Skill comparison

Compare agent skills before installing.

Put high-signal skills side by side and inspect quality, adoption, freshness, install readiness, use-case fit, and warnings in one place.

Comparing 1 skill

Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.

Add more skills

Decision summary

gh-pr-review is the strongest overall pick here because it has a 100/100 readiness score and fits GitHub automation.

Strongest overall

gh-pr-review

Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.

Fastest prototype

gh-pr-review

Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.

Freshest repo

gh-pr-review

Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.

Signalgh-pr-review

Automated Cherry Studio review for local branches, PRs, commits, files, architecture docs, and repository skills. Use for code or documentation reviews that need project-specific naming, main/renderer/shared placement and dependency rules, IpcApi and DataApi boundaries, lifecycle/service ownership, renderer hooks, React/UI conventions, and tests. Supports single-agent review with interactive fix selection or multi-agent reviewer-verifier review with risk-based auto-fix. To diagnose gaps in the skill after a review session, run `/gh-pr-review diag`.

Quality
93/100
Excellent
Decision verdict
100/100
Production-ready

Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.

Adoption51K stars
Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page
FreshnessAug 20, 2026
Use-case fit
Workflow fit
Platform hintsClaude Code
WarningsNo OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Best forGitHub automation workflows · Claude Code teams · teams that value GitHub adoption signals
Not ideal forteams that need a vendor-supported SLA · high-compliance environments without internal security review
OpenAgentSkill engagement0 views
0 install copies
Install
$ npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-pr-review