Skill comparison
Compare agent skills before installing.
Comparing 3 skills
Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.
Decision summary
Implement is the strongest overall pick here because it has a 100/100 readiness score and fits Coding agents.
Strongest overall
Implement
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Fastest prototype
Implement
Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.
Freshest repo
code-review
Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.
| Signal | code-review Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes. | Implement Implement work from an approved spec or ticket set, run focused and full tests, invoke code review, and commit the result to the current branch. | Code Review Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 55/100 Promising | 100/100 Excellent | 100/100 Excellent |
| Decision verdict | 54/100 Needs manual review Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow. | 100/100 Production-ready Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack. | 100/100 Production-ready Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack. |
| Adoption | 13 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page | 176K stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page | 169K stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page |
| Freshness | Aug 17, 2026 | Jul 17, 2026 | Jul 13, 2026 |
| Use-case fit | |||
| Workflow fit | |||
| Platform hints | Claude Code | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenAI Agents | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenAI Agents |
| Warnings | Low GitHub adoption signal · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet | Modifies repository files, executes project commands, and creates a Git commit on the current branch. · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet | No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet |
| Best for | Coding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects | Coding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · teams that value GitHub adoption signals | Coding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · teams that value GitHub adoption signals |
| Not ideal for | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · high-compliance environments without internal security review |
| OpenAgentSkill engagement | 0 views 0 install copies | 0 views 0 install copies | 0 views 0 install copies |
| Install | $ npx skills add rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering --skill code-review | $ npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill implement | $ npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review |