@trailofbits

创作者 · trailofbits

最近更新 · 2026年8月24日

cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

审查 · 63已收录

Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabilities — chain halts, fund loss, state divergence. 25 core + 16 IBC + 10 EVM + 3 CosmWasm patterns. Use when auditing custom x/ modules, reviewing IBC integrations, or assessing pre-launch

OpenAgentSkill 信任评分
63/100

仅限沙盒

质量85/100
审计81/100
Stars6.8K
Verified installs0

安装目标

Codex 安装提示词

Install the "cosmos-vulnerability-scanner" agent skill from https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/tree/main/plugins/building-secure-contracts/skills/cosmos-vulnerability-scanner. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabilities — chain halts, fund loss, state divergence. 25 core + 16 IBC + 10 EVM + 3 CosmWasm patterns. Use when auditing custom x/ modules, reviewing IBC integrations, or assessing pre-launch chain security. Updated for SDK v0.53.x. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner","task":"Install cosmos-vulnerability-scanner","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.

供给资产档案

编程与开发 Agent

代码审查、仓库分析、测试、CI、GitHub、DevOps 与开发工作流 Skill。

浏览赛道

场景

GitHub automation

I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.

适配 Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

适用于 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor、CLI 或自定义 Agent。

安装

就绪

npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

维护状态

新鲜

今天有推送

风险

需审查

Dependency or permission surface needs review

GitHub 质量

6.8K

85/100 质量 · 71/100 信任

覆盖标签

编程GitHub automation安全agent-skill

审查说明

Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing

Agent 采用评分卡

一眼查看信任、审计与安装准备度

这些分数综合公开仓库元数据、OpenAgentSkill 审查信号、维护新鲜度与安装准备度。它用于候选筛选,不替代人工审查。

质量

优秀
85

高置信候选,具有较强的采用度与健康维护信号。

信任

仅限沙盒
63

有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。

审计

需审查
81

对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。

OpenAgentSkill 信任评分 v5

安装前需人工审查

仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

6.8K 个 GitHub Stars

仓库活跃度

6.8K 个 Star,585 个 Fork

维护状态

今天有推送

许可证

CC-BY-SA-4.0

安装

npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

安装安全性

标准软件包或运行时安装路径

权限范围

secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

Agent 结果

暂未有 Agent 结果数据

文档

Usable metadata, review docs

风险摘要

生产前审查

  • Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

安装准备度

安装路径可用

  • 安装路径可用
  • 仓库证据可用
  • 已声明许可证
  • 暂无 Agent 验证结果证据

Agent 可读元数据

这个 Skill 的机器可读决策数据。

使用此区块或内嵌 JSON 判断 Agent 是否应安装该 Skill、选择替代方案,或先请求人工审查。

View technical data+

适用任务

  • GitHub automation 工作流
  • Claude Code 团队
  • 重视 GitHub 采用信号的团队
  • Inspect repository metadata

适用 Agent

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

安装决策

命令
npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner
策略
阻止
人工审查

信任与风险

信任
63/100
审计
81/100
风险级别
需审查

结果闭环

端点
/api/agent/outcome
事件 ID
resolve
结果
5

安装命令

npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

不适用场景

  • 需要厂商支持 SLA 的团队
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.
  • 高风险权限提示:Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
  • Dependency or permission surface needs review

Agent 安全 v2

37/100 · 避免自动安装

Blocked for auto-install阻止

This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.

Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.

通过 API 解析

Shell 或命令执行

Skill 元数据引用了终端、CLI、Shell、子进程或命令执行工作流。

网络访问

Skill 可能访问远程页面、API、仓库或外部服务。

文件系统访问

Skill 可能读取或写入项目文件、文档、生成产物或本地工作区状态。

Secrets or environment access

Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.

  • 高风险权限提示:Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
  • Dependency or permission surface needs review

Agent 解析计划

让 Agent 在安装前验证匹配度。

Resolve API 返回首选 Skill、替代方案、安全策略、审计说明、安装目标和可直接执行的提示词,无需抓取此页面。

打开文本计划

Agent 应检查

  • 从 Resolve API 检查任务匹配与替代方案。
  • 检查审计评分、信任评分和安全策略警告。
  • 检查 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor 或 CLI 的安装目标兼容性。

复制提示词

Task: Use cosmos-vulnerability-scanner in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20cosmos-vulnerability-scanner%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner/install
Install command: npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent 交接

把安装路径交给 Agent,而不是再给一个目录页。

通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。

打开安装 API

Agent 提示词

Use cosmos-vulnerability-scanner for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner/install, then install with: npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

Registry 元数据

用于自动选择 Skill 的 Agent 可读档案。

本页通过 Registry API 提供相同的决策、信任、审计、场景和安装信号,让 Agent 无需抓取界面即可排序。

打开 Manifest

适配 Agent

98/100

GitHub automation

平台

Claude Code

审计报告

需审查 · 81/100

对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。

查看审计报告查看评估报告

Agent 决策面板

适合 GitHub automation 的首选

将其作为优先候选,再在你的 Agent 环境中验证 README 与安装路径。

98
就绪度
采用
阶段

栈中角色

首选

主要匹配

GitHub automation

信任标签

可用于生产

安装路径

命令已就绪

适用场景

  • GitHub automation 工作流
  • Claude Code 团队
  • 重视 GitHub 采用信号的团队

证据

  • 6,823 个 GitHub Stars
  • 仓库近期活跃
  • 已提供安装命令或 GitHub 仓库
  • 85/100 质量档案
  • 4 个 OpenAgentSkill 交互事件

先审查

  • Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.

实施路径

  1. 1在沙盒 Agent 中安装它,并端到端完成一次GitHub automation任务。
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

信任档案

仅限沙盒

有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。

63
OpenAgentSkill 信任评分

GitHub 采用度

通过

6.8K 个 GitHub Stars

Star/Fork 活跃度

通过

6.8K 个 Star,585 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息

近期维护

通过

今天有推送

许可证清晰度

通过

CC-BY-SA-4.0

积极信号

  • AI 审查已通过
  • 安装路径可用
  • 仓库证据可用
  • 近期维护的仓库
  • Large GitHub adoption signal
  • 安装命令未发现明显高风险模式
  • 结果闭环已就绪,但需要首次真实 Agent 运行

安装前审查

  • Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
  • Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
  • Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
  • 暂未有真实 Agent 结果报告
  • 无人值守安装前需要人工审查

建议操作

仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。

质量档案

优秀 适用于 Agent 工作流的候选

高置信候选,具有较强的采用度与健康维护信号。

85
GitHub Stars
6.8K
新鲜度
今天
安装就绪
许可证
CC-BY-SA-4.0
安装前审查: Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.

工作流匹配

在这些场景使用此 Skill

工作流匹配

加入完整工作流

替代方案短名单

安装前对比

可能适合该任务的相近 Skill。

对比全部

概览

--- name: cosmos-vulnerability-scanner description: "Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabilities — chain halts, fund loss, state divergence. 25 core + 16 IBC + 10 EVM + 3 CosmWasm patterns. Use when auditing custom x/ modules, reviewing IBC integrations, or assessing pre-launch chain security. Updated for SDK v0.53.x." ---

# Cosmos Vulnerability Scanner

## Purpose

Scan Cosmos SDK modules and CosmWasm contracts for vulnerabilities that cause chain halts, consensus failures, or fund loss. Spawns parallel scanning agents — each specializing in a vulnerability category — that return findings to the main skill, which then writes them as individual markdown files to an output directory.

**Output directory**: defaults to `.bughunt_cosmos/`. If the user specifies a different directory in their prompt, use that instead.

## When to Use

- Auditing Cosmos SDK modules (custom `x/` modules) - Reviewing CosmWasm smart contracts - Pre-launch security assessment of Cosmos chains - Investigating chain halt incidents

## When NOT to Use

- Pure Solidity/EVM audits without Cosmos SDK — use Solidity-specific tools - CometBFT consensus engine internals — this covers SDK modules, not the consensus layer itself - General Go code review with no blockchain context - Cosmos SDK application logic that is not consensus-critical (e.g., CLI commands, REST endpoints) - CosmWasm contract-only audits on chains without custom SDK modules — use the CosmWasm checklist items alone

## Essential Principles

1. **Consensus path is king** — A bug only matters for chain halt/fund loss if it's on the consensus-critical execution path (BeginBlock, EndBlock, FinalizeBlock, msg_server handlers, AnteHandler). Always verify a finding is reachable from consensus before reporting it. 2. **State divergence = chain halt** — Any non-determinism that causes validators to compute different state roots will halt the chain. This is the highest-severity class because it affects all validators simultaneously. 3. **Check the version** — Cosmos SDK has breaking changes across major versions (v0.47 removed GetSigners, v0.50 added ABCI 2.0, v0.53 deprecated ValidateBasic). Always check `go.mod` versions before applying patterns. 4. **False positives waste audit time** — A map iteration in a CLI command is not a consensus bug. A panic in a query handler does not halt the chain. Verify the execution context before flagging. 5. **Cross-module interactions are where bugs hide** — The most severe findings (IBC reentrancy, EVM/Cosmos state desync, authz escalation) involve interactions between modules, not bugs within a single module.

## Scanning Workflow

### Phase 1: Discovery (synchronous)

**Entry**: Target codebase path provided by user. Codebase contains Go source (e.g., `x/` modules, `go.mod`) or Rust contracts with `cosmwasm_std`.

Run a **synchronous subagent** (Agent tool) with the full contents of [DISCOVERY.md](resources/DISCOVERY.md) as its prompt. The agent must:

1. Follow the Discovery workflow to explore the target codebase 2. Return the full CLAUDE.md content (the technical inventory and threat model) in its response 3. Return a structured summary with exactly these fields:

``` PLATFORM: pure-cosmos | evm | wasm (pick one; if multiple, comma-separated) IBC_ENABLED: true | false SDK_VERSION: <version from go.mod> IBC_GO_VERSION: <version from go.mod, or "n/a"> CUSTOM_MODULES: <comma-separated list of x/* modules> ```

After the subagent returns, **you** (the main skill) Write the CLAUDE.md to the target repo root. Save its path and the discovery values — these feed into Phase 2.

**Exit**: CLAUDE.md written by main skill. PLATFORM, IBC_ENABLED, SDK_VERSION, IBC_GO_VERSION, and CUSTOM_MODULES captured.

### Phase 2: Parallel Vulnerability Scan

Spawn scanning agents **in a single message** for maximum parallelism. Use the Agent Prompt Template below, filling in the reference file for each agent. Subagents only need read access (Grep, Glob, Read) — they return findings in their response and the main skill writes the files.

**Always spawn these 3 agents:**

| Agent Name | Reference File | Scope | |------------|---------------|-------| | `core-scanner` | `VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | §1-9: non-determinism, ABCI, signers, validation, handlers, ante security | | `state-scanner` | `STATE_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | §11-23: bookkeeping, bank, pagination, events, tx replay, governance, arithmetic, encoding, deprecated modules | | `advanced-scanner` | `ADVANCED_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | §24-27: storage keys, consensus validation, circuit breaker, crypto |

**Spawn conditionally (in the same parallel message):**

| Agent Name | Condition | Reference File | |------------|-----------|---------------| | `evm-scanner` | PLATFORM includes `evm` | `EVM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | | `ibc-scanner` | IBC_ENABLED is `true` | `IBC_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | | `cosmwasm-scanner` | PLATFORM includes `wasm` | `COSMWASM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` |

#### Agent Prompt Template

Construct each agent's prompt by replacing `{REFERENCE_FILE_PATH}` with the full path to the reference file (under `{baseDir}/resources/`) and `{CLAUDE_MD_PATH}` with the path to the CLAUDE.md written in Phase 1:

~~~ Perform a very thorough security scan of a Cosmos SDK codebase for specific vulnerability patterns.

CONTEXT: Read {CLAUDE_MD_PATH} for codebase context (SDK version, modules, threat model, key files).

PATTERNS: Read {REFERENCE_FILE_PATH} — it contains numbered vulnerability patterns. For EACH pattern: 1. Read the detection patterns and "What to Check" items 2. Use Grep and Glob to search the target codebase for each pattern 3. When a match is found, Read surrounding code to verify it's on a consensus-critical path (BeginBlock, EndBlock, FinalizeBlock, msg_server handlers, AnteHandler) 4. Classify severity per the guidelines below

RULES: - Consensus path only: Only flag code reachable from consensus-critical execution. CLI/query/test code is NOT a finding. - Check SDK version in go.mod before applying patterns (v0.47 removed GetSigners, v0.50 added ABCI 2.0, v0.53 deprecated ValidateBasic). - Always use the Grep tool for searches, not bash grep. The reference file contains search patterns — use them directly with the Grep tool. - Ignore cross-references to other resource files (e.g., links to IBC or COSMWASM patterns). Those patterns are covered by other scanning agents. - Reject these rationalizations: - "ValidateBasic catches this" — deprecated and facultative since SDK v0.53 - "Behind governance, so safe" — governance proposals can be malicious - "IBC counterparty is trusted" — any chain can open a channel - "Panic can't happen, input is validated" — trace the full call chain - "Rounding error is only a few tokens" — compounds over time, can be looped - "EVM precompile handles rollback" — many have incomplete rollback

SEVERITY: - Critical (fund loss): signer mismatch, broken bookkeeping, AnteHandler bypass, bank keeper misuse, IBC token inflation, EVM/Cosmos desync, Merkle proof forgery, arithmetic overflow - High (chain halt): non-determinism, ABCI panics, slow ABCI, non-deterministic IBC acks, consensus gaps, CacheContext event leak - Medium (DoS): unbounded pagination, tx replay, missing validation, governance spam, rate limiting, circuit breaker bypass, storage key collisions - Low (logic): rounding errors, stub handlers, event override, module ordering

OUTPUT — RETURN FORMAT: Do NOT write any files. Return ALL findings and the summary in your response.

For each pattern, return one of: §NUM PATTERN_NAME: Not applicable — [one-line reason] §NUM PATTERN_NAME: FINDING (followed by the finding block below)

For each finding, include the full content using this template:

FINDING_FILE: {SEVERITY}-s{SECTION_NUM}-{kebab-description}.md ## [SEVERITY] Title **Location**: `file:line` **Description**: What the bug is and why it matters **Vulnerable Code**: [snippet] **Attack Scenario**: [numbered steps] **Recommendation**: How to fix **References**: [links to relevant advisories or building-secure-contracts]

You MUST report on ALL patterns in the reference file — do not skip any. ~~~

**Exit**: All scanning agents returned. Each reported on every pattern in their reference file.

### Phase 3: Write Findings

After all scanning agents return, write finding files to the output directory (default `.bughunt_cosmos/`):

1. Parse each agent's response for `FINDING_FILE:` blocks 2. For each finding, Write the content to `{OUTPUT_DIR}/{filename}` using the filename from `FINDING_FILE:` 3. Create the output directory first if it doesn't exist

### Phase 4: Verify Completeness

After writing all findings, verify every pattern was assessed:

1. Collect the summary lines (§NUM entries) returned by each agent 2. Check pattern counts against expected totals: - `core-scanner`: 8 patterns (§1-9, excluding §8 legacy-only) - `state-scanner`: 13 patterns (§11-23) - `advanced-scanner`: 4 patterns (§24-27) - `evm-scanner` (if spawned): 10 patterns (§1-10) - `ibc-scanner` (if spawned): 16 patterns (§1-16) - `cosmwasm-scanner` (if spawned): 3 patterns (§1-3) 3. If any pattern is missing from a summary, flag it and re-prompt that agent 4. List all finding files written to the output directory with a `Glob` for `*.md`

**Exit**: All patterns accounted for. Finding files listed for the user.

---

## Success Criteria

- [ ] Discovery CLAUDE.md written with complete technical inventory and threat model - [ ] All scanning agents completed and reported on every pattern in their reference file - [ ] Pattern counts verified against expected totals (no patterns skipped) - [ ] All findings written to output directory as individual markdown files - [ ] Each finding file includes: severity, location, vulnerable code, attack scenario, recommendation

---

## Resources

- **Discovery & CLAUDE.md**: [DISCOVERY.md](resources/DISCOVERY.md) - **Core patterns (§1-9)**: [VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **State & module patterns (§11-23)**: [STATE_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/STATE_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **Advanced patterns (§24-27)**: [ADVANCED_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/ADVANCED_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **IBC vulnerabilities**: [IBC_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/IBC_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **CosmWasm vulnerabilities**: [COSMWASM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/COSMWASM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **EVM vulnerabilities**: [EVM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/EVM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **Building Secure Contracts**: `building-secure-contracts/not-so-smart-contracts/cosmos/` - **Cosmos SDK Docs**: https://docs.cosmos.network/ - **CodeQL for Cosmos SDK**: https://github.com/crypto-com/cosmos-sdk-codeql

技术详情

版本
1.0.0
许可证
CC-BY-SA-4.0
最近更新
2026年8月24日
发布时间
2026年8月24日

决策摘要

首选

98
就绪
采用
阶段

6,823 个 GitHub Stars

审计

安装审查

安装与采用审查

81
需审查
安全性
72/100
维护状态
100/100
安装
92/100
打开完整审计查看评估报告

Agent 验证证据

Agent 验证证据

来自解析、审查、安装和一次小范围运行后的结果报告。

0
已验证
Needs first agent run自动安装: 先审查最近: 未知
成功率
近期失败
结果
0
输出质量
失败
0
不相关
0
安装次数
0
风险拦截
0
需要配置
0
生产环境
0

暂时没有 Agent 结果数据。首次 Agent 执行可以通过 /api/agent/outcome 报告成功、需要设置、风险拦截、失败或不相关。

安装

加入 Agent 工作流

免费且开源. 在生产 Agent 中安装前请先审查报告。

增长闭环

分享工具包

X

为 cosmos-vulnerability-scanner 准备的场景化草稿,可手动发布到 X。

策展说明
cosmos-vulnerability-scanner: Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabili...

6.8K stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?ref=x
打开 X 草稿
可选:带安装命令的回复
Listing + install path for cosmos-vulnerability-scanner:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?ref=x

Install: npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner
打开回复草稿

收录来源

Registry 收录

可认领

此列表来自公开来源,维护者认领获批前不会标记为官方。

创作者
trailofbits
收录方
OpenAgentSkill 社区索引

归属链接指向公开仓库或创作者主页。创作者可认领列表以更新所有权信号。

认领此 Skill

所有者认领

认领此 Skill 页面

这条 Registry 收录 列表归属于 trailofbits,但尚未标记为官方。认领后可增加已验证所有者信号,使后续发布、安装和审计更新更值得信赖。

创作者外链工具包

将证据徽章加入你的 README

在开发者评估仓库的位置展示规范页面、当前信任与审计信号,以及真实的 Agent 验证证据。

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner)

作者

T

trailofbits

@trailofbits

平台适配

健康信号

GitHub Stars
6.8K
质量评分
50/100
最近 GitHub 推送
2026年8月24日
框架提示
未知
OpenAgentSkill 浏览量
4
复制安装命令
0
跳转点击
0

社区信号

告诉我们这个 Skill 是否对你的 Agent 工作流有帮助。汇总反馈会持续改善排序。

信任与安全

仅限沙盒

63
  • GitHub 采用度6.8K 个 GitHub Stars通过
  • Star/Fork 活跃度6.8K 个 Star,585 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息通过
  • 近期维护今天有推送通过
  • 许可证清晰度CC-BY-SA-4.0通过
  • README/SKILL.md 完整度公开元数据需要更完整的 README/SKILL.md 上下文信息
  • 依赖与运行时风险command execution surface, credential or environment access检查