Skill comparison
Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.
Decision summary
Strongest overall
writing-relayflows
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Fastest prototype
writing-relayflows
Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.
Freshest repo
ai-jailbreak
Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.
| Signal | writing-relayflows Use when authoring a Relayflows flow (@relayflows/surface / @relayflows/sdk, the journal-based v2 engine — the CLI is `flows`, package versions 2.0.x) in TypeScript or YAML/JSON. Covers the three-rung ladder (run/llm/agent), the resident verbs (human/dispatch/done), verification gates, TypeScript vs YAML authoring, per-step cli/model selection and its resolution order, flows.json, and `flows check`/`run`/`resume` with their real refusal shapes and exit codes. Not for the older, unrelated `@relayflows/core` WorkflowBuilder engine (`.pattern('dag')`/.agent()/.step() chains) that `writing-agent-relay-workflows` and `migrating-persona-to-relayflow` cover — that's a different product despite the similar name. | ai-jailbreak Bypass an LLM's safety/guardrails to make it produce restricted output or ignore its policy. Load when testing an AI product's content controls, "jailbreak", "guardrail bypass", refusal testing, or safety evals. Signals: a chatbot/assistant with a usage policy, refusals to test, content filters. | ai-llm-dos Unbounded-consumption / denial-of-wallet attacks on LLM apps — force runaway tokens, cost, or latency. Load when testing an LLM product's limits/billing, on "LLM DoS", cost amplification, or resource exhaustion. Signals: user-controlled prompts/max_tokens, agent loops, no rate/'cost caps'. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 71/100 Strong | 54/100 Needs review | 54/100 Needs review |
| Decision verdict | 82/100 Strong shortlist Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption. | 53/100 Needs manual review Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow. | 53/100 Needs manual review Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow. |
| Adoption | 855 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page | 20 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page | 20 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page |
| Freshness | Sep 28, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 |
| Use-case fit |
| Workflow fit |
| Platform hints | Claude Code | Claude Code | Claude Code |
| Warnings | No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet | Low GitHub adoption signal · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet | Low GitHub adoption signal · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet |
| Best for | Design and creative workflows · Claude Code teams · teams that value GitHub adoption signals | Testing and QA workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects | Coding agents workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects |
| Not ideal for | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · high-compliance environments without internal security review | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review |
| OpenAgentSkill engagement | 0 views 0 install copies | 0 views 0 install copies | 0 views 0 install copies |
| Install | $ npx skills add AgentWorkforce/relay --skill writing-relayflows | $ npx skills add NoorQureshi/SploitAgent --skill ai-jailbreak | $ npx skills add NoorQureshi/SploitAgent --skill ai-llm-dos |