Skill audit report
gtm-channel Audit report.
Single compounding-channel pick for /gtm channel <target> - forces the choice of ONE distribution channel by scoring every candidate against where the ICP actually gathers, the founder's real weekly hours, how the product is bought, and how fast the channel compounds; outputs one primary channel with a 4-week starter plan, an explicit not-now list for every rejected channel, and a kill/review date set before the work starts. It deletes options, it doesn't add them. Use when the user asks which marketing channel to focus on, where to spend their limited time, or feels spread across five channels with none working. Also trigger for "which channel", "where should I focus", "distribution channel", "traction channel", "spread too thin", "marketing channel strategy", "what channel should I bet on", or "Bullseye".
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
FAIL30
20 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
FAIL32
20 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
11d since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
PASS82
network or browser surface
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add adaptico/adaptico-os --skill gtm-channel
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
WARN48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/adaptico/adaptico-os/tree/main/src/core/skills/gtm-channel
Review status
WARN46
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install and adoption review
Install path
92
npx skills add adaptico/adaptico-os --skill gtm-channel
Repository
88
https://github.com/adaptico/adaptico-os/tree/main/src/core/skills/gtm-channel
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
11d since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Usable description available
Dependency risk
82
network or browser surface
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Stars/forks activity
32
20 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
42
20 GitHub stars
Warnings
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- AI review approval is missing
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 20 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 20 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Review status: AI review approval is missing
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Related skills to audit next
link-building
When the user wants to earn backlinks or third-party mentions that lift rankings and AI citations. Also use when the user mentions 'link building,' 'linkbuilding,' 'backlinks,' 'get more backlinks,' 'link prospecting,' 'link gap,' 'competitor backlinks,' 'unlinked mentions,' 'link reclamation,' 'broken link building,' 'resource pages,' 'guest posting,' 'get into best-of lists,' 'listicle outreach,' 'domain rating,' 'referring domains,' 'anchor text,' or 'is this link vendor safe.' Use this whenever rankings stall on authority or someone wants off-site mentions that AI engines cite. Never recommend buying links that pass ranking credit: paid or exchanged placements get rel=sponsored or nofollow. For press coverage and journalist requests, see public-relations. For directories, see directory-submissions. For reviews, see referrals. For Reddit and communities, see community-marketing. For on-site AI citation work, see ai-seo.
56K Stars · Audit report
marketing-loops
When the user wants to set up a recurring, self-running marketing workflow — a repeatable loop an AI agent runs on a cadence (weekly, daily, on a trigger) rather than a one-off task. Also use when the user mentions 'marketing loop,' 'recurring marketing workflow,' 'automate my marketing,' 'marketing on autopilot,' 'weekly marketing review,' 'ad fatigue check,' 'weekly ads check,' 'content refresh loop,' 'churn watch,' 'ranking drop alert,' 'run my SEO,' 'SEO operator,' 'daily SEO agent,' 'run my outbound,' 'AI SDR,' 'reply triage,' 'always-on marketing,' 'marketing automation workflow,' or 'run this every week.' Use this to pick, adapt, and schedule an ongoing marketing loop that orchestrates the other marketing skills. For one-off marketing ideas, see marketing-ideas. For the experimentation loop specifically, see ab-testing.
55K Stars · Audit report
free-tools
When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.
55K Stars · Audit report