Skill comparison
Compare agent skills before installing.
Comparing 1 skill
Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.
Decision summary
code-review is the strongest overall pick here because it has a 57/100 readiness score and fits Research agents.
Strongest overall
code-review
Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.
Fastest prototype
code-review
Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.
Freshest repo
code-review
Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.
| Signal | code-review Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes. |
|---|---|
| Quality | 58/100 Promising |
| Decision verdict | 57/100 Needs manual review Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow. |
| Adoption | 13 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page |
| Freshness | Aug 17, 2026 |
| Use-case fit | |
| Workflow fit | |
| Platform hints | Claude Code |
| Warnings | Low GitHub adoption signal · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet |
| Best for | Research agents workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects |
| Not ideal for | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review |
| OpenAgentSkill engagement | 0 views 0 install copies |
| Install | $ npx skills add rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering --skill code-review |