Skill ディレクトリ
すべての推奨は、リポジトリ、監査、インストール経路に明確につながっています。
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
A collection of reusable Claude Code skills for automating GitHub issues, PR reviews, and releases using a Fable-driven planning approach.
Open-source Human Design AI with BodyGraph charts, DeepSeek consultation, and installable agent skills for AI runtimes.
Pressure-test an existing plan or design artifact until it is coherent enough for the next workflow step or plainly blocked. Use when the user wants to be grilled on a plan, design doc, PRD, ADR, rollout plan, migration runbook, rolling-wave project shape, or slice contract; when they say "grill me"; or when Codex should interrogate a source-of-truth artifact, inspect code and adjacent docs before asking, auto-answer evidence-backed questions, ask only about conflicts or low-confidence recommendations, edit the original file in place, preserve the artifact's existing format, and keep conclusions, blockers, readiness, and deferred work synchronized in the document.
Skill ディレクトリ
すべての推奨は、リポジトリ、監査、インストール経路に明確につながっています。
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
A collection of reusable Claude Code skills for automating GitHub issues, PR reviews, and releases using a Fable-driven planning approach.
Open-source Human Design AI with BodyGraph charts, DeepSeek consultation, and installable agent skills for AI runtimes.
Pressure-test an existing plan or design artifact until it is coherent enough for the next workflow step or plainly blocked. Use when the user wants to be grilled on a plan, design doc, PRD, ADR, rollout plan, migration runbook, rolling-wave project shape, or slice contract; when they say "grill me"; or when Codex should interrogate a source-of-truth artifact, inspect code and adjacent docs before asking, auto-answer evidence-backed questions, ask only about conflicts or low-confidence recommendations, edit the original file in place, preserve the artifact's existing format, and keep conclusions, blockers, readiness, and deferred work synchronized in the document.
Skill ディレクトリ
すべての推奨は、リポジトリ、監査、インストール経路に明確につながっています。
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
A collection of reusable Claude Code skills for automating GitHub issues, PR reviews, and releases using a Fable-driven planning approach.
Open-source Human Design AI with BodyGraph charts, DeepSeek consultation, and installable agent skills for AI runtimes.
Pressure-test an existing plan or design artifact until it is coherent enough for the next workflow step or plainly blocked. Use when the user wants to be grilled on a plan, design doc, PRD, ADR, rollout plan, migration runbook, rolling-wave project shape, or slice contract; when they say "grill me"; or when Codex should interrogate a source-of-truth artifact, inspect code and adjacent docs before asking, auto-answer evidence-backed questions, ask only about conflicts or low-confidence recommendations, edit the original file in place, preserve the artifact's existing format, and keep conclusions, blockers, readiness, and deferred work synchronized in the document.
Skill ディレクトリ
すべての推奨は、リポジトリ、監査、インストール経路に明確につながっています。
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
A collection of reusable Claude Code skills for automating GitHub issues, PR reviews, and releases using a Fable-driven planning approach.
Open-source Human Design AI with BodyGraph charts, DeepSeek consultation, and installable agent skills for AI runtimes.
Pressure-test an existing plan or design artifact until it is coherent enough for the next workflow step or plainly blocked. Use when the user wants to be grilled on a plan, design doc, PRD, ADR, rollout plan, migration runbook, rolling-wave project shape, or slice contract; when they say "grill me"; or when Codex should interrogate a source-of-truth artifact, inspect code and adjacent docs before asking, auto-answer evidence-backed questions, ask only about conflicts or low-confidence recommendations, edit the original file in place, preserve the artifact's existing format, and keep conclusions, blockers, readiness, and deferred work synchronized in the document.