roadtrip-navigator

审查 · 67
已收录

Generate North American road-trip itineraries as a map-first, offline-friendly single-file HTML page. Plans around daily driving segments, overnight stops, fuel/EV-charging, national-park reservations (Recreation.gov / NPS), seasonal road closures, and timezone/border crossings —

Verified installs0
Stars10
版本1.0.0
质量57/100 · 有潜力
信任67/100 · 仅限沙盒
审计77/100 · 需审查

供给资产档案

研究与知识工作

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

浏览赛道

场景

研究 Agent

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

适配 Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

适用于 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor、CLI 或自定义 Agent。

安装

就绪

npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

维护状态

新鲜

距上次推送 4 天

风险

需审查

Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

GitHub 质量

10

57/100 质量 · 75/100 信任

覆盖标签

研究研究 Agent自动化agent-skill

审查说明

Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · Low GitHub adoption signal

Agent 采用评分卡

一眼查看信任、审计与安装准备度

这些分数综合公开仓库元数据、OpenAgentSkill 审查信号、维护新鲜度与安装准备度。它用于候选筛选,不替代人工审查。

质量

有潜力
57

有用的候选项,但采用前应与替代方案比较。

信任

仅限沙盒
67

有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。

审计

需审查
77

对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。

OpenAgentSkill 信任评分 v5

安装前需人工审查

仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

10 个 GitHub Stars

仓库活跃度

10 个 Star,3 个 Fork

维护状态

距上次推送 4 天

许可证

MIT

安装

npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

安装安全性

标准软件包或运行时安装路径

权限范围

filesystem or document access, database access

Agent 结果

暂未有 Agent 结果数据

文档

README/SKILL.md 上下文充分

风险摘要

生产前审查

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 10 GitHub stars

安装准备度

安装路径可用

  • 安装路径可用
  • 仓库证据可用
  • 已声明许可证
  • 暂无 Agent 验证结果证据

Agent 可读元数据

这个 Skill 的机器可读决策数据。

使用此区块或内嵌 JSON 判断 Agent 是否应安装该 Skill、选择替代方案,或先请求人工审查。

打开 JSON

适用任务

  • Local desktop 工作流
  • Claude Code 团队
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Navigate local resources

适用 Agent

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

安装决策

命令
npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator
策略
审查
人工审查

信任与风险

信任
67/100
审计
77/100
风险级别
需审查

结果闭环

端点
/api/agent/outcome
事件 ID
resolve
结果
5

安装命令

npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

不适用场景

  • 需要厂商支持 SLA 的团队
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.

Agent 安全 v2

57/100 · 安装前审查

实验性审查

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

通过 API 解析

网络访问

Skill 可能访问远程页面、API、仓库或外部服务。

文件系统访问

Skill 可能读取或写入项目文件、文档、生成产物或本地工作区状态。

数据库访问

Skill 可能检查 Schema、查询数据库或处理持久化存储。

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

安装目标

在你的 Agent 工作流中安装此 Skill

通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator

Agent 解析计划

让 Agent 在安装前验证匹配度。

Resolve API 返回首选 Skill、替代方案、安全策略、审计说明、安装目标和可直接执行的提示词,无需抓取此页面。

打开文本计划

Agent 应检查

  • 从 Resolve API 检查任务匹配与替代方案。
  • 检查审计评分、信任评分和安全策略警告。
  • 检查 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor 或 CLI 的安装目标兼容性。

复制提示词

Task: Use roadtrip-navigator in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20roadtrip-navigator%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator/install
Install command: npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent 交接

把安装路径交给 Agent,而不是再给一个目录页。

通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。

打开安装 API

Agent 提示词

Use roadtrip-navigator for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator/install, then install with: npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

Registry 元数据

用于自动选择 Skill 的 Agent 可读档案。

本页通过 Registry API 提供相同的决策、信任、审计、场景和安装信号,让 Agent 无需抓取界面即可排序。

打开 Manifest

适配 Agent

59/100

Local desktop

平台

Claude Code

审计报告

需审查 · 77/100

对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。

查看审计报告查看评估报告

Agent 决策面板

Fallback candidate for Local desktop

先用此 Skill 做原型验证,并保留备选方案。

59
就绪度
原型验证
阶段

栈中角色

备选候选

主要匹配

Local desktop

信任标签

先做原型验证

安装路径

命令已就绪

适用场景

  • Local desktop 工作流
  • Claude Code 团队
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

证据

  • 仓库近期活跃
  • 已提供安装命令或 GitHub 仓库
  • 57/100 质量档案
  • 7 个 OpenAgentSkill 交互事件

先审查

  • Low GitHub adoption signal

实施路径

  1. 1在沙盒 Agent 中安装它,并端到端完成一次Local desktop任务。
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

信任档案

仅限沙盒

有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。

67
OpenAgentSkill 信任评分

GitHub 采用度

修复

10 个 GitHub Stars

Star/Fork 活跃度

修复

10 个 Star,3 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息

近期维护

通过

距上次推送 4 天

许可证清晰度

通过

MIT

积极信号

  • AI 审查已通过
  • 安装路径可用
  • 仓库证据可用
  • 近期维护的仓库
  • 安装命令未发现明显高风险模式
  • 结果闭环已就绪,但需要首次真实 Agent 运行

安装前审查

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 10 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 10 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • 暂未有真实 Agent 结果报告
  • 无人值守安装前需要人工审查

建议操作

仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。

质量档案

有潜力 适用于 Agent 工作流的候选

有用的候选项,但采用前应与替代方案比较。

57
GitHub Stars
10
新鲜度
4 天前
安装就绪
许可证
MIT
安装前审查: Low GitHub adoption signal

工作流匹配

在这些场景使用此 Skill

工作流匹配

加入完整工作流

替代方案短名单

安装前对比

可能适合该任务的相近 Skill。

对比全部

概览

--- name: roadtrip-navigator description: > Generate North American road-trip itineraries as a map-first, offline-friendly single-file HTML page. Plans around daily driving segments, overnight stops, fuel/EV-charging, national-park reservations (Recreation.gov / NPS), seasonal road closures, and timezone/border crossings — for executable, decision-ready trips. Two entry modes: give a start + region/destination + days and it plans the whole route, or hand it an existing route and it verifies, fills gaps, and produces the page. read-when: > road trip, self drive, 自驾, 公路旅行, national park, scenic drive, RV trip, EV road trip, Southwest loop, route 66, drive itinerary, campground, 自驾路线, 租车自驾, 环线, road trip planner, US/Canada drive, park reservation ---

# RoadTrip Navigator

Turn **"start + days"** or **"an existing route"** into a road trip you can actually drive: paced into days, with overnight stops, fuel/charging, park reservations, seasonal road risks, and a map-first single-file HTML page.

North American road trips revolve around the **car**, not flights: *how many hours do we drive today, where do we sleep, will we make it on the fuel/charge we have, and is the road even open.* That focus is what this skill adds on top of a generic "list of attractions."

## When to use

Use this skill whenever the request is about driving a multi-stop trip in the US / Canada / Mexico (see `read-when` triggers). If the user only wants a single city guide or a flight itinerary, this is not the right skill.

## Two entry modes

Detect the mode up front (see `scripts/helper.py` for the heuristic):

- **Light mode (plan it for me):** user gives a start, a rough region or destination, day count, and party/vehicle. → Run the full 7-step workflow, designing the route yourself. - **Heavy mode (verify my route):** user pastes/links/screenshots an existing route. → Skip route invention. Parse their route into the schema, then *verify and fill gaps*: driving segmentation, overnight realism, fuel/charge coverage, reservation countdown, seasonal closures, and produce the page.

When unsure which mode, ask one short question. Otherwise infer and proceed.

## The five things that make this more than a list

These are where pure-model answers fail and where this skill earns its keep:

1. **Daily driving segmentation (the core).** Slice the whole route into days under a sane daily drive limit, place an overnight at each segment end, and *validate* each day: drive ≤ limit, arrive before dark, no stop hits a closed gate, fatigue buffer. This is the road-trip equivalent of connection-checking — most AI itineraries skip it. 2. **Reservation countdown.** Recreation.gov campgrounds often release ~6 months out; popular timed-entry a few days out; in-park lodges up to ~13 months out. From the departure date, work backwards into a "book by" to-do list. 3. **Fuel / charge planning.** Gas: flag long empty stretches ("next fuel in X mi"). EV: plan a charging corridor against the vehicle's range and note whether each leg makes it, charger power, and a backup. 4. **Seasonal road conditions & closures.** Mountain passes that close in winter (Going-to-the-Sun, Tioga Pass, Trail Ridge Rd), wildfire/hurricane/snow season. If the travel date hits one, down-rank or reroute and say so. 5. **Timezones & borders.** Correct arrival times across timezone lines; for border crossings, flag documents / vehicle papers / insurance / wait times.

## Workflow (7 steps)

> Run `scripts/helper.py "<user request>"` first — it parses slots, guesses the > entry mode, picks the trip region (for HTML theming), and prints what's still > missing. Use its output to drive the steps below.

### Step 1 — Collect requirements (slot filling) Required: **start, travel date, days, party makeup, vehicle (gas/EV/RV + range)**. Optional: destination/region, budget, preferences (scenic vs. fast, hike intensity, loop vs. one-way, border crossing). Only ask follow-ups for missing **required** slots; fill the rest with sensible defaults and proceed.

**Validate place names before planning.** Slot presence is not slot truth: a made-up start like "ABC" parses fine and would otherwise flow straight into a fabricated route. Run every user-supplied place — start, destination, named waypoints; in heavy mode each day's from/to towns — through `python3 tools/places_client.py "<name>"` and branch on its verdict: `match` → adopt the returned canonical name + coordinates; `did-you-mean` → confirm the intended place with the user (one short question, same spirit as the required-slot follow-ups); `no-match` → **stop and ask — never plan a route around a place you could not verify**; `unverified` (offline) → use your own judgment and ask about any name you don't recognize. A `match` with `outsideNA: true` is a real place outside US/Canada/Mexico — tell the user it's beyond this skill's coverage instead of calling it fake.

### Step 2 — Route / destination planning (if not given) Decide **loop vs. one-way** first (affects one-way drop fees and pacing). For region-level input ("the Southwest", "Pacific Northwest"): search candidates → seasonal & closure check → shortlist. Compute rough total miles / driving days for the shortlist and drop any "can't be driven in N days" option.

**Present two candidate routes before committing (light mode only).** Once the shortlist is down to viable options, draft **exactly two** genuinely distinct routes yourself — e.g. a faster direct corridor vs. a scenic detour, or two different geographic loops — each with a short label, a one-line summary, and rough total miles/driving days. Show both to the user and ask them to pick (or say "surprise me") before moving to Step 3. This is a single short question, same spirit as the required-slot follow-up in Step 1 — don't draft a full itinerary for either option first. If the conversation is one-shot and no reply is possible, pick the better-rated option yourself, proceed, and note the alternative you didn't take. Skip this entirely in heavy mode (the user already supplied a route) or once the user has already chosen. Carry both options into `scripts/helper.compare_routes()` to populate `routeOptions[]` (Phase-3 module below) so the rendered page shows the comparison table with the chosen route flagged.

### Step 3 — Daily driving segmentation (core; see five-things #1) 1. Split by a **daily drive limit** (default: relaxed adults ≤ 4–5h; with kids/seniors ≤ 3–4h; user-adjustable). 2. Put an **overnight** at each segment end (has lodging, supplies, good for the next morning). 3. Validate: arrive **before dark**, no stop hits a **closed gate**, long legs have a fuel/charge point mid-way. 4. If infeasible: cut miles / add a night / pick a closer overnight town. 5. Surface risks explicitly in the day, e.g. "no fast charger for 180 mi on this leg — charge to full before leaving."

Rule of thumb: **plan by daylight, not by odometer** — a day that ends after dark fails at the trailhead, not on the map.

### Step 4 — Parallel research (sub-agents) Fan out (one concern per sub-agent, run concurrently): weather (per day), lodging/campgrounds (price + booking difficulty), fuel/charging points, attractions & tickets/permits, food, scenic byways & hikes, Reddit real-world gotchas. **Delegation rule: instruct each sub-agent to hit official APIs first (NPS / NWS / Recreation.gov / Open Charge Map) and fall back to web search only on failure.** See `reference.md` for the tool routing table and `tools/`.

### Step 5 — Reservation countdown (see five-things #2) From the departure date, generate a "book by" to-do list: campgrounds (Recreation.gov, ~T-6 months), timed-entry / wilderness permits (per park rule, T-X days), popular in-park lodges (up to ~T-13 months), one-way car/RV rental (lock price early). Render as a ⚠️ checklist at the top of the page + a timeline. Populate `bookingCountdown[]`.

### Step 6 — Budget (with reliability grading) Tag every line **verified / reference(~) / estimate(≈)**. Road-trip specifics: fuel = total miles ÷ MPG × gas price (or EV charging cost); tolls; park entry or the **America the Beautiful** annual pass; one-way drop fee; campground; lodging; food. Force a bottom disclaimer: prices are dynamic, confirm before departure.

### Step 7 — Generate the single-file HTML (map-first) 1. Write the data to **`tripData.json`** first (data/view separation — editable, re-renderable). 2. Render: `python3 assets/generate.py tripData.json -o trip.html` → Leaflet map (numbered stops + ordered polyline) + one-tap mobile nav (Google/Apple deep links) + daily timeline + reservation to-do + budget. Responsive (mobile single-column / desktop multi-column) + print friendly. 3. **Validate before delivering** (plan §9): the generator already does a light schema check and a JSON parse of the injected data. Optionally syntax-check the inline JS, then open/preview. 4. Full-page disclaimer: AI-assembled, may be out of date, verify with official sources.

## Output contract

- Always produce **both** `tripData.json` and the rendered `trip.html`. - Units: miles, °F, MPG, USD by default; switch to km/°C/local currency on Canadian/Mexican legs and note the change. A trip entirely within China prices its budget in CNY (¥) — never converted into USD. - Never invent a precise reservation availability, live charger occupancy, or minute-level traffic — point to the official app / Recreation.gov / nav.

## Honesty boundaries (Phase 1)

Do **not** promise: exact live fuel/electricity prices, live charger occupancy, minute-level traffic, live campground availability, or replacing turn-by-turn navigation. For these, tell the user to confirm via the official app / Recreation.gov / their navigation app in real time. The page's job is to be right the morning you leave, not merely impressive the night it was generated.

## Files

- `reference.md` — tripData schema, reliability grading, tool routing table. - `AGENTS.md` ("Worked examples") — typical prompts and expected outputs. - `assets/generate.py` — `tripData.json` → single-file HTML. - `assets/template.html` — the HTML/JS renderer (Leaflet map + timeline). - `assets/tripData.example.json` / `assets/preview.html` — Southwest 7-day demo. - `assets/tripData.tahoe.json` / `assets/preview-tahoe.html` — Sunnyvale→Tahoe 3-day demo (mountain theme, state-park reservations, Sierra snow risk). - `assets/tripData.pnw.json` / `assets/preview-pnw.html` — Seattle→Vancouver→ Whistler EV cross-border demo (exercises all three Phase-3 modules below).

## Phase-3 modules (implemented)

These render as extra sections when their data is present (see `reference.md`):

- **Multi-route comparison** — `scripts/helper.compare_routes(options, party)` → `routeOptions[]`. Feeds from the Step 2 two-route pick above; it auto-rates drive intensity and renders a comparison table with the chosen route flagged. - **Cross-border** — `tools/border_client.trip_section([("US","CA",rental),...])` → `crossBorder`. Per-crossing documents / insurance / customs / unit-switch checklist for US↔CA↔MX. Note the key asymmetry it encodes: US insurance is usually valid in **Canada** but **never in Mexico** (buy Mexican insurance). - **Duty-free exemption** — `tools/customs_client.personal_exemption(residence, hours_abroad, used_within_30_days=False)` → the per-person allowance quoted in `crossBorder` customs notes. Encodes the 24h/48h tiers (US: USD 800 at 48h+, once per 30 days, else USD 200; CA: 0 / CAD 200 / CAD 800; MX land: USD 300) with EN + 中文 note strings — quote the tool, never recall these amounts. - **EV charging corridor** — `tools/charging_client.corridor(legs, usableRange, winter_derate=...)` → `evPlan`. Simulates state-of-charge leg by leg, sets a recommended charge-to at each stop, and flags legs that won't make the buffer. Pass `winter_derate` (e.g. 0.25) for cold-weather r

技术详情

版本
1.0.0
许可证
MIT
最近更新
2026年8月19日
发布时间
2026年8月19日

决策摘要

备选候选

59
就绪
原型验证
阶段

仓库近期活跃

审计

安装审查

安装与采用审查

77
需审查
安全性
85/100
维护状态
100/100
安装
92/100
打开完整审计查看评估报告

Agent 验证证据

Agent 验证证据

来自解析、审查、安装和一次小范围运行后的结果报告。

0
已验证
Needs first agent run自动安装: 先审查最近: 未知
成功率
近期失败
结果
0
输出质量
失败
0
不相关
0
安装次数
0
风险拦截
0
需要配置
0
生产环境
0

暂时没有 Agent 结果数据。首次 Agent 执行可以通过 /api/agent/outcome 报告成功、需要设置、风险拦截、失败或不相关。

安装

加入 Agent 工作流

免费且开源. 在生产 Agent 中安装前请先审查报告。

增长闭环

分享工具包

X

为 roadtrip-navigator 准备的场景化草稿,可手动发布到 X。

策展说明
A practical pick for a web workflow:

roadtrip-navigator: Generate North American road-trip itineraries as a map-first, offline-friendly single-file HTML page. Plans around daily dr...

10 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?ref=x
打开 X 草稿
可选:带安装命令的回复
Listing + install path for roadtrip-navigator:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?ref=x

Install: npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator
打开回复草稿

收录来源

Registry 收录

可认领

此列表来自公开来源,维护者认领获批前不会标记为官方。

创作者
Waybox-AI
收录方
OpenAgentSkill 社区索引

归属链接指向公开仓库或创作者主页。创作者可认领列表以更新所有权信号。

认领此 Skill

所有者认领

认领此 Skill 页面

这条 Registry 收录 列表归属于 Waybox-AI,但尚未标记为官方。认领后可增加已验证所有者信号,使后续发布、安装和审计更新更值得信赖。

创作者外链工具包

将证据徽章加入你的 README

在开发者评估仓库的位置展示规范页面、当前信任与审计信号,以及真实的 Agent 验证证据。

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator)

作者

W

Waybox-AI

@waybox-ai

平台适配

健康信号

GitHub Stars
10
质量评分
31/100
最近 GitHub 推送
2026年8月19日
框架提示
未知
OpenAgentSkill 浏览量
7
复制安装命令
0
跳转点击
0

社区信号

告诉我们这个 Skill 是否对你的 Agent 工作流有帮助。汇总反馈会持续改善排序。

信任与安全

仅限沙盒

67
  • GitHub 采用度10 个 GitHub Stars修复
  • Star/Fork 活跃度10 个 Star,3 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息修复
  • 近期维护距上次推送 4 天通过
  • 许可证清晰度MIT通过
  • README/SKILL.md 完整度元数据包含足够的用法与工作流上下文通过
  • 依赖与运行时风险公开元数据中未发现主要依赖风险提示通过