Skill comparison
Compare agent skills before installing.
Put high-signal skills side by side and inspect quality, adoption, freshness, install readiness, use-case fit, and warnings in one place.
Comparing 1 skill
Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.
Decision summary
gza-code-review-interactive is the strongest overall pick here because it has a 56/100 readiness score and fits GitHub automation.
Strongest overall
gza-code-review-interactive
Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.
Fastest prototype
gza-code-review-interactive
Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.
Freshest repo
gza-code-review-interactive
Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.
| Signal | gza-code-review-interactive Review changes on current branch and output a structured review. Optionally post to PR with --pr flag, or apply non-blocking follow-ups inline with --apply-followups. |
|---|---|
| Quality | 57/100 Promising |
| Decision verdict | 56/100 Needs manual review Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow. |
| Adoption | 11 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page |
| Freshness | Aug 21, 2026 |
| Use-case fit | |
| Workflow fit | |
| Platform hints | Claude Code |
| Warnings | Low GitHub adoption signal · The skill reads AGENTS.md, REVIEW.md, and project docs as context for the review subagent without explicitly stating that these files should be treated as untrusted data. A malicious repo could inject instructions into these files to influence the subagent's behavior (prompt injection). · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet |
| Best for | GitHub automation workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects |
| Not ideal for | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review |
| OpenAgentSkill engagement | 0 views 0 install copies |
| Install | $ npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-code-review-interactive |