Skill comparison
Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.
Decision summary
Strongest overall
old-coder
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Fastest prototype
old-coder
Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.
Freshest repo
old-coder
Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.
| Signal | old-coder Evidence-first development — surround the implementation with an executable spec and a gauntlet of constraints (tests, types, coverage, mutation) so line-by-line review becomes optional. Use when the user explicitly asks for high-assurance or evidence-first work ("reliable", "TDD", "prove it works", "I won't read the code"), or when the change touches high-stakes domains (money, auth, data loss, concurrency, public API). For routine changes where the user just wants normal tests, write good tests directly instead of invoking this loop. |
|---|---|
| Quality | 75/100 Strong |
| Decision verdict | 86/100 Production-ready Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack. |
| Adoption | 710 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page |
| Freshness | Aug 18, 2026 |
| Use-case fit | |
| Workflow fit | |
| Platform hints | Claude Code |
| Warnings | No critical security risks identified. The skill handles dependency/install approval carefully and explicitly records when autonomous mode skips human spec approval. · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet |
Skill comparison
Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.
Decision summary
Strongest overall
old-coder
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Fastest prototype
old-coder
Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.
Freshest repo
old-coder
Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.
| Signal | old-coder Evidence-first development — surround the implementation with an executable spec and a gauntlet of constraints (tests, types, coverage, mutation) so line-by-line review becomes optional. Use when the user explicitly asks for high-assurance or evidence-first work ("reliable", "TDD", "prove it works", "I won't read the code"), or when the change touches high-stakes domains (money, auth, data loss, concurrency, public API). For routine changes where the user just wants normal tests, write good tests directly instead of invoking this loop. |
|---|---|
| Quality | 75/100 Strong |
| Decision verdict | 86/100 Production-ready Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack. |
| Adoption | 710 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page |
| Freshness | Aug 18, 2026 |
| Use-case fit | |
| Workflow fit | |
| Platform hints | Claude Code |
| Warnings | No critical security risks identified. The skill handles dependency/install approval carefully and explicitly records when autonomous mode skips human spec approval. · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet |
| Best for | Coding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · teams that value GitHub adoption signals |
| Not ideal for | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review |
| OpenAgentSkill engagement | 0 views 0 install copies |
| Install | $ npx skills add AmazingAng/old-coder --skill old-coder |
| Best for | Coding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · teams that value GitHub adoption signals |
| Not ideal for | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review |
| OpenAgentSkill engagement | 0 views 0 install copies |
| Install | $ npx skills add AmazingAng/old-coder --skill old-coder |