Skill comparison

Compare agent skills before installing.

Put high-signal skills side by side and inspect quality, adoption, freshness, install readiness, use-case fit, and warnings in one place.

Comparing 1 skill

Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.

Add more skills

Decision summary

code-review is the strongest overall pick here because it has a 57/100 readiness score and fits Research agents.

Strongest overall

code-review

Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.

Fastest prototype

code-review

Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.

Freshest repo

code-review

Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.

Signalcode-review

Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes.

Quality
58/100
Promising
Decision verdict
57/100
Needs manual review

Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.

Adoption13 stars
Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page
FreshnessAug 17, 2026
Use-case fit
Workflow fit
Platform hintsClaude Code
WarningsLow GitHub adoption signal · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Best forResearch agents workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Not ideal forteams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review
OpenAgentSkill engagement0 views
0 install copies
Install
$ npx skills add rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering --skill code-review