Star0

Pre-install eval

Git Spice eval report.

A machine-readable install decision for agents: task fit, Trust Score, Audit Score, install safety, permission surface, and a concrete validation plan before this skill touches a workspace.

Needs reviewMEDIUM RISKREVIEW POLICY
83
Eval
84
Trust
88
Audit
72
Safety

manual review

Review the audit page, then allow agent install in a sandboxed workflow.

Required gates

Checks an agent must pass before install

Open JSON

Task fit

84

pass

Task wording matches this skill metadata.

  • Evaluate Git Spice before installing it in an agent workflow
  • coding-agents
  • Coding agents workflows; Claude Code teams; teams that value GitHub adoption signals

Install path

92

pass

Install handoff is available.

  • npx skills add abhinav/git-spice

Install command safety

92

pass

standard package or runtime install path

  • npx skills add abhinav/git-spice

Trust score

84

pass

Good trust signals with a few areas worth checking before rollout.

  • Strong shortlist
  • 685 GitHub stars
  • GPL-3.0

Audit score

88

pass

Safe to try

  • Quality score needs review

Agent safety gate

72

warn

Good audit and safety signals with no high-risk permission hints in public metadata.

  • Review the audit page, then allow agent install in a sandboxed workflow.
  • Safe-to-try audit

License clarity

86

pass

GPL-3.0

  • GPL-3.0

Permission surface

86

pass

filesystem or document access

  • Network access: medium
  • Filesystem access: medium

Validation plan

What the agent should do next

  1. 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
  2. 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
  3. 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
  4. 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
  5. 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.

Do not use when

Conditions that require another skill

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • high-compliance environments without internal security review
  • No major risk signals from current metadata
  • Quality score needs review
  • Documentation summary is thin
  • Production credentials, payments, or irreversible account changes without explicit human review

Supporting checks

Trust signals behind the decision

README/SKILL.md completeness

warn

74

Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context

Recent maintenance

pass

100

2d since push

Alternatives available

pass

82

Alternative skills are available for comparison.