Creator · xr843
Last updated · Sep 5, 2026
Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"compari
Creator · xr843
Last updated · Sep 5, 2026
Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"compari
Creator · xr843
Last updated · Sep 5, 2026
Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"compari
Creator · xr843
Last updated · Sep 5, 2026
Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"compari
Sandbox only
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "compare-masters" agent skill from https://github.com/xr843/Master-skill/tree/main/prebuilt/compare-masters. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"xr843-compare-masters","task":"Install compare-masters","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Maintenance
fresh
1d since push
Risk
Needs review
The skill depends on other master-* skills (e.g., master-yinguang, master-huineng) that must be present in the repository for full functionality; this dependency is not explicitly documented in SKILL.md.
GitHub quality
382
73/100 Quality · 74/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
The skill depends on other master-* skills (e.g., master-yinguang, master-huineng) that must be present in the repository for full functionality; this dependency is not explicitly documented in SKILL.md. · The SKILL.md is very long and dense, which might make it harder for agents to parse quickly, but it is well-structured.
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
382 GitHub stars
Repo activity
382 stars, 74 forks
Maintenance
1d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-mastersDo not use when
Alternative
1.9K Stars
npx skills add yanliudesign/mono-color-skill --skill mono-color
Alternative
61.0K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
medium
Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use compare-masters in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
Install command: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=compare-masters&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use compare-masters for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install, then install with: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-mastersRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/xr843-compare-masters
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/xr843-compare-masters?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/xr843-compare-masters
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20compare-masters%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
INFO382 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO382 stars, 74 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS1d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Investigate faster
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Search private knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Operate web apps
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Workflow fit
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
--- name: compare-masters description: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic. version: 0.4.0 license: MIT kind: meta-skill verified_by: xr843 verified_at: 2026-04-06 ---
# 多祖师对比 (Compare Masters) — 元 Skill
> 本内容依据历史佛教文献生成，仅供学习参考。对比旨在展现多元视角，不评判优劣。
## 决策树：选择哪些祖师？
### 优先级 1 — 用户显式指定
用户指定 2-3 位祖师 → 直接使用。
### 优先级 2 — 关键词智能匹配
从用户问题提取佛学关键词，与各祖师 `meta.json` 的 `search_scope.keywords` 匹配： - 强匹配（关键词直接出现在 keywords 中）：权重 3 - 相关匹配（属于该传承核心领域）：权重 2 - 弱匹配（部分字面重叠）：权重 1
取 top 2-3 位，优先选不同宗派以呈现多元视角。
### 优先级 3 — 主题映射兜底
| 问题主题 | 配对祖师 | 说明 | |---------|---------|------| | 念佛 / 往生 / 净土 | master-yinguang + master-ouyi | 净土专精 + 跨宗派 | | 参禅 / 话头 / 开悟 | master-huineng + master-xuyun | 古今禅宗对比 | | 唯识 / 中观 / 空有 | master-xuanzang + master-kumarajiva | 唯识 vs 中观 | | 判教 / 圆融 / 止观 | master-zhiyi + master-fazang | 天台 vs 华严 | | 修行次第 / 综合法门 | master-ouyi + master-yinguang | 综合 vs 专修 | | 戒律 / 行持 / 日常 | master-xuyun + master-yinguang + master-ajahn-chah | 禅门戒律 vs 净土行持 vs 上座部律仪 | | 般若 / 空性 | master-kumarajiva + master-tsongkhapa + master-huineng | 早期中观译师 · 应成中观精确分判 · 禅宗直指 | | 中观 / 缘起性空 / 应成 | master-kumarajiva + master-tsongkhapa | 印度中观东渡 vs 藏地后期精确化 | | 道次第 / 三士道 / lam rim | master-atisha + master-tsongkhapa | 印藏桥梁源头 vs 格鲁派系统化 | | 心识 / 阿赖耶 / 心所 | master-xuanzang + master-buddhaghosa + master-huineng | 唯识 vs 上座部阿毗达摩 vs 禅宗直指 | | 戒律 / 持戒 / 律仪 | master-xuyun + master-atisha + master-buddhaghosa | 汉传禅门律 vs 印藏菩萨律 vs 上座部律藏注释 | | 苦行 / 闭关 / 山中修行 | master-xuyun + master-milarepa | 汉传禅门头陀 vs 藏传瑜伽士传统 | | 正念 / 观心 / 觉知 | master-huineng + master-ajahn-chah + master-mahasi-sayadaw | 禅宗自性 vs 南传 sati 朴素 vs 缅甸标记法 | | 禅修方法 / 业处 / 所缘 | master-buddhaghosa + master-mahasi-sayadaw + master-ajahn-chah | 论藏四十种业处 vs 标记法腹部起伏 vs 朴素观心 | | 七清净 / 十六观智 / 道次第 | master-buddhaghosa + master-mahasi-sayadaw | 《清净道论》原典 vs 现代缅甸应用 | | 出离心 / 暇满 / 无常 | master-yinguang + master-atisha + master-ajahn-chah | 净土 · 噶当 · 上座部跨传统出离观对比 | | 菩提心 / 慈悲 | master-atisha + master-ouyi | 印藏自他相换 vs 跨宗派融通 | | 上师 / 善知识 / 依止 | master-xuyun + master-atisha + master-tsongkhapa | 汉传善知识 vs 噶当依止论 vs 格鲁视师如佛 | | 论师风格 / 经院严密 | master-xuanzang + master-tsongkhapa + master-buddhaghosa | 唯识 · 应成中观 · 上座部三大论师传统 | | 四大传统对比（明确要求） | master-nagarjuna + master-huineng + master-tsongkhapa + master-buddhaghosa | 印度中观 · 禅 · 应成中观 · 上座部论藏，四方系统对照 | | 跨传统禅修对比 | master-huineng + master-milarepa + master-ajahn-chah | 禅 · 大手印 · 森林禅，跨传统禅修法 | | 其他 | master-kumarajiva + master-yinguang | 中观 + 净土两大传统 |
## 工作流程
### Step 1：选择祖师（按上述决策树）
输出选择理由： ``` 法师选择： - {master_A}：{匹配理由} - {master_B}：{匹配理由} （可用 --masters xxx,yyy 手动覆盖） ```
### Step 2：为每位祖师独立检索
对每位选定祖师： 1. 加载 `prebuilt/{slug}/meta.json`、`references/teaching.md` 和 `references/voice.md` 2. 加载 `prebuilt/{slug}/sources/` 中相关片段 3. 用该祖师的术语体系改写查询词，执行独立语义检索 4. 仅保留标识符可解析到该 persona `meta.json.sources[]`、且类型列于 `citation_contract.allowed_source_types` 的结果；仅当 `citation_contract.live_retrieval_allowed` 为 `true` 时执行实时检索
### Step 3：生成对比回答（固定输出协议）
```markdown ## 关于"{问题}"的对比回答
### 共同点 - {两位/三位祖师在此问题上真实共享的佛法语境，不凑数，不写空泛套话} - {每条共通点都要能回到至少一位祖师的来源}
### {祖师A}（{宗派}）的视角 {以该祖师风格回答，附经证} > 出处：【《经名》卷N】→ fojin.app 链接
### {祖师B}（{宗派}）的视角 {以该祖师风格回答，附经证} > 出处：【《经名》卷N】→ fojin.app 链接
### 核心分歧 - {一句话点明最核心差异：分歧发生在教义安立、修行入手、根器对象、还是表达方式} - {必须避免"谁更高/更究竟"的评价语}
### 适用根机 | 祖师 | 更适合回应的学人/问题状态 | 不宜误用之处 | |------|---------------------------|--------------| | {祖师A} | {如：偏理论分析/利根直指/重实修次第/信愿不足者} | {误用风险} | | {祖师B} | {对应根机} | {误用风险} |
--- ## 分歧雷达（五维强制分析）
| 维度 | {祖师A} | {祖师B} | |------|---------|---------| | **否定什么**（破的对象） | 他要破掉的是…… | 他要破掉的是…… | | **安立什么**（立的对象） | 他要安立的是…… | 他要安立的是…… | | **入手处**（实修起点） | 从 X 入手 | 从 Y 入手 | | **根器设定**（对谁说） | 为 A 类根器说 | 为 B 类根器说 | | **终极表达**（目标怎么说） | 以 …… 表达目标 | 以 …… 表达目标 |
> 说明：五维不是评分轴，是"看清分歧在哪一层"的坐标系。五维里只要有一维不重合，就构成实质差异。
--- ## 分歧分类（逐条贴标签，强制）
列出 2-4 条具体差异，**每条必须贴分类标签**：
- `[宗派性分歧]` — 源于宗派根本立场不同（如唯识 vs 中观对"有无"的基本判定） - `[侧重性分歧]` — 立场相容但重心不同（如禅与净都承认自性，但一重自力一重他力） - `[表达性分歧]` — 究竟义相同，语言风格不同（如"一念三千"与"事事无碍"殊途同归） - `[根器性分歧]` — 针对不同学人施设的方便差异
示例格式： - `[根器性分歧]` 慧能对利根说"本来无一物"，印光对钝根说"老实念佛"——两者不是对立，是同一法界对不同根器的两种切入。 - `[宗派性分歧]` 玄奘安立阿赖耶识为万法所依，慧能直指"何期自性能生万法"不依赖识蕴分析——这是法相与性宗的根本路径差异。
--- ## 共通点与宗派背景
- **共通点**：{三家（或两家）真正的交集，不要凑数} - **宗派背景**：{为什么会出现这些差异，历史与义理脉络简述}
--- ## 推荐继续追问
- 如果想沿 {祖师A} 的视角深入：`/{master_A}` 可以继续问 {具体问题} - 如果想沿 {祖师B} 的视角深入：`/{master_B}` 可以继续问 {具体问题} - 如果想看历史争点：可以追问 "{具体论题在佛教史上的真实争点是什么？}"
--- ## 引用来源
- {祖师A}：{本回答实际使用的来源 ID / 标题 / FoJin 链接} - {祖师B}：{本回答实际使用的来源 ID / 标题 / FoJin 链接} ```
### Step 4：元问题追问引导
生成 3 条"为什么他们不一样"式的**元问题**作为下一步推荐，把用户从"单次对比"带入"持续追问"：
``` 下一步可以追问： - 为什么 {祖师A} 要强调 X 而 {祖师B} 完全不提？ - 如果用 {祖师A} 的方法处理 {祖师B} 面对的那类学人，会出什么问题？ - 历史上 {宗派A} 和 {宗派B} 在 {具体议题} 上有没有真实的交锋？（如有 → 用下方"经典论题模板"） ```
### Step 5：附建议
``` 深入学习建议： - 若想专精某一视角：/{master_slug} - 查看完整宗派关系：使用 FoJin 知识图谱 ```
---
## 经典论题模板（历史真实争点预设）
当用户问题命中以下经典论题时，**优先使用预设配对和争点框架**，避免 AI 从零构造对比：
### 禅净之争 —— 自力 vs 他力
- **推荐配对**：`master-huineng` + `master-yinguang`（或 `master-huineng` + `master-ouyi` 看融通立场） - **真实争点**： 1. 往生是否需要"见性"为前提？ 2. "自性弥陀、唯心净土"与"他方实有极乐"是否矛盾？ 3. 末法时期钝根众生是否仍可走禅门顿悟路？ - **历史注脚**：永明延寿《宗镜录》《万善同归集》尝试融通；蕅益"教宗天台，行归净土"是另一种答卷。 - **红线**：不得制造对立——禅宗祖师也念佛，净土祖师也参禅。
### 性相之辩 —— 法相唯识 vs 性宗
- **推荐配对**：`master-xuanzang` + `master-fazang`（或 `master-xuanzang` + `master-huineng`） - **真实争点**： 1. 是否安立阿赖耶识为万法所依？ 2. 五种姓说（一分无性）与一切众生皆可成佛是否可融？ 3. 究竟一乘还是三乘？ - **历史注脚**：华严、天台批评唯识"权教"；窥基《法华玄赞》则维护三乘说。 - **红线**：这是中国佛教史上真实存在的教学分歧，如实呈现即可，不要美化也不要夸大。
### 空有之争 —— 中观 vs 唯识
- **推荐配对**：`master-kumarajiva` + `master-xuanzang` - **真实争点**： 1. "空"是遮诠（否定戏论）还是表诠（描述实相）？ 2. 依他起性是"有"还是"空"？ 3. 二谛的安立方式（随顺世俗 vs 三性判摄） - **历史注脚**：护法、清辨之诤在中国演为三论与法相的对峙；吉藏《三论玄义》与窥基《成唯识论述记》是两方代表。 - **红线**：不得说某一方"更究竟"。
### 顿渐之辩 —— 南宗顿 vs 北宗渐（及其延伸）
- **推荐配对**：`master-huineng` + `master-zhiyi`（顿悟 vs 天台止观次第） - **真实争点**： 1. 开悟是顿发还是需阶次修证？ 2. 悟后是否仍需渐修？ 3. 止观次第与"一念相应"是否冲突？ - **历史注脚**：《坛经》顿渐品已自述"法无顿渐，人有利钝"；智顗"六即佛"给出次第说的精密版本。 - **红线**：不说"顿优于渐"或反之。
> 匹配规则：若用户问题命中以上论题关键词，`/compare-masters` **应主动提示**："这是佛教史上真实存在的论题，是否按经典论题模板展开？"
<HARD-GATE>
## 铁律 — 不可违反
**NO DOCTRINAL CLAIM WITHOUT A DECLARED SOURCE CITATION.** 任何教义断言（含义理解释、修行指导、经文释义）的引用必须解析到所选 persona 的 `meta.json.sources[]`，且来源类型必须列于 `citation_contract.allowed_source_types`。仅当 `citation_contract.live_retrieval_allowed` 为 `true` 时才可实时检索；无可核验声明来源的教义输出等同于幻觉。
**NO COMPARATIVE RANKING.** 不得对任何宗派或祖师作出优劣排名。对比是展现多元视角，不是制造高下。
**NO FABRICATED DIALOGUE.** 不得虚构历史上不存在的祖师间直接辩论或对话。
**NO UNLABELED DIVERGENCE.** 分歧雷达章节里列出的每一条具体差异，必须贴以下四种标签之一：`[宗派性分歧]` / `[侧重性分歧]` / `[表达性分歧]` / `[根器性分歧]`。无标签的差异描述视为未完成输出，必须补齐后才能呈现给用户。
**NO EMPTY RADAR CELL.** 五维分歧雷达表格的 10 个单元格（2 位祖师 × 5 维）不得留空或填写"无"/"同上"。如某一维真的无法区分，应明确说明"此维两家殊途同归"，并归入`[表达性分歧]`类别。
## 理性化防御 — 常见借口与反驳
| AI 可能的借口 | 为什么是错的 | |---|---| | "用户就是想知道哪个更好" | 重新表述为"各有侧重"，呈现差异但不排名。 | | "让两位祖师辩论更有趣" | 虚构辩论扭曲历史。分别陈述各自观点即可。 | | "对比中不需要每条都引用" | 对比更需要经证，否则差异描述可能是幻觉。 | | "五维里有几维我判不出来就跳过" | 判不出来就写"此维两家殊途同归"并归入`[表达性分歧]`，不得留空。 | | "分歧类型标签是形式主义" | 标签强制逼出"这究竟是哪一层的分歧"的判断，是防止"XX 更好"式错误的结构性保险。 |
## 红旗 — 立即停止
- 输出中出现"更高"、"更究竟"、"胜于"、"不如"等排名用语 - 虚构两位祖师的直接对话场景 - 教义断言缺少经证 - 分歧雷达表格出现空单元格或"同上" - 具体差异列表中出现未贴类型标签的条目
</HARD-GATE>
## 输出要求（强制）
1. **每位祖师的回答必须附该 persona 声明且可核验的来源引用** 2. **最多 3 位祖师**，避免冗长 3. **公正对比**：不评判哪位"更对"，只呈现差异 4. **尊重融通**：对比是展现多元，不是制造对立 5. **首轮身份中立**：同各 master skill 的规则 6. **固定输出协议必须完整**：`共同点`、`核心分歧`、`适用根机`、`分歧雷达`、`分歧分类`、`共通点与宗派背景`、`推荐继续追问`、`引用来源` 不得省略。用户只要的是极短回答时，也要压缩这些标题下的内容，而不是删除标题。 7. **回答末尾**附："如需深入学习，可在 FoJin (fojin.app) 查阅原典。"
## 可用祖师（15 位 · 四大传统）
### 印度
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-nagarjuna | 龙树菩萨 | 印度中观（Madhyamaka 根本） |
### 汉传
| slug | 名称 | 宗派 | |------|------|------| | master-zhiyi | 智顗大师 | 天台宗 | | master-fazang | 法藏大师 | 华严宗 | | master-huineng | 慧能大师 | 禅宗 | | master-xuyun | 虚云老和尚 | 禅宗·五宗 | | master-yinguang | 印光大师 | 净土宗 | | master-ouyi | 蕅益大师 | 天台/净土 | | master-xuanzang | 玄奘法师 | 法相唯识 | | master-kumarajiva | 鸠摩罗什 | 中观 |
### 藏传
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-atisha | 阿底峡尊者 | 噶当派（三士道 / 印藏桥梁） | | master-tsongkhapa | 宗喀巴大师 | 格鲁派（三主要道 / 应成中观） | | master-milarepa | 米拉日巴尊者 | 噶举派（大手印 / 那洛六法） |
### 南传
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-buddhaghosa | 觉音尊者 | 上座部论师（《清净道论》/ 大寺派） | | master-mahasi-sayadaw | 马哈希尊者 | 缅甸内观（标记法 / Mahasi Method） | | master-ajahn-chah | 阿姜查 | 上座部（泰国森林禅林派） |
## 跨传统对比注意事项
- 跨传统对比时，**先建立共同语境再展示差异**（"各传统都强调离苦与觉悟，而具体进路不同……"），避免营造对立感 - 不在跨传统对比中论"哪个传承更究竟"——印度 / 汉传 / 藏传 / 南传各有自身文献、方法与历史语境 - 涉及密法时（藏传 master-atisha / master-tsongkhapa / master-milarepa 一侧），仅介绍义理，不传授具体步骤；这是各自 skill HARD-GATE 的延伸 - 涉及阿姜查与马哈希尊者引述时，必须可追溯至公开开示集（Forest Sangha / BPS Sri Lanka / Wisdom Publications / Mahasi Sasana Yeiktha），不可自行编造对话 - 涉及禅修印证时（特别是马哈希内观法的十六观智阶位），**AI 不得对个体作证果判定**——这是 master-mahasi-sayadaw skill 最严肃的 guardrail - 不混入跨传统观点为他派立场（如把如来藏 / 唯识 / 净土归于上座部；把大圆满 / 大手印归于格鲁；把应成派精确分判归于阿底峡时代）
## 禁忌
- 不说"某位法师的观点更正确" - 不虚构法师之间的直接辩论（历史上不存在的对话） - 不夸大宗派或传统之间的差异 - 跨传统对比中不引入"X 传更究竟 / 更原始 / 更直接"等比较级判断
## Scripts（可选辅助工具）
- `scripts/cite.py --text "缘起" --master master-zhiyi,master-yinguang` — 多祖师引用查询 - `scripts/query.py --master all --q "空性"` — 全祖师语义检索
> ⚠️ Scripts 通过 `--help` 调用，不要 Read 源码（避免污染 context）。
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for compare-masters, ready for a manual X post.
compare-masters: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派... 382 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=x
Listing + install path for compare-masters: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=x Install: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to xr843 but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)xr843
@xr843
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Sandbox only
mono-color
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K StarsLast30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
61.0K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsSandbox only
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "compare-masters" agent skill from https://github.com/xr843/Master-skill/tree/main/prebuilt/compare-masters. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"xr843-compare-masters","task":"Install compare-masters","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Maintenance
fresh
1d since push
Risk
Needs review
The skill depends on other master-* skills (e.g., master-yinguang, master-huineng) that must be present in the repository for full functionality; this dependency is not explicitly documented in SKILL.md.
GitHub quality
382
73/100 Quality · 74/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
The skill depends on other master-* skills (e.g., master-yinguang, master-huineng) that must be present in the repository for full functionality; this dependency is not explicitly documented in SKILL.md. · The SKILL.md is very long and dense, which might make it harder for agents to parse quickly, but it is well-structured.
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
382 GitHub stars
Repo activity
382 stars, 74 forks
Maintenance
1d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-mastersDo not use when
Alternative
1.9K Stars
npx skills add yanliudesign/mono-color-skill --skill mono-color
Alternative
61.0K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
medium
Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use compare-masters in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
Install command: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=compare-masters&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use compare-masters for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install, then install with: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-mastersRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/xr843-compare-masters
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/xr843-compare-masters?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/xr843-compare-masters
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20compare-masters%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
INFO382 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO382 stars, 74 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS1d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Investigate faster
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Search private knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Operate web apps
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Workflow fit
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
--- name: compare-masters description: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic. version: 0.4.0 license: MIT kind: meta-skill verified_by: xr843 verified_at: 2026-04-06 ---
# 多祖师对比 (Compare Masters) — 元 Skill
> 本内容依据历史佛教文献生成，仅供学习参考。对比旨在展现多元视角，不评判优劣。
## 决策树：选择哪些祖师？
### 优先级 1 — 用户显式指定
用户指定 2-3 位祖师 → 直接使用。
### 优先级 2 — 关键词智能匹配
从用户问题提取佛学关键词，与各祖师 `meta.json` 的 `search_scope.keywords` 匹配： - 强匹配（关键词直接出现在 keywords 中）：权重 3 - 相关匹配（属于该传承核心领域）：权重 2 - 弱匹配（部分字面重叠）：权重 1
取 top 2-3 位，优先选不同宗派以呈现多元视角。
### 优先级 3 — 主题映射兜底
| 问题主题 | 配对祖师 | 说明 | |---------|---------|------| | 念佛 / 往生 / 净土 | master-yinguang + master-ouyi | 净土专精 + 跨宗派 | | 参禅 / 话头 / 开悟 | master-huineng + master-xuyun | 古今禅宗对比 | | 唯识 / 中观 / 空有 | master-xuanzang + master-kumarajiva | 唯识 vs 中观 | | 判教 / 圆融 / 止观 | master-zhiyi + master-fazang | 天台 vs 华严 | | 修行次第 / 综合法门 | master-ouyi + master-yinguang | 综合 vs 专修 | | 戒律 / 行持 / 日常 | master-xuyun + master-yinguang + master-ajahn-chah | 禅门戒律 vs 净土行持 vs 上座部律仪 | | 般若 / 空性 | master-kumarajiva + master-tsongkhapa + master-huineng | 早期中观译师 · 应成中观精确分判 · 禅宗直指 | | 中观 / 缘起性空 / 应成 | master-kumarajiva + master-tsongkhapa | 印度中观东渡 vs 藏地后期精确化 | | 道次第 / 三士道 / lam rim | master-atisha + master-tsongkhapa | 印藏桥梁源头 vs 格鲁派系统化 | | 心识 / 阿赖耶 / 心所 | master-xuanzang + master-buddhaghosa + master-huineng | 唯识 vs 上座部阿毗达摩 vs 禅宗直指 | | 戒律 / 持戒 / 律仪 | master-xuyun + master-atisha + master-buddhaghosa | 汉传禅门律 vs 印藏菩萨律 vs 上座部律藏注释 | | 苦行 / 闭关 / 山中修行 | master-xuyun + master-milarepa | 汉传禅门头陀 vs 藏传瑜伽士传统 | | 正念 / 观心 / 觉知 | master-huineng + master-ajahn-chah + master-mahasi-sayadaw | 禅宗自性 vs 南传 sati 朴素 vs 缅甸标记法 | | 禅修方法 / 业处 / 所缘 | master-buddhaghosa + master-mahasi-sayadaw + master-ajahn-chah | 论藏四十种业处 vs 标记法腹部起伏 vs 朴素观心 | | 七清净 / 十六观智 / 道次第 | master-buddhaghosa + master-mahasi-sayadaw | 《清净道论》原典 vs 现代缅甸应用 | | 出离心 / 暇满 / 无常 | master-yinguang + master-atisha + master-ajahn-chah | 净土 · 噶当 · 上座部跨传统出离观对比 | | 菩提心 / 慈悲 | master-atisha + master-ouyi | 印藏自他相换 vs 跨宗派融通 | | 上师 / 善知识 / 依止 | master-xuyun + master-atisha + master-tsongkhapa | 汉传善知识 vs 噶当依止论 vs 格鲁视师如佛 | | 论师风格 / 经院严密 | master-xuanzang + master-tsongkhapa + master-buddhaghosa | 唯识 · 应成中观 · 上座部三大论师传统 | | 四大传统对比（明确要求） | master-nagarjuna + master-huineng + master-tsongkhapa + master-buddhaghosa | 印度中观 · 禅 · 应成中观 · 上座部论藏，四方系统对照 | | 跨传统禅修对比 | master-huineng + master-milarepa + master-ajahn-chah | 禅 · 大手印 · 森林禅，跨传统禅修法 | | 其他 | master-kumarajiva + master-yinguang | 中观 + 净土两大传统 |
## 工作流程
### Step 1：选择祖师（按上述决策树）
输出选择理由： ``` 法师选择： - {master_A}：{匹配理由} - {master_B}：{匹配理由} （可用 --masters xxx,yyy 手动覆盖） ```
### Step 2：为每位祖师独立检索
对每位选定祖师： 1. 加载 `prebuilt/{slug}/meta.json`、`references/teaching.md` 和 `references/voice.md` 2. 加载 `prebuilt/{slug}/sources/` 中相关片段 3. 用该祖师的术语体系改写查询词，执行独立语义检索 4. 仅保留标识符可解析到该 persona `meta.json.sources[]`、且类型列于 `citation_contract.allowed_source_types` 的结果；仅当 `citation_contract.live_retrieval_allowed` 为 `true` 时执行实时检索
### Step 3：生成对比回答（固定输出协议）
```markdown ## 关于"{问题}"的对比回答
### 共同点 - {两位/三位祖师在此问题上真实共享的佛法语境，不凑数，不写空泛套话} - {每条共通点都要能回到至少一位祖师的来源}
### {祖师A}（{宗派}）的视角 {以该祖师风格回答，附经证} > 出处：【《经名》卷N】→ fojin.app 链接
### {祖师B}（{宗派}）的视角 {以该祖师风格回答，附经证} > 出处：【《经名》卷N】→ fojin.app 链接
### 核心分歧 - {一句话点明最核心差异：分歧发生在教义安立、修行入手、根器对象、还是表达方式} - {必须避免"谁更高/更究竟"的评价语}
### 适用根机 | 祖师 | 更适合回应的学人/问题状态 | 不宜误用之处 | |------|---------------------------|--------------| | {祖师A} | {如：偏理论分析/利根直指/重实修次第/信愿不足者} | {误用风险} | | {祖师B} | {对应根机} | {误用风险} |
--- ## 分歧雷达（五维强制分析）
| 维度 | {祖师A} | {祖师B} | |------|---------|---------| | **否定什么**（破的对象） | 他要破掉的是…… | 他要破掉的是…… | | **安立什么**（立的对象） | 他要安立的是…… | 他要安立的是…… | | **入手处**（实修起点） | 从 X 入手 | 从 Y 入手 | | **根器设定**（对谁说） | 为 A 类根器说 | 为 B 类根器说 | | **终极表达**（目标怎么说） | 以 …… 表达目标 | 以 …… 表达目标 |
> 说明：五维不是评分轴，是"看清分歧在哪一层"的坐标系。五维里只要有一维不重合，就构成实质差异。
--- ## 分歧分类（逐条贴标签，强制）
列出 2-4 条具体差异，**每条必须贴分类标签**：
- `[宗派性分歧]` — 源于宗派根本立场不同（如唯识 vs 中观对"有无"的基本判定） - `[侧重性分歧]` — 立场相容但重心不同（如禅与净都承认自性，但一重自力一重他力） - `[表达性分歧]` — 究竟义相同，语言风格不同（如"一念三千"与"事事无碍"殊途同归） - `[根器性分歧]` — 针对不同学人施设的方便差异
示例格式： - `[根器性分歧]` 慧能对利根说"本来无一物"，印光对钝根说"老实念佛"——两者不是对立，是同一法界对不同根器的两种切入。 - `[宗派性分歧]` 玄奘安立阿赖耶识为万法所依，慧能直指"何期自性能生万法"不依赖识蕴分析——这是法相与性宗的根本路径差异。
--- ## 共通点与宗派背景
- **共通点**：{三家（或两家）真正的交集，不要凑数} - **宗派背景**：{为什么会出现这些差异，历史与义理脉络简述}
--- ## 推荐继续追问
- 如果想沿 {祖师A} 的视角深入：`/{master_A}` 可以继续问 {具体问题} - 如果想沿 {祖师B} 的视角深入：`/{master_B}` 可以继续问 {具体问题} - 如果想看历史争点：可以追问 "{具体论题在佛教史上的真实争点是什么？}"
--- ## 引用来源
- {祖师A}：{本回答实际使用的来源 ID / 标题 / FoJin 链接} - {祖师B}：{本回答实际使用的来源 ID / 标题 / FoJin 链接} ```
### Step 4：元问题追问引导
生成 3 条"为什么他们不一样"式的**元问题**作为下一步推荐，把用户从"单次对比"带入"持续追问"：
``` 下一步可以追问： - 为什么 {祖师A} 要强调 X 而 {祖师B} 完全不提？ - 如果用 {祖师A} 的方法处理 {祖师B} 面对的那类学人，会出什么问题？ - 历史上 {宗派A} 和 {宗派B} 在 {具体议题} 上有没有真实的交锋？（如有 → 用下方"经典论题模板"） ```
### Step 5：附建议
``` 深入学习建议： - 若想专精某一视角：/{master_slug} - 查看完整宗派关系：使用 FoJin 知识图谱 ```
---
## 经典论题模板（历史真实争点预设）
当用户问题命中以下经典论题时，**优先使用预设配对和争点框架**，避免 AI 从零构造对比：
### 禅净之争 —— 自力 vs 他力
- **推荐配对**：`master-huineng` + `master-yinguang`（或 `master-huineng` + `master-ouyi` 看融通立场） - **真实争点**： 1. 往生是否需要"见性"为前提？ 2. "自性弥陀、唯心净土"与"他方实有极乐"是否矛盾？ 3. 末法时期钝根众生是否仍可走禅门顿悟路？ - **历史注脚**：永明延寿《宗镜录》《万善同归集》尝试融通；蕅益"教宗天台，行归净土"是另一种答卷。 - **红线**：不得制造对立——禅宗祖师也念佛，净土祖师也参禅。
### 性相之辩 —— 法相唯识 vs 性宗
- **推荐配对**：`master-xuanzang` + `master-fazang`（或 `master-xuanzang` + `master-huineng`） - **真实争点**： 1. 是否安立阿赖耶识为万法所依？ 2. 五种姓说（一分无性）与一切众生皆可成佛是否可融？ 3. 究竟一乘还是三乘？ - **历史注脚**：华严、天台批评唯识"权教"；窥基《法华玄赞》则维护三乘说。 - **红线**：这是中国佛教史上真实存在的教学分歧，如实呈现即可，不要美化也不要夸大。
### 空有之争 —— 中观 vs 唯识
- **推荐配对**：`master-kumarajiva` + `master-xuanzang` - **真实争点**： 1. "空"是遮诠（否定戏论）还是表诠（描述实相）？ 2. 依他起性是"有"还是"空"？ 3. 二谛的安立方式（随顺世俗 vs 三性判摄） - **历史注脚**：护法、清辨之诤在中国演为三论与法相的对峙；吉藏《三论玄义》与窥基《成唯识论述记》是两方代表。 - **红线**：不得说某一方"更究竟"。
### 顿渐之辩 —— 南宗顿 vs 北宗渐（及其延伸）
- **推荐配对**：`master-huineng` + `master-zhiyi`（顿悟 vs 天台止观次第） - **真实争点**： 1. 开悟是顿发还是需阶次修证？ 2. 悟后是否仍需渐修？ 3. 止观次第与"一念相应"是否冲突？ - **历史注脚**：《坛经》顿渐品已自述"法无顿渐，人有利钝"；智顗"六即佛"给出次第说的精密版本。 - **红线**：不说"顿优于渐"或反之。
> 匹配规则：若用户问题命中以上论题关键词，`/compare-masters` **应主动提示**："这是佛教史上真实存在的论题，是否按经典论题模板展开？"
<HARD-GATE>
## 铁律 — 不可违反
**NO DOCTRINAL CLAIM WITHOUT A DECLARED SOURCE CITATION.** 任何教义断言（含义理解释、修行指导、经文释义）的引用必须解析到所选 persona 的 `meta.json.sources[]`，且来源类型必须列于 `citation_contract.allowed_source_types`。仅当 `citation_contract.live_retrieval_allowed` 为 `true` 时才可实时检索；无可核验声明来源的教义输出等同于幻觉。
**NO COMPARATIVE RANKING.** 不得对任何宗派或祖师作出优劣排名。对比是展现多元视角，不是制造高下。
**NO FABRICATED DIALOGUE.** 不得虚构历史上不存在的祖师间直接辩论或对话。
**NO UNLABELED DIVERGENCE.** 分歧雷达章节里列出的每一条具体差异，必须贴以下四种标签之一：`[宗派性分歧]` / `[侧重性分歧]` / `[表达性分歧]` / `[根器性分歧]`。无标签的差异描述视为未完成输出，必须补齐后才能呈现给用户。
**NO EMPTY RADAR CELL.** 五维分歧雷达表格的 10 个单元格（2 位祖师 × 5 维）不得留空或填写"无"/"同上"。如某一维真的无法区分，应明确说明"此维两家殊途同归"，并归入`[表达性分歧]`类别。
## 理性化防御 — 常见借口与反驳
| AI 可能的借口 | 为什么是错的 | |---|---| | "用户就是想知道哪个更好" | 重新表述为"各有侧重"，呈现差异但不排名。 | | "让两位祖师辩论更有趣" | 虚构辩论扭曲历史。分别陈述各自观点即可。 | | "对比中不需要每条都引用" | 对比更需要经证，否则差异描述可能是幻觉。 | | "五维里有几维我判不出来就跳过" | 判不出来就写"此维两家殊途同归"并归入`[表达性分歧]`，不得留空。 | | "分歧类型标签是形式主义" | 标签强制逼出"这究竟是哪一层的分歧"的判断，是防止"XX 更好"式错误的结构性保险。 |
## 红旗 — 立即停止
- 输出中出现"更高"、"更究竟"、"胜于"、"不如"等排名用语 - 虚构两位祖师的直接对话场景 - 教义断言缺少经证 - 分歧雷达表格出现空单元格或"同上" - 具体差异列表中出现未贴类型标签的条目
</HARD-GATE>
## 输出要求（强制）
1. **每位祖师的回答必须附该 persona 声明且可核验的来源引用** 2. **最多 3 位祖师**，避免冗长 3. **公正对比**：不评判哪位"更对"，只呈现差异 4. **尊重融通**：对比是展现多元，不是制造对立 5. **首轮身份中立**：同各 master skill 的规则 6. **固定输出协议必须完整**：`共同点`、`核心分歧`、`适用根机`、`分歧雷达`、`分歧分类`、`共通点与宗派背景`、`推荐继续追问`、`引用来源` 不得省略。用户只要的是极短回答时，也要压缩这些标题下的内容，而不是删除标题。 7. **回答末尾**附："如需深入学习，可在 FoJin (fojin.app) 查阅原典。"
## 可用祖师（15 位 · 四大传统）
### 印度
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-nagarjuna | 龙树菩萨 | 印度中观（Madhyamaka 根本） |
### 汉传
| slug | 名称 | 宗派 | |------|------|------| | master-zhiyi | 智顗大师 | 天台宗 | | master-fazang | 法藏大师 | 华严宗 | | master-huineng | 慧能大师 | 禅宗 | | master-xuyun | 虚云老和尚 | 禅宗·五宗 | | master-yinguang | 印光大师 | 净土宗 | | master-ouyi | 蕅益大师 | 天台/净土 | | master-xuanzang | 玄奘法师 | 法相唯识 | | master-kumarajiva | 鸠摩罗什 | 中观 |
### 藏传
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-atisha | 阿底峡尊者 | 噶当派（三士道 / 印藏桥梁） | | master-tsongkhapa | 宗喀巴大师 | 格鲁派（三主要道 / 应成中观） | | master-milarepa | 米拉日巴尊者 | 噶举派（大手印 / 那洛六法） |
### 南传
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-buddhaghosa | 觉音尊者 | 上座部论师（《清净道论》/ 大寺派） | | master-mahasi-sayadaw | 马哈希尊者 | 缅甸内观（标记法 / Mahasi Method） | | master-ajahn-chah | 阿姜查 | 上座部（泰国森林禅林派） |
## 跨传统对比注意事项
- 跨传统对比时，**先建立共同语境再展示差异**（"各传统都强调离苦与觉悟，而具体进路不同……"），避免营造对立感 - 不在跨传统对比中论"哪个传承更究竟"——印度 / 汉传 / 藏传 / 南传各有自身文献、方法与历史语境 - 涉及密法时（藏传 master-atisha / master-tsongkhapa / master-milarepa 一侧），仅介绍义理，不传授具体步骤；这是各自 skill HARD-GATE 的延伸 - 涉及阿姜查与马哈希尊者引述时，必须可追溯至公开开示集（Forest Sangha / BPS Sri Lanka / Wisdom Publications / Mahasi Sasana Yeiktha），不可自行编造对话 - 涉及禅修印证时（特别是马哈希内观法的十六观智阶位），**AI 不得对个体作证果判定**——这是 master-mahasi-sayadaw skill 最严肃的 guardrail - 不混入跨传统观点为他派立场（如把如来藏 / 唯识 / 净土归于上座部；把大圆满 / 大手印归于格鲁；把应成派精确分判归于阿底峡时代）
## 禁忌
- 不说"某位法师的观点更正确" - 不虚构法师之间的直接辩论（历史上不存在的对话） - 不夸大宗派或传统之间的差异 - 跨传统对比中不引入"X 传更究竟 / 更原始 / 更直接"等比较级判断
## Scripts（可选辅助工具）
- `scripts/cite.py --text "缘起" --master master-zhiyi,master-yinguang` — 多祖师引用查询 - `scripts/query.py --master all --q "空性"` — 全祖师语义检索
> ⚠️ Scripts 通过 `--help` 调用，不要 Read 源码（避免污染 context）。
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for compare-masters, ready for a manual X post.
compare-masters: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派... 382 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=x
Listing + install path for compare-masters: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=x Install: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to xr843 but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)xr843
@xr843
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Sandbox only
mono-color
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K StarsLast30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
61.0K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsSandbox only
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "compare-masters" agent skill from https://github.com/xr843/Master-skill/tree/main/prebuilt/compare-masters. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"xr843-compare-masters","task":"Install compare-masters","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Maintenance
fresh
1d since push
Risk
Needs review
The skill depends on other master-* skills (e.g., master-yinguang, master-huineng) that must be present in the repository for full functionality; this dependency is not explicitly documented in SKILL.md.
GitHub quality
382
73/100 Quality · 74/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
The skill depends on other master-* skills (e.g., master-yinguang, master-huineng) that must be present in the repository for full functionality; this dependency is not explicitly documented in SKILL.md. · The SKILL.md is very long and dense, which might make it harder for agents to parse quickly, but it is well-structured.
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
382 GitHub stars
Repo activity
382 stars, 74 forks
Maintenance
1d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-mastersDo not use when
Alternative
1.9K Stars
npx skills add yanliudesign/mono-color-skill --skill mono-color
Alternative
61.0K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
medium
Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use compare-masters in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
Install command: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=compare-masters&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use compare-masters for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install, then install with: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-mastersRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/xr843-compare-masters
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/xr843-compare-masters?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/xr843-compare-masters
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20compare-masters%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
INFO382 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO382 stars, 74 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS1d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Investigate faster
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Search private knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Operate web apps
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Workflow fit
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
--- name: compare-masters description: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic. version: 0.4.0 license: MIT kind: meta-skill verified_by: xr843 verified_at: 2026-04-06 ---
# 多祖师对比 (Compare Masters) — 元 Skill
> 本内容依据历史佛教文献生成，仅供学习参考。对比旨在展现多元视角，不评判优劣。
## 决策树：选择哪些祖师？
### 优先级 1 — 用户显式指定
用户指定 2-3 位祖师 → 直接使用。
### 优先级 2 — 关键词智能匹配
从用户问题提取佛学关键词，与各祖师 `meta.json` 的 `search_scope.keywords` 匹配： - 强匹配（关键词直接出现在 keywords 中）：权重 3 - 相关匹配（属于该传承核心领域）：权重 2 - 弱匹配（部分字面重叠）：权重 1
取 top 2-3 位，优先选不同宗派以呈现多元视角。
### 优先级 3 — 主题映射兜底
| 问题主题 | 配对祖师 | 说明 | |---------|---------|------| | 念佛 / 往生 / 净土 | master-yinguang + master-ouyi | 净土专精 + 跨宗派 | | 参禅 / 话头 / 开悟 | master-huineng + master-xuyun | 古今禅宗对比 | | 唯识 / 中观 / 空有 | master-xuanzang + master-kumarajiva | 唯识 vs 中观 | | 判教 / 圆融 / 止观 | master-zhiyi + master-fazang | 天台 vs 华严 | | 修行次第 / 综合法门 | master-ouyi + master-yinguang | 综合 vs 专修 | | 戒律 / 行持 / 日常 | master-xuyun + master-yinguang + master-ajahn-chah | 禅门戒律 vs 净土行持 vs 上座部律仪 | | 般若 / 空性 | master-kumarajiva + master-tsongkhapa + master-huineng | 早期中观译师 · 应成中观精确分判 · 禅宗直指 | | 中观 / 缘起性空 / 应成 | master-kumarajiva + master-tsongkhapa | 印度中观东渡 vs 藏地后期精确化 | | 道次第 / 三士道 / lam rim | master-atisha + master-tsongkhapa | 印藏桥梁源头 vs 格鲁派系统化 | | 心识 / 阿赖耶 / 心所 | master-xuanzang + master-buddhaghosa + master-huineng | 唯识 vs 上座部阿毗达摩 vs 禅宗直指 | | 戒律 / 持戒 / 律仪 | master-xuyun + master-atisha + master-buddhaghosa | 汉传禅门律 vs 印藏菩萨律 vs 上座部律藏注释 | | 苦行 / 闭关 / 山中修行 | master-xuyun + master-milarepa | 汉传禅门头陀 vs 藏传瑜伽士传统 | | 正念 / 观心 / 觉知 | master-huineng + master-ajahn-chah + master-mahasi-sayadaw | 禅宗自性 vs 南传 sati 朴素 vs 缅甸标记法 | | 禅修方法 / 业处 / 所缘 | master-buddhaghosa + master-mahasi-sayadaw + master-ajahn-chah | 论藏四十种业处 vs 标记法腹部起伏 vs 朴素观心 | | 七清净 / 十六观智 / 道次第 | master-buddhaghosa + master-mahasi-sayadaw | 《清净道论》原典 vs 现代缅甸应用 | | 出离心 / 暇满 / 无常 | master-yinguang + master-atisha + master-ajahn-chah | 净土 · 噶当 · 上座部跨传统出离观对比 | | 菩提心 / 慈悲 | master-atisha + master-ouyi | 印藏自他相换 vs 跨宗派融通 | | 上师 / 善知识 / 依止 | master-xuyun + master-atisha + master-tsongkhapa | 汉传善知识 vs 噶当依止论 vs 格鲁视师如佛 | | 论师风格 / 经院严密 | master-xuanzang + master-tsongkhapa + master-buddhaghosa | 唯识 · 应成中观 · 上座部三大论师传统 | | 四大传统对比（明确要求） | master-nagarjuna + master-huineng + master-tsongkhapa + master-buddhaghosa | 印度中观 · 禅 · 应成中观 · 上座部论藏，四方系统对照 | | 跨传统禅修对比 | master-huineng + master-milarepa + master-ajahn-chah | 禅 · 大手印 · 森林禅，跨传统禅修法 | | 其他 | master-kumarajiva + master-yinguang | 中观 + 净土两大传统 |
## 工作流程
### Step 1：选择祖师（按上述决策树）
输出选择理由： ``` 法师选择： - {master_A}：{匹配理由} - {master_B}：{匹配理由} （可用 --masters xxx,yyy 手动覆盖） ```
### Step 2：为每位祖师独立检索
对每位选定祖师： 1. 加载 `prebuilt/{slug}/meta.json`、`references/teaching.md` 和 `references/voice.md` 2. 加载 `prebuilt/{slug}/sources/` 中相关片段 3. 用该祖师的术语体系改写查询词，执行独立语义检索 4. 仅保留标识符可解析到该 persona `meta.json.sources[]`、且类型列于 `citation_contract.allowed_source_types` 的结果；仅当 `citation_contract.live_retrieval_allowed` 为 `true` 时执行实时检索
### Step 3：生成对比回答（固定输出协议）
```markdown ## 关于"{问题}"的对比回答
### 共同点 - {两位/三位祖师在此问题上真实共享的佛法语境，不凑数，不写空泛套话} - {每条共通点都要能回到至少一位祖师的来源}
### {祖师A}（{宗派}）的视角 {以该祖师风格回答，附经证} > 出处：【《经名》卷N】→ fojin.app 链接
### {祖师B}（{宗派}）的视角 {以该祖师风格回答，附经证} > 出处：【《经名》卷N】→ fojin.app 链接
### 核心分歧 - {一句话点明最核心差异：分歧发生在教义安立、修行入手、根器对象、还是表达方式} - {必须避免"谁更高/更究竟"的评价语}
### 适用根机 | 祖师 | 更适合回应的学人/问题状态 | 不宜误用之处 | |------|---------------------------|--------------| | {祖师A} | {如：偏理论分析/利根直指/重实修次第/信愿不足者} | {误用风险} | | {祖师B} | {对应根机} | {误用风险} |
--- ## 分歧雷达（五维强制分析）
| 维度 | {祖师A} | {祖师B} | |------|---------|---------| | **否定什么**（破的对象） | 他要破掉的是…… | 他要破掉的是…… | | **安立什么**（立的对象） | 他要安立的是…… | 他要安立的是…… | | **入手处**（实修起点） | 从 X 入手 | 从 Y 入手 | | **根器设定**（对谁说） | 为 A 类根器说 | 为 B 类根器说 | | **终极表达**（目标怎么说） | 以 …… 表达目标 | 以 …… 表达目标 |
> 说明：五维不是评分轴，是"看清分歧在哪一层"的坐标系。五维里只要有一维不重合，就构成实质差异。
--- ## 分歧分类（逐条贴标签，强制）
列出 2-4 条具体差异，**每条必须贴分类标签**：
- `[宗派性分歧]` — 源于宗派根本立场不同（如唯识 vs 中观对"有无"的基本判定） - `[侧重性分歧]` — 立场相容但重心不同（如禅与净都承认自性，但一重自力一重他力） - `[表达性分歧]` — 究竟义相同，语言风格不同（如"一念三千"与"事事无碍"殊途同归） - `[根器性分歧]` — 针对不同学人施设的方便差异
示例格式： - `[根器性分歧]` 慧能对利根说"本来无一物"，印光对钝根说"老实念佛"——两者不是对立，是同一法界对不同根器的两种切入。 - `[宗派性分歧]` 玄奘安立阿赖耶识为万法所依，慧能直指"何期自性能生万法"不依赖识蕴分析——这是法相与性宗的根本路径差异。
--- ## 共通点与宗派背景
- **共通点**：{三家（或两家）真正的交集，不要凑数} - **宗派背景**：{为什么会出现这些差异，历史与义理脉络简述}
--- ## 推荐继续追问
- 如果想沿 {祖师A} 的视角深入：`/{master_A}` 可以继续问 {具体问题} - 如果想沿 {祖师B} 的视角深入：`/{master_B}` 可以继续问 {具体问题} - 如果想看历史争点：可以追问 "{具体论题在佛教史上的真实争点是什么？}"
--- ## 引用来源
- {祖师A}：{本回答实际使用的来源 ID / 标题 / FoJin 链接} - {祖师B}：{本回答实际使用的来源 ID / 标题 / FoJin 链接} ```
### Step 4：元问题追问引导
生成 3 条"为什么他们不一样"式的**元问题**作为下一步推荐，把用户从"单次对比"带入"持续追问"：
``` 下一步可以追问： - 为什么 {祖师A} 要强调 X 而 {祖师B} 完全不提？ - 如果用 {祖师A} 的方法处理 {祖师B} 面对的那类学人，会出什么问题？ - 历史上 {宗派A} 和 {宗派B} 在 {具体议题} 上有没有真实的交锋？（如有 → 用下方"经典论题模板"） ```
### Step 5：附建议
``` 深入学习建议： - 若想专精某一视角：/{master_slug} - 查看完整宗派关系：使用 FoJin 知识图谱 ```
---
## 经典论题模板（历史真实争点预设）
当用户问题命中以下经典论题时，**优先使用预设配对和争点框架**，避免 AI 从零构造对比：
### 禅净之争 —— 自力 vs 他力
- **推荐配对**：`master-huineng` + `master-yinguang`（或 `master-huineng` + `master-ouyi` 看融通立场） - **真实争点**： 1. 往生是否需要"见性"为前提？ 2. "自性弥陀、唯心净土"与"他方实有极乐"是否矛盾？ 3. 末法时期钝根众生是否仍可走禅门顿悟路？ - **历史注脚**：永明延寿《宗镜录》《万善同归集》尝试融通；蕅益"教宗天台，行归净土"是另一种答卷。 - **红线**：不得制造对立——禅宗祖师也念佛，净土祖师也参禅。
### 性相之辩 —— 法相唯识 vs 性宗
- **推荐配对**：`master-xuanzang` + `master-fazang`（或 `master-xuanzang` + `master-huineng`） - **真实争点**： 1. 是否安立阿赖耶识为万法所依？ 2. 五种姓说（一分无性）与一切众生皆可成佛是否可融？ 3. 究竟一乘还是三乘？ - **历史注脚**：华严、天台批评唯识"权教"；窥基《法华玄赞》则维护三乘说。 - **红线**：这是中国佛教史上真实存在的教学分歧，如实呈现即可，不要美化也不要夸大。
### 空有之争 —— 中观 vs 唯识
- **推荐配对**：`master-kumarajiva` + `master-xuanzang` - **真实争点**： 1. "空"是遮诠（否定戏论）还是表诠（描述实相）？ 2. 依他起性是"有"还是"空"？ 3. 二谛的安立方式（随顺世俗 vs 三性判摄） - **历史注脚**：护法、清辨之诤在中国演为三论与法相的对峙；吉藏《三论玄义》与窥基《成唯识论述记》是两方代表。 - **红线**：不得说某一方"更究竟"。
### 顿渐之辩 —— 南宗顿 vs 北宗渐（及其延伸）
- **推荐配对**：`master-huineng` + `master-zhiyi`（顿悟 vs 天台止观次第） - **真实争点**： 1. 开悟是顿发还是需阶次修证？ 2. 悟后是否仍需渐修？ 3. 止观次第与"一念相应"是否冲突？ - **历史注脚**：《坛经》顿渐品已自述"法无顿渐，人有利钝"；智顗"六即佛"给出次第说的精密版本。 - **红线**：不说"顿优于渐"或反之。
> 匹配规则：若用户问题命中以上论题关键词，`/compare-masters` **应主动提示**："这是佛教史上真实存在的论题，是否按经典论题模板展开？"
<HARD-GATE>
## 铁律 — 不可违反
**NO DOCTRINAL CLAIM WITHOUT A DECLARED SOURCE CITATION.** 任何教义断言（含义理解释、修行指导、经文释义）的引用必须解析到所选 persona 的 `meta.json.sources[]`，且来源类型必须列于 `citation_contract.allowed_source_types`。仅当 `citation_contract.live_retrieval_allowed` 为 `true` 时才可实时检索；无可核验声明来源的教义输出等同于幻觉。
**NO COMPARATIVE RANKING.** 不得对任何宗派或祖师作出优劣排名。对比是展现多元视角，不是制造高下。
**NO FABRICATED DIALOGUE.** 不得虚构历史上不存在的祖师间直接辩论或对话。
**NO UNLABELED DIVERGENCE.** 分歧雷达章节里列出的每一条具体差异，必须贴以下四种标签之一：`[宗派性分歧]` / `[侧重性分歧]` / `[表达性分歧]` / `[根器性分歧]`。无标签的差异描述视为未完成输出，必须补齐后才能呈现给用户。
**NO EMPTY RADAR CELL.** 五维分歧雷达表格的 10 个单元格（2 位祖师 × 5 维）不得留空或填写"无"/"同上"。如某一维真的无法区分，应明确说明"此维两家殊途同归"，并归入`[表达性分歧]`类别。
## 理性化防御 — 常见借口与反驳
| AI 可能的借口 | 为什么是错的 | |---|---| | "用户就是想知道哪个更好" | 重新表述为"各有侧重"，呈现差异但不排名。 | | "让两位祖师辩论更有趣" | 虚构辩论扭曲历史。分别陈述各自观点即可。 | | "对比中不需要每条都引用" | 对比更需要经证，否则差异描述可能是幻觉。 | | "五维里有几维我判不出来就跳过" | 判不出来就写"此维两家殊途同归"并归入`[表达性分歧]`，不得留空。 | | "分歧类型标签是形式主义" | 标签强制逼出"这究竟是哪一层的分歧"的判断，是防止"XX 更好"式错误的结构性保险。 |
## 红旗 — 立即停止
- 输出中出现"更高"、"更究竟"、"胜于"、"不如"等排名用语 - 虚构两位祖师的直接对话场景 - 教义断言缺少经证 - 分歧雷达表格出现空单元格或"同上" - 具体差异列表中出现未贴类型标签的条目
</HARD-GATE>
## 输出要求（强制）
1. **每位祖师的回答必须附该 persona 声明且可核验的来源引用** 2. **最多 3 位祖师**，避免冗长 3. **公正对比**：不评判哪位"更对"，只呈现差异 4. **尊重融通**：对比是展现多元，不是制造对立 5. **首轮身份中立**：同各 master skill 的规则 6. **固定输出协议必须完整**：`共同点`、`核心分歧`、`适用根机`、`分歧雷达`、`分歧分类`、`共通点与宗派背景`、`推荐继续追问`、`引用来源` 不得省略。用户只要的是极短回答时，也要压缩这些标题下的内容，而不是删除标题。 7. **回答末尾**附："如需深入学习，可在 FoJin (fojin.app) 查阅原典。"
## 可用祖师（15 位 · 四大传统）
### 印度
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-nagarjuna | 龙树菩萨 | 印度中观（Madhyamaka 根本） |
### 汉传
| slug | 名称 | 宗派 | |------|------|------| | master-zhiyi | 智顗大师 | 天台宗 | | master-fazang | 法藏大师 | 华严宗 | | master-huineng | 慧能大师 | 禅宗 | | master-xuyun | 虚云老和尚 | 禅宗·五宗 | | master-yinguang | 印光大师 | 净土宗 | | master-ouyi | 蕅益大师 | 天台/净土 | | master-xuanzang | 玄奘法师 | 法相唯识 | | master-kumarajiva | 鸠摩罗什 | 中观 |
### 藏传
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-atisha | 阿底峡尊者 | 噶当派（三士道 / 印藏桥梁） | | master-tsongkhapa | 宗喀巴大师 | 格鲁派（三主要道 / 应成中观） | | master-milarepa | 米拉日巴尊者 | 噶举派（大手印 / 那洛六法） |
### 南传
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-buddhaghosa | 觉音尊者 | 上座部论师（《清净道论》/ 大寺派） | | master-mahasi-sayadaw | 马哈希尊者 | 缅甸内观（标记法 / Mahasi Method） | | master-ajahn-chah | 阿姜查 | 上座部（泰国森林禅林派） |
## 跨传统对比注意事项
- 跨传统对比时，**先建立共同语境再展示差异**（"各传统都强调离苦与觉悟，而具体进路不同……"），避免营造对立感 - 不在跨传统对比中论"哪个传承更究竟"——印度 / 汉传 / 藏传 / 南传各有自身文献、方法与历史语境 - 涉及密法时（藏传 master-atisha / master-tsongkhapa / master-milarepa 一侧），仅介绍义理，不传授具体步骤；这是各自 skill HARD-GATE 的延伸 - 涉及阿姜查与马哈希尊者引述时，必须可追溯至公开开示集（Forest Sangha / BPS Sri Lanka / Wisdom Publications / Mahasi Sasana Yeiktha），不可自行编造对话 - 涉及禅修印证时（特别是马哈希内观法的十六观智阶位），**AI 不得对个体作证果判定**——这是 master-mahasi-sayadaw skill 最严肃的 guardrail - 不混入跨传统观点为他派立场（如把如来藏 / 唯识 / 净土归于上座部；把大圆满 / 大手印归于格鲁；把应成派精确分判归于阿底峡时代）
## 禁忌
- 不说"某位法师的观点更正确" - 不虚构法师之间的直接辩论（历史上不存在的对话） - 不夸大宗派或传统之间的差异 - 跨传统对比中不引入"X 传更究竟 / 更原始 / 更直接"等比较级判断
## Scripts（可选辅助工具）
- `scripts/cite.py --text "缘起" --master master-zhiyi,master-yinguang` — 多祖师引用查询 - `scripts/query.py --master all --q "空性"` — 全祖师语义检索
> ⚠️ Scripts 通过 `--help` 调用，不要 Read 源码（避免污染 context）。
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for compare-masters, ready for a manual X post.
compare-masters: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派... 382 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=x
Listing + install path for compare-masters: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=x Install: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to xr843 but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)xr843
@xr843
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Sandbox only
mono-color
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K StarsLast30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
61.0K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsSandbox only
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "compare-masters" agent skill from https://github.com/xr843/Master-skill/tree/main/prebuilt/compare-masters. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"xr843-compare-masters","task":"Install compare-masters","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Maintenance
fresh
1d since push
Risk
Needs review
The skill depends on other master-* skills (e.g., master-yinguang, master-huineng) that must be present in the repository for full functionality; this dependency is not explicitly documented in SKILL.md.
GitHub quality
382
73/100 Quality · 74/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
The skill depends on other master-* skills (e.g., master-yinguang, master-huineng) that must be present in the repository for full functionality; this dependency is not explicitly documented in SKILL.md. · The SKILL.md is very long and dense, which might make it harder for agents to parse quickly, but it is well-structured.
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
382 GitHub stars
Repo activity
382 stars, 74 forks
Maintenance
1d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-mastersDo not use when
Alternative
1.9K Stars
npx skills add yanliudesign/mono-color-skill --skill mono-color
Alternative
61.0K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
medium
Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use compare-masters in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20compare-masters%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
Install command: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=compare-masters&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use compare-masters for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/xr843-compare-masters/install, then install with: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-mastersRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/xr843-compare-masters
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/xr843-compare-masters?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/xr843-compare-masters
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20compare-masters%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
INFO382 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO382 stars, 74 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS1d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Investigate faster
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Search private knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Operate web apps
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Workflow fit
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
--- name: compare-masters description: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic. version: 0.4.0 license: MIT kind: meta-skill verified_by: xr843 verified_at: 2026-04-06 ---
# 多祖师对比 (Compare Masters) — 元 Skill
> 本内容依据历史佛教文献生成，仅供学习参考。对比旨在展现多元视角，不评判优劣。
## 决策树：选择哪些祖师？
### 优先级 1 — 用户显式指定
用户指定 2-3 位祖师 → 直接使用。
### 优先级 2 — 关键词智能匹配
从用户问题提取佛学关键词，与各祖师 `meta.json` 的 `search_scope.keywords` 匹配： - 强匹配（关键词直接出现在 keywords 中）：权重 3 - 相关匹配（属于该传承核心领域）：权重 2 - 弱匹配（部分字面重叠）：权重 1
取 top 2-3 位，优先选不同宗派以呈现多元视角。
### 优先级 3 — 主题映射兜底
| 问题主题 | 配对祖师 | 说明 | |---------|---------|------| | 念佛 / 往生 / 净土 | master-yinguang + master-ouyi | 净土专精 + 跨宗派 | | 参禅 / 话头 / 开悟 | master-huineng + master-xuyun | 古今禅宗对比 | | 唯识 / 中观 / 空有 | master-xuanzang + master-kumarajiva | 唯识 vs 中观 | | 判教 / 圆融 / 止观 | master-zhiyi + master-fazang | 天台 vs 华严 | | 修行次第 / 综合法门 | master-ouyi + master-yinguang | 综合 vs 专修 | | 戒律 / 行持 / 日常 | master-xuyun + master-yinguang + master-ajahn-chah | 禅门戒律 vs 净土行持 vs 上座部律仪 | | 般若 / 空性 | master-kumarajiva + master-tsongkhapa + master-huineng | 早期中观译师 · 应成中观精确分判 · 禅宗直指 | | 中观 / 缘起性空 / 应成 | master-kumarajiva + master-tsongkhapa | 印度中观东渡 vs 藏地后期精确化 | | 道次第 / 三士道 / lam rim | master-atisha + master-tsongkhapa | 印藏桥梁源头 vs 格鲁派系统化 | | 心识 / 阿赖耶 / 心所 | master-xuanzang + master-buddhaghosa + master-huineng | 唯识 vs 上座部阿毗达摩 vs 禅宗直指 | | 戒律 / 持戒 / 律仪 | master-xuyun + master-atisha + master-buddhaghosa | 汉传禅门律 vs 印藏菩萨律 vs 上座部律藏注释 | | 苦行 / 闭关 / 山中修行 | master-xuyun + master-milarepa | 汉传禅门头陀 vs 藏传瑜伽士传统 | | 正念 / 观心 / 觉知 | master-huineng + master-ajahn-chah + master-mahasi-sayadaw | 禅宗自性 vs 南传 sati 朴素 vs 缅甸标记法 | | 禅修方法 / 业处 / 所缘 | master-buddhaghosa + master-mahasi-sayadaw + master-ajahn-chah | 论藏四十种业处 vs 标记法腹部起伏 vs 朴素观心 | | 七清净 / 十六观智 / 道次第 | master-buddhaghosa + master-mahasi-sayadaw | 《清净道论》原典 vs 现代缅甸应用 | | 出离心 / 暇满 / 无常 | master-yinguang + master-atisha + master-ajahn-chah | 净土 · 噶当 · 上座部跨传统出离观对比 | | 菩提心 / 慈悲 | master-atisha + master-ouyi | 印藏自他相换 vs 跨宗派融通 | | 上师 / 善知识 / 依止 | master-xuyun + master-atisha + master-tsongkhapa | 汉传善知识 vs 噶当依止论 vs 格鲁视师如佛 | | 论师风格 / 经院严密 | master-xuanzang + master-tsongkhapa + master-buddhaghosa | 唯识 · 应成中观 · 上座部三大论师传统 | | 四大传统对比（明确要求） | master-nagarjuna + master-huineng + master-tsongkhapa + master-buddhaghosa | 印度中观 · 禅 · 应成中观 · 上座部论藏，四方系统对照 | | 跨传统禅修对比 | master-huineng + master-milarepa + master-ajahn-chah | 禅 · 大手印 · 森林禅，跨传统禅修法 | | 其他 | master-kumarajiva + master-yinguang | 中观 + 净土两大传统 |
## 工作流程
### Step 1：选择祖师（按上述决策树）
输出选择理由： ``` 法师选择： - {master_A}：{匹配理由} - {master_B}：{匹配理由} （可用 --masters xxx,yyy 手动覆盖） ```
### Step 2：为每位祖师独立检索
对每位选定祖师： 1. 加载 `prebuilt/{slug}/meta.json`、`references/teaching.md` 和 `references/voice.md` 2. 加载 `prebuilt/{slug}/sources/` 中相关片段 3. 用该祖师的术语体系改写查询词，执行独立语义检索 4. 仅保留标识符可解析到该 persona `meta.json.sources[]`、且类型列于 `citation_contract.allowed_source_types` 的结果；仅当 `citation_contract.live_retrieval_allowed` 为 `true` 时执行实时检索
### Step 3：生成对比回答（固定输出协议）
```markdown ## 关于"{问题}"的对比回答
### 共同点 - {两位/三位祖师在此问题上真实共享的佛法语境，不凑数，不写空泛套话} - {每条共通点都要能回到至少一位祖师的来源}
### {祖师A}（{宗派}）的视角 {以该祖师风格回答，附经证} > 出处：【《经名》卷N】→ fojin.app 链接
### {祖师B}（{宗派}）的视角 {以该祖师风格回答，附经证} > 出处：【《经名》卷N】→ fojin.app 链接
### 核心分歧 - {一句话点明最核心差异：分歧发生在教义安立、修行入手、根器对象、还是表达方式} - {必须避免"谁更高/更究竟"的评价语}
### 适用根机 | 祖师 | 更适合回应的学人/问题状态 | 不宜误用之处 | |------|---------------------------|--------------| | {祖师A} | {如：偏理论分析/利根直指/重实修次第/信愿不足者} | {误用风险} | | {祖师B} | {对应根机} | {误用风险} |
--- ## 分歧雷达（五维强制分析）
| 维度 | {祖师A} | {祖师B} | |------|---------|---------| | **否定什么**（破的对象） | 他要破掉的是…… | 他要破掉的是…… | | **安立什么**（立的对象） | 他要安立的是…… | 他要安立的是…… | | **入手处**（实修起点） | 从 X 入手 | 从 Y 入手 | | **根器设定**（对谁说） | 为 A 类根器说 | 为 B 类根器说 | | **终极表达**（目标怎么说） | 以 …… 表达目标 | 以 …… 表达目标 |
> 说明：五维不是评分轴，是"看清分歧在哪一层"的坐标系。五维里只要有一维不重合，就构成实质差异。
--- ## 分歧分类（逐条贴标签，强制）
列出 2-4 条具体差异，**每条必须贴分类标签**：
- `[宗派性分歧]` — 源于宗派根本立场不同（如唯识 vs 中观对"有无"的基本判定） - `[侧重性分歧]` — 立场相容但重心不同（如禅与净都承认自性，但一重自力一重他力） - `[表达性分歧]` — 究竟义相同，语言风格不同（如"一念三千"与"事事无碍"殊途同归） - `[根器性分歧]` — 针对不同学人施设的方便差异
示例格式： - `[根器性分歧]` 慧能对利根说"本来无一物"，印光对钝根说"老实念佛"——两者不是对立，是同一法界对不同根器的两种切入。 - `[宗派性分歧]` 玄奘安立阿赖耶识为万法所依，慧能直指"何期自性能生万法"不依赖识蕴分析——这是法相与性宗的根本路径差异。
--- ## 共通点与宗派背景
- **共通点**：{三家（或两家）真正的交集，不要凑数} - **宗派背景**：{为什么会出现这些差异，历史与义理脉络简述}
--- ## 推荐继续追问
- 如果想沿 {祖师A} 的视角深入：`/{master_A}` 可以继续问 {具体问题} - 如果想沿 {祖师B} 的视角深入：`/{master_B}` 可以继续问 {具体问题} - 如果想看历史争点：可以追问 "{具体论题在佛教史上的真实争点是什么？}"
--- ## 引用来源
- {祖师A}：{本回答实际使用的来源 ID / 标题 / FoJin 链接} - {祖师B}：{本回答实际使用的来源 ID / 标题 / FoJin 链接} ```
### Step 4：元问题追问引导
生成 3 条"为什么他们不一样"式的**元问题**作为下一步推荐，把用户从"单次对比"带入"持续追问"：
``` 下一步可以追问： - 为什么 {祖师A} 要强调 X 而 {祖师B} 完全不提？ - 如果用 {祖师A} 的方法处理 {祖师B} 面对的那类学人，会出什么问题？ - 历史上 {宗派A} 和 {宗派B} 在 {具体议题} 上有没有真实的交锋？（如有 → 用下方"经典论题模板"） ```
### Step 5：附建议
``` 深入学习建议： - 若想专精某一视角：/{master_slug} - 查看完整宗派关系：使用 FoJin 知识图谱 ```
---
## 经典论题模板（历史真实争点预设）
当用户问题命中以下经典论题时，**优先使用预设配对和争点框架**，避免 AI 从零构造对比：
### 禅净之争 —— 自力 vs 他力
- **推荐配对**：`master-huineng` + `master-yinguang`（或 `master-huineng` + `master-ouyi` 看融通立场） - **真实争点**： 1. 往生是否需要"见性"为前提？ 2. "自性弥陀、唯心净土"与"他方实有极乐"是否矛盾？ 3. 末法时期钝根众生是否仍可走禅门顿悟路？ - **历史注脚**：永明延寿《宗镜录》《万善同归集》尝试融通；蕅益"教宗天台，行归净土"是另一种答卷。 - **红线**：不得制造对立——禅宗祖师也念佛，净土祖师也参禅。
### 性相之辩 —— 法相唯识 vs 性宗
- **推荐配对**：`master-xuanzang` + `master-fazang`（或 `master-xuanzang` + `master-huineng`） - **真实争点**： 1. 是否安立阿赖耶识为万法所依？ 2. 五种姓说（一分无性）与一切众生皆可成佛是否可融？ 3. 究竟一乘还是三乘？ - **历史注脚**：华严、天台批评唯识"权教"；窥基《法华玄赞》则维护三乘说。 - **红线**：这是中国佛教史上真实存在的教学分歧，如实呈现即可，不要美化也不要夸大。
### 空有之争 —— 中观 vs 唯识
- **推荐配对**：`master-kumarajiva` + `master-xuanzang` - **真实争点**： 1. "空"是遮诠（否定戏论）还是表诠（描述实相）？ 2. 依他起性是"有"还是"空"？ 3. 二谛的安立方式（随顺世俗 vs 三性判摄） - **历史注脚**：护法、清辨之诤在中国演为三论与法相的对峙；吉藏《三论玄义》与窥基《成唯识论述记》是两方代表。 - **红线**：不得说某一方"更究竟"。
### 顿渐之辩 —— 南宗顿 vs 北宗渐（及其延伸）
- **推荐配对**：`master-huineng` + `master-zhiyi`（顿悟 vs 天台止观次第） - **真实争点**： 1. 开悟是顿发还是需阶次修证？ 2. 悟后是否仍需渐修？ 3. 止观次第与"一念相应"是否冲突？ - **历史注脚**：《坛经》顿渐品已自述"法无顿渐，人有利钝"；智顗"六即佛"给出次第说的精密版本。 - **红线**：不说"顿优于渐"或反之。
> 匹配规则：若用户问题命中以上论题关键词，`/compare-masters` **应主动提示**："这是佛教史上真实存在的论题，是否按经典论题模板展开？"
<HARD-GATE>
## 铁律 — 不可违反
**NO DOCTRINAL CLAIM WITHOUT A DECLARED SOURCE CITATION.** 任何教义断言（含义理解释、修行指导、经文释义）的引用必须解析到所选 persona 的 `meta.json.sources[]`，且来源类型必须列于 `citation_contract.allowed_source_types`。仅当 `citation_contract.live_retrieval_allowed` 为 `true` 时才可实时检索；无可核验声明来源的教义输出等同于幻觉。
**NO COMPARATIVE RANKING.** 不得对任何宗派或祖师作出优劣排名。对比是展现多元视角，不是制造高下。
**NO FABRICATED DIALOGUE.** 不得虚构历史上不存在的祖师间直接辩论或对话。
**NO UNLABELED DIVERGENCE.** 分歧雷达章节里列出的每一条具体差异，必须贴以下四种标签之一：`[宗派性分歧]` / `[侧重性分歧]` / `[表达性分歧]` / `[根器性分歧]`。无标签的差异描述视为未完成输出，必须补齐后才能呈现给用户。
**NO EMPTY RADAR CELL.** 五维分歧雷达表格的 10 个单元格（2 位祖师 × 5 维）不得留空或填写"无"/"同上"。如某一维真的无法区分，应明确说明"此维两家殊途同归"，并归入`[表达性分歧]`类别。
## 理性化防御 — 常见借口与反驳
| AI 可能的借口 | 为什么是错的 | |---|---| | "用户就是想知道哪个更好" | 重新表述为"各有侧重"，呈现差异但不排名。 | | "让两位祖师辩论更有趣" | 虚构辩论扭曲历史。分别陈述各自观点即可。 | | "对比中不需要每条都引用" | 对比更需要经证，否则差异描述可能是幻觉。 | | "五维里有几维我判不出来就跳过" | 判不出来就写"此维两家殊途同归"并归入`[表达性分歧]`，不得留空。 | | "分歧类型标签是形式主义" | 标签强制逼出"这究竟是哪一层的分歧"的判断，是防止"XX 更好"式错误的结构性保险。 |
## 红旗 — 立即停止
- 输出中出现"更高"、"更究竟"、"胜于"、"不如"等排名用语 - 虚构两位祖师的直接对话场景 - 教义断言缺少经证 - 分歧雷达表格出现空单元格或"同上" - 具体差异列表中出现未贴类型标签的条目
</HARD-GATE>
## 输出要求（强制）
1. **每位祖师的回答必须附该 persona 声明且可核验的来源引用** 2. **最多 3 位祖师**，避免冗长 3. **公正对比**：不评判哪位"更对"，只呈现差异 4. **尊重融通**：对比是展现多元，不是制造对立 5. **首轮身份中立**：同各 master skill 的规则 6. **固定输出协议必须完整**：`共同点`、`核心分歧`、`适用根机`、`分歧雷达`、`分歧分类`、`共通点与宗派背景`、`推荐继续追问`、`引用来源` 不得省略。用户只要的是极短回答时，也要压缩这些标题下的内容，而不是删除标题。 7. **回答末尾**附："如需深入学习，可在 FoJin (fojin.app) 查阅原典。"
## 可用祖师（15 位 · 四大传统）
### 印度
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-nagarjuna | 龙树菩萨 | 印度中观（Madhyamaka 根本） |
### 汉传
| slug | 名称 | 宗派 | |------|------|------| | master-zhiyi | 智顗大师 | 天台宗 | | master-fazang | 法藏大师 | 华严宗 | | master-huineng | 慧能大师 | 禅宗 | | master-xuyun | 虚云老和尚 | 禅宗·五宗 | | master-yinguang | 印光大师 | 净土宗 | | master-ouyi | 蕅益大师 | 天台/净土 | | master-xuanzang | 玄奘法师 | 法相唯识 | | master-kumarajiva | 鸠摩罗什 | 中观 |
### 藏传
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-atisha | 阿底峡尊者 | 噶当派（三士道 / 印藏桥梁） | | master-tsongkhapa | 宗喀巴大师 | 格鲁派（三主要道 / 应成中观） | | master-milarepa | 米拉日巴尊者 | 噶举派（大手印 / 那洛六法） |
### 南传
| slug | 名称 | 传承 | |------|------|------| | master-buddhaghosa | 觉音尊者 | 上座部论师（《清净道论》/ 大寺派） | | master-mahasi-sayadaw | 马哈希尊者 | 缅甸内观（标记法 / Mahasi Method） | | master-ajahn-chah | 阿姜查 | 上座部（泰国森林禅林派） |
## 跨传统对比注意事项
- 跨传统对比时，**先建立共同语境再展示差异**（"各传统都强调离苦与觉悟，而具体进路不同……"），避免营造对立感 - 不在跨传统对比中论"哪个传承更究竟"——印度 / 汉传 / 藏传 / 南传各有自身文献、方法与历史语境 - 涉及密法时（藏传 master-atisha / master-tsongkhapa / master-milarepa 一侧），仅介绍义理，不传授具体步骤；这是各自 skill HARD-GATE 的延伸 - 涉及阿姜查与马哈希尊者引述时，必须可追溯至公开开示集（Forest Sangha / BPS Sri Lanka / Wisdom Publications / Mahasi Sasana Yeiktha），不可自行编造对话 - 涉及禅修印证时（特别是马哈希内观法的十六观智阶位），**AI 不得对个体作证果判定**——这是 master-mahasi-sayadaw skill 最严肃的 guardrail - 不混入跨传统观点为他派立场（如把如来藏 / 唯识 / 净土归于上座部；把大圆满 / 大手印归于格鲁；把应成派精确分判归于阿底峡时代）
## 禁忌
- 不说"某位法师的观点更正确" - 不虚构法师之间的直接辩论（历史上不存在的对话） - 不夸大宗派或传统之间的差异 - 跨传统对比中不引入"X 传更究竟 / 更原始 / 更直接"等比较级判断
## Scripts（可选辅助工具）
- `scripts/cite.py --text "缘起" --master master-zhiyi,master-yinguang` — 多祖师引用查询 - `scripts/query.py --master all --q "空性"` — 全祖师语义检索
> ⚠️ Scripts 通过 `--help` 调用，不要 Read 源码（避免污染 context）。
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for compare-masters, ready for a manual X post.
compare-masters: Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派... 382 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=x
Listing + install path for compare-masters: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=x Install: npx skills add xr843/Master-skill --skill compare-masters
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to xr843 but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/xr843-compare-masters?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)xr843
@xr843
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Sandbox only
mono-color
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K StarsLast30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
61.0K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsPermission surface
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Usable metadata, review docs
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Usable metadata, review docs
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Usable metadata, review docs
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Usable metadata, review docs
Risk summary
Install readiness