Star0

Skill comparison

Compare agent skills before installing.

Put high-signal skills side by side and inspect quality, adoption, freshness, install readiness, use-case fit, and warnings in one place.

Comparing 4 skills

Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.

Add more skills

Decision summary

Reviewdog is the strongest overall pick here because it has a 100/100 readiness score and fits Coding agents.

Strongest overall

Reviewdog

Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.

Fastest prototype

Reviewdog

Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.

Freshest repo

Reviewdog

Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.

SignalCode Review

Code Reviews in Emacs

Reviewdog

🐶 Automated code review tool integrated with any code analysis tools regardless of programming language

Danger

🚫 Stop saying "you forgot to …" in code review (in Ruby)

Github Review

Github code reviews with Emacs.

Quality
53/100
Needs review
100/100
Excellent
100/100
Excellent
51/100
Needs review
Decision verdict
43/100
Needs manual review

Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.

100/100
Production-ready

Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.

100/100
Production-ready

Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.

41/100
Needs manual review

Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.

Adoption487 stars
0 installs
9.4K stars
0 installs
5.7K stars
0 installs
333 stars
0 installs
FreshnessMay 29, 2024Jun 12, 2026Jun 11, 2026Oct 29, 2021
Use-case fit
Coding agentsGitHub automationRAG and knowledge
Coding agentsGitHub automationRAG and knowledge
Coding agentsGitHub automationRAG and knowledge
Coding agentsGitHub automationRAG and knowledge
Stack fit
Coding review agentContent growth agent
Coding review agentContent growth agent
Coding review agentContent growth agent
Coding review agentContent growth agent
Platform hintsEmacs Lisp, Code Review, Claude CodeGo, Code Review, Claude CodeRuby, Code Review, Claude CodeEmacs Lisp, Code Review, Claude Code
WarningsRepository looks stale · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yetNo OpenAgentSkill engagement data yetNo OpenAgentSkill engagement data yetRepository looks stale · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Best forCoding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projectsCoding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · teams that value GitHub adoption signalsCoding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · teams that value GitHub adoption signalsCoding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Not ideal forteams that require actively maintained dependencies · production agents without a repository reviewteams that need a vendor-supported SLA · high-compliance environments without internal security reviewteams that need a vendor-supported SLA · high-compliance environments without internal security reviewteams that require actively maintained dependencies · production agents without a repository review
OpenAgentSkill engagement0 views
0 install copies
0 views
0 install copies
0 views
0 install copies
0 views
0 install copies
Install
$ npx skills add wandersoncferreira/code-review
$ npx skills add reviewdog/reviewdog
$ npx skills add danger/danger
$ npx skills add charignon/github-review