kendex-issues
Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in ke
供给资产档案
研究与知识工作
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
场景
研究 Agent
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
适配 Agent
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
适用于 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor、CLI 或自定义 Agent。
安装
就绪
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
维护状态
新鲜
今天有推送
风险
需审查
Permission surface may require sandboxing
GitHub 质量
63
65/100 质量 · 74/100 信任
覆盖标签
审查说明
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Quality score needs review
Agent 采用评分卡
一眼查看信任、审计与安装准备度
这些分数综合公开仓库元数据、OpenAgentSkill 审查信号、维护新鲜度与安装准备度。它用于候选筛选,不替代人工审查。
质量
有潜力有用的候选项,但采用前应与替代方案比较。
信任
仅限沙盒有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。
审计
需审查对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。
OpenAgentSkill 信任评分 v5
安装前需人工审查
仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。
Stars
63 个 GitHub Stars
仓库活跃度
63 个 Star,23 个 Fork
维护状态
今天有推送
许可证
MIT
安装
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
安装安全性
标准软件包或运行时安装路径
权限范围
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent 结果
暂未有 Agent 结果数据
文档
README/SKILL.md 上下文充分
风险摘要
生产前审查
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
安装准备度
安装路径可用
- 安装路径可用
- 仓库证据可用
- 已声明许可证
- 暂无 Agent 验证结果证据
Agent 可读元数据
这个 Skill 的机器可读决策数据。
使用此区块或内嵌 JSON 判断 Agent 是否应安装该 Skill、选择替代方案,或先请求人工审查。
适用任务
- 工作流自动化 工作流
- Claude Code 团队
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Move data between tools
适用 Agent
安装决策
- 命令
- npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
- 策略
- 审查
- 人工审查
- 是
信任与风险
- 信任
- 66/100
- 审计
- 78/100
- 风险级别
- 需审查
结果闭环
- 端点
- /api/agent/outcome
- 事件 ID
- resolve
- 结果
- 5
不适用场景
- 需要厂商支持 SLA 的团队
- 没有内部安全审查的高合规环境
- 当前元数据中未发现重大风险信号
- 高风险权限提示:Shell 或命令执行
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
替代 Skill
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
替代 Skill
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
替代 Skill
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
替代 Skill
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Agent 安全 v2
50/100 · 避免自动安装
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
高
Shell 或命令执行
Skill 元数据引用了终端、CLI、Shell、子进程或命令执行工作流。
中
网络访问
Skill 可能访问远程页面、API、仓库或外部服务。
中
文件系统访问
Skill 可能读取或写入项目文件、文档、生成产物或本地工作区状态。
- 高风险权限提示:Shell 或命令执行
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
安装目标
在你的 Agent 工作流中安装此 Skill
通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install vanillagreencom-kendex-issuesAgent 解析计划
让 Agent 在安装前验证匹配度。
Resolve API 返回首选 Skill、替代方案、安全策略、审计说明、安装目标和可直接执行的提示词,无需抓取此页面。
打开 JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve 文本
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
安装交接
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Agent 应检查
- 从 Resolve API 检查任务匹配与替代方案。
- 检查审计评分、信任评分和安全策略警告。
- 检查 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor 或 CLI 的安装目标兼容性。
复制提示词
Task: Use kendex-issues in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Install command: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent 交接
把安装路径交给 Agent,而不是再给一个目录页。
通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。
安装交接
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
LLM 文本格式
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install?format=text
寻找替代方案
/api/skills/search?q=kendex-issues&limit=3
Agent 提示词
Use kendex-issues for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install, then install with: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issuesRegistry 元数据
用于自动选择 Skill 的 Agent 可读档案。
本页通过 Registry API 提供相同的决策、信任、审计、场景和安装信号,让 Agent 无需抓取界面即可排序。
Agent 决策面板
Fallback candidate for Workflow automation
先用此 Skill 做原型验证,并保留备选方案。
栈中角色
备选候选
主要匹配
工作流自动化
信任标签
先做原型验证
安装路径
命令已就绪
适用场景
- 工作流自动化 工作流
- Claude Code 团队
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
证据
- 仓库近期活跃
- 已提供安装命令或 GitHub 仓库
- 65/100 质量档案
- 1 个 OpenAgentSkill 交互事件
先审查
- 当前元数据中未发现重大风险信号
实施路径
- 1在沙盒 Agent 中安装它,并端到端完成一次工作流自动化任务。
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
信任档案
仅限沙盒
有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。
GitHub 采用度
检查63 个 GitHub Stars
Star/Fork 活跃度
检查63 个 Star,23 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息
近期维护
通过今天有推送
许可证清晰度
通过MIT
积极信号
- AI 审查已通过
- 安装路径可用
- 仓库证据可用
- 近期维护的仓库
- 安装命令未发现明显高风险模式
- 结果闭环已就绪,但需要首次真实 Agent 运行
安装前审查
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- 暂未有真实 Agent 结果报告
- 无人值守安装前需要人工审查
建议操作
仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。
质量档案
有潜力 适用于 Agent 工作流的候选
有用的候选项,但采用前应与替代方案比较。
工作流匹配
在这些场景使用此 Skill
Automate repeated work
Workflow automation
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Operate local tools
Local desktop
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
工作流匹配
加入完整工作流
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
替代方案短名单
安装前对比
可能适合该任务的相近 Skill。
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
概览
--- name: kendex-issues description: > Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in kendex's skills/agents/hooks/pi-extensions or the Rust CLI), run each fix through the orch skill, merge, propagate via kendex refresh, then reschedule. A thin wrapper: fix cycles belong to orch, PR mechanics to the github skill, PR monitoring to review-gate's pr-watch, Linear ops to the linear skill — this skill carries only the kendex-specific stewardship knowledge. Use when asked to monitor kendex's issues continuously or to run one fix-and-propagate cycle. ---
> **Never edit this file directly.** To make additions or modifications, edit the appropriate section in the managing project's kendex config — `kendex.toml` at the kendex project root, or `kendex-local.toml` in a source-catalog checkout. Then run `kendex refresh`.
# kendex Issue Steward
Keep the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue clean and its consumers in sync: watch → poll → triage → fix → merge → propagate → repeat. One cycle per turn, then reschedule.
**This skill is a thin wrapper.** The mechanics live in four owning skills, and every cycle uses them instead of hand-rolling:
| Concern | Owning skill | Load when | |---------|--------------|-----------| | Fix cycle (prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge) | **orch** | every fix, before creating the worktree | | PR threads / replies / reviews / merges / CI logs | **github** | any PR mutation or read | | Watching open PRs across the loop | **review-gate** (`pr-watch.sh`) | first action, every cycle | | Linear reads and writes | **linear** | any Linear operation |
A session driven by this skill should load those naturally at each step and produce zero hand-rolled PR mechanics (raw `gh api` GraphQL where a `github.sh` command exists is the failure smell).
## Loop (one turn)
1. **PR watch first** — `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/kendex .agents/skills/review-gate/scripts/pr-watch.sh`. Silence + exit 0 means no open PR needs you. Attention lines (threads-open, changes-requested, gate-stale, disarmed, awaiting-stale) → act through the github skill. NEVER hand-roll a PR monitor: pr-watch is the monitoring primitive for every open-PR concern except queue ejection, which it cannot see — after any gate-green, additionally check `isInMergeQueue` + `autoMergeRequest` (GraphQL; `gh pr view --json` lacks queue membership). Ejection is SILENT and discards the auto-merge arm: re-arm once; a second ejection means a flaky required suite — quarantine/escalate rather than re-arm loops. 2. **Poll Linear** — creation sync is ONE-WAY GitHub→Linear (owner reverted the 2026-08-09 two-way experiment), so Linear (team KEN) is the only complete queue: Linear-native issues never appear in `gh issue list`. Refresh the cache first, then read open issues: `linear.sh sync --reconcile`, then `linear.sh cache issues list --state "Triage,Backlog,Todo,In Progress" --max`. GH-synced issues arrive in **Triage** — omitting it hides the entire synced queue (bit the 2026-08-03 campaign: 14 pending issues invisible). Then cross-check GitHub: `gh issue list --repo vanillagreencom/kendex --state open` — cheap, and history earned it (2026-08-09: nine stray open GH issues over eight "empty" cycles while both a generate-on-merge automation and two-way creation sync were briefly on; both are off now, but pre-revert GH copies of Linear issues still exist and can stick open). An open GH issue whose Linear mirror is DONE is residue — close it with the diagnosis. An open GH issue with NO Linear mirror means the GH→Linear sync broke — triage it from GitHub directly and flag the sync. Zero attention lines and zero open on both surfaces → reschedule, stop. 3. **Triage** each issue; run the **Fix cycle** for each valid defect. Mutate on the issue's home surface: a GH-mirrored issue (its Linear body links the GitHub issue) is closed/commented on GitHub and sync updates Linear; a Linear-native issue (no GH link) is updated with the linear skill (`issues update` / `comments create` / `issues complete`). PRs, branches, and CI stay on GitHub either way. The PR body carries BOTH references when the issue has a GitHub mirror — `Closes KEN-<n>` for the tracker and `Closes #<n>` for the mirror — so GitHub links the PR on the issue and closes it with that reference at merge; a Linear-native issue gets `Closes KEN-<n>` alone. Never close a mirror by hand without naming the PR in the closing comment. 4. After any merge, **Propagate + Sync**. 5. **Schedule the next wakeup** (see Cadence). Stop only if the user asked.
## Triage (per issue)
Read body + comments, then classify:
- **Duplicate** → close, referencing the canonical issue. - **Not a kendex asset** → verify by grepping the kendex repo; ownership comes from the asset's own SKILL.md frontmatter (`source: kendex`), never from its install location. Close with a specific rationale. Project-local assets: repost to the owning repo, cross-link both ways, and notify that repo's overseer (tmux tab 1: `memsira:1`, `drovr:1`, `hyprtrade:1`) that the fix is theirs. The steward never fixes a consuming repo's own defect, however easy it looks. - **Speculative / one-project architecture** → close with reasoning; offer a scoped proposal only if it generalizes. - **Genuine kendex defect** (skills/, agents/, hooks/, pi-extensions/, cli/) → Fix cycle. A guidance gap is fixable even when the root trigger is a harness limitation; note the harness part upstream. - **Unfindable references** → check history (`git log -S '<name>' --all`) before assuming a rename or regression. A name that never existed in any version is a recorded typo: close with that evidence; never ship a compatibility shim for it. - **Empty-body issues** → don't guess the defect from the title. Comment asking for the concrete repro, note what your sweep found, leave open.
## Fix cycle (per valid defect) — load orch
The whole cycle is orch's domain: prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge. Load the orch skill and follow its workflows; do not re-implement any step here. kendex-specific parameters orch can't know:
- **Agent fit for delegation**: `generalist` (shell/docs/skills), `rust` (cli/), `iced` (iced-rs). Require tests and the relevant suite green (`bash skills/orch/tests/run-all.sh`, per-skill `tests/*.test.sh`, or `cd cli && cargo test`). - **Fix direction rides in every delegation** when the issue touches skills or tooling: determinism and tooling first — a deletion, a short-circuit, or a tool; added prose is the last resort. Skills are instructions, not explanations (AGENTS.md § Rules, "Engineer over patch"). - **Review the diff yourself** before submit — confirm the actual root cause, not a plausible guess. If a delegate stalls, inspect its worktree and nudge once. - A clearly-coupled real defect found along the way → file a tracking issue and fix it too. - Disjoint files → run issues in parallel; same file → sequence or bundle. - A flaked required check reporting "cannot be rerun" gets a fresh head (`git commit --amend --no-edit` + `push --force-with-lease` — only on never-shared heads; never amend a pushed commit others may have seen), never a force-merge past red.
PR reads and mutations inside the cycle (threads, replies, resolution, merge, CI logs) go through the github skill: `pr-data --actionable`, `post-reply`, `resolve-thread`, `pr-merge`, `ci-logs`, `await-mergeable`.
## Propagate + Sync
**BATCH trains (owner directive 2026-08-12): before opening consumer refresh PRs, scan the open queue (Todo/Triage/in-flight PRs) for items that touch VENDORED assets — if any would force another re-vendor soon, HOLD propagation until those land, then run ONE train carrying everything.** Per-merge trains cost a review round in every consumer each time; the fail-closed direction of vendored fixes makes the wait safe (consumers sit at most one train behind, failing loud, never open). Exceptions worth an immediate train anyway: a fix for a fail-OPEN defect in a consumer-enforced gate, or an owner ask.
**Only after the upstream change is MERGED and on `origin/main`.** A PR that is approved, queued, or mid-merge-queue has not propagated anything: merges can take a while, and refreshing a consumer from an unmerged or mid-queue state vendors bytes main may never contain. Before any consumer refresh, verify the source being read (the cache, or the recorded remote clone) sits at the `origin/main` tip that contains the merge commit — never propagate from a feature branch, a local unpushed main, or a stale cache.
After merges:
1. Sync local main (`checkout main && pull --ff-only`) and fast-forward the cache (`git -C ~/.kendex/cache/vanillagreencom_kendex pull --ff-only`) — some consumers source from the cache, and a stale one silently no-ops their refresh. Confirm the cache tip equals `origin/main` tip before refreshing any consumer. 2. Skill/agent/hook changes → `kendex refresh` (default all scopes) + `kendex verify` in each consumer that vendors the asset. Never narrow to `--scope project`: Pi packages install at global scope, so a project-scoped refresh leaves them drifted and only `kendex verify` catches it (bit the 2026-08-09 batch: pi-task-panel stayed at the old version through a project-scoped refresh in all five consumers). CLI-only changes need a binary rebuild instead, not a skill refresh. 3. Committing in a consumer: - Probe first: `git check-ignore -q <refreshed path>` → ignored means a local-only install mirror with nothing to commit. The probe is authoritative over any remembered per-repo list. - Stage only kendex paths (scoped `git add`, never `-A`). Revert no-op `.kendex-refreshed` churn and template-default churn on tracked `kendex.settings.toml`/`kendex.toml` unless a key change is the payload. - Merge-queue repos: branch → PR → `gh pr merge --auto` (no strategy flag). Force-merge (`--admin --squash`) is pre-authorized only for kendex-only refresh PRs with `kendex verify` green and the required CI check green or unaffected; it cannot override a failing required check — there, arm `--auto` and let the normal flow merge. Reply to and resolve any bot threads either way. - Confirm each push landed and the commit contains only kendex files. - **While propagation PRs are open, sweep each consumer with `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/<repo> pr-watch.sh --heal` every cycle** — the writer's event triggers occasionally miss a bot review (observed 2026-08-11: hyprtrade-io#43 sat gate-pending ~10 min on a delivered review until the cron floor), and `--heal` converges a stale gate in seconds instead of waiting out the */15 cron (which itself can slip to ~25 min). Same sweep surfaces thread and disarm states on YOUR propagation PRs; other PRs' findings route to that repo's overseer. 4. **New skills don't propagate via refresh** — refresh reinstalls only locked items. A new skill needs a one-time `kendex add --skill <name> -y` per consumer (always `-y`; the interactive prompt dies in non-interactive shells), and the `kendex.toml` entry it writes committed through the repo's queue where that file is tracked. 5. **Review-bot findings on propagation PRs**: a real defect in vendored content is fixed upstream first — issue → fix → merge → refresh on the PR branch → resolve threads citing the fix. Stale-doc nits on the PR's own payload may be fixed directly on the branch. 6. **Capability changes need repo-side wiring.** A change consumers must recognize in their own CI or branch protection
技术详情
- 版本
- 1.0.0
- 许可证
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026年8月23日
- 发布时间
- 2026年8月23日
决策摘要
备选候选
仓库近期活跃
Agent 验证证据
Agent 验证证据
来自解析、审查、安装和一次小范围运行后的结果报告。
- 成功率
- —
- 近期失败
- —
- 结果
- 0
- 输出质量
- —
- 失败
- 0
- 不相关
- 0
- 安装次数
- 0
- 风险拦截
- 0
- 需要配置
- 0
- 生产环境
- 0
暂时没有 Agent 结果数据。首次 Agent 执行可以通过 /api/agent/outcome 报告成功、需要设置、风险拦截、失败或不相关。
增长闭环
分享工具包
为 kendex-issues 准备的场景化草稿,可手动发布到 X。
kendex-issues: Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub s... 63 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x
可选:带安装命令的回复
Listing + install path for kendex-issues: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x Install: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
收录来源
Registry 收录
此列表来自公开来源,维护者认领获批前不会标记为官方。
- 收录方
- OpenAgentSkill 社区索引
归属链接指向公开仓库或创作者主页。创作者可认领列表以更新所有权信号。
认领此 Skill所有者认领
认领此 Skill 页面
这条 Registry 收录 列表归属于 vanillagreencom,但尚未标记为官方。认领后可增加已验证所有者信号,使后续发布、安装和审计更新更值得信赖。
创作者外链工具包
将证据徽章加入你的 README
在开发者评估仓库的位置展示规范页面、当前信任与审计信号,以及真实的 Agent 验证证据。
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)作者
vanillagreencom
@vanillagreencom
平台适配
健康信号
- GitHub Stars
- 63
- 质量评分
- 36/100
- 最近 GitHub 推送
- 2026年8月23日
- 框架提示
- 未知
- OpenAgentSkill 浏览量
- 1
- 复制安装命令
- 0
- 跳转点击
- 0
社区信号
告诉我们这个 Skill 是否对你的 Agent 工作流有帮助。汇总反馈会持续改善排序。
信任与安全
仅限沙盒
- GitHub 采用度63 个 GitHub Stars检查
- Star/Fork 活跃度63 个 Star,23 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息检查
- 近期维护今天有推送通过
- 许可证清晰度MIT通过
- README/SKILL.md 完整度元数据包含足够的用法与工作流上下文通过
- 依赖与运行时风险command execution surface, network or browser surface信息
相关 Skill
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars