
Primary pick
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Production-ready
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Good shortlist signal, but the agent should review audit notes, install policy, and outcome evidence before running it.
GitHub adoption
PASS91K GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
PASS91K stars, 9.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS8d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Use as the primary candidate after human or sandbox review.
Quality profile
High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Workflow fit
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Answer users
I need my agent to triage support requests and draft useful replies from product knowledge.
Build and ship code
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Workflow fit
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Apache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browser
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. :bar_chart::chart_with_upwards_trend::tada:
Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 160,000+ scientists worldwide. 140 ready-to-use skills plus 100+ scientific databases covering biology, chemistry, medicine, and drug discovery. Compatible with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, Antigravity, and the open Agent Skills standard.
Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
--- name: observability-and-instrumentation description: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data. ---
# Observability and Instrumentation
## Overview
Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.
## When to Use
- Building any feature that will run in production - Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration - A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened") - Setting up or reviewing alerting rules - Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls
**NOT for:** - Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the `debugging-and-error-recovery` skill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time) - Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the `performance-optimization` skill - Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the `shipping-and-launch` skill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them
## Process
### 1. Define "working" before instrumenting
Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
``` FEATURE: checkout payment retry QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK: 1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry? 2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?) 3. Is the payment provider slower than usual? → Every signal below must help answer one of these. ```
If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.
### 2. Pick the right signal for each question
| Signal | Answers | Cost profile | Example | |---|---|---|---| | **Structured log** | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event; grows with traffic | `payment_failed` with provider error code | | **Metric** | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series; cheap to query | p99 latency of provider calls | | **Trace** | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request; usually sampled | One slow checkout, broken down by hop |
Rule of thumb: metrics tell you **that** something is wrong, traces tell you **where**, logs tell you **why**.
### 3. Structured logging
Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:
```typescript // BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);
// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields logger.warn({ event: 'payment_failed', paymentId: id, provider: 'stripe', errorCode: err.code, attempt: n, }, 'payment failed'); ```
**Log levels — use them consistently:**
| Level | Meaning | On-call action | |---|---|---| | `error` | Invariant broken; someone may need to act | Investigate | | `warn` | Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) | Watch for trends | | `info` | Significant business event (order placed, job finished) | None | | `debug` | Diagnostic detail | Off in production by default |
**Correlation IDs are mandatory.** Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:
```typescript // Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream app.use((req, res, next) => { req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID(); req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id }); res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id); next(); }); ```
**Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII.** This is a hard rule from the `security-and-hardening` skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.
### 4. Metrics
For request-driven services, instrument **RED** on every endpoint and every external dependency: **R**ate (requests/sec), **E**rrors (failure rate), **D**uration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use **USE**: **U**tilization, **S**aturation, **E**rrors.
As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' `prom-client` — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.
```typescript import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';
const httpDuration = new Histogram({ name: 'http_request_duration_seconds', help: 'HTTP request duration', labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'], // '2xx', not '200' buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5], }); ```
**Cardinality is the failure mode.** Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.
``` OK as label: route="/api/tasks/:id" status_class="5xx" provider="stripe" NEVER a label: user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text ```
Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.
### 5. Distributed tracing
Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
```typescript // tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node'; import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
const sdk = new NodeSDK({ serviceName: 'checkout-service', instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()], }); sdk.start(); ```
Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., `applyDiscounts`, `chargeProvider`) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.
### 6. Alerting
Alert on **symptoms users feel**, not on causes:
``` SYMPTOM (page-worthy): CAUSE (dashboard, not a page): error rate > 1% for 5 min CPU at 85% p99 latency > 2s one pod restarted queue age > 10 min disk at 70% ```
Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.
Rules for every alert you create:
1. **It must be actionable.** If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert. 2. **It links to a runbook** — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path. 3. **It has a threshold and duration** justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess. 4. Use two severities only: **page** (user-facing, act now) and **ticket** (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
### 7. Verify the telemetry itself
Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:
- Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by `requestId`, confirm fields are structured (not `[object Object]`) - Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values - Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans - Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works
## Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | "I'll add logging after it works" | "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build. | | "More logs = more observability" | Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines. | | "console.log is fine for now" | Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once. | | "We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" | Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions. | | "Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" | A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does. | | "User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" | It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces. | | "Tracing is overkill for our two services" | Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial. |
## Red Flags
- A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry - Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields - No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan - Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb) - Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles - Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action - Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored - Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs - "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy
## Verification
After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
- [ ] The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one - [ ] All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line - [ ] No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output) - [ ] RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets - [ ] Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable - [ ] A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans - [ ] Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once - [ ] An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source
For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see `../../references/observability-checklist.md`.
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
91,373 GitHub stars
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for observability-and-instrumentation, ready for a manual X post.
observability-and-instrumentation: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging,... 91.4K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=x
Listing + install path for observability-and-instrumentation: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=x Install: npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to addyosmani but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/addyosmani-observability-and-instrumentation?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)addyosmani
@addyosmani
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Review then install
Echarts
Apache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browser
67.2K StarsD3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. :bar_chart::chart_with_upwards_trend::tada:
113.1K StarsScientific Agent Skills
Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 160,000+ scientists worldwide. 140 ready-to-use skills plus 100+ scientific databases covering biology, chemistry, medicine, and drug discovery. Compatible with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, Antigravity, and the open Agent Skills standard.
33.5K StarsSuperset
Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
74.7K StarsPermission surface
network or browser access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
network or browser access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
network or browser access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
network or browser access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness